Digitisation and Sovereignty in Humanitarian Space: Technologies, Territories and Tensions

References

• Amoore, L. 2013. The politics of possibility: Risk and uncertainty beyond probability. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrada, N. October 16 2019. 8 digital principal issues with UNICEF’s Ethereum cryptocurrency donations. ICTworks https://www.ictworks.org/uncief-ethereum-cryptocurrency-donations/
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, C. 2020. Experimentality, surplus data and the politics of debilitation in borderzones. Geopolitics. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1853103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baradaran, M. 2015. How the other half banks: Exclusion, exploitation, and the threat to democracy. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, N., L. Swartz, and A. Alarcon. 2019. Convening technologies: Blockchain and the music industry. International Journal of Communication 13:402–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. 2019. Race after technology. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagat, A., & Roderick, L. (2020). Banking on refugees: Racialized expropriation in the fintech era. Environment and Planning A, 1–18. doi:10.1177/0308518X20904070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Big Brother Award. 2018. The Big Brother Award 2018 in the “public administration” category goes to Cevisio Software und Systeme GmbH in Torgau , Germany. https://bigbrotherawards.de/en/2018/administration-cevisio-software-systeme-gmbh
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2004. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Canales, K. February 23 2021. US Senate grilled SolarWinds, Microsoft over cyberattack. Business Insider https://www.businessinsider.com/watch-live-senate-hearing-solarwinds-microsoft-fireeye-crowdstrike-cyberattack-2021-2200C
   Google Scholar
• Cevisio. 2016. Cevisio QMM. Die software zur zentralen erfassung von flüchtlingen zur verwaltung von flüchtlingsunterkünften [Cevisio QMM. The software for central registration of refugees and management of refugee accommodation]. Product Information Leaflet of Civisio. https://kipdf.com/die-software-zur-zentralen-erfassung-von-flchtlingen-zur-verwaltung-von-flchtlin_5aaff76e1723dd379cc33e3e.html
   Google Scholar
• Cheesman, M. 2020. Self-sovereignty for refugees? The contested horizons of digital identity. Geopolitics. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1823836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheesman, M., and A. Slavin. 2021. Self-sovereignty and forced migration: Slippery terms and the refugee data apparatus. In Digital identity, virtual borders and social media: Panaceas for migration governance, ed. E. Korkmaz, 10–32. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• CISA. 2021 January 5. Joint statement by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), and the National Security Agency (NSA). Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency https://www.cisa.gov/news/2021/01/05/joint-statement-federal-bureau-investigation-fbi-cybersecurity-and-infrastructure
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, S., and S. Elhawary. 2012. Humanitarian space: A review of trends and issues. Humanitarian Policy Group 32:1–36. https://odi.org/en/publications/humanitarian-space-a-review-of-trends-and-issues/.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. 2007. The Complexities of Sovereignty. In Giorgio Agamben: Sovereignty and life, ed. M. Calarco and S. DeCaroli, 23–42. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Consensys. 2019. Project unblocked cash: Revolutionising humanitarian cash transfers in Vanuatu. https://consensys.net/blockchain-use-cases/social-impact/project-unblocked-cash-case-study/
   Google Scholar
• Coppi, G. 2021. Introduction to distributed ledger technologies for social, development, and humanitarian impact. In Blockchain, law and governance, ed. B. Cappiello and G. Carullo, 231–41. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52722-8_17.
   Google Scholar
• Coppi, G., and L. Fast. February 28 2019. Blockchain and distributed ledger technologies in the humanitarian sector. Humanitarian Policy Group https://odi.org/en/publications/blockchain-and-distributed-ledger-technologies-in-the-humanitarian-sector/
   Google Scholar
• Couture, S., and S. Toupin. 2019. What does the notion of ‘sovereignty’ mean when referring to the digital? New Media & Society 21 (10):2305–22. doi:10.1177/1461444819865984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currion, P. June 25 2018. Four lessons learned launching blockchain financial services for NGOs. ICT Works https://www.ictworks.org/lessons-learned-blockchain-financial-services
   Google Scholar
• Currion, P. February 22 2021. The consequences of cash-based aid. The New Humanitarian https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/opinion/2021/2/22/the-case-against-humanitarian-cash
   Google Scholar
• De Genova, N., et al. 2021. Minor keywords of political theory: Migration as a critical standpoint. A collaborative project of collective writing. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 1–95. doi:10.1177/2399654420988563.
   Google Scholar
• Demchak, C., and P. Dombrowski. 2013. Cyber westphalia: Asserting state prerogatives in cyberspace. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs (2013):29–38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43134320
   Google Scholar
• Development Aid. October 23 2020. The unblocked cash project: Oxfam Pacific scales blockchain solution to revolutionize humanitarian aid. https://www.developmentaid.org/#!/news-stream/post/77034/the-unblocked-cash-project-oxfam-pacific-scales-blockchain-solution-to-revolutionize-humanitarian-aid
   Google Scholar
• Devidal, P. March 22 2021. Cashless cash: Financial inclusion or surveillance humanitarianism? ICRC Humanitarian Law & Policy Blog https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2021/03/02/cashless-cash/
   Google Scholar
• Dijstelbloem, H. 2021. Borders as infrastructure: The technopolitics of border control. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Disberse. 2020. Our story. https://www.disberse.com/
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, K. P. 2018. Financial inclusion means your money isn’t with you”: Conflicts over social grants and financial services in South Africa. In Money at the margins: Global perspectives on technology, financial inclusion, and design, ed. B. Maurer, S. Musaraj, and I. V. Small, 155–78. New York: Berghahn Books. doi:10.2307/j.ctvw04bp0.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, K. P., and E. Park. 2020. Rentier infrastructure: Data, debt, and sovereignty in Kenya. Presentation at Danish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen. Accessed November 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHdepHLItNo
   Google Scholar
• Easterday, J. February 8 2019. Open letter to WFP re: Palantir agreement. Responsible Data https://responsibledata.io/2019/02/08/open-letter-to-wfp-re-palantir-agreement/
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2016 November 22. What is the “splinternet”? The Economist https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2016/11/22/what-is-the-splinternet
   Google Scholar
• ECRE. 2019 July 19. Return policy: Desperately seeking evidence and balance. European Council on Refugees and Exiles https://www.ecre.org/ecre-policy-note-return-policy-desperately-seeking-evidence-and-balance/
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. 2013. The birth of territory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellermann, A. 2010. Undocumented migrants and resistance in the liberal state. Politics & Society 38 (3):408–29. doi:10.1177/0032329210373072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Engine Room. 2020. Understanding the lived effects of digital ID: A multi-country study. The Engine Room https://www.theengineroom.org/understanding-the-lived-effects-of-digital-id-systems/
   Google Scholar
• ‌Fanselow, Y. 2018. Cashing in on crisis? The refugee eye scan experiment. Redfish documentary. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUtl8Hpg15w
   Google Scholar
• Feuer, W. January 23 2020. Palantir CEO Alex Karp defends his company’s relationship with government agencies. CNBC https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/23/palantir-ceo-alex-karp-defends-his-companys-work-for-the-government.html
   Google Scholar
• Gabor, D., and S. Brooks. 2017. The digital revolution in financial inclusion: International development in the fintech era. New Political Economy 22 (4):423–36. doi:10.1080/13563467.2017.1259298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibney, M., and R. Hansen. 2003. Deportation and the liberal state: The forcible return of asylum seekers and unlawful migrants in Canada, Germany and the United Kingdom. New Issues in Refugee Research 77:1–21. https://www.unhcr.org/research/working/3e59de764/deportation-liberal-state-forcible-return-asylum-seekers-unlawful-migrants.html.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, L. November 26 2019. Red Cross boosts disaster-prone communities with blockchain ‘cash’. Reuters https://www.reuters.com/article/us-technology-aid-climate-change/red-cross-boosts-disaster-prone-communities-with-blockchain-cash-idUSKBN1Y01K1
   Google Scholar
• Hallwright, J., and E. Carnaby. 2019. Complexities of implementation: Oxfam Australia’s experience in piloting blockchain. Frontiers in Blockchain 2 (August):1–6. doi:10.3389/fbloc.2019.00010.
   Google Scholar
• Hamburg Bürgerschaft. 2017. Schriftliche Kleine Anfrage Der Abgeordneten Christiane Schneider (DIE LINKE) Vom 27.0417 Und Antwort Des Senats Betr.: Quartiersmanagement in Flüchtlingsunterkünften II [Parliamentary Inquiry by Representative Christiane Schneider (The Left Party), Relating to: Accommodation Management in Housing for Refugees II]. Bürgerschaft der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg [Parliament of the Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg].
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. B., and F. Stepputat. 2006. Sovereignty revisited. Annual Review of Anthropology 35 (1):295–315. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‌Heath, A. January 31 2022. Zuckerberg’s dream of launching a cryptocurrency is officially over. The Verge https://www.theverge.com/2022/1/31/22911426/meta-diem-cryptocurrency-confirms-sale
   Google Scholar
• Heller, C., and L. Pezzani. March 2016. Ebbing and flowing: The EU’s shifting practices of (non-)assistance and bordering in a time of crisis. Near Futures Online http://nearfuturesonline.org/ebbing-and-flowing-the-eus-shifting-practices-of-non-assistance-and-bordering-in-a-time-of-crisis/
   Google Scholar
• Hope, A. 2021. Cloud services from major providers including Amazon and Microsoft vulnerable to the widespread SolarWinds hack. CPO Magazine, January 4. https://www.cpomagazine.com/cyber-security/cloud-services-from-major-providers-including-amazon-and-microsoft-vulnerable-to-the-widespread-solarwinds-hack
   Google Scholar
• Huillet, M. November 26 2019. Red Cross deploys blockchain to boost communities’ economic resilience. Coin Telegraph https://cointelegraph.com/news/red-cross-deploys-blockchain-to-boost-communities-economic-resilience
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, P., M. Braun, M. Tretter, and P. Dabrock. 2021. Data sovereignty: A review. Big Data & Society January-June:1–17. doi:10.1177/2053951720982012.
   Google Scholar
• Husain, S. O., A. Franklin, and D. Roep. 2020. The political imaginaries of blockchain projects: Discerning the expressions of an emerging ecosystem. Sustainability Science 15 (2):379–94. doi:10.1007/s11625-020-00786-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutten, M. (2018). The Soft Spot of Hard Code: Blockchain Technology, Network Governance, and Pitfalls of Technological Utopianism. Global Networks, 19(3). doi:10.1111/glob.12217.
   Google Scholar
• IASC. 2016. About the grand bargain. Inter-Agency Standing Committee. https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/about-the-grand-bargain
   Google Scholar
• IFRC. 2018 October 5. Blockchain open loop cash transfer pilot project. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies https://preparecenter.org/resource/blockchain-open-loop-cash-transfer-pilot-project
   Google Scholar
• Insureblocks. 2020 January 10. UN World Food Programme on the blockchain. Insureblocks https://insureblocks.com/ep-143-un-world-food-programme-on-the-blockchain/
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, K. 2015. Experimentation in humanitarian locations: UNHCR and biometric registration of afghan refugees. Security Dialogue 46 (2):144–64. doi:10.1177/0967010614552545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, K. L., and K. B. Sandvik. 2018. UNHCR and the pursuit of international protection: Accountability through technology? Third World Quarterly 39 (8):1508–24. doi:10.1080/01436597.2018.1432346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jibilian, I., and K. Canales. April 15 2021. What is the SolarWinds hack and why is it a big deal? Business Insider https://www.businessinsider.com/solarwinds-hack-explained-government-agencies-cyber-security-2020-12
   Google Scholar
• Jutel, O. 2021 January-June. Blockchain imperialism in the Pacific. Big Data & Society 1–14. doi:10.1177/2053951720985249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaurin, D. July 8 2019. Why Libra needs a humanitarian fig leaf. Berkman Klein Center Medium Collection https://medium.com/berkman-klein-center/why-libra-needs-a-humanitarian-fig-leaf-79ae6a463c8
   Google Scholar
• Keating, J. February 26 2008. How to start your own country in four easy steps. Foreign Policy https://foreignpolicy.com/2008/02/26/how-to-start-your-own-country-in-four-easy-steps/
   Google Scholar
• Kilcullen, D. 2020. The dragons and the snakes: How the rest learned to fight the west. New York NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, A. E. June 6 2019. Huawei, shunned by U.S. Government, is welcomed in Russia. The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/06/business/huawei-russia-5g.html
   Google Scholar
• Kshetri, N. 2017. Potential roles of blockchain in fighting poverty and reducing financial exclusion in the Global South. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 20 (4):201–04. doi:10.1080/1097198X.2017.1391370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukutai, T., and J. Taylor. 2016. Indigenous data sovereignty: Towards an agenda. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakshmanan, R. December 31 2020. Microsoft says SolarWinds hackers accessed some of its source code. The Hacker News https://thehackernews.com/2020/12/microsoft-says-solarwinds-hackers.html
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A radical view. London and Basingstoke: The MacMillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madianou, M. 2019. Technocolonialism: Digital innovation and data practices in the humanitarian response to refugee crises. Social Media + Society 5 (3):1–13. doi:10.1177/2056305119863146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manski, S., and M. Bauwens. 2020. Reimagining new socio-technical economics through the application of distributed ledger technologies. Frontiers in Blockchain 2 (January):1–17. doi:10.3389/fbloc.2019.00029.
   Google Scholar
• Marelli, M. 2020. Hacking humanitarians: Defining the cyber perimeter and developing a cyber security strategy for international humanitarian organizations in digital transformation. International Review of the Red Cross 102 (913):367–87. doi:10.1017/S1816383121000151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrow, A., and D. Antonov. July 22 2021. Russia disconnects from internet in tests as it bolsters security. Reuters https://www.reuters.com/article/russia-internet-idCNL1N2OY13C
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A., and L. Taylor. 2021. Exclusion and inclusion in identification: Regulation, displacement and data justice. Information Technology for Development 27 (1):50–66. doi:10.1080/02681102.2020.1811943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. 2019August 15. Space to supply chains: A plan for humanitarian data governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3436179
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. M. April 8 2021. A humanitarian duty to integrity. ICRC Humanitarian Law & Policy Blog https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2021/04/08/humanitarian-duty-to-integrity
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., and A. X. Mina. February 26 2019. The war-torn web. Foreign Policy https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/19/the-war-torn-web-internet-warring-states-cyber-espionage
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2017. The economization of life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ODI. 2015 September 14. Doing cash differently: How cash transfers can transform humanitarian aid. Overseas Development Institute https://odi.org/en/publications/doing-cash-differently-how-cash-transfers-can-transform-humanitarian-aid/
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam Pacific. October 22 2020. The unblocked cash project: Oxfam Pacific scales blockchain solution to revolutionize humanitarian aid. https://medium.com/unblockedcash/unblocked-cash-oxfam-pacific-scales-blockchain-solution-to-revolutionize-humanitarian-aid-4fb7f2a14f6b
   Google Scholar
• Parker, B., and A. Slemrod. June 17 2019. UN gives ultimatum to Yemen rebels over reports of aid theft. The New Humanitarian https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/news/2019/06/17/un-yemen-rebels-aid-theft-biometrics
   Google Scholar
• Pasquale, F. 2018. Digital capitalism: How to tame the platform juggernauts. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung - Division for Economic and Social Policy 1–4. https://www.fes.de/en/digital-capitalism-how-to-tame-the-platform-juggernauts
   Google Scholar
• Pelizza, A. 2019. Processing alterity, enacting Europe: Migrant registration and identification as co-construction of individuals and polities. Science, Technology & Human Values 45 (2):1–27. doi:10.1177/0162243919827927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, F. April 24 2017. Political legitimacy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/legitimacy/
   Google Scholar
• Pohle, J., and T. Thiel. 2020. Digital sovereignty. Internet Policy Review 9 (4):4. doi:10.14763/2020.4.1532.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, Z. June 21 2021. The UN’s refugee data shame. The New Humanitarian https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/opinion/2021/6/21/rohingya-data-protection-and-UN-betrayal
   Google Scholar
• Rodenhäuser, T. March 16 2020. Hacking Humanitarians? IHL and the protection of humanitarian organizations against cyber operations. EJIL:Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law https://www.ejiltalk.org/hacking-humanitarians-ihl-and-the-protection-of-humanitarian-organizations-against-cyber-operations/
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, S. November 30 2021. Facebook’s executive in charge of cryptocurrency is leaving the company. CNBC https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/30/metas-head-of-cryptocurrency-david-marcus-resigns.html
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, B. 2015. Security Spheres: A phenomenology of maritime spatial practices. Security Dialogue 46 (6):568–84. doi:10.1177/0967010615598049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salesforce. 2019. First do no (digital) harm: Protecting the humanitarian mission with the cloud. https://www.salesforce.org/blog/first-do-no-digital-harm-protecting-the-humanitarian-mission-with-the-cloud/
   Google Scholar
• Sandvik, K. B. 2019. Making wearables in aid: Digital bodies, data and gifts. Journal of Humanitarian Affairs 1 (3):33–41. doi:10.7227/JHA.023.
   Google Scholar
• Scheel, S. 2021. The politics of (non)knowledge in the (un)making of migration. Journal of Migration Studies 1 (2):1–33. doi:10.48439/zmf.v1i2.113.
   Google Scholar
• Scott-Smith, T. 2016. Humanitarian neophilia: The ‘innovation turn’ and its implications. Third World Quarterly 37 (12):2229–51. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1176856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serres, M. 2007. The parasite. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S., and S. Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, V. 2020. Europe’s Migration Crisis: Border deaths and human dignity. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, K., and H. ‌Murphy. April 17 2020. How Facebook’s Libra went from world changer to just another PayPal. Financial Times https://www.ft.com/content/79376464-72b5-41fa-8f14-9f308acaf83b
   Google Scholar
• Staton, B. May 18 2016. Eye spy: Biometric aid system trials in Jordan. The New Humanitarian https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/analysis/2016/05/18/eye-spy-biometric-aid-system-trials-jordan
   Google Scholar
• Sturm, C. 2017. Reflections on the anthropology of sovereignty and settler colonialism: Lessons from native North America. Cultural Anthropology 32 (3):340–48. doi:10.14506/ca32.3.03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz, L. 2017. Blockchain dreams: Imagining economic alternatives after bitcoin. In Another economy is possible: culture and economy in a time of crisis, ed. M. Castells, 82–105. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swartz, L. 2020. New money: How payment became social media. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. 2016. No place to hide? The ethics and analytics of tracking mobility using mobile phone data. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 34 (2):319–36. doi:10.1177/0263775815608851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‌Tazzioli, M. September 25 2017. The circuits of financial-humanitarianism in the Greek migration laboratory. Border Criminologies Blog https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2017/09/circuits
   Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M. 2019. Refugees’ debit cards, subjectivities, and data circuits: Financial-humanitarianism in the Greek migration laboratory. International Political Sociology 13 (4):392–408. doi:10.1093/ips/olz014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNICEF. 2020 June 19. UNICEF cryptocurrency fund announces its largest investment of start-ups in developing and emerging economies. UNICEF https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/unicef-cryptocurrency-fund-announces-its-largest-investment-startups-developing-and
   Google Scholar
• UNOCHA. 2012 June. OCHA on message: Humanitarian principles. UNOCHA https://www.unocha.org/sites/dms/Documents/OOM-humanitarianprinciples_eng_June12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNOCHA. 2020 December 1. Global humanitarian review 2021. ReliefWeb https://reliefweb.int/report/world/global-humanitarian-overview-2021-enarfres
   Google Scholar
• van Reekum, R. 2018. Patrols, records and pictures: Demonstrations of Europe in the midst of migration’s crisis. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 37 (4):625–43. doi:10.1177/0263775818792269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigneswaran, D. 2020. Europe has never been modern: Recasting historical narratives of migration control. International Political Sociology 14 (1):2–21. doi:10.1093/ips/olz025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, Gerard. 2016. Bruno Latour. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzberg, K., M. Cheesman, A. Martin, and E. Schoemaker. 2021. Between surveillance and recognition: Rethinking digital identity in aid. Big Data & Society January-June:1–7. doi:10.1177/20539517211006744.
   Google Scholar
• WFP. 2019a February 5. Palantir and WFP partner to help transform global humanitarian delivery. World Food Programme https://www.wfp.org/news/palantir-and-wfp-partner-help-transform-global-humanitarian-delivery
   Google Scholar
• WFP. 2019b June 20. World Food Programme begins partial suspension of aid in Yemen. ReliefWeb https://reliefweb.int/report/yemen/world-food-programme-begins-partial-suspension-aid-yemen
   Google Scholar
• WFP. 2020. Building blocks project overview. World Food Programme Innovation Accelerator. https://innovation.wfp.org/project/building-blocks.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, L. 1980. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109 (1):121–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Vision/Nepal Innovation Lab. 2018. Sikka: A digital asset transfer platform designed for the financially marginalized, 1–11. Nepal: World Vision international.
   Google Scholar
• Zetter, K. 2014. Countdown to zero day: Stuxnet and the launch of the world’s first digital weapon. New York: Crown Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Zook, M., and J. Blankenship. 2018. New spaces of disruption? The failures of Bitcoin and the rhetorical power of algorithmic governance. Geoforum 96 (August):248–55. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.023.
   Google Scholar
• Zook, M., and M. Graham. 2018. Hacking code/space: Confounding the code of global capitalism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 43 (3):390–404. doi:10.1111/tran.12228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar