Calculated Informality in Governing (Non)return: An Evolutionary Governance Perspective

References

• Ahmad, W. 2017. The fate of durable solutions in protracted refugee situations: The odyssey of Afghan refugees in Pakistan. Journal for Social Justice 15 (3):591–661.
   Google Scholar
• Alimia, S. 2019. Performing the Afghanistan–Pakistan border through refugee ID cards. Geopolitics 24 (2):391–425. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1465046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsayyad, N., and A. Roy. 2006. Medieval modernity: on citizenship and urbanism in a global era. Space and Polity 10 (1):1–20. doi:10.1080/13562570600796747.
   Google Scholar
• Ashutosh, I., and A. Mountz. 2012. The geopolitics of migrant mobility: Tracing state relations through refugee claims, boats, and discourses. Geopolitics 17 (2):335–54. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.567315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baczko, A., and G. Dorronsoro. 2015. United Nations good offices mission in Afghanistan and Pakistan (UNGOMAP). In The Oxford handbook of United Nations peacekeeping operations, ed. J. A. Koops, T. Tardy, N. MacQueen, and P.D. Williams, 269–275. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, M. 2018. Pakistan’s Imran Khan pledges citizenship for 1.5m Afghan refugees. The Guardian, September 17. Accessed March 20, 2021 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/sep/17/pakistan-imran-khan-citizenship-pledge-afghan-refugees
   Google Scholar
• Beunen, R., K. van Assche, and M. Duineveld, eds. 2015. Evolutionary governance theory: Theory and applications. Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Björkdahl, A., and K. Höglund. 2013. Precarious peacebuilding: Friction in global-local encounters. Peacebuilding 1 (3): 289–299 .
   Google Scholar
• Borthakur, A. 2017. Afghan refugees: The impact on Pakistan. Asian Affairs 48 (3):488–509. doi:10.1080/03068374.2017.1362871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brun, C. 2015. Active waiting and changing hopes: Toward a time perspective on protracted displacement. Social Analysis 59 (1). doi:10.3167/sa.2015.590102.
   Google Scholar
• Carling, J., M. B. Erdal, and C. Talleraas. 2021. Living in two countries: Transnational living as an alternative to migration. Population, Space and Place 21 (4):127.
   Google Scholar
• Chimni, B. S. 1998. The geopolitics of refugee studies: A view from the South. Journal of Refugee Studies 11 (4):350–74. doi:10.1093/jrs/11.4.350-a.
   Google Scholar
• Chimni, B. S. 2009. The birth of a ‘discipline’: From refugee to forced migration studies. Journal of Refugee Studies 22 (1):11–20. doi:10.1093/jrs/fen051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Genova, N. P. 2002. Migrant “illegality” and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology 31 (1):419–47. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Genova, N. 2020. 'Doin’ hard time on planet earth’: Migrant detainability, disciplinary power and the disposability of life. In Waiting and the temporalities of irregular migration, ed. C. M. Jacobsen, M.-A. Karlsen, and S. Khosravi, 186–201. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fakhoury, T. 2021. Refugee return and fragmented governance in the host state: Displaced Syrians in the face of Lebanon’s divided politics. Third World Quarterly 42 (1):162–80. doi:10.1080/01436597.2020.1762485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielden, M. B. 1998. The geopolitics of aid: The provision and termination of aid to Afghan refugees in North West Frontier Province, Pakistan. Political Geography 17 (4):459–87. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(97)00034-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1990. History of sexuality. New York: Vintage Books. [Histoire de la sexualité I: La volonté de savoir, 1977].
   Google Scholar
• Gerver, M. 2015. Refugee repatriation and voluntariness. The International Journal of Human Rights 19 (1):32–52. doi:10.1080/13642987.2014.981535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerver, M. 2019. Must refugees return? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (3):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ghufran, N. 2011. The role of UNHCR and Afghan refugees in Pakistan. Strategic Analysis 35 (6):945–54. doi:10.1080/09700161.2011.608833.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Pakistan. 1997. Repatriation challenges. Islamabad: States and F.R. Division.
   Google Scholar
• Grawert, E., and K. Mielke. 2018. Coping with protracted displacement - how Afghans secure their livelihood in Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan. Working Paper 3/2018. Accessed July 29, 2019. https://www.bicc.de/uploads/tx_bicctools/BICC_Working_paper_2_2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, M. 2016. UNHCR doubles stipend for Afghan refugees returning home. Dawn, June 29 http://dawn.com/news/1268010.
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, J. M., and A, Smart. 1999. States and illegal practices: An overview. In States and illegal practices, ed. J. M. Heyman, 1–24. Oxford, New York: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, C. 2018. Forced migration: Morality and politics. Ethnic and Racial Studies 41 (3):440–47. doi:10.1080/01419870.2018.1388422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. 2015. ‘What are you doing here?’: Police abuses against Afghans in Pakistan. Accessed February 21, 2021. https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/11/18/what-are-you-doing-here/police-abuses-against-afghans-pakistan
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. 2017. Pakistan coercion, UN complicity: The mass forced return of Afghan refugees. Accessed February 21, 2021. https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/02/13/pakistan-coercion-un-complicity/mass-forced-return-afghan-refugees.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J. 2012. The geopolitics of migration and mobility. Geopolitics 17 (2):243–55. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.569321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group (ICG). 2012. Aid and conflict in Pakistan. Crisis Group Asia Report No. 227.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Migration (IOM). 2017. Assessment of incoming Afghan nationals (Torkham border). Accessed February 21, 2021. https://reliefweb.int/report/pakistan/iom-pakistan-assessment-incoming-afghan-nationals-torkham-border-june-2017.
   Google Scholar
• Dawn. 2020. International support for Pakistan has been minimal, says UN chief at Afghan refugee summit, February 17. Accessed June 12, 2021. https://www.dawn.com/news/1535026.
   Google Scholar
• IOM. 2019. Pakistan migration snapshot. Accessed June 01, 2021. https://pakistan.iom.int/sites/pakistan/files/publications/1.%20Pakistan%20Migration%20Snapshot%202019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Langenkamp, D. 2003. The victory of expediency: Afghan refugees and Pakistan in the 1990s. The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 27 (2):229–54.
   Google Scholar
• Long, K. 2013. The point of no return: refugees, rights, and repatriation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malkki, L. H. 1995. Refugees and exile: From ‘refugee studies’ to the national order of things. Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1):495–523. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.002431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margesson, R. 2007. Afghan refugees: current status and future prospects. CRS Report for Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2000. Regional dynamics and the security of Afghan refugees in Pakistan. Refugee Survey Quarterly 19 (1):71–78. doi:10.1093/rsq/19.1.71.
   Google Scholar
• Micinski, N. R. 2021. Threats, deportability and aid: The politics of refugee rentier states and regional stability. Security Dialogue 16:096701062110274. Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Mielke, K. 2016. Tracing change: On the positionality of traditionally mobile groups in kabul’s camps. International Quarterly for Asian Studies 47 (3–4):245–71.
   Google Scholar
• Mielke, K. M., N. Shahid, A. R. Khatana, S. Asghari, A. Zahoor, A. Irshad, S. Kiran, B. Etzold, and M. M. Javed. 2021. Figurations of displacement in and beyond Pakistan: Empirical findings and reflections on protracted displacement and translocal connections of Afghans. TRAFIG Working Paper Series 7. Accessed December 15, 2021. https://reliefweb.int/report/pakistan/trafig-working-paper-no-7-figurations-displacement-and-beyond-pakistan
   Google Scholar
• Monsutti, A. 2008. Afghan migratory strategies and the three solutions to the refugee problem. Refugee Survey Quarterly 27 (1):58–73. doi:10.1093/rsq/hdn007.
   Google Scholar
• Mourad, L., and K. P. Norman. 2020. Transforming refugees into migrants: Institutional change and the politics of international protection. European Journal of International Relations 26 (3):687–713. doi:10.1177/1354066119883688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassar, J., and N. Stel. 2019. Lebanon’s response to the Syrian refugee crisis – Institutional ambiguity as a governance strategy. Political Geography 70:44–54. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Counter Terrorism Authority (NACTA). 2014. National Action Plan, Accessed December 05, 2020. https://nacta.gov.pk/nap-2014/.
   Google Scholar
• O’Tuathail, G. 2005. Geopolitics. In Cultural geography: A critical dictionary of key concepts. In ed. D. Atkinson, 65–71. London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Oztig, L. I. 2020. Pakistan’s border policies and security dynamics along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. Journal of Borderland Studies 35 (2):211–26. doi:10.1080/08865655.2018.1545598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2009. Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory 8 (1):76–87. doi:10.1177/1473095208099299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2018. The potency of the state: Logics of informality and subalternity. The Journal of Development Studies 54 (12):2243–46. doi:10.1080/00220388.2018.1460470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safri, M. 2011. The transformation of the Afghan refugee: 1979-2009. Middle East Journal 56 (4):587–601. doi:10.3751/65.4.14.
   Google Scholar
• Şahin Mencütek, Z., N. E. Gökalp Aras, A. Kaya, and S. B. Rottmann. forthcoming. Syrian refugees in Turkey: Between reception and integration. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schöch, R. 2008. Afghan refugees in Pakistan during the 1980s: cold war politics and registration practice. New Issues in Refugee Research, Research Paper No. 157.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. 2002. The spaces and times of globalization: Place, scale, networks, and positionality*. Economic Geography 78 (3):307–30. doi:10.2307/4140812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stel, N. 2020. Hybrid political order and the politics of uncertainty: Refugee governance in Lebanon. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tsourapas, G. 2019. The Syrian refugee crisis and foreign policy decision-making in Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey. Journal of Global Security Studies 4 (4):464–81. doi:10.1093/jogss/ogz016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 1990. Afghan refugees in Pakistan: New arrivals and repatriation 11/88 through 6/90. Islamabad: UNHCR.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2003. Tripartite Repatriation Agreement between UNHCR and the Governments of Pakistan and Afghanistan. Accessed December 05, 2020. https://www.refworld.org/docid/55e6a5324.html.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2004. Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) on the Census and Registration of Afghan Citizens Living in Pakistan. Accessed December 05, 2020. https://www.refworld.org/docid/55e6a3534.html.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2006. Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (GOP) and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) on the Registration of Afghan Citizens Living in Pakistan. Accessed December 05, 2020. https://www.refworld.org/docid/55e6a0374.html.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2010. Extension of the Agreement Between the Government of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the Transitional Islamic State of Afghanistan and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Governing the Repatriation of Afghan Citizens Living in Pakistan. Accessed December 05, 2020. https://www.refworld.org/docid/555ae4e14.html.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2012. Solutions Strategy for Afghan Refugees, to support voluntary repatriation, sustainable reintegration and assistance to host countries(SSAR). Accessed December 05, 2020. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/62341.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. n.d. Operational portal: Pakistan. Accessed December 05, 2020. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/country/pak
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Security Council. 1988. Letter dated april 14 1988 from the secretary-general addressed to the president of the security council. S/ 19834. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• van Assche, K., R. Beunen, and M. Duineveld. 2014. Evolutionary governance theory: An introduction. Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van Assche, K., R. Beunen, and M. Duineveld. 2015. An overview of EGT’s main concepts. In Evolutionary governance theory: Theory and applications, ed. R. Beunen, K. van Assche, and M. Duineveld, 19–36. Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, W. 2002. Deportation, expulsion, and the international police of aliens. Citizenship Studies 6 (3):265–92. doi:10.1080/1362102022000011612.
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, A., and N. Glick Schiller. 2003. Methodological nationalism, the social sciences, and the study of migration: an essay in historical epistemology. International Migration Review 37 (3):576–610. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00151.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zardo, F. 2020. The EU Trust Fund for Africa: Geopolitical space making through migration policy instruments. Geopolitics 15 (31):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Zieck, M. 2008. The legal status of Afghan refugees in Pakistan, a story of eight agreements and two suppressed premises. International Journal of Refugee Law 20 (2):253–72. doi:10.1093/ijrl/een014.
   Google Scholar