646
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

After the Rice Frontier: Producing State and Ethnic Territory in Northwest Myanmar

References

  • Astuti, R., and A. McGregor. 2017. Indigenous land claims or green grabs? Inclusions and exclusions within forest carbon politics in Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (2):445–66. doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1197908.
  • Aung-Thwin, M. 1984. Hierarchy and order in pre-colonial Burma. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 15 (2):224–32. doi:10.1017/S0022463400012467.
  • Baird, I. G. 2014. The global land grab meta-narrative, Asian money laundering and elite capture: Reconsidering the cambodian context. Geopolitics 19 (2):431–53. doi:10.1080/14650045.2013.811645.
  • Ballvé, T. 2020. The frontier effect: State formation and violence in Colombia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Barney, K. 2009. Laos and the making of a ‘relational’ resource frontier. The Geographical Journal 175 (2):146–59. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2009.00323.x.
  • Barth, F. 1969. Introduction. In Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference, ed. F. Barth, 9–38. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
  • Beban, A., and T. Gorman. 2017. From land grab to Agrarian transition? Hybrid trajectories of accumulation and environmental change on the Cambodia–Vietnam border. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (4):842–62. doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1241770.
  • Boutry, M., C. Allaverdian, M. Mellac, S. Huard, U. San Thein, T. M. Win, and K. P. Sone. 2017. Land tenure in rural lowland Myanmar: From historical perspectives to contemporary realities in the Dry Zone and the Delta. Yangon: GRET.
  • Bryant, R. L. 1997. The political ecology of forestry in Burma 1824-1994. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Campbell, J. M. 2015. Conjuring property: Speculation and environmental futures in the Brazilian Amazon. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Cederlof, G. 2014. Founding an empire on India’s North-Eastern frontiers, 1790-1840: Climate, commerce, polity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cheesman, N. 2017. How in Myanmar “National Races” came to surpass citizenship and exclude Rohingya. Journal of Contemporary Asia 47 (3):461–83. doi:10.1080/00472336.2017.1297476.
  • Cons, J. 2016. Sensitive space: Fragmented territory at the India-Bangladesh border. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Cons, J., and M. Eilenberg. 2019. Introduction: On the new politics of margins in Asia: Mapping frontier assemblages. In Frontier assemblages: The emergent politics of resource frontiers in Asia, ed. J. Cons and M. Eilenberg, 1-18. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Culcasi, K. 2016. Images and Imaginings of Palestine: Territory and Everyday Geopolitics for Palestinian Jordanians. Geopolitics 21 (1):69–91. doi:10.1080/14650045.2015.1100993.
  • Das, V., and D. Poole. 2004. State and its margins: Comparative ethnographies. In Anthropology in the Margins of the State, ed. V. Das and D. Poole, 3-33. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
  • De Koninck, R. 1996. The peasantry as the territorial spearhead of the state in Southeast Asia: The case of Vietnam. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 11 (2):231–58. doi:10.1355/SJ11-2C.
  • Edelman, M., and A. León. 2013. Cycles of land grabbing in Central America: An argument for history and a case study in the Bajo Aguán, Honduras. Third World Quarterly 34 (9):1697–722. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.843848.
  • Elden, S. 2013. The Birth of Territory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Faxon, H. O. 2017. In the law & on the land: Finding the female farmer in Myanmar’s national land use policy. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (6):1197–214. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1324424.
  • Faxon, H. O. 2020. The peasant and her smartphone: Agrarian change and land politics in Myanmar. diss., Ithaca: Cornell University.
  • Ferguson, J. M. 2014. The scramble for the waste lands: Tracking colonial legacies, counterinsurgency and international investment through the lens of land laws in Burma/Myanmar. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 35 (3):295–311. doi:10.1111/sjtg.12078.
  • Ferguson, J. M. 2015. Who’s counting? Ethnicity, belonging, and the national census in Burma/Myanmar. Bijdragen Tot De Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde/Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia 171 (1):1–28.
  • Fiskesjö, M. 2010. Mining, history, and the anti-state Wa: The politics of autonomy between Burma and China. Journal of Global History 5 (2):241–64. doi:10.1017/S1740022810000070.
  • Friedman, J. 2011. States, Hinterlands, and Governance in Southeast Asia. Focaal 2011 (61):117–22. doi:10.3167/fcl.2011.610109.
  • Hall, D. 2011. Land grabs, land control, and Southeast Asian Crop Booms. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (4):837–57. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.607706.
  • Hall, D., P. Hirsch, and T. M. Li. 2011. Powers of Exclusion: Land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Singapore: NUS Press.
  • Huard, S. 2020. Nobody owns the land: How inheritance shapes land relations in the central plain of Myanmar. Journal of Burma Studies 24 (1):79–117. doi:10.1353/jbs.2020.0004.
  • Jones, R. 2009. Categories, Borders and Boundaries. Progress in Human Geography 33 (2):174–89. doi:10.1177/0309132508089828.
  • Kipgen, N. 2018. The Quest for Federalism in Myanmar. Strategic Analysis 42(6):612–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2018.1557933
  • Lefebvre, H. 2009. State, space, world: Selected essays. ed. Neil Brenner and Stuart Elden. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Lehman, F. K. 1967. Ethnic categories in Burma and the theory of social systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Li, T. M. 2014. Land’s end: Capitalist relations on an indigenous frontier. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Lu, J., and O. Schönweger. 2019. Great Expectations: Chinese investment in Laos and the Myth of empty land. Territory, Politics, Governance 7 (1):61–78. doi:10.1080/21622671.2017.1360195.
  • Lukas, M. C., and N. L. Peluso. 2019. Transforming the classic political forest: contentious territories in Java. Antipode 52 (4):1–25.
  • Lund, C. 2008. Local politics and the dynamics of property in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Maclean, K. 2008. Sovereignty after the entrepreneurial turn: Mosaics of control, commodified spaces, and regulated violence in contemporary Burma. In Taking Southeast Asia to market: Commodities, nature, and people in a neoliberal age, ed. N. Peluso and J. Nevins, 140–57. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Mark, S. 2016. Are the odds of justice “Stacked” against them? Challenges and opportunities for securing land claims by smallholder farmers in Myanmar. Critical Asian Studies 48 (3):443–60. doi:10.1080/14672715.2016.1196888.
  • Mark, S., and B. Belton. 2020. Breaking with the Past? The Politics of Land Restitution and the Limits to Restitutive Justice in Myanmar. Land Use Policy 94:104503. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104503.
  • Mathews, A. S. 2011. Instituting nature: Authority, expertise, and power in Mexican Forests. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Meehan, P. 2015. Fortifying or fragmenting the state? The political economy of the opium/heroin trade in Shan State, Myanmar, 1988–2013. Critical Asian Studies 47 (2):253–82. doi:10.1080/14672715.2015.1041280.
  • Mitchell, T. 2002. Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Moore, D. S. 2005. Suffering for territory: Race, place, and power in Zimbabwe. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Murphy, A. B. 2013. Territory's Continuing Allure. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103(5):1212–1226.
  • Myint-U, T. 2020. The hidden history of Burma: Race, capitalism, and the crisis of democracy in the 21st century. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Ninh, K. N. B., and M. Arnold. 2016. Decentralization in Myanmar: A nascent and evolving process. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies 33 (2):224–41. doi:10.1355/ae33-2g.
  • Ong, A. 2006. Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
  • Peluso, N. L. 2017. Plantations and mines: Resource frontiers and the politics of the smallholder slot. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (4):954–89. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1339692.
  • Peluso, N. L., and C. Lund. 2011. New frontiers of land control: Introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (4):667–81. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.607692.
  • Peluso, N. L., and P. Vandergeest. 2001. Genealogies of the political forest and customary rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. The Journal of Asian Studies 60 (3):761–812. doi:10.2307/2700109.
  • Rasmussen, M. B., and C. Lund. 2018. Reconfiguring frontier spaces: The territorialization of resource control. World Development 101:388–99. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.018.
  • Reeves, M. 2014. Border work: Spatial lives of the state in rural central Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Rhoads, E. L., and C. T. Wittekind. 2018. Rethinking land and property in a “Transitioning” Myanmar: Representations of isolation, neglect, and natural decline. Journal of Burma Studies 22 (2):171–213. doi:10.1353/jbs.2018.0011.
  • Sadan, M. 2013. Being and becoming Kachin: Histories beyond the state in the borderworlds of Burma. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sakhong, L. H. 2003. In search of chin identity: A study in religion, politics and ethnic identity in Burma. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
  • San Thein, J.-C. Diepart, HlwanMoe, and C. Allaverdian. 2018. Large-scale land acquisitions for agricultural development in Myanma : A review of past and current processes. Vientiane: GRET.
  • Sarma, J., H. O. Faxon, and K. B. Roberts. forthcoming. Remaking and living with resource frontiers: Myanmar and Beyond. Geopolitics.
  • Sud, N. 2014. The men in the middle: A missing dimension in global land deals. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (4):593–612. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.920329.
  • Suhardiman, D., J. Bright, and C. Palmano. 2019. The Politics of Legal Pluralism in the Shaping of Spatial Power in Myanmar’s Land Governance. The Journal of Peasant Studies . doi:10.1080/03066150.2019.1656200.
  • Suhardiman, D., M. Kenney-Lazar, and R. Meinzen-Dick. 2019. The Contested Terrain of Land Governance Reform in Myanmar. Critical Asian Studies 51 (3):368–85. doi:10.1080/14672715.2019.1630845.
  • Taylor, R. H. 2009. The State in Myanmar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Tsing, A. L. 2005. Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Tyerman, T. 2019. Everyday borders in calais: The globally intimate injustices of segregation. Geopolitics. doi:10.1080/14650045.2019.1631807.
  • van Schendel, W. 2002. Geographies of knowing, geographies of ignorance: Jumping scale in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 20 (6):647–68. doi:10.1068/d16s.
  • Vandergeest, P., and N. L. Peluso. 1995. Territorialization and state power in Thailand. Theory and Society 24 (3):385–426. doi:10.1007/BF00993352.
  • Verdery, K. 1994. The elasticity of land: Problems of property restitution in Transylvania. Slavic Review 53 (4):1071–109. doi:10.2307/2500847.
  • Walton, M. J. 2013. The “Wages of Burman-Ness:” Ethnicity and Burman privilege in contemporary Myanmar. Journal of Contemporary Asia 43 (1):1–27. doi:10.1080/00472336.2012.730892.
  • Watts, M. J. 2018. Frontiers: Authority, precarity, and insurgency at the edge of the state. World Development 101:477–88. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.024.
  • Winichakul, T. 1997. Siam mapped: A history of the geo-body of a nation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Woods, K. 2011. Ceasefire capitalism: military–private partnerships, resource concessions and military–state building in the Burma–China borderlands. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (4):747–70. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.607699.
  • Woods, K. M. 2019. Green territoriality: Conservation as state territorialization in a resource frontier. Human Ecology 47 (2):217–32. doi:10.1007/s10745-019-0063-x.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.