Border Settlement Dynamics and Border Status Quo: A Comparative Analysis of Turkey’s Borders

References

• Al-Muallim, W. 1998. Suriyah 1916–1946: Al-tariq ila-l-huriyah [Syria 1916–1943: The Road toFreedom]. Damascus. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=z-iKDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT219&dq=Al-Muallim,+W.+1998.+Suriyah+1916–1946:+al-tariq+ila-l-huriyah&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj2y-njmon4AhXASfEDHdHGBjEQ6AF6BAgEEAI#v=onepage&q=Al-Muallim%2C%20W.%201998.%20Suriyah%201916–1946%3A%20al-tariq%20ila-l-huriyah&f=false
   Google Scholar
• Alhassan, N. 2021. Once again, Iraq at crossroads. Middle East Institute, Accessed April 30, 2021. https://www.mei.edu
   Google Scholar
• Ali, O. 2017. The Career of Ozdemir: A Turkish bid for Northern Iraq, 1921–1923. Middle Eastern Studies 53 (6):966–85. doi:10.1080/00263206.2017.1332595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljazeera. 2016. Battle for Mosul: Turkey confirms military involvement, 24 October. Accessed May 13, 2021. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/10/24/battle-for-mosul-turkey-confirms-military-involvement
   Google Scholar
• Altug, S. 2020. The Turkish-Syrian border and politics of difference in Turkey and Syria(1921–1939). In Syria: Borders, Boundaries, and the State, ed. Matthieu Cimino. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 47-71.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., and L. O’ Dowd. 2010. Borders, border regions and territoriality: Contradictory meanings, changing significance. Regional Studies 33 (7):593–604. doi:10.1080/00343409950078648.
   Google Scholar
• Aral, B. 2001. Dispensing with tradition? Turkish politics and International Society during the Özal Decade, 1983-93. Middle Eastern Studies 37 (1):72–88. doi:10.1080/714004360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aras, T. R. 1926. The minute of grand national assembly of Turkey (in Turkish) 2nd period. 115. Ankara: TBMM Print.
   Google Scholar
• As, E. 2010. XVI. YY. dan Cumhuriyetin İlk Yıllarına Kadar Türk-İran Sınır Sorunları ve Çözümü. Atatürk Yolu Dergisi 46:219–53.
   Google Scholar
• Asır, Y. 2017. Musul ve Kerkük’te babamın dediği çıktı [ What my father said came true in Mosul and Kirkuk]. 23 September. Accessed July 23, 2021. https://www.yeniasir.com.tr/gundem/2017/09/23/musul-ve-kerkukte-babamin-dedigi-cikti.
   Google Scholar
• Atabaki, T. 2006. Iran and the First World War: Battleground of the great powers. London: I.B.
   Google Scholar
• Atatürk, M. K. 1920. The minutes of the grand assembly of Turkey (in Turkish), the 8th meeting, the 2nd session. Ankara: The Grand Assembly of Turkey Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ates, S. 2013. Ottoman-Iranian borderlands: Making a boundary, 1843-1914. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Atzili, B. 2012. Good fences, bad neighbors: Border fixity and international conflict. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri, S. 2017. Turkish military intervention in Mosul: A legal and political perspective. EJIL: Talk! Accessed May 13, 2021. https://www.ejiltalk.org/turkish-military-intervention-in-mosul-a-legal-and-political-perspective/
   Google Scholar
• Barlas, M. 2005. Musul’u almak. Sabah, 5 January. Accessed May 7, 2021. https://www.sabah.com.tr/yazarlar/barlas/2005/01/05/ata_nin_vasiyeti_neden_yerine_getirilmedi
   Google Scholar
• Barlas, D. 2014. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin Kuruluş Döneminde Hatay. In Unutulmuş Krallık: Antik Alalah’ta Arkeoloji ve Fotoğraf, ed. M. Akar and H. Maloigne. İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları. p. 20-34.
   Google Scholar
• Baud, M., and W. van Shendel. 1997. Towards a comparative history of borderlands. Journal of World History 8 (2):211–42. doi:10.1353/jwh.2005.0061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC Turkce. 2016. Erdogan: Trübunden izlemeyecegiz. Accessed October 22, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/37740210.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, P. J. 1981. A tedious and perilous controversy’: Britain and the settlement of the mosul dispute, 1918–1926. Middle Eastern Studies 17 (2):256–76. doi:10.1080/00263208108700471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biger, G. 2015. Turkey-Syria. In Border disputes: A global encyclopedia Vol I, ed. E. B. Jailly. Santa Barbara: ABCCLIO. p. 435-441.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, J. F. 2005. Linking border disputes and war: An institutional-statist theory. Geopolitics 10 (4):688–711.
   Google Scholar
• Bloombergth. 2017. MGK bildirisinde altı çizilen uluslararası haklar neler? Accessed September 11, 2021. https://www.bloomberght.com/haberler/haber/2050396-mgk-bildirisinde-alti-cizilen-uluslararasi-haklar-neler.
   Google Scholar
• Bozarslan, H. 2002. Kürd Milliyetciligi ve Kürd Hareketi (1898-2000). In Modern Türkiye’de Siyasal Düşünce: Milliyetçilik, ed. T. Bora. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of the Geographer. 1978. International Boundary Study no. 163: Syria and Turkey boundary. Accessed June 11, 2021. https://fall.fsulawrc.com/collection/LimitsinSeas/IBS163.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 1924. The treaties of peace 1919-1923. Vol. II. New York. p. 841-870. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/article/abs/the-treaties-of-peace-19191923-new-york-carnegie-endowment-for-international-peace-1924-2-vols-pp-1098-300/30599B2856E1C160E53756B5D68EBC10
   Google Scholar
• Çetinsaya, G. 1999. Atatürk Dönemi Türkiye-İran İlişkileri (1926-1938). Avrasya Dosyasi 5 (3):148–75.
   Google Scholar
• Cimino, M. 2020. Syria: Borders, Boundaries, and the State. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cons, J. 2016. Sensitive space: Fragmented territory at the India-Bangladeshi border. University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coşar, N., and S. Demirci. 2006. The mosul question and the Turkish republic: Before and after the frontier treaty, 1926. Middle Eastern Studies 42 (1):123–32. doi:10.1080/00263200500399611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cribb, R., and L. Narangoa. 2004. Orphans of empire: Divided peoples, dilemmas of identity, and old imperial borders in East and Southeast Asia. Comparative Studies in Society and History 46 (1):164–87. doi:10.1017/S0010417504000088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culcasi, K. 2016. Images and imaginings of palestine: Territory and everyday geopolitics for palestinian jordanians. Geopolitics 21 (1):69–91. doi:10.1080/14650045.2015.1100993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagtas, S. 2018. Nationalism, displacement, and ethnoreligious differentiation in Turkey’s southern borderlands. Dialect Anthropology 42 (4):359–72. doi:10.1007/s10624-017-9481-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, F. M., and Z. W. I. 2002. A strategic vision for Africa: The Kampala movement. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erim, N. 1952. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin Kuzeydoğu ve Doğu Sınırları. AÜ Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 9:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Firat, M., and O. Kurkcuoglu. 2011. Sancak (Hatay Sorunu) [The Problem of Hatay]. In Turk Dis Politikasi: Kurtulus Savasindan Bugune Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar I: 1919- 1980 [Turkish Foreign Policy: Facts, Documents, Comments Since the War of Independence], ed. B. Oran. İstanbul: Iletisim Yayınları. p. 279-280.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, T. 2003. The ground without foundation? Territory as a social construct. Geopolitics 8 (2):7–24. doi:10.1080/714001038.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin-Bouillon/Ankara agreement. 1921. Accessed July 3, 2021. http://www.hri.org/docs/FT1921/Franco-Turkish_Pact_1921.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gerede, H. 1952. Siyasi Hatıralarım I: İran 1930-1934. Istanbul: Vakit Yayınları. My political memories: Iran 1930-1934.
   Google Scholar
• Getachew, A. 2019. Worldmaking after empire: The rise and fall of self-determination. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibler, D. M. 2017. What they fight for: Specific territorial issues in militarized interstate disputes, 1816–2001. Conflict Management and Peace Science 34 (2):194–211. doi:10.1177/0738894216653382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibler, D. M., and A. P. Owsiak. 2018. Democracy and the settlement of international borders,1919 to 2001. Journal of Conflict Resolution 62 (9):1847–75. doi:10.1177/0022002717708599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gökmen, Y. 1994. Özal Yaşasaydı. Ankara: Verso Yayıncılık. Had Özal lived.
   Google Scholar
• Grube, D. C. 2016. Sticky words? Towards a theory of rhetorical path dependency. Australian Journal of Political Science 51 (3):530–45. doi:10.1080/10361146.2016.1171824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guclu, Y. 2006. The controversy over the delimitation of the Turco-Syrian frontier in the period between the Two World Wars. Middle Eastern Studies 42 (4):641–57. doi:10.1080/00263200600642357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambly, G. R. G. 2008. The Pahlavi autocracy: Riza Shah, 1921-1941. In The Cambridge History of Iran: From Nadir Shah to the Islamic Republic, ed. P. Avery, G. Hambly, and C. Merville. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 213-244.
   Google Scholar
• Houtum, V. H. 2005. The geopolitics of borders and boundaries. Geopolitics 10 (4):672–79. doi:10.1080/14650040500318522.
   Google Scholar
• Hurriyet. 2017. Ak Partili vekil: ‘MGK Bildirisinin tercümesi, Irak bölünürse Musul ve Kerkük yolu gözükür. Hurriyet. Accessed June 7, 2021. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/ak-partili-vekil-mgk-bildirisinin-tercumesi-irak-bolunurse-musul-ve-kerkuk-yolu-gozukur-40587797.
   Google Scholar
• Huth, P. K. 1996. Enduring rivalries and territorial disputes, 1950-1990. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 (1):7–41. doi:10.1177/073889429601500102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huth, P. K., and T. L. Allee. 2004. The democratic peace and territorial conflict in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikome, F. N. 2012. Africa’s International borders as potential sources of conflict and future threats to peace and security. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• International Boundary Study. 1964. Iran-Turkey boundary. Accessed April 29, 2021. https://fall.fsulawrc.com/collection/LimitsinSeas/IBS028.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. 2012. Spaces of refusal: Rethinking sovereign power and resistance at the border. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (3):685–99. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.600193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorum, E. L. 2014a. Beyond Syria’s borders: A history of territorial disputes in the Middle East. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Jorum, E. L. 2014b. Syria’s “Lost Province”: The Hatay question returns. Carnegie Middle East Center 28 January. Accessed May 18, 2021. https://carnegie-mec.org/diwan/54340.
   Google Scholar
• Kadercan, B. 2017. Territorial design and grand strategy in the Ottoman Empire. Territory, Politics, Governance 5 (2):158–76. doi:10.1080/21622671.2016.1265465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahler, M. 2006. Territoriality and conflict in an era of globalization. In Territoriality and conflict in an era of globalization, ed. M. Kahler and B. F. Walter. New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 1-24.
   Google Scholar
• Kayaoglu, T. 2010. Legal imperialism sovereignty and extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman Empire, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaymaz, İ. Ş. 2007. Emperyalizmin Kürt Kartı. Gazi Akademik Bakis 1 (1):155–90.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, B. A. 1926. The league of nations and Mosul. Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 8 (1):38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Khadduri, N. 1945. The Alexandretta dispute. American Journal of International Law 39 (3):406–25. doi:10.2307/2193522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoury, P. S. 1987. Syria and the French Mandate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klapsis, A. 2014. Attempting to Revise the Treaty of Lausanne: Greek Foreign Policy and Italy during the Pangalos Dictatorship, 1925–1926. Diplomacy & Statecraft 25 (2):240–59. doi:10.1080/09592296.2014.907062.
   Google Scholar
• Kocer, M. 2004. Ağrı İsyanı (1926-1930). Firat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 14 (2):379–88.
   Google Scholar
• Kodal, T. 2015. Paylasilamayan Toprak. Istanbul: Yeditepe Yayinevi.
   Google Scholar
• Kumral, M. A. 2016. Rethinking Turkey-Iraq relations: The dilemma of partial cooperation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lesaffer, R. 2015. The Iran-Iraq border: A story of too many treaties, Oxford historical treaties online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Makko, A. 2010. Arbitrator in a World of Wars: The league of Nations and the Mosul dispute, 1924–1925. Diplomacy & Statecraft 21 (4):631–49. doi:10.1080/09592296.2010.529344.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel, R. 1980. Roots of the modern interstate border dispute. Journal of Conflict Resolution 24 (3):427–54. doi:10.1177/002200278002400303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manpreet, S. 2000. Novel ways of settling border disputes: The Peru‐Ecuador case. Strategic Analysis 23 (10):1769–77. doi:10.1080/09700160008455158.
   Google Scholar
• Migdal, J. S. 2004. Bölümün adı yok. In Boundaries and belonging: states and societies in the struggle to shape identities and local practices, ed. J. S. Migdal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 3-24.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. B. 1990. Historical justifications for territorial claims. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 80 (4):531–48. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1990.tb00316.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, D. 2006. Borders and bordering: Towards an interdisciplinary dialogue. European Journal of Social Theory 9 (2):171–86. doi:10.1177/1368431006063331.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. 2011. Contemporary research agendas in border studies: An overview. In The Ashgate research companion to border studies, ed. D. W. Walter. Farnham: Ashgate. p. 33-49.
   Google Scholar
• Okur, M. A. 2020. Men-Zor Tezi ve Eşitsiz Anlaşmalar Tartışmasının Işığında Musul Vilayeti Türkiye’nin Tarihi Hakları/Haklılığı Meselesi. In Yüzyıllık Sorun: Musul Vilayeti: Tarih, Toplum ve Siyaset, ed. Z. Kurşun and D. Hut. İstanbul: Vakıfbank Kültür Yayınları. p. 317-360
   Google Scholar
• Othman, A. 2017. The career of Ozdemir: A Turkish bid for Northern Iraq, 1921–1923. Middle Eastern Studies 53 (6):966–85. doi:10.1080/00263206.2017.1332595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owsiak, A. P. 2012. Signing up for peace: International boundary agreements, democracy, and militarized interstate disputes. International Studies Quarterly 56 (1):51–66. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00699.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owsiak AP, Rider TJ (2013) Clearing the Hurdle: Border Settlement and Rivalry Termination. Journal of Politics 75(3):757–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozbey, I. 2019. Basbug: Seyh Said isyani olmasa Musul’u kaybetmezdik. Hürriyet 21 October.Accessed May 3, 2021. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/seyh-said-isyani-olmasa-musulu-kaybetmezdik-41354836.
   Google Scholar
• Ozgen, N. 2005. Sinirin Iktisadi Antropolojisi: Suriye ve Irak Sinirlarinda Iki Kasaba. In Gelenekten Gelecege Antropoloji, ed. B. Kumbetoglu. Istanbul: Birkalan-Gedik. Epsilon yayinlari. p. 100-129.
   Google Scholar
• Oztan, R. H. 2020. The great depression and the making of Turkish-Syrian border, 1921–1939. International Journal of Middle East Studies 52 (2):311–26. doi:10.1017/S0020743820000021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. 1999. Boundaries as social practice and discourse: The Finnish-Russian border. Regional Studies 33 (7):669–80. doi:10.1080/00343409950078701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, S. 2007. Back to the league of nations. The American Historical Review 112 (4):1091–117. doi:10.1086/ahr.112.4.1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelkmans, M. 2006. Defending the Border: Identity, religion, and modernity in the Republic of Georgia. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, E. J., and K. E. Wiegand. 2010. Legal systems and peaceful attempts to resolveterritorial disputes. Conflict Management and Peace Science 27 (2):129–51. doi:10.1177/0738894209343979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasheed, A. 2017. Iraq court rules no region can secede after Kurdish Independence Bid. Reuters 6 November. Accessed August 9, 2021. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-iraq-kurds/iraqcourt-rules-no-region-can-secede-after-kurdish-independence-bid-idUSKBN1D617O.
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. 2017. Turkey, Iran, Iraq consider counter-measures over Kurdish referendum. 21 September. Accessed August 25, 2021. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-kurds-referendum-minis-idUSKCN1BW1EA.
   Google Scholar
• Rider, T. J., and A. P. Owsiak. 2015. Border settlement, commitment problems, and the causes of contiguous rivalry. Journal of Peace Research 52 (4):508–21. doi:10.1177/0022343315571675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, J. 2007. The foreign policy of small states: Sweden and the Mosul crisis, 1924-1925. Contemporary European History 16 (3):349–69. doi:10.1017/S0960777307003979.
   Google Scholar
• Sanjian, A. 1956. The Sanjak of Alexandretta (Hatay): Its impact on Turkish-Syrian Relations(1939-1956). Middle East Journal 10 (4):379–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheller, B. 2013. The wisdom of Syria’s waiting game syrian foreign policy under the assads. London: C. Hurst & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Şener, B. 2012. Ağrı İsyanı (1926-1930) ve Türkiye-İran Krizi (1930): Türk Dış Politikası Tarihinde Bir Zorlayıcı Diplomasi Uygulaması. History Studies 4 (4):385–413.
   Google Scholar
• Sherrill, C. H. 1932. Turkey’s Southern Policy, May 26, RG 59\ General Records of the Department of State, Central Decimal File 1930-1939, Box 4378, 797.00/41
   Google Scholar
• Shields, S. D. 2011. Fezzes in the river: Identity politics and European diplomacy on the eve of World War II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverfarb, D. 1986. Britain’s informal empire in the middle East: A Case Study of Iraq: 1929-1941. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A. 2005. Rules over real estate: Trade, territorial conflict, and international borders as institution. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (6):823–48. doi:10.1177/0022002705281349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A. 2006. Trade and territorial conflict. In Territoriality and conflict in an Era of globalization, ed. M. Kahler and B. F. Walter. New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 251-288.
   Google Scholar
• Şimsir, B. 2008. Lozan ve Sonrasinda Sinirlar ve Bogazlar. 18 November. Accessed May 27, 2021. https://www.ismetinonu.org.tr/dr-bilal-n-simsirin-konferansi/
   Google Scholar
• Soysal, İ. 1998/99. Turkish-Syrian relations (1946–1996). Turkish Review of Middle Eastern Studies 10:25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Spiermann, O. 2004. International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice: The rise of the international judiciary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahler-Sholk, R. 2020. Resistance at the borders of power: Reflections on the Zapatista and palestinian experiences. Humanity & Society XX (X):1–23. doi:10.1177/0160597620951952.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, P. E. 2009. Sovereignty, territory, and the mapping of mobility: A view from the outside. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 99 (3):467–95. doi:10.1080/00045600902931702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, M. 1998. Imagining ‘the South: Hybridity, heterotopias and Arabesk on the Turkish-Syrian border. In Border identities, nation and state at international frontiers, ed. T. M. Wilson and H. Donnan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 263-288.
   Google Scholar
• Sur, M. 2021. Jungle passports: Fences, mobility, and citizenship at the Northeast India- Bangladesh border. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Syrian Parliament. 2021. The people’s assembly’s statement on the eighty-second anniversary of the disarmament of the Iskenderun Brigade (in Arabic), November 29. Accessed December 3, 2021. http://www.parliament.gov.sy/arabic/index.php?node=554&nid=22770&First=0&Last=2753&CurrentPage=0&mid=&refBack=
   Google Scholar
• Time Turk. 2015. Demirel ile Musul anekdotunu ilk kez yazdı. 9 December. Accessed July 11, 2021. https://www.timeturk.com/demirel-ile-musul-anekdotunu-ilk-kez-yazdi/haber-103720.
   Google Scholar
• The Treaty of Lausanne. 1923. World War I document archive. Accessed April 1, 2021. https://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Treaty_of_Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• The National Information Centre. 2001. Syria 2000: geographical and economic yearbook. Damascus.
   Google Scholar
• The League of Nations. 1925. Question of the frontier between Turkey and Iraq, report submitted to the council by the commission instituted by the council resolution of september 30th, 1924, Geneva, Accessed February 14, 2021. https://biblio-archive.unog.ch/Dateien/CouncilMSD/C-400-M-147-1925-VII_BI.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The League of Nations. 1937. Collection of texts concerning the Sanjak of Alexandretta. Geneva: The League of Nations. Accessed April 22, 2021. https://biblio-archive.unog.ch/Dateien/CouncilMSD/C-282-M-183-1937_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Turkey - Persia text of treaty of friendship and security. Bulletin of International News 1926. 2(15):1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez, J. A. 1993. The war puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan-Williams, N. 2009. Border politics: The limits of sovereign power. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wandji, G. 2019. Rethinking the time and space of resilience beyond the west: An example of the Post-Colonial border. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 7 (3):288–302. doi:10.1080/21693293.2019.1601861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. M., and H. Donnan. 1998. Nation, state and identity at international borders. In Border identities: Nation and state at international frontiers, ed. T. M. Wilson and H. Donnan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, M. 2014. Colonialism and border disputes in Africa: The case of the Malawi-Tanzania dispute over lake Malawi/Nyasa. The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies 1 (1):75–89.
   Google Scholar
• Zengin, H. S. 2016. Asker direnmeseydi Ozal Musul’a girecekti. Sabah 27 October. Accessed August 25, 2021. https://www.sabah.com.tr/gundem/2016/10/27/asker-direnmeseydi-ozal-musula-girecekti.
   Google Scholar