Intraregional Geopolitical Imaginaries in Europe: Hungary and Poland Vs. France and Germany

References

• Adler, E. 2013. Constructivism in international relations: Sources, contributions and debates. In Handbook of international relations, ed. W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B. A. Simmons, 112–44. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. 2016. The origins of critical geopolitics. In The ashgate research companion to critical geopolitics, ed. K. Dodds, M. Kuus, and J. P. Sharp, 19–32. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ambaras, David , Mcdonald, Kate. 2021. Imaginative geographies. Last modified April 6, 2021. Accessed April 6, 2021. https://scalar.chass.ncsu.edu/bodies-and-structures/imaginative-geographies
   Google Scholar
• Balogh, P. 2020. Clashing geopolitical self-images? The strange co-existence of christian bulwark and Eurasianism (Turanism) in Hungary. Eurasian Geography and Economics 1–27. doi:10.1080/15387216.2020.1779772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. 2006. How narratives explain. In Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn, ed. P. Schwartz-Shea and D. Yanow, 281–90. Armonk, N.Y: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. 2010. Anti-Foundationalism. In The Oxford Handbook of British politics, ed. M. Flinders, A. Gamble, C. Hay, and M. Kenny. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 115–137. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199230952.003.0007.
   Google Scholar
• Bialasiewicz, L., P. Giaccaria, A. Jones, and C. Minca. 2013. Re-scaling ‘EU’rope: EU macro-regional fantasies in the Mediterranean. European Urban and Regional Studies 20 (1):59–76. doi:10.1177/0969776412463372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojinović Fenko, A., M. Lovec, J. Požgan, and D. Crnčec. 2019. Euroscepticism as a functional pretext for populism in central and eastern European states: The Eurozone, migration and Ukrainian crises. TEORIJA IN PRAKSA LVI:391–417.
   Google Scholar
• Collignon, Stefan. 2018. Negative and positive liberty and the freedom to choose in Isaiah Berlin and Jean-Jacques Rousseau The Journal of Philosophical Economics: Reflections on Economic and Social Issues. 12 (1) :36–64. https://www.jpe.ro/pdf.php?id=8075.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkink, G. 1996. National identity and visions: Maps of pride and pain. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, K., M. Kuus, and J. P. Sharp. eds. 2016. The Ashgate Research Companion to critical geopolitics. Ashgate Research Companion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duda, A. 2018. The future of Europe: The foundations of unity of the states of Europe. Last modified August 3, 2021. Accessed August 3, 2021. https://www.president.pl/en/news/art,874,he-future-of-europe-the-foundations-of-unity–of-the-states-of-europe.html
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. 2008. Pragmatic analysis. In Qualitative methods in international relations: A pluralist guide, eds. A. Klotz and D. Prakash, 168–86. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G., and B. Frederking. 2009. Changing the rules: A speech act analysis of the end of the Cold War. International Studies Quarterly 53 (2):325–47. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00536.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2020. Democracy index 2020: In sickness and in health? Accessed March 30, 2021. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Epple, A., and K. Kramer. 2016. Globalization, imagination, social space: The making of geopolitical imaginaries. Fiar Forum for Inter-American Research 9 (1):41–63.
   Google Scholar
• Fierke, K. M. 1998. Changing games, changing strategies: Critical investigations in security/K.M. Fierke. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fierke, K. M. 2001. Critical methodology and constructivism. In Constructing international relations: The next generation/[edited by] karin m. Fierke and knud erik jørgensen, ed. K. M. Fierke and K. E. Jørgensen, 115–35. Armonk, N.Y: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Fierke, K. M. 2002. Links across the abyss: Language and logic in international relations. International Studies Quarterly 46 (3):331–54. doi:10.1111/1468-2478.00236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierke, K. M. 2010. Wittgenstein and international relations theory. In International relations theory and philosophy: Interpretive dialogues, eds. C. Moore and C. Farrands, 83–94. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fierke, K. M. 2012. Wittgenstein and international relations theory. In International relations theory and philosophy: Interpretive dialogues, eds. C. Moore and C. Farrands, 83–94. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fierke, K. M., and K. E. Jørgensen, ed. 2015. Constructing international relations: The next generation. International relations in a constructed world. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fierke, K. M. 2015. Critical methodology and constructivism. In Constructing international relations: The next generation, eds. K. M. Fierke and K. E. Jørgensen, 115–35. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fürstenau, M. 2022. German government: What are the chances for a ‘traffic light’ coalition? | DW | 07.10.2021. Last modified January 20, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2022. https://www.dw.com/en/german-government-what-are-the-chances-for-a-traffic-light-coalition/a-59441511
   Google Scholar
• Ganesh, B., and C. Froio. 2020. A “Europe des nations”: Far right imaginative geographies and the politicization of cultural crisis on twitter in Western Europe. Journal of European Integration 42 (5):715–32. doi:10.1080/07036337.2020.1792462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundy, P. 2020. Doing pragmatics. London: Routledge, Taylor et Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hargitai, T. 2020. How eurosceptic is fidesz actually?. Politics in Central Europe 16 (1):189–209. doi:10.2478/pce-2020-0009.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. 2017. The Oxford handbook of pragmatics. Oxford handbooks in linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J. 2000. Towards a feminist geopolitics. The inaugural Suzanne Mackenzie memorial lecture, Brock University. Accessed March 6, 2021. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/10976199.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kazharski, A. 2018. The end of ‘Central Europe’? The rise of the radical right and the contestation of identities in Slovakia and the Visegrad Four. Geopolitics 23 (4):754–80. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1389720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazharski, A. 2019. Two kinds of small? The ‘EU core’ in Slovak and Czech geopolitical imagination. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 27 (4):424–38. doi:10.1080/14782804.2019.1598340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz, A., and D. Prakash, ed. 2008. Qualitative methods in international relations: A pluralist guide. Research methods series. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kolár, T. 2016. The migration crisis and the rise of right-wing extremism and euroscepticism. The Institute for Politics and Society. Accessed March 31, 2021. https://www.politikaspolecnost.cz/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Kol%C3%A1r_Euroscepticism-and-Political-Radicalism.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kopytko, R. 2007. Philosophy and pragmatics: A language-game with Ludwig wittgenstein. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (5):792–812. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2009. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Kubalkova, V., ed. 2001. Foreign policy in a constructed world: International relations in a constructed world. Armonk, NY: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kubálková, V. 2001. A constructivist primer. In Foreign policy in a constructed world, ed. V. Kubalkova, 56–76. Armonk, NY: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. 2011. Policy and geopolitics: Bounding Europe in Europe. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (5):1140–55. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.577362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leruth, B., N. Startin, and S. M. Usherwood. 2018. Defining Euroscepticism: From a broad concept to a field of study. In The Routledge handbook of euroscepticism, eds. B. Leruth, N. Startin, and S. M. Usherwood, 3–10. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Light, D., and C. Young. 2009. European Union enlargement, post-accession migration and imaginative geographies of the ‘New Europe’: Media discourses in Romania and the United Kingdom. Journal of Cultural Geography 26 (3):281–303. doi:10.1080/08873630903322205.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, C. 2014. Interpreting international politics. Routledge series on interpretive methods. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macron, E. 2018. Speech by Emmanuel Macron, President of the Republic at European Parliament. Last modified August 3, 2021. Accessed August 3, 2021. https://www.elysee.fr/emmanuel-macron/2018/04/17/speech-by-emmanuel-macron-president-of-the-republic-at-european-parliament.en
   Google Scholar
• Marttila, T. 2016. Post-foundational discourse analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M., and D. Balázs. 2018. Modern silk road imaginaries and the co-production of space. In Rethinking the silk road: China’s belt and road initiative and emerging Eurasian relations, ed. M. Mayer, 205–26. Singapore: Springer Singapore; Imprint; Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McGinn, M. 1997. Routledge philosophy guidebook to Wittgenstein and the philosophical investigations. Routledge philosophy guidebooks. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Medby, I. A. 2019. Language-games, geography, and making sense of the Arctic. Geoforum 107:124–33. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel, A. 2018. Speech by Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel to the European Parliament, Strasbourg, 13 November 2018. Last modified August 3, 2021. Accessed August 3, 2021. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/news/speech-by-federal-chancellor-angela-merkel-to-the-european-parliament-strasbourg-13-november-2018-1550688
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S. 2002. EU eligibility, Central Europe, and the invention of applicant state narrative. Geopolitics 7 (3):89–116. doi:10.1080/714000971.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S. 2003. Back to Baltoscandia? European Union and geo-conceptual remaking of the European North. Geopolitics 8 (1):72–100. doi:10.1080/714001004.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S., V. Bachmann, L. Bialasiewicz, E. Dell’agnese, J. Dittmer, and V. Mamadouh. 2013. Mapping the political geographies of europeanization. Progress in Human Geography 37 (6):737–61. doi:10.1177/0309132512472093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moisio, S. 2015. Geopolitics/critical geopolitics. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Geography, eds. J. A. Agnew, V. Mamadouh, A. Secor, and J. Sharp, 220–34. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2011. Doing discourse analysis in critical geopolitics. L’Espace Politique 12. doi:10.4000/espacepolitique.1743.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Tuathail, G. 2002. Theorizing practical geopolitical reasoning: The case of the United States’ response to the war in Bosnia. Political Geography 21 (5):601–28. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00009-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onuf, N. 1997. A constructivist manifesto. In Constituting International Political Economy, ed. K. Burch and R. A. Denemark, 7–17. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Onuf, N. 1998. Constructivism: A user’s manual. In International relations in a constructed world, ed. N. G. Onuf, P. Kowert, and V. Kubalkova, 58–78. Armonk, N.Y: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Onuf, N. 1999. A constructivist manifesto. In Constituting International Political Economy, ed. K. Burch and R. Denemark, 7–20. Boulder, Colo: Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 2013. In World of our making: Rules and rule in social theory and international relations, Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge. 978-0-415-63039-9.
   Google Scholar
• Orbán, V. 2018. About Hungary - Viktor Orbán’s speech at the Visegrád Group Conference “The Future of Europe”. Last modified August 3, 2021. Accessed August 3, 2021. http://abouthungary.hu/speeches-and-remarks/viktor-orbans-speech-at-the-visegrad-group-conference-the-future-of-europe/
   Google Scholar
• Parker-Ryan, S. n.d. Ordinary language philosophy | Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Last modified January 18, 2022. Accessed January 18, 2022. https://iep.utm.edu/ord-lang/#H3
   Google Scholar
• Pastorella, G. 2018. LSE European politics and policy (Europp) blog: When Europe is fashionable: The strange paradox of the Italian elections. Accessed July 6, 2021. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/88724/1/europpblog-2018-02-15-when-europe-is-fashionable-the-strange-paradox.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paulovicova, N., and T. Stępniewski. 2020. Central and Eastern Europe: Imaginary geographies, geopolitics and security issues. Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej 18 (1):7–22. doi:10.36874/RIESW.2020.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. M. 2002. Speech acts and agents: A semantic analysis. Accessed January 4, 2021. http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/pubdb/edoc/imm880.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A. 2020. Language-games philosophy: Language-games as rationality and method. Educational Philosophy and Theory 1–7. doi:10.1080/00131857.2020.1821190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pin-Fat, V. 1997. Why aren’t we laughing? Grammatical investigations in world politics. Politics 17 (2):79–86. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.00037.
   Google Scholar
• Rajaram, P. K. 2016. Europe’s ‘Hungarian solution’. Radical Philosophy 197:2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. 2020. Hungarian border politics as an anti-politics of the European Union. Geopolitics 25 (3):658–77. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1548438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serhan, Y. 2021. The last chance to stop autocracy in Hungary. The Atlantic, July 6. Accessed February 7, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Shoorcheh, M. 2019. On the spatiality of geographic knowledge. Asian Geographer 36 (1):63–80. doi:10.1080/10225706.2018.1463854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, P., A. Szczerbiak, and P. A. Taggart. 2008. Opposing Europe? Vol. 2: The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism. New York: Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• van Efferink, L. 2010. Martin Lewis: Metageographies, postmodernism and fallacy of unit comparability - exploring geopolitics. Last modified February 9, 2019. Accessed February 18, 2022. https://exploringgeopolitics.org/interview_lewis_martin_metageographies_postmodernism_fallacy_of_unit_comparability_historical_spatial_ideological_development_constructs_taxonomy_ideas_systems/
   Google Scholar
• van Middelaar, L. 2020. Europe’s existential crisis: With the fight over the rule of law, the eu has to choose between its values and its geographical ambitions. Accessed May 6, 2021. https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-existential-crisis-rule-of-law-hungary-poland/
   Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulou, S. 2018. Theory, concepts and research design in the study of euroscepticism. In The Routledge Handbook of Euroscepticism, eds. B. Leruth, N. Startin, and S. M. Usherwood, 22–35. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wehrmann, D. 2018. Critical geopolitics of the polar regions: An inter-American perspective/Dorothea wehrmann. InterAmerican research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Y. D. 2015. Spatiality of regional inequality. Applied Geography 61:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigen, E. 2015. Two-level language games: International relations as inter-lingual relations. European Journal of International Relations 21 (2):427–50. doi:10.1177/1354066114541878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M., and M. Ossewaarde. 2018. The political vision of Europe during the ‘refugee crisis’: Missing common ground for integration. Journal of European Integration 40 (1):33–50. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1404054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wydra, D. 2020. Between normative visions and pragmatic possibilities: The European politics of state recognition. Geopolitics 25 (2):315–45. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1556643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xanthos, Nicolas. 2006. Wittgenstein’s Language Games. In Louis Hébert (dir.), Signo [online], Rimouski (Quebec). Last modified August 3, 2021. Accessed August 3, 2021. http://www.signosemio.com/wittgenstein/language-games.asp
   Google Scholar
• Yule, G. 2010. Pragmatics. Oxford introductions to language study. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Pr.
   Google Scholar