The Geopolitics of China’s Overseas Port Investments: A Comparative Analysis of Greece and Pakistan

References

• Aldrich, R. 1996. Greater France: A history of French overseas expansion. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beckley, M. 2011. China’s century? Why America’s edge will endure. International Security 36 (3):41–78. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwill, R. D., and J. M. Harris. 2016. War by other means: Geoeconomics and statecraft. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blunden, M. 2012. Geopolitics and the Northern Sea route. International Affairs 88 (1):115–29. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01060.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo, Z. 2014. The string of pearls and the maritime Silk Road. China-US Focus, February 11. Accessed October 15, 2019. https://www.chinausfocus.com/foreign-policy/the-string-of-pearls-and-the-maritime-silk-road.
   Google Scholar
• Boute, A. 2019. Energy security along the new silk road: Energy law and geopolitics in Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bräutigam, D., and X. Tang. 2012. Economic statecraft in China’s new overseas special economic zones: soft Power, business, or resource-security? International Affairs 88 (4):799–816. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01102.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewster, D. 2011. Indian strategic thinking about East Asia. Journal of Strategic Studies 34 (6):825–52. doi:10.1080/01402390.2011.627155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeze, F. 1997. Geostrategy and navy ports in the Indian Ocean since C. 1970. Marine Policy 21 (4):345–62. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00013-4.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, G. B. and W. C. Wolhforth. 2016. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century: China's Rise and the fate of America's Global Position. International Security 40 (3):7–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caceres, S. F., and S. Ear. 2012. The geopolitics of China’s global resources quest. Geopolitics 17:47–79. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.562943.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, V. D. 2000. Abandonment, entrapment, and neoclassical realism in Asia: The United States, Japan, and Korea. International Studies Quarterly 44 (2):261–91. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatin, M. 2016. Brazil: Analysis of a rising soft power. Journal of Political Power 9 (3):369–93. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. 2017. Port in a storm: China rebuilds Gwadar in Pakistan. The Telegraph. May 5. Accessed August 20, 2018. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/china-watch/business/china-rebuilds-port-in-pakistan/.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. B. 2003. Geopolitics of the World System. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Collin, K. S. L. 2016. China and Pakistan join forces under the sea. The National Interest. January 7. Accessed October 17, 2019. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/china-pakistan-join-forces-under-the-sea-14829?page=3
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, S., and S. O’Hagan. 2012. German colonialism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Haan, A. 2009. Will China change international development as we know it? Working paper 145. The Hague: International Institute of Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, S. 2010. Analyzing rising power from the perspective of soft power: A new look at China’s rise to the status quo power. Journal of Contemporary China 19 (64):255–72. doi:10.1080/10670560903444207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dueck, C. 2005. Realism, Culture and Grand Strategy: Explaining America's Peculiar Path to World Power. Security Studies 14 (2):195–231 doi:10.1080/09636410500232891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnie, D. A. 1969. East and West of Suez: The Suez Canal in History, 1854-1956. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fichtner, J. 2016. Perpetual decline or persistent dominance? Uncovering Anglo-America’s true structural power in global finance. Review of International Studies 43 (1):3–28. doi:10.1017/S0260210516000206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, F. R. 2011. The breakout of China-India strategic rivalry in Asia and the Indian Ocean. Journal of International Affairs 64 (2):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, C. 2011. Market expansion and grand strategy of rising powers. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 4 (4):405–46. doi:10.1093/cjip/por021.
   Google Scholar
• García-Herrera, L. M., and F. Sabaté-Bel. 2009. Global geopolitics and local geoeconomics in North West Africa: The industrial Port of Granadilla (Canary Islands, Spain). Geopolitics 14 (4):589–603. doi:10.1080/14650040802693754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garge, R. 2017. Maritime Outreach as part of India's 'Act East' Policy. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs 9 (3):150–167. doi:10.1080/18366503.2017.1285217
   Google Scholar
• Gong, P., and J. Wang. 2011. China’s 12th five-year plan: An overview. Stewart and Stewart, May 18. Accessed September 15, 2018 http://www.stewartlaw.com/Article/ViewArticle/573.
   Google Scholar
• Hadfield, A. 2010. British foreign policy, national identity, and neoclassical realism. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hyam, R. 2002. Britain's Imperial Century, 1815–1914: A Study of Empire and Expansion. 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781403918420
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, R. 2018. China needs a win in Afghanistan to keep its edge in Asian trade. Forbes, February 27. Accessed May 16, 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2018/02/27/china-needs-a-win-in-afghanistan-to-keep-its-edge-in-asian-trade/
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. 2018. Why is China buying up Europe’s ports? Foreign Policy, February 2. Accessed July 10, 2019. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/02/02/why-is-china-buying-up-europes-ports/.
   Google Scholar
• Juneau, T. 2015. Squandered opportunity: Neoclassical realism and Iranian foreign policy. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. D. 2013. China’s string of pearls? Stratfor. February 13, Accessed October 20, 2019. https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/chinas-string-pearls.
   Google Scholar
• Kirshner, J. 2014. American power after the financial crisis. New York: Cornell.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, N. 2010. Systemic pressures and domestic ideas: A neoclassical realist model of grand strategy formation. Review of International Studies 36 (1):117–43. doi:10.1017/S0260210509990532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurlantzick, J. 2007. Charm Offensive: how China's soft power is transforming the world. New Haven and London: Yale University Press
   Google Scholar
• Laffey, J. F. 1969. Roots of French imperialism in the nineteenth century: The case of Lyon. French Historical Studies 6 (1):78–92. doi:10.2307/286245.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, H. H. 2007. Chinas oil diplomacy: Is it a global security threat?’. Third World Quarterly 28 (3):519–37. doi:10.1080/01436590701192645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne, C. 1993. The unipolar illusion: Why new great powers will rise. International Security 17 (4):5–51. doi:10.2307/2539020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. 2018. China’s Trojan ports. Hudson Institute, November 29. Accessed January 10, 2019. https://www.hudson.org/research/14717-china-s-trojan-ports.
   Google Scholar
• Linantud, J. L. 2008. Pressure and protection: Cold War geopolitics and nation-building in South Korea, South Vietnam, Philippines, and Thailand. Geopolitics 13 (4):635–56. doi:10.1080/14650040802275487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobell, S. E. 2009. Threat assessment, the state, and foreign policy: A neoclassical realist model. In Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy, ed. S. Lobell, J. W. Taliaferro, and N. M. Ripsman, 42–74. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinder, H. J. 1904. The geographical pivot of history. Royal Geographical Society 23:421–437.
   Google Scholar
• Mahan, A. T. 1987. The influence of sea power upon history, 1660-1783. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Marcadon, J., and D. Pinder. 1997. Geostrategy, naval ports and local economic development: Brest in an era of strategic reappraisal. Marine Policy 21 (4):391–408. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00021-3.
   Google Scholar
• Marketos, T. N. 2009. China’s energy geopolitics: The Shanghai cooperation organization and Central Asia. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, K. 2014. Leading from behind: Neoclassical realism and Operation Odyssey dawn. Defense & Security Analysis 30 (2):120–32. doi:10.1080/14751798.2014.894295.
   Google Scholar
• Merk, O. 2017. Geopolitics and commercial seaports. Revue Internationale et Stratégique 107 (3):73–83. doi:10.3917/ris.107.0073.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. 1843. A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation, Vol. 1. London: John W. Parker.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. C. 2016. The role of beliefs in identifying rising powers. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 9 (2):211–38. doi:10.1093/cjip/pow006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, W. M. 2011. China’s economic conditions’. Congressional research service.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, W. J. 2016. Chinese economic statecraft: Commercial actors, grand strategy, and state control. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onea, T. 2012. Putting the ‘classical’ in neoclassical realism: Neoclassical realist theories and US expansion in the post-cold war. International Relations 26 (2):139–64. doi:10.1177/0047117811430674.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, M. 2004. The Euro-Mediterranean partnership and the common mediterranean strategy? European Union policy from a discursive perspective. Geopolitics 9 (2):292–309. doi:10.1080/14650040490442872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardesi, S. M. 2011. India, US in East Asia: Emerging strategic partnership analysis. Eurasia Review, April 12. Accessed June 20, 2019. https://www.eurasiareview.com/12042011-india-us-in-east-asia-emerging-strategic-partnership-analysis/.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, T. V. 2012. International relations theory and regional transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rathburn, B. 2008. A rose by any other name: Neoclassical realism as the logical and necessary extension of structural realism. Security Studies 17 (2):294–321. doi:10.1080/09636410802098917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridolfi, G. 1997. Geostrategy and naval power in the Mediterranean: Changing scenarios, continuing conflict. Marine Policy 21 (4):377–90. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00022-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmer, P. J. 1997. US Western Pacific geostrategy: Subic Bay before and after withdrawal. Marine Policy 21 (4):325–44. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00012-2.
   Google Scholar
• Ripsman, N. M., J. W. Taliaferro, and S. E. Lobell. 2016. Neoclassical realist theory of international politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 1998. Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics 51 (1):144–72. doi:10.1017/S0043887100007814.
   Google Scholar
• Russett, B. 2016. Purpose and policy in the global community. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, J., K. Lazarus, and S. Kelley. 2008. Rethinking investments in natural resources: China’s emerging role in the mekong region. Phnom Penh: Heinrich Boll Stiftung; Copenhagen: WWF; Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• Schweller, R. 2018. Opposite but compatible nationalisms: A neoclassical realist approach to the future of US–China relations. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 11 (1):23–48. doi:10.1093/cjip/poy003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, D. 2012. US strategy in the Pacific – Geopolitical positioning for the twenty-first century. Geopolitics 17 (3):607–28. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.631200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, D. 2013. India’s aspirations and strategy for the Indian Ocean – securing the waves? Journal of Strategic Studies 36 (4):484–511. doi:10.1080/01402390.2012.728134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sender, H., and K. Stacey. 2017. China takes ‘project of the century’ to Pakistan. Financial Times. Accessed December 29, 2017. https://www.ft.com/content/05979e18-2fe4-11e7-9555-23ef563ecf9a.
   Google Scholar
• Shams, S. 2011. Afghanistan brings Russia and Pakistan closer. DW, January 24. Accessed September 25, 2019. https://www.dw.com/en/afghanistan-brings-russia-and-pakistan-closer/a-6415486-0.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S. 2011. China’s Forays into the Indian Ocean: Strategic implications for India. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 7 (2):235–48. doi:10.1080/19480881.2011.637427.
   Google Scholar
• Slack, B., and J. Starr. 1997. Geostrategy, resources and geopolitics: Implications for the US Navy and naval port system. Marine Policy 21 (4):309–23. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00011-0.
   Google Scholar
• Small, A. 2015. The China-Pakistan axis: Asia’s new geopolitics. London: Hurst & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. D., and D. Pinder. 1997. Geostrategy and naval port systems: Frameworks for analysis. Marine Policy 21 (4):291–308. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00026-2.
   Google Scholar
• Spykman, N. J. 1944. The geography of the peace. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Stanzel, A. 2016. China’s interests in Afghanistan. Asia Dialogue. September 5. Accessed January 20, 2019. https://theasiadialogue.com/2016/09/05/chinas-interests-in-afghanistan/.
   Google Scholar
• Steinsson, S. 2017. Neoclassical realism in the North Atlantic: Explaining behaviors and outcomes in the cod war. Foreign Policy Analysis 13 (3):599–617. doi:10.1093/fpa/orw062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taliaferro, J. W. 2001. Security seeking under anarchy: Defensive realism revisited. International Security 25 (3):128–61. doi:10.1162/016228800560543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taliaferro, J. W. 2006. State building for future wars: Neoclassical realism and the resource-extractive state. Security Studies 15 (3):464–95. doi:10.1080/09636410601028370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunsjø, Ø. 2013. Security and profit in China’s energy policy: Hedging against risk. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2018. Review of maritime transport 2018. Accessed April 9, 2020. https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2018_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• van der Putten, F.-P. 2019. European seaports and chinese strategic influence: The relevance of the maritime silk road for the Netherlands.Clingendael Report, December.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. 2013. Chinese company will run strategic Pakistani port. The New York Times, January 31. Accessed July 19, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/01/world/asia/chinese-firm-will-run-strategic-pakistani-port-at-gwadar.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., and M. R. Karim. 2018. India looks East and China looks south: Competition, confrontation or balance. In Changing regional alliances for China and the west, ed. D. Lane and G. Zhu, 109–30. London: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. 2016. Offensive for defensive: the belt and road initiative and China's new grand strategy. The Pacific Review 29 (3):455–464. doi:10.1080/09512748.2016.1154690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, H. W. 2004. Strategic governance and economic diplomacy in China: The political economy of government-linked companies from Singapore. East Asia 21 (1):40–64. doi:10.1007/s12140-004-0009-8.
   Google Scholar