The Geopolitics of State Recognition in a Transitional International Order

References

• Acharya, A. (2014). The End of the American World Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. 2017. After liberal hegemony: The advent of a multiplex world order. Ethics & International Affairs 31 (3):271–85. doi:10.1017/S089267941700020X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, R. 2008. ‘Russia resurgent? Moscow’s campaign to ‘coerce Georgia to peace”. International Affairs 84 (6):1145–71. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00762.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, R. 2013. Russia, the West, and military intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ambassador of India to Serbia. 2008. India’s Kosovo stance consistent. Online. https://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2008&mm=03&dd=31&nav_id=48973
   Google Scholar
• American Institute in Taiwan. 2020. ‘Statement by secretary of state Michael R. Pompeo on Taiwan’s election’, PR-2002, January 11, 2020. https://www.ait.org.tw/statement-by-secretary-of-state-michael-r-pompeo-on-taiwans-election/.
   Google Scholar
• B92. 2016. ‘Putin: If Kosovo could do it, so could crimea’. 11 January. Online. www.b92.net/eng/news/world.php?yyyy=2016&mm=01&dd=11&nav_id=96651
   Google Scholar
• Bartelson, J. 2016. Recognition: A short history. Ethics and International Affairs 30 (3):202–321. doi:10.1017/S089267941600023X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechev, D. 2019. ‘Russia’s stratergic interests and tools of influence in the Western Balkans, Riga: NATO strategic communications centre of excellence. Available at: https://stratcomcoe.org/russias-strategic-interests-and-tools-influence-western-balkans?fbclid=IwAR1wgeglBoryDydCz6PMa4NAKb1TnrMepVrmzZr2cpV9wiaDnOmHX76iaXo.
   Google Scholar
• Björkdahl, A. 2018. Republika Srpska: Imaginary, performance and spatialization. Political Geography 66 (3):34–43. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.07.005.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, J. 2007. Surrender is not an option: Defending America at the United Nations and Abroad, 368–69. London: Threshold Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Bouris, D., and D. Papadimitriou. 2020. The EU and contested Statehood in its near Abroad: Europeanisation, Actorness and State-building. Geopolitics 25 (2):273–93. doi:10.1080/14650045.2019.1643162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazilian Ambassador to the ICJ. 2009. Brazil to take part in ICJ hearings. [Online]. www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2009&mm=09&dd=04&nav_id=61564
   Google Scholar
• Brownlie, I. 2008. Principles of public international law. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. 2003. Justice, legitimacy, and self-determination: Moral foundations for international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bugajski, J. (2008) ‘Kosova: The next phase’, U.S. Senate foreign relations committee, 4 March. Available at: www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/BugajskiTestimony080304a.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, R. 2005. Europe and the recognition of new states in Yugoslavia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caspersen, N. 2012. Unrecognized states: The struggle for sovereignty in the modern international system. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• CNN. 2008. ‘Transcript: CNN interview with Vladimir Putin’, 28 August. Available at:https://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/08/29/putin.transcript/(accessed 28 January 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Coggins, B. 2014. Power politics and state formation in the twentieth century: The dynamics of recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colaresi, M. P., K. Rasler, and W. R. Thompson. 2007. Strategic rivalries in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, A. 2015. Authoritarianism goes global. Countering democratic norms. Journal of Democracy 26 (3):49–63. doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, A., and D. Nexon. 2020. Exit from hegemony: The unraveling of the American global order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, A., D. Nexon, and S. Ward. 2019. Revising order or challenging the balance of military power? An alternative typology of revisionist and status-quo states. Review of International Studies 45 (4):689–708. doi:10.1017/S0260210519000019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2015. ‘Council conclusions on the Middle East peace process, press release no. 610/15, 20 July, available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2015/07/20-fac-mepp-conclusions - accessed 20 January 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2019. ‘Declaration by the high representative on behalf of the EU on the golan heights’, 27 March. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2019/03/27/declaration-by-the-high-representative-on-behalf-of-the-eu-on-the-golan-heights/#.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, K.G. 2014. Inside the Politics of Self-Determination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darbouche, H., and Y. H. Zoubir. 2008. Conflicting international policies and the Western Sahara stalemate. The International Spectator 43 (1):91–105. doi:10.1080/03932720701880049.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, L., P. Englebert, and M. Schomerus, eds. 2019. Secessionism in African politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• De Waal, T., and N. Von Twickel. 2020. Beyond frozen conflict scenarios for the separatist disputes of Eastern Europe. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, N., and L. Zimmermann. 2020. Things we lost in the fire: How different types of contestation affect the robustness of international norms. International Studies Review 22 (1):51–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitris Bouris, D., and B. İşleyen.2020.The European Union and practices of governing space and population in contested States: Insights from EUPOL COPPS in palestine.Geopolitics 25 (2):428–48. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1552946.
   Google Scholar
• Dugard,J. 1987.Recognition and the United Nations.Cambridge:Grotius Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in the UK. 2008. Foreign ministry spokesperson Liu Jianchao’s remarks on Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence. [Online]. http://www.chinese-embassy.org.uk/eng/zt/fyrth/t408032.htm.
   Google Scholar
• European Community. 1992. Declaration on Yugoslavia and on the guidelines on the recognition of New States. International Legal Materials (31)6: 1485–1487.
   Google Scholar
• Fabry, M. 2002. International norms of territorial integrity and the Balkan wars of the 1990s. Global Society 16 (2):145–74. doi:10.1080/09537320220132901.
   Google Scholar
• Fabry, M. 2010. Recognizing states: International society and the establishment of new states since 1776. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fabry, M. 2012. The contemporary practice of state recognition: Kosovo, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, and their aftermath. Nationalities Papers 40 (5):661–76. doi:10.1080/00905992.2012.705266.
   Google Scholar
• Fisch, J. 2015. The right to self-determination: The domestication of an illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) 2009. Written Statement of the United Kingdom in Response to the Request for an Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Question ‘Is the Unilateral Declaration of Independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government in Kosovo in Accordance with International Law?’. London: FCO.
   Google Scholar
• Franck, T. M. 1992. The emerging right to democratic governance. The American Journal of International Law 86 (1):46–91. doi:10.2307/2203138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates, R. M. 2014. Duty: Memoirs of a secretary at war. New York: Alfred A. Kopf.
   Google Scholar
• Global Taiwan Institute. 2019. Taiwan, China, and US interests in the South Pacific, 25 November.http://globaltaiwan.org/2019/11/december-9-taiwan-china-and-us-interests-in-the-south-pacific/
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. 2019. Statement on the golan heights, 25 March. https://www.canada.ca/en/global-affairs/news/2019/03/statement-on-the-golan-heights.html.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, T. D. 2015. Aggression against Ukraine: Territory, responsibility, and international law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, R. D. 2017. Admission to the sovereignty club: The past, present, and future of the international recognition regime. Territory, Politics, Governance 5 (2):177–89. doi:10.1080/21622671.2016.1265463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. 2007. On global order: Power, values, and the constitution of international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. 2013. Power transitions, emerging powers, and the shifting terrain of the middle ground. In Ethical reasoning in international affairs, ed. C. Navari, 222–45. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. 2018. Beyond the BRICS: Power, pluralism, and the future of global order. Ethics & International Affairs 32 (1):89–101. doi:10.1017/S0892679418000126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, J. G. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The origins, crisis and transformation of the American world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Court of Justice, 2010. Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo (Request for advisory opinion), Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/141 (accessed in July 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2000. The global covenant: Human conduct in the world of states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T., and A. Jeffrey. 2019. Improvising regions: Diplomatic practices between Russia and the Republika Srpska. Territory, Politics, Governance 1–21. doi:10.1080/21622671.2019.1688674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ker-Lindsay, J. 2015. Engagement without recognition: The limits of diplomatic interaction with contested states. International Affairs 91 (2):267–85. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinne, B.J. 2014. Dependent Diplomacy: Signaling, Strategy, and Prestige in the Diplomatic Network, International Studies Quarterly 58(2): 247–259. d oi.o rg/1 0.1111/isqu.12047.
   Google Scholar
• Laídi, Z. 2012. BRICS: Sovereignty power and weakness.International Politics. 49(5): 614-632.
   Google Scholar
• Lauterpacht, H. 1944. Recognition of states in international law. The Yale Law Journal 53 (3):385–459. doi:10.2307/792830.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. 2014. Conceptualizing the nexus of ‘interdependent hegemony’ between the existing and emerging world orders. Fudan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 7 (3):343–62. doi:10.1007/s40647-014-0021-3.
   Google Scholar
• Luban, D. 2020. What Is Spontaneous Order? American Political Science Review 114(1): 68–80. doi:10.1017/S0003055419000625.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, D. 2002. Separatist states and post-Soviet conflicts. International Affairs 78 (4):831–48. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.00282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maass, A. 2020. The actorness of the EU’s state- building in Ukraine - before and after crimea. Geopolitics 25 (2):387–40. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1559149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazza, M. 2020. An American perspective on Australia’s approach to the Taiwan strait. Global Taiwan Brief 5 (5):8–12. Available at http://globaltaiwan.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/5.5-PDF-GTB-3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. 2019. Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order. International Security 43 (4):7–50. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanovic, M., and M. Wood, eds. 2015. The law and politics of the Kosovo advisory opinion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of External Affairs of India. 2008. In response to questions on developments regarding Kosovo. [Online]. http://www.mea.gov.in/mediabriefings.htm?dtl/4297/In+response+to+questions+on+developments+regarding+Kosovo.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, P. 2019. Normative power Europe and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: The EU’s peacebuilding narrative meets local narratives. European Security 28 (3):251–67. doi:10.1080/09662839.2019.1648259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundy, J. 2017. The geopolitical functions of the Western Sahara conflict: US hegemony, Moroccan stability and Sahrawi strategies of resistance. In Global, regional and local dimensions of Western Sahara’s protracted decolonization: When a conflict gets old, ed. R. Ojeda-Garcia, Fernández-Molina, and V. Veguilla, 53–78. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Muro, D. 2017. Strategies of Secession and Counter-Secession. In Secession and Counter-secession. An International Relations Perspective, ed. D. Muro and Woertz, E., 19–25. Barcelona: Barcelona Centre for International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. D. 1999. Democratic legitimacy and the recognition of states and governments. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48 (3):545–81. doi:10.1017/S0020589300063430.
   Google Scholar
• New York Times. 2019. In shift, U.S. says Israeli settlements in West Bank do not violate international law, 18 November. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/18/world/middleeast/trump-israel-west-bank-settlements.html.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, E. 2018. The EU global strategy in a transitional international order. Global Society 32 (2):198–209. doi:10.1080/13600826.2018.1450732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, E., and B. Zala. 2018. Rising powers and order contestation: Disaggregating the normative from the representational. Third World Quarterly 39 (5):871–88. doi:10.1080/01436597.2017.1392085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, E., and G. Visoka. 2018a. The European Union’s practice of state recognition: Between norms and interests. Review of International Studies 44 (4):760–86. doi:10.1017/S0260210518000104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, E., and G. Visoka. 2018b. The foreign policy of state recognition: Kosovo’s diplomatic strategy to join international society. Foreign Policy Analysis 14 (3):367–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noutcheva, G. 2020. Contested statehood and EU actorness in Kosovo, Abkhazia and Western Sahara. Geopolitics 25 (2):449–71. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1556641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ó Beacháin, D. 2020. Abkhazia and South Ossetia. In Routledge handbook of state recognition, 2019, ed. G. Visoka, J. Doyle, and E. Newman, 430–45. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, J. 2010. A stability-seeking power: U.S. foreign policy and secessionist conflicts. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, T. V., D. W. Larson, and W. C. Wohlforth, eds. 2014. Status in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• People’s Republic of China. 2009. Written statement of the People’s Republic of China to the international court of justice on the issue of Kosovo. Available at: www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/141/15611.pdf (accessed 20 August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Porter, P. 2020. The false promise of liberal order: Nostalgia, delusion and the rise of trump. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of France. 2009. Written statement of the French Republic in the case concerning the accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence by the provisional institutions of self-government of Kosovo, 7 April.
   Google Scholar
• Rezvani, D. A. 2014. Surpassing the sovereign state: The wealth, self-rule, and security advantages of partially independent territories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russia Today. 2014. Putin: Crimea similar to Kosovo, West is rewriting its own rule book. 18 March. Available at: www.rt.com/news/putin-address-parliament-crimea-562/(accessed 20 August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2008. Statement of the Russian foreign ministry on Kosovo. 17 February 2008. Available at: http://www.mid.ru/ru/press_service/spokesman/official_statement//asset_publisher/t2GCdmD8RNIr/content/id/348618 (accessed 20 August 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Ryngaert, C., and S. Sobrie. 2011. Recognition of states: International law or realpolitik? The practice of recognition in the wake of Kosovo, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia. Leiden Journal of International Law 24 (2):467–90. doi:10.1017/S0922156511000100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakwa, R. 2017. Russia against the rest: The post-cold war crisis of world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samorukov, M. 2019. A spoiler in the Balkans? Russia and the final resolution of the Kosovo conflict. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at https://carnegieendowment.org/files/WP_Samorukov_Balkans_v2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schweller, R. L. 2011. Emerging powers in an age of disorder. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 17 (3):285–97. doi:10.1163/19426720-01703002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A., and H. Jo. 2019. Measuring norms and normative contestation: The case of international criminal law. Journal of Global Security Studies 4 (1):18–36. doi:10.1093/jogss/ogy043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siroky, D. S., M. Popovic, and N. Mirilovic. 2020. Unilateral secession, international recognition, and great power contestation. Journal of Peace Research 002234332096338. doi:10.1177/0022343320963382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuenkel, O. 2016. Post-western world: How emerging powers are remaking global order. Oxford: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, J., ed. 2011. Kosovo: A precedent? The declaration of independence, the advisory opinion and implications for statehood, self-determination and minority rights. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian. 2019. US says Israeli settlements no longer considered illegal in dramatic shift, 18 November. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/18/us-israeli-settlements-no-longer-considered-illegal-palestinian-land-mike-pompeo.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, S. 2013. Legal issues surrounding the referendum on independence for Scotland. European Constitutional Law Review 9 (3):376–77. doi:10.1017/S1574019612001216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S. 2009. Russia, China and a multipolar world order: The danger in the unidentified. Asian Perspective 33 (1):159–84. doi:10.1353/apr.2009.0029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN Security Council. 1981. Resolution 497 (1981), UN Doc. S/RES/497, 17 December.
   Google Scholar
• UN Security Council. 2019. Provisional verbatim of the 8618th meeting, UN Doc. S/PV.8518, 30 April.
   Google Scholar
• US Congress. 2020 Taiwan allies international protection and enhancement initiative (TAIPEI) act of 2019,https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/s1678/BILLS-116s1678enr.xml
   Google Scholar
• US Department of State 2008. ‘U.S. Recognizes Kosovo as Independent State’. 18 February, https://2001-2009.state.gov/secretary/rm/2008/02/100973.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Visoka, G. 2021. Statehood and recognition in world politics: Towards a critical research agenda. Cooperation and Conflict. Online First. d oi.o rg/1 0.1177/00108367211007876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visoka, G. 2018. Acting like a state: Kosovo and the everyday making of statehood. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Visoka, G. forthcoming. The derecognition of states. An Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Visoka, G., J. Doyle, and E. Newman, eds. 2020. Routledge handbook of state recognition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Volgy, T., R. Corbetta, K. Grant, and R. Baird. 2011. Major powers and the quest for status in international politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• White House. 2018. Statement from the press secretary on El Salvador, 23 August. Available at: www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-press-secretary-el-salvador/
   Google Scholar
• White House. 2019. Proclamation on recognizing the golan heights as part of the state of Israel, 25 March. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-recognizing-golan-heights-part-state-israel/.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 2018. Contestation and constitution of norms in global international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wydra, D. 2020. Between normative visions and pragmatic possibilities: The EUropean politics of state recognition. Geopolitics 25 (2):315–45. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1556643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaoyu, P. 2012. Socialisation as a two-way process: Emerging powers and the diffusion of international norms. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 (4):341–67. doi:10.1093/cjip/pos017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar