The Geopolitics of Returns: Geopolitical Reasoning and Space-Making in Turkey’s Repatriation Regime

References

• AA. 2019. Erdogan speaks at 74th UNGA on safe zone in Syria. September 24. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dc8at5RnRdU.
   Google Scholar
• AA. 2021. Geri Gonderme Merkezi. Accessed March 22, 2021.https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/geri-gonderme-merkezlerinde-en-fazla-irakli-yabanci-terorist-savasci-bulunuyor/1646340
   Google Scholar
• Abdelaaty, L. E. 2021. Discrimination and delegation: Explaining state responses to refugees. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adamson, F. B., and G. Tsourapas. 2018. Migration diplomacy in world politics. International Studies Perspectives 20 (2):113–28. doi:10.1093/isp/eky015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adar, S.2020 Introduction repatriation to Turkey’s “Safe Zone” in Northeast Syria. SWP Comment, No.1. https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2020C01_ada.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, W. 2017. The fate of durable solutions in protracted refugee situations. Journal for Social Justice 15 (3):591–661.
   Google Scholar
• AI. 2019. Sent to a War Zone: Turkey’s Illegal Deportation of Syrian Refugees. October 25, Amnesty International. Accessed May 26, 2022. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur44/1102/2019/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Altıok, B., and S. Tosun. 2020. Understanding foreign policy strategies during migration movements: A comparative study of Iraqi and Syrian mass refugee inflows to Turkey. Turkish Studies 21 (5):684–704. doi:10.1080/14683849.2019.1709055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amnesty. 2021. Denmark: “Syria is not safe”. May 18. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2021/05/denmark-syria-is-not-safe-nationwide-demonstrations-against-return-of-syrian-refugees/.
   Google Scholar
• Aras, N. E. G., and Z. S. Mencutek. 2019. Border management and migration controls: Turkey. Report. Accessed March 2, 2021. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2rcent3A1349261&dswid=−147.
   Google Scholar
• Ashutosh, I., and A. Mountz. 2012. The geopolitics of migrant mobility: Tracing state relations through refugee claims, boats, and discourses. Geopolitics 17 (2):335–54. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14650045.2011.567315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslan, M. 2019. Turkey’s reconstruction model in Syria. Ankara: SETA. https://setav.org/en/assets/uploads/2019/04/R139Syria.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Asseburg, M. 2020. Reconstruction in Syria challenges and policy options for the EU and its member states. SWP Research Paper, July 11. https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/research_papers/2020RP11_ReconstructionSyria.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2022. Düzensiz Göç. May 4. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-61319972.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin, P. 2012. Turkey’s ‘geopolitics dogma’. The Return of Geopolitics in Europe?: Social Mechanisms and Foreign Policy, edited by S. Guzzini, 151–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, R., and K. Kosher. 1999. End of refugee circle. eds. Berghahn Books: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Blitz, B., R. Sales, and L. Marzano. 2005. Non-voluntary return? The politics of return to Afghanistan. Political Studies 53:182–200. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00523.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrelli, L., P. Pinkerton, H. Safouane, A. Jünemann, S. Göttsche, S. Scheel, and C. Oelgemöller. 2021. Agency within mobility: Conceptualising the geopolitics of migration management. Geopolitics. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2021.1973733. Advance online publication.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. 2013. Refugee repatriation: Justice, responsibility and redress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. 2021. Realising the right of return: Refugees’ roles in localising norms and socialising UNHCR. Geopolitics. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1994399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cemgil, C. 2021. The geopolitics of democratic confederalism in Syria. Geopolitics 26 (4):1046–74. doi:10.1080/14650045.2019.1691998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chimni, B. S. 1998. The geopolitics of refugee studies: A view from the South. Journal of Refugee Studies 11 (4):350–74. doi:10.1093/jrs/11.4.350-a.
   Google Scholar
• Chimni, B. S. 2002. Refugees, return and reconstruction of ‘post-conflict’ SOCIETIES. International Peacekeeping 9 (2):163–80. doi:10.1080/714002734.
   Google Scholar
• Cobarrubias, S. 2020. Beyond the European Union’s neighbourhood: Liberation geographies in the Mediterranean. Geopolitics 25 (4):887–915. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1508015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. B. 2003. Geopolitics of the world system. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Collyer, M. 2012. Deportation and the micropolitics of exclusion: The rise of removals from the UK to Sri Lanka. Geopolitics 17 (2):276–92. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.562940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collyer, M. 2016. Geopolitics as a migration governance strategy: European Union bilateral relations with Southern Mediterranean countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (4):606–24. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2015.1106111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté-Boucher, K., F. Infantino, and M. B. Salters. 2014. Border security as practice: An agenda for research. Security Dialogue 45 (3):195–208. doi:10.1177/0967010614533243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, J., and K. Long. 2016. Safe and voluntary refugee repatriation: From principle to practice. Journal on Migration and Human Security 4 (3):141–47. doi:10.1177/233150241600400305.
   Google Scholar
• De Genova, N. 2016. Detention, deportation, and waiting: Toward a theory of migrant detainability. Geneva: Global Detention.
   Google Scholar
• DGMM. 2021. Distribution of Syrians under temporary protection by year. Last updated February 17. Accessed March 01, 2021. https://en.goc.gov.tr/temporary-protection27.
   Google Scholar
• Dinçer, O. B., and M. Hecan. 2021. Turkey’s Syria policy: The political opportunities and pitfalls of the syrian conflict. In Striking from the margins, ed. A. N. al-Azmeh. N. Al-Bagdadi, H. Hasan, H. Akdedian, 255–282. London: Saqi Books. https://www.amazon.com/Striking-Margins-Religion-Devolution-Authority/dp/086356139X.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2020. Brussels, SWD(2020) 355, Turkey 2020 report. Accessed January 10, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/turkey_report_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ECRE. 2021. Turkey: Country report. Update. Asylum information database. ECRE. Accessed May 26, 2022. http://www.asylumineurope.org/reports/country/turkey/exclusion-and-cancellation-temporary-protection.
   Google Scholar
• Elitok, S. P. 2013. Turkish migration policy over the last decade. Turkish Policy Quarterly 12 (1):161–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ellermann, A. 2008. The limits of unilateral migration control: Deportation and inter-state cooperation. Government and Opposition 43 (2):168–89. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00248.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdoğan, M. 2020. Turkey: Syrian Barometer 2019. UNHCR. Accessed March 20, 2021. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/78901.
   Google Scholar
• Erzurum. 2018. Afganistan´dan Erzurum´a heyet geldi. April 06. http://erzurumgunebakis.com/haber/afganistandan-erzuruma-heyet-geldi-sorun-cozuldu-yuruyerek-geldiler-ucakla-donecekler-10553.html.
   Google Scholar
• Essuman-Johnson, A. 2011. When refugees don’t go home: The situation of Liberian refugees in Ghana. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 9 (2):105–26. doi:10.1080/15562948.2011.567139.
   Google Scholar
• EU Pact 2020. Communication from the Commission on a New Pact on Migration and Asylum. 23 September 2020. Communication from the Commission on a New Pact on Migration and Asylum. Accessed May 5, 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0609.
   Google Scholar
• Fakhoury, T. 2021. Refugee return and fragmented governance in the host state: Displaced Syrians in the face of Lebanon’s divided politics. Third World Quarterly 42 (1):162–80. doi:10.1080/01436597.2020.1762485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakhoury, T., and N. Stel. 2022. EU engagement with contested refugee returns in Lebanon: The aftermath of resilience. Geopolitics 1–26. doi:10.1080/14650045.2022.2025779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freier, L. F., N. R. Micinski, and G. Tsourapas. 2021. Refugee commodification: The diffusion of refugee rent-seeking in the Global South. Third World Quarterly 42 (11):2747–66. doi:10.1080/01436597.2021.1956891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerver, M. 2018. The ethics and practice of refugee repatriation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerver, M. 2018. The Ethics and Practice of Refugee Repatriation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/46537.
   Google Scholar
• Gibney, M. J. 2013. Is deportation a form of forced migration? Refugee Survey Quarterly 32 (2):116–29. doi:10.1093/rsq/hdt003.
   Google Scholar
• Gocgov. 2019. Accessed March 20, 2020. https://www.goc.gov.tr/uluslararasi-af-orgutunun-suriyelilerin-hukuka-aykiri-olarak-sinir-disi-edildigi-iddiasina-iliskin-basin-aciklamasi.
   Google Scholar
• Gocgov. 2020. Istatistikler. November. https://www.goc.gov.tr/uluslararasi-koruma-istatistikler.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, A. 2020. The deportation machine: America’s long history of expelling immigrants. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhill, K. 2008. Strategic engineered migration as a weapon of war. Civil Wars 10 (1):6–21. doi:10.1080/13698240701835425.
   Google Scholar
• Haberturk. 2022. Malatya’da 908 düzensiz göçmen. April 25. Accessed May 3, 2022. https://www.haberturk.com/malatyada-908-duzensiz-gocmen-ulkelerine-gonderildi-3419894.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, C., and K. Grabska. 2015. Flight and exile—Uncertainty in the context of conflict-induced displacement. Social Analysis 59 (1):1–18. doi:10.3167/sa.2015.590101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HRW. 2019. Turkey: Syrians being deported to danger. Accessed Januay 20, 2021. https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/10/24/turkey-syrians-being-deported-danger.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J. 2012. The geopolitics of migration and mobility. Geopolitics 17 (2):243–55. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.569321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Icduygu, A. 2004. Demographic mobility and Turkey: Migration experiences and government responses. Mediterranean Quarterly 15 (4):88–99. doi:10.1215/10474552-15-4-88.
   Google Scholar
• Icduygu, A., and M. Nimer. 2020. The politics of return: Exploring the future of Syrian refugees in Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey. Third World Quarterly 41 (3):415–33. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1675503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isleyen, B. 2018. Transit mobility governance in Turkey. Political Geography 62:23–32. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabul, G. 2021. News, Accessed May 3, 2022. https://www.goc.gov.tr/arama/ara/geri%20kabul.
   Google Scholar
• Karadağ, S., and A. Üstübici 2021. Protection during pre-pandemic and COVID-19 periods in Turkey. Accessed October 10, 2021. https://admigov.eu/upload/Deliverable_42_Protection_COVID19_Turkey_Karadag_Ustubici.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Karar. 2018. Accessed January 10, 2020. https://www.karar.com/yildirimdan-yasa-disi-goc-aciklamasi-anlasmaya-vardik812236.
   Google Scholar
• Kaytaz, E. S. 2021. Held at the gates of Europe: Barriers to abolishing immigration detention in Turkey. Citizenship Studies 25 (2):203–23. doi:10.1080/13621025.2020.1859192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirisci, K. 1996. Is Turkey lifting the ‘Geographical Limitation’? – The November 1994 regulation on Asylum in Turkey. International Journal of Refugee Law 8 (3):293. doi:10.1093/ijrl/8.3.293.
   Google Scholar
• Kirisci, K. 2012. Turkey’s new draft law on asylum. In Turkey, migration and the EU, ed. S. P. Elitok and T. Straubhaar, 63–83. Hamburg: HWWI.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, A. 2014. The politics and discourse of migrant return: The role of UNHCR and IOM in the governance of return. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (6):905–23. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2013.855073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkut, U. 2016. Pragmatism, moral responsibility or policy change: The Syrian refugee crisis and selective humanitarianism in the Turkish refugee regime. Comparative Migration Studies 4 (1):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, O. T. 2011. Along the BORGESIAN FRONTIER: Excavating the neighbourhood of “Wider Europe”. Geopolitics 16 (1):193–210. doi:10.1080/14650045.2010.493786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krichker, D. 2021. Making Sense of Borderscapes: Space, Imagination and Experience. Geopolitics 26 (4):1224–42. doi:10.1080/14650045.2019.1683542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutz, W., and S. Wolff. 2020. Urban geopolitics and the decentring of migration diplomacy in EU-Moroccan affairs. Geopolitics. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1843438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LFIP. 2013. Law on Foreigners and International Protection Law No: 6458. Accessed January 10, 2020. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.6458.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lietaert, I., and L. V. Gorp. 2019. Talking across borders: Successful re-entry in different strands of re-entry literature. International Migration 57 (4):105–20. doi:10.1111/imig.12544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, K. 2013. The point of no return: refugees, rights, and repatriation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mamadouh, V., and G. Dijkink. 2006. Geopolitics, international relations and political geography: The politics of geopolitical discourse. Geopolitics 11 (3):349–66. doi:10.1080/14650040600767859.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L. 2012. ‘Catch and remove’: Detention, deterrence, and discipline in US noncitizen family detention practice. Geopolitics 17 (2):312–34. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.554463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mencutek, Z. S. 2021. Governing practices and strategic narratives for Syrian refugee returns. Journal of Refugee Studies 34 (3):2804–26. doi:10.1093/jrs/feaa121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mencutek, Z. S. 2022. The institutionalization of “Voluntary” Returns in Turkey. Migration and Society 5 (1):43–58. doi:10.3167/arms.2022.050105.
   Google Scholar
• Mielke, K. 2022. Calculated informality in governing (Non)return: An evolutionary governance perspective. Geopolitics 1–24. doi:10.1080/14650045.2022.2052854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MMC 2019. Distant dreams: Understanding the aspirations of Afghan returnees. Mixed Migration Center. Accessed January 10, 2020. https://returnandreintegration.iom.int/en/resources/report/distant-dreams-understanding-aspirations-afghan-returnees.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, K. P. 2020. Reluctant reception: refugees, migration and governance in the Middle East and North Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NSC. 2019a. Press release. Milli Güvenlik Kurulu, September 30. https://www.mgk.gov.tr/index.php/30-eylul-2019-tarihli-toplanti.
   Google Scholar
• NSC. 2019b. Press release. Milli Güvenlik Kurulu, November 26. https://www.mgk.gov.tr/index.php/26-kasim-2019-tarihli-toplanti.
   Google Scholar
• NSC. 2020. Press release. Milli Güvenlik Kurulu, June 02. https://www.mgk.gov.tr/index.php/02-haziran-2020-tarihli-toplanti.
   Google Scholar
• Oomkens, A., and B. Kalir. 2020. Legal and operational infrastructures of exit regimes in Europe. AdMiGov Paper D2.1. Amsterdam: UvA.
   Google Scholar
• Pajhwok. 2018. No forced deportations. May 10. Accessed March 28, 2022. https://pajhwok.com/2018/05/10/no-forced-deportations-turkey-says-barakzai/.
   Google Scholar
• Pascucci, E. 2016. Transnational disruptions: Materialities and temporalities of transnational citizenship among Somali refugees in Cairo. Global Networks 16 (3):326–43. doi:10.1111/glob.12115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat, R. K. 2018. Religious solidarity, historical mission and moral superiority: Construction of external and internal ‘others’ in AKP’s discourses on Syrian refugees in Turkey. Critical Discourse Studies 15 (5):500–16. doi:10.1080/17405904.2018.1500925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V. 2015. Practice tracing. In Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool, ed. A. Bennett and J. T. Checkel, 237–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qadim, N. E. 2014. Postcolonial challenges to migration control: French–Moroccan cooperation practices on forced returns. Security Dialogue 45 (3):242–61. doi:10.1177/0967010614533139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabah, D. 2021. Accessed November 10, 2021. https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/diplomacy/turkey-qatar-uae-may-operate-kabul-airport-trilaterally.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, L. 2011. Turning refugees into ‘illegal migrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies 34 (8):1392–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. 2021 Return without Refoulement: How states avoid hosting refugees after recognition. Paper presented ın Authors workshop at Centre of Global Cooperatıon Research, 27 March 2021.
   Google Scholar
• SJAC. 2021. Refuge No More: The Danger of Forced Return to Syria. Syrian Justice and Accountability Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Sökefeld, M. 2019. Nations rebound: German politics of deporting Afghans. International Quarterly for Asian Studies 50 (1–2):91–118.
   Google Scholar
• Spathopoulou, A., A. Carastathis, and M. Tsilimpounidi. 2020. ‘Vulnerable refugees’ and ‘Voluntary deportations’: Performing the hotspot, embodying its violence. Geopolitics 1–27. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1772237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stel, N. 2020. Hybrid political order and the politics of uncertainty: Refugee governance in Lebanon. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strategy. 2017–21. Strategic plan 2017–2021. Göç İdaresi. Accessed March 10, 2021. https://www.goc.gov.tr/stratejik-planlar.
   Google Scholar
• Strategy. 2019–23. Strategic plan 2019–2023. Göç İdaresi. Accessed March 10, 2021. https://www.goc.gov.tr/stratejik-planlar.
   Google Scholar
• Sunata, U., and S. Erduran. 2021. Practicing law in administrative detention for Syrian Refugees in Turkey. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, Early Print 1–15. doi:10.1080/15562948.2021.1926611.
   Google Scholar
• Sundaram, S. S. 2020. Strategic legitimation through rhetorical dissociation in international relations. Journal of Global Security Studies, Early Print. doi:10.1093/jogss/ogaa001.
   Google Scholar
• TBMM. 2019. Genel Kurul Tutanağı, 24 October https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/develop/owa/tutanak_sd.birlesim_baslangic?P4=23352&P5=H&PAGE1=6&PAGE2=&web_user_id=19505864.
   Google Scholar
• TBMM. 2020. Genel Kurul Tutanağı. 5 November https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/develop/owa/tutanak_sd.birlesim_baslangic?P4=23503&P5=H&PAGE1=24&PAGE2=&web_user_id=19506038
   Google Scholar
• Tetik, M. O. 2019. The construction of containment anxiety. New Middle Eastern Studies 9 (1):69–95.
   Google Scholar
• TİKA. 2019. Türkiye Kalkınma Yardımları Raporları 2019. Accessed March 28, 2022. https://www.tika.gov.tr/upload/sayfa/publication/2019/TurkiyeKalkinma2019Web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• TİKA. 2020. TİKA’dan Afganistan’da 15 Yılda 1300ʹden Fazla Proje ve Faaliyet. December 21. Accessed March 28, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• TPR 2014. Turkey: Temporary Protection Regulation, 22 October 2014, Accessed October 22, 2014. https://www.refworld.org/docid/56572fd74.html.
   Google Scholar
• Triandafyllidou, A. 2020. Decentering the study of migration governance. Geopolitics, Early Print. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1839052.
   Google Scholar
• TRT Haber. 2020. Bakan Soylu. Accessed March 26, 2022. https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/bakan-soylu-414-bin-61-suriyeli-gonullu-olarak-ulkesine-dondu-523516.html.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M., and F. P. Kühn. 2016. Introduction. In The politics of international intervention: The tyranny of peace, ed. M. Turner and F. P. Kühn, 1–19. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2018. Global compact on refugees. New York: UN. Accessed March 20, 2021. https://www.unhcr.org/5c658aed4.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 1994. Note on temporary protection in a broader context. UNHCR, January 1. Accessed October 7, 2021. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b32514.html.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 1997. Statement by Mrs. Sadako Ogata. Accessed November 10, 2020. https://www.unhcr.org/en-us/admin/hcspeeches/3ae68fae8/statement-mrs-sadako-ogata-united-nations-high-commissioner-refugees-interaction.html.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2003. Framework for durable solutions UNHCR Geneva. Accessed May 26, 2022. https://www.unhcr.org/partners/partners/3f1408764/framework-durable-solutions-refugees-persons-concern.html?query=Framework%20for%20Durable%20Solution.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2019. Accessed January 20, 2020. https://www.unhcr.org/tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2019/08/UNHCR-Turkey-Operational-Update-June-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Voanews. 2021. Accessed March 22, 2021. https://www.voanews.com/a/europe_turkish-officials-say-deportation-centers-packed-afghan-refugees/6210189.html.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, et al. 2021. Deportation. In Minor keywords of political theory, ed. De Genova, et al., 73–80. EPC: Politics and Space. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2399654420988563.
   Google Scholar
• Yanık, L. K. 2009. The metamorphosis of metaphors of vision. Geopolitics 14 (3):531–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zardo, F. 2020. The EU trust fund for Africa. Geopolitics, Early Print. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1815712.
   Google Scholar
• Zeager, L. A., and J. B. Bascom. 1996. Strategic behavior in refugee repatriation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 40 (3):460–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeager, L. A. 1998. Negotiations for refugee repatriation or local settlements. International Studies Quarterly 42 (2):367–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar