Moral Exclusion, Dehumanisation, and Continued Resistance to Return: Experiences of Refused Afghan Asylum Seekers in the Netherlands

References

• Achtnich, M. 2021. Waiting to move on: migration, borderwork and mobility economies in Libya. Geopolitics. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1919626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agamben, G. 1998. Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agamben, G. 2000. Means without end: notes on politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, L., S. Y. Cheung, and J. Phillimore. 2016. The asylum-integration paradox: comparing asylum support systems and refugee integration in the Netherlands and the UK. International Migration 54 (4):118–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabantseva, E., A. N. Mhurchú, and V. S. Peterson. 2021. Introduction: Engaging geopolitics through the lens of the intimate. Geopolitics 26 (2):343–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, A. 2014. Living in fear: rejected asylum seekers living as irregular migrants in England. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (10):1507–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBS (Centraal Bureau of Statistics). 2015. Asylum statistics. Accessed June 282018, 2021. statline.cbs.nl
   Google Scholar
• Chavez, L. R. 2007. The condition of illegality. International Migration 45 (3):192–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee of Ministers. 2015. ‘Resolution CM/ResChS(2015)5’. Accessed November 4, 2021. http://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng/?i=reschs-2015-5-en.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, H., J. Hemmings, and N. Price. 2011. Coping with destitution: survival and livelihood strategies of refused asylum seekers living in the UK. Oxfam GB. Accessed November 4, 2021. https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/wps/oxfam/0021554/f_0021554_17843.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davies, T., A. Isakjee, and S. Dhesi. 2017. Violent inaction: the necropolitical experience of refugees in Europe. Antipode 49 (5):1263–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Genova, N. 2002. Migrant “illegality” and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology 31 (1):419–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Genova, N. 2013. Spectacles of migrant ‘illegality’: the scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (7):1180–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriadi, A. 2017. In search of asylum: Afghan migrants in Greece. European Journal of Migration and Law 19 (1):57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, D., and S. Marston. 2011. Introduction: Feminist engagements with geopolitics. Gender, Place & Culture 18 (4):445–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutch News. 2014. German court says Dutch treatment of asylum seekers is inhumane. May 10. Accessed November 4, 2021. https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2014/05/german_court_says_dutch_treatm/
   Google Scholar
• Dutch News. 2015. UN human rights expert condemns Dutch refugee deal. April 23. Accessed June 2, 2021. https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2015/04/un-human-rights-expert-condemns-dutch-refugee-deal/
   Google Scholar
• ECSR. 2016. Assessment of the follow-up: Conference of European churches (CEC) v. the Netherlands, complaint no. 90/2013. Accessed November 4, 2021. http://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng/?i=cc-90-2013-Assessment-en.
   Google Scholar
• EEAA. 2020. Afghans lodge 72% more asylum applications in the EU+. December 2. Accessed February 2, 2022. https://euaa.europa.eu/news-events/afghans-lodge-72-more-asylum-applications-eu
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat, 2021. Asylum and first time asylum applicants by citizenship, age and sex Annual aggregated data (rounded). Accessed June 2, 2021. https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=migr_asyappctza&lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, D. 2009. Moral economies revisited. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 64 (6):1237–66.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, R. G., and L. R. Chavez. 2012. “Awakening to a nightmare”: abjectivity and illegality in the lives of undocumented 1.5-generation Latino immigrants in the United States. Current Anthropology 53 (3):255–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, R. G., and N. Sigona, eds. 2017. Within and beyond citizenship: borders, membership and belonging. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodale, M. 2016. Human values and moral exclusion. Ethics & Global Politics 9 (1):32957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselberg, I., 2014. Coerced to leave: Punishment and the surveillance of foreign-national offenders in the UK. Surveillance & Society 12 (4):471–484.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J. 2004. Mind the gap: bridging feminist and political geography through geopolitics. Political Geography 23 (3):307–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IND. 2021. IND is allowed to decide later on Afghan asylum applications. 27 August. Accessed November 4, 2021. https://ind.nl/en/news/Pages/IND-is-allowed-to-decide-later-on-Afghan-asylum-applications.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. C. 2017. Violence without moral restraint: reflections on the dehumanization of victims and victimizers. In The Criminology of War, ed. Jamieson R. ed., 145–181. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi, S. 2010. An ethnography of migrant “illegality” in Sweden: included yet excepted?. Journal of International Political Theory 6 (1):95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Klaas, J. 2017. Strategic litigation as a tool to help the Afghan 1F’ers in the Netherlands. February 16. European Database of Ayslum Law. Accessed June 2, 2021. https://www.asylumlawdatabase.eu/en/journal/strategic-litigation-tool-help-afghan-1f%E2%80%99ers-netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Kos, S., M. Maussen, and J. Doomernik. 2016. Policies of exclusion and practices of inclusion: how municipal governments negotiate asylum policies in the Netherlands. Territory, Politics, Governance 4 (3):354–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koser, K., and K. Kuschminder. 2015. Comparative research on the assisted voluntary return and reintegration of migrants. IOM, Geneva, Switzerland. Accessed June 2, 2021. https://returnandreintegration.iom.int/en/resources/study/comparative-research-assisted-voluntary-return-and-reintegration-migrants
   Google Scholar
• Kox, M., M. Boone, and R. Staring. 2020. The pains of being unauthorized in the Netherlands. Punishment & Society 22 (4):534–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leerkes, A. 2016. Back to the poorhouse? Social protection and social control of unauthorised immigrants in the shadow of the welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy 26 (2):140–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leerkes, A., E. Boersema, R. M. V. van Os, A. M. Galloway, and M. van Londen. 2014. Afgewezen en uit Nederland vertrokken? Een onderzoek naar de achtergronden van variatie in zelfstandige terugkeer onder uitgeprocedeerde asielzoekers. WODC. Accessed June 2, 2021. https://www.arjenleerkes.nl/Afgewezen%20en%20uit%20Nederland%20vertrokken.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leerkes, A., M. Galloway, and M. Kromhout. 2010. Kiezen tussen twee kwaden determinanten van blijf- en terugkeerintenties onder (bijna) uitgeprocedeerde asielmigranten. WODC. Accessed February 7, 2022. https://repository.wodc.nl/handle/20.500.12832/91
   Google Scholar
• Leerkes, A., and M. Kox. 2017. Pressured into a preference to leave? A study on the “specific” deterrent effects and perceived legitimacy of immigration detention. Law & Society Review 51 (4):895–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietaert, I., E. Broekaert, and I. Derluyn. 2015. The lived experiences of migrants in detention. Population, Space and Place 21 (6):568–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migration Policy Institute. 2021. Asylum recognition rates in the EU/EFTA by country, 2008-2017. Accessed June 2, 2021. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/charts/asylum-recognition-rates-euefta-country-2008-2017
   Google Scholar
• Mountz, A., and J. Hyndman. 2006. Feminist approaches to the global intimate. Women’s Studies Quarterly 34 (1/2):446–63.
   Google Scholar
• Opotow, S., J. Gerson, and S. Woodside. 2005. From moral exclusion to moral inclusion: theory for teaching peace. Theory into Practice 44 (4):303–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, S., and S. Koppes. 2018. Claiming control: cooperation with return as a condition for social benefits in Austria and the Netherlands. Comparative Migration Studies 6 (1):26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sajjad, T. 2018. What’s in a name? “refugees”, “migrants” and the politics of labelling. Race & Class 60 (2):40–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, L. 2011. Turning refugees into ‘illegal migrants’: Afghan asylum seekers in Europe. Ethnic and Racial Studies 34 (8):1392–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, L. 2020. Fatal flaws in the UK asylum decision-making system: an analysis of home office refusal letters. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (7):1371–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, L., and N. Majidi. 2013. What happens post-deportation? The experience of deported Afghans. Migration Studies 1 (2):221–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, K. 2009. The second destitute tally. London: Asylum Support Partnership Policy Report.
   Google Scholar
• Stierl, M. (2019). Migrant resistance in contemporary Europe. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, S. 2019. Living the spectre of forced return: Negotiating deportability in British immigration detention. Migration Studies 7 (4):513–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyerman T. (2021). Everyday borders in Calais: The globally intimate injustices of segregation. Geopolitics, 26(2), 464–485. doi:10.1080/14650045.2019.1631807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, I. 2013. Revolting subjects: social abjection and resistance in neoliberal Britain. London and New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• UNAMA/ UN Human Rights Office. 2021. Afghanistan protection of civilians in armed conflict annual report 2020. Accessed June 2, 2021. https://unama.unmissions.org/protection-of-civilians-reports
   Google Scholar
• Van der Leun, J., and H. Bouter. 2015. Gimme shelter: inclusion and exclusion of irregular immigrants in Dutch civil society. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 13 (2):135–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meeteren, M. 2014. Irregular migrants in Belgium and the Netherlands: aspirations and incorporation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandevoordt, R. 2020. Resisting bare life: civil solidarity and the hunt for illegalized migrants. International Migration 59 (3):47–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venturi, E., and A. I. Vallianatou. 2021. Why Europe must end limbo for Afghans seeking asylum. Chatham House. 14 October 2021. Accessed November 4, 2021. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/10/why-europe-must-end-limbo-afghans-seeking-asylum.
   Google Scholar
• Wijkhuis, L. J. J., A. M. Galloway, M. H. C. Kromhout, I. C. Van der Welle, and M. Smit. 2011. Pardon? Evaluatie van de regeling afwikkeling nalatenschap oude Vreemdelingenwet. Den Haag: WODC.
   Google Scholar
• Willen, S. S. 2012. Migration, “illegality”, and health: mapping embodied vulnerability and debating health-related deservingness. Social Science & Medicine (1982) 74 (6):805–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar