Engaging the Geopolitics of Asylum Seeking: The Care/control Function of Vulnerability Assessments in the Context of the EU–Turkey Agreement

References

• Aas, K., and H. Gundhus. 2015. Policing humanitarian borderlands: Frontex, human rights and the precariousness of life. British Journal Of Criminology 55 (1):1–18. doi:10.1093/bjc/azu086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramowitz, S., M. Marten, and C. Panter‐Brick. 2015. Medical humanitarianism: Anthropologists speak out on policy and practice. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 29 (1):1–23. doi:10.1111/maq.12139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashutosh, I., and A. Mountz. 2012. The geopolitics of migrant mobility: Tracing state relations through refugee claims, boats, and discourses. Geopolitics: The Geopolitics of Migration and Mobility 17 (2):335–54. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.567315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. 2014. Questioning the vulnerability zeitgeist: Care and control practices with ‘vulnerable’ young people. Social Policy and Society, 13 (3):371–87.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K., K. Ecclestone, and N. Emmel. 2017. The Many faces of vulnerability. Social Policy and Society, 16 (3):497–510.
   Google Scholar
• Burghardt, M. 2013. Common frailty, constructed oppression: Tensions and debates on the subject of vulnerability. Disability & Society 28 (4):556–568. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.711244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2003. Violence, mourning, politics. Studies in Gender and Sexuality 4 (1):9–37. doi:10.1080/15240650409349213.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2009. Frames of war: When is life grievable? London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Coddington, K. 2018. Landscapes of refugee protection. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 43 (3):326–40. doi:10.1111/tran.12224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. 2007. Immigration geopolitics beyond the Mexico–US border. Antipode 39 (1):54–76. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00506.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlon, D. 2011. Waiting: Feminist perspectives on the spacings/timings of migrant (im)mobility. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 18 (3):353–60. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2011.566320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelisse, G. 2016. Territory, procedures and rights: Border procedures in European asylum law. Refugee Survey Quarterly 35 (1):74–90. doi:10.1093/rsq/hdv023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, C., and E. Hancox. 2016. The recast asylum procedures directive: Caught between the stereotypes of the abusive asylum seeker and the vulnerable refugee. In Reforming the common European asylum system: The new European refugee law, ed. V. Chetail, P. Bruycker, and F. Maiani. Leiden; Boston: Brill Nijhof. pp. 375–445.
   Google Scholar
• Dijstelbloem, H. O., and L. Veer van der. 2019. The multiple movements of the humanitarian border: The portable provision of care and control at the Aegean Islands. Journal of Borderlands Studies, Urn 1–18. doi:10.1080/08865655.2019.1567371.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriadi, A. 2017. Governing irregular migration at the margins of Europe: The case of hotspots on the Greek islands. Etnografia E Recerca Qualitativa 1:75–95.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, D., and S. Marston. 2011. Introduction: Feminist engagements with geopolitics. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 18 (4):445–53. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2011.583401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowler, L., J. Sharp, and J. Dittmer. 2014. A feminist geopolitics? In Geopolitics: An introductory reader, 296–302, Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203092170.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, S., and J. Buckle. 2009. The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8 (1):54–63. doi:10.1177/160940690900800105.
   Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, K. 2017. Changing the subject of education? A Critical Evaluation of ‘Vulnerability Creep’ and Its Implications 16 (3):443–56.\
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, D., and E. D’Halluin. 2005. The truth from the body: Medical certificates as ultimate evidence for asylum seekers. American Anthropologist 107 (4):597–608. doi:10.1525/aa.2005.107.4.597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrarese, E. 2016. Vulnerability: A concept with which to undo the world as it is? Critical Horizons 17 (2):149–59. doi:10.1080/14409917.2016.1153885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay, A. 2005. Editorial: Vulnerable spatialities. Population, Space and Place 11 (6):429–39. doi:10.1002/psp.399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. 2008. The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20:1.
   Google Scholar
• FitzGerald, S. 2012. Vulnerable bodies, vulnerable borders: Extraterritoriality and human trafficking. Feminist Legal Studies 2012 (20):3. s 227–244 8263901.
   Google Scholar
• FitzGerald, S. A. 2016. Vulnerable geographies: Human trafficking, immigration and border control in the UK and beyond. Gender, Place & Culture 23 (2):181–197. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2015.1013441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, N., D. Conlon, D. Moran, and A. Burridge. 2018. Carceral circuitry: New directions in carceral geography. Progress in Human Geography 42 (2):183–204. doi:10.1177/0309132516671823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, E. 2016. Vulnerability and victimization: Rethinking key concepts in feminist discourses on sexual violence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 42 (1):71–98. doi:10.1086/686753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin-Gill, G., and J. McAdam. 2007. The refugee in international law. 3.rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, C. 2017. Redefining refugees: Interpretive control and the bordering work of legal categorization in U.S. asylum law. Political Geography 58:36–45. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancox, E., and C. Costello. 2016. The recast procedure directive 2013/32/EU: Caught between the stereotypes of abusive asylum seeker and the vulnerable refugee”. In Reforming the common European asylum system: The new European refugee law (Immigration and asylum law and policy in Europe, ed. V. Chetail, P. Bruycker, and F. Maiani, 39. Brill/ Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, S., and B. Kasparek. 2017. Under control? Or border (as) conflict: Reflections on the European border regime. Social Inclusion 5 (3):58–68. doi:10.17645/si.v5i3.1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiemstra, N. 2012. Geopolitical reverberations of US migrant detention and deportation: The view from ecuador. Geopolitics 17 (2):293–311. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.562942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howden, D., and M. Kodalak (2018). The vulnerability contest. The new Humanitarian. Accessed January 10, 2021. https://deeply.thenewhumanitarian.org/refugees/articles/2018/10/17/the-vulnerability-contest
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J. 1997. BorderCrossings. Antipode 29 (2):149–76. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J. 2012. The geopolitics of migration and mobility. Geopolitics 17 (2):243–55. Web. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.569321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J., and A. Mountz. 2008. Another brick in the wall? Neo-refoulement and the externalization of asylum by Australia and Europe. Government and Opposition 43 (3):249–69. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00251.x.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., R. Jones, A. Paasi, L. Amoore, A. Mountz, M. Salter, and C. Rumford. 2011. Interventions on rethinking ‘the border’ in border studies. Political Geography 30 (2):61–69. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R., C. Johnson, W. Brown, G. Popescu, P. Pallister-Wilkins, A. Mountz, and E. Gilbert. 2017. Interventions on the state of sovereignty at the border. Political Geography 59:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalir, B., and K. Rozakou 2016. ‘“Giving form to chaos”: The futility of EU border management at Moria hotspot in Lesvos’, society & space essay series. Accessed June 1 2020. https://societyandspace.org/2016/11/16/giving-form-to-chaos-the-futility-of-eu-border-management-at-moria-hotspot-in-lesvos/
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, S. 2014. Subversive property: Law and the production of spaces of belonging. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kofman, E. 2019. Gendered mobilities and vulnerabilities: Refugee journeys to and in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies: Special Issue: Against the Evidence: Europe’s Migration Challenge and the Failure to Protect 45 (12):2185–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauren, M. 2013. Getting out and Getting in: Legal Geographies of US Immigration Detention. In Moran, D., N. Gill, and D. Conlon (ed). Carceral spaces: Mobility and agency in imprisonment and migrant detention.Farnham:Ashgate. pp. 149–166.
   Google Scholar
• Little, A., and N. Vaughan-Williams. 2017. Stopping boats, saving lives, securing subjects: Humanitarian borders in Europe and Australia. European Journal of International Relations 23 (3):533–56. doi:10.1177/1354066116661227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maillet, P., A. Mountz, K. Williams, C. Mainwaring, and M. Walton-Roberts. 2018. Exclusion through imperio: Entanglements of law and geography in the waiting zone, excised territory and search and rescue region. Social & Legal Studies 27 (2):142–63. doi:10.1177/0964663917746487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. 2011. The geopolitics of vulnerability: Children’s legal subjectivity, immigrant family detention and US immigration law and enforcement policy. Gender, Place & Culture 18 (4):477–98. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2011.583345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. 2015. Noncitizen detention: Spatial strategies of migrant precarity in US immigration and border control. Annales de géographie 702-703 (2):231–47. doi:10.3917/ag.702.0231.
   Google Scholar
• Mavelli, L. 2017. Governing populations through the humanitarian government of refugees: Biopolitical care and racism in the European refugee crisis. Review of International Studies, 43 (5):809–32. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1605566.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, K. 2011. Surviving identity: Vulnerability and the psychology of recognition. Routledge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Mountz, A. 2011a. The enforcement archipelago: Detention, haunting, and asylum on islands. Political Geography 30 (3):118–128. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountz, A. 2011b. Where asylum-seekers wait: Feminist counter-topographies of sites between states. Gender, Place & Culture 18 (3):381–99. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2011.566370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountz, A. 2020. The death of asylum: Hidden geographies of the enforcement archipelago. Minneapolis: Minesota University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mountz, A., and J. Loyd. 2014. Constructing the mediterranean region: Obscuring violence in the bordering of Europe’s migration crises. ACME 13 (2):173–95.
   Google Scholar
• Mountz, A., K. Coddington, R. Catania, and J. Loyd. 2013. Conceptualizing detention: Mobility, containment, bordering, and exclusion. Progress in Human Geography 37 (4):522–41. doi:10.1177/0309132512460903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountz, A., and N. Hiemstra. 2014. Chaos and crisis: Dissecting the spatiotemporal logics of contemporary migrations and state practices. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104 (2):382–90. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.857547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullings, B. 1999. Insider or outsider, both or neither: Some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum 30 (4):337–50. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00025-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallister-Wilkins, P. 2018. Hotspots and the geographies of humanitarianism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Special Issue: Governing Hotspots. 38 (6):991–1008. doi:10.1177/0263775818754884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallister-Wilkins, P. 2019. Im/mobility and humanitarian triage. In Handbook on critical geographies of migration (Research handbooks in geography), ed. K. Mitchell, R. Jones, and J. Fluri. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.pp. 372–383
   Google Scholar
• Pallister‐Wilkins, P. 2015. The humanitarian politics of european border policing: Frontex and border police in evros. International Political Sociology 9 (1):53–69. doi:10.1111/ips.12076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papada, E., A. Papoutsi, J. Painter, and A. Vradis. 2019. Pop-up governance: Transforming the management of migrant populations through humanitarian and security practices in Lesbos, Greece, 2015–2017. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Special Issue: Governing Hotspots. 38 (6):1028–45. doi:10.1177/0263775819891167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papada, E., Papoutsi, A., Painter, J., & Vradis, A. (2020). Pop-up governance: Transforming the management of migrant populations through humanitarian and security practices in Lesbos, Greece, 2015–2017. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space, 38(6), 1028–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papoutsi, A., J. Painter, E. Papada, and A. Vradis. 2018. The EC hotspot approach in Greece: Creating liminal EU territory. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (12):2200–12. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1468351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peroni, L., and A. Timmer. 2013. Vulnerable groups: The promise of an emerging concept in European human rights convention law. International Journal of Constitutional Law 11 (4):1056–85. doi:10.1093/icon/mot042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzani, L., and C. Heller. 2013. A disobedient gaze: Strategic interventions in the knowledge(s) of maritime borders. Postcolonial Studies 16 (3):289–98. doi:10.1080/13688790.2013.850047.
   Google Scholar
• Philo, C. 2005. The geographies that wound.Population, Space and Place 11 (6):441–54. doi:10.1002/psp.400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, G. 2016. Children and the intimate violence of transnational labor migration. In Conflict, violence and peace. Geographies of children and young people, ed. C. Harker, K. Hörschelmann, and T. Skelton, Vol. 11. Singapore: Springer.pp 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sahraoui, N. 2020. Gendering the care/control nexus of the humanitarian border: Women’s bodies and gendered control of mobility in a EUropean borderland. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 38 (5):905–22. doi:10.1177/0263775820925487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K., and L. Waite. 2018. New and enduring narratives of vulnerability: Rethinking stories about the figure of the refugee. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (13): 2289–2307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spathopoulou, A., A. Carastathis, and M. Tsilimpounidi. 2020. ‘Vulnerable refugees’ and ‘voluntary deportations’: Performing the hotspot, embodying its violence. Geopolitics 1–27. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1772237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, E. 2005. Exploring the vulnerability of asylum seekers in the UK. Population, Space and Place 11 (6):499–512. doi:10.1002/psp.394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M. 2015. The desultory politics of mobility and the humanitarian-military border in the mediterranean. Mare Nostrum Beyond the Sea. Remhu: Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana 23 (44):61–82.
   Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M. 2018. The temporal borders of asylum. Temporality of control in the EU border regime. Political Geography 64:13–22. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M., and G. Garelli. 2018. Containment beyond detention: The hotspot system and disrupted migration movements across Europe. Environment and planning D: Society and space. Special Issue: Governing Hotspots 38 (6):1009–27.
   Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M., and W. Walters. 2016. The sight of migration: Governmentality, visibility and Europe’s contested borders. Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations 30 (3):445–64. doi:10.1080/13600826.2016.1173018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ticktin, M. 2011. Casualties of care: Immigration and the politics of humanitarianism in France. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyner, J. 2013. Population geography I: Surplus populations. Progress in Human Geography 37 (5):701–11. doi:10.1177/0309132512473924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vradis, A., E. Papada, J. Painter, and A. Papoutsi. 2018. New borders: Hotspots and the European migration regime. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, W. 2011. Foucault and frontiers: Notes on the birth of the humanitarian border. In Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges, ed. U. Bröckling, S. Krassman, and T. Lemke, 138–64. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, M., and H. Bohle. 1993. The space of vulnerability: The causal structure of hunger and famine. Progress in Human Geography 17 (1):43–67. doi:10.1177/030913259301700103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2011. Protection as subjection: Discourses of vulnerability and protection in post-9/11 border enforcement efforts. City 15 (3–4):414–28. doi:10.1080/13604813.2011.595919.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2015. From humanitarian exceptionalism to contingent care: Care and enforcement at the humanitarian border. Political Geography 47:11. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar