American Imperial Sovereignty and Militarised Land Dispossession During the Korean War

References

• Agnew, J. 1994. The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy 1 (1):53–80. doi:10.1080/09692299408434268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, J., and U. Oslender. 2013. Overlapping territorialities, sovereignty in dispute: Empirical lessons from Latin America. In W. Nicholls, J. Beaumont, and B. Miller (Eds.), Spaces of contention: Spatialities and social movements. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arrighi, G. 1983. The geometry of imperialism: The limits of Hobson’s Paradigm. London: Verso Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, P., and A. Arroyo. 2017. Ecologies of power: Countermapping the logistical landscapes and military geographies of the U.S. Department of Defense. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billé, F. ed. 2020. Voluminous states: Sovereignty, materiality, and the territorial imagination. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C. D. 2005. Edges of empire and the limits of sovereignty: American Guano islands. American Quarterly 57 (3):779–803. doi:10.1353/aq.2005.0040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, K. E. 2007. Embattled garrisons: Comparative base politics and American Globalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, E. 2019. Three-dimensional security: Layers, spheres, volumes, milieus. Political Geography 69:10–21. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, K. 2020. Independence without liberation: Democratization as decolonization management in US-Occupied Korea, 1945–1948. The Journal of American History 107 (1):77–106. doi:10.1093/jahist/jaaa009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, A. 2008. Base politics: Democratic change and the U.S. military overseas. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, A., and J. Hopkin. 2010. Base closings: The rise and decline of the US military base issue in Spain, 1975–2005. International Political Science Review 31 (4):494–513. doi:10.1177/0192512110372975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, A., and D. H. Nexon. 2013. The empire will compensate you: The structural dynamics of the U.S. Overseas Basing Network. Perspectives on Politics 11 (4):1034–50. doi:10.1017/S1537592713002818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, A., and H. Spryut. 2009. Contracting states: Sovereign transfers in international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cumings, B. 1981. The origins of the Korean War, volume 1: Liberation and the emergence of separate regimes, 1945–1947. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cumings, B. 1990. Origins of the Korean War, volume 2: The taming of the cataract, 1947–1950. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denfeld, C. D. 1997. American military camps in the Republic of Korea, 1866–1996. Anchorage, AK: Pacific Base Research.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Army, Headquarters. 1943. United States Army and Navy manual of military government and civil affairs (Field manual 27–5). Washington, DC: US Government.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. 1994. How should we do the history of territory? Territory, Politics, Governance 1 (1):5–20. doi:10.1080/21622671.2012.733317.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. 2009. Terror and territory: The spatial extent of sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. 2013. Secure the volume: Vertical geopolitics and the depth of power. Political Geography 34:35–51. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregonese, S. 2012. Beyond the ‘weak state’: Hybrid sovereignties in Beirut. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space 30 (4):655–74. doi:10.1068/d11410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordillo, G. 2021. The power of terrain: The affective materiality of planet earth in the age of revolution. Dialogues in Human Geography 11 (2):190–94. doi:10.1177/20438206211001023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberstam, D. 2008. The coldest winter: America and the Korean War. New York: Hyperion.
   Google Scholar
• Hermansen, M. 2000. “The United States Military Logistics in the First Part of the Korean War.” PhD diss., University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, S.-K. 2014. South Korea, the United States and emergency powers during the Korean conflict. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 12 (5):4069.
   Google Scholar
• Immerwahr, D. 2019. How to hide an empire: A history of the greater United States. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Iwama, D. 2021. Tides of dispossession: Property in military land and coloniality of military base conversions in Okinawa. Okinawan Journal of Island Studies 2:93–114.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. 2003. America’s empire of bases. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 1 (5):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• The Judge Advocate General’s School. 1945. Law of land warfare, JAG text no. 7. Ann Arbor: The Judge Advocate General’s School.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D.J. [ Kim Dŭkchung]. 2007. Chugŏmŭrossŏ nararŭl chik’ija: 1950 nyŏndae, pan’gong tongwŏn kamsaŭi shidae [Protecting the country to the death: The 1950s, an era of anticommunist mobilization and surveillance]. Seoul: Sŏnin.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D.H. 2020. Case analysis of the ROK-US alliance burden-sharing through theoretical approaches to the evolution of an asymmetric alliance. Korea Observer (Institute of Korean Studies) 51 (1):27–52. doi:10.29152/KOIKS.2020.51.1.27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D.C. [ Translated by Sung-ok Kim]. 2009. The unending Korean War: A social history. Honolulu: Tamal Vista Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. 2017. Pusan at war: Refuge, relief, and resettlement in the temporary capital, 1950–1953. Journal of American-East Asian Relations 24:103–27. doi:10.1163/18765610-02402011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. 2022. Settler Garrison: Debt imperialism, militarism, and transpacific imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. 2019. The interrogation rooms of the Korean War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, P.A. 2018. How not to write a history of American empire. Diplomatic History 42 (5):911–31. doi:10.1093/dh/dhy071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, H. 2020. After the Korean War: An intimate history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, D. 1999. Entangling relations: American foreign policy in its century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, D. 2011. Hierarchy in international relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. 2010. The United States, the United Nations, and the second occupation of Korea, 1950–1951. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 8 (50):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Levien, M. 2013. Regimes of dispossession: From steel towns to special economic zones. Development and Change 44 (2):381–407. doi:10.1111/dech.12012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, W. R. 1978. Imperialism at bay, 1941–1945: The United States and the decolonization of the British Empire. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, F. 2009. De Facto, displaced, tacit: The sovereign articulations of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile. Political Geography 28 (6):343–52. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza, M., and C. Hanley. 2007. The massacre at No Gun Ri: Army letter reveals US intent. Asia Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 5 (4):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Na’Puti, T. 2019. Archipelagic rhetoric: Remapping the Marianas and challenging militarization from ‘a stirring place’. Communication and Critical/cultural Studies 16 (1):4–25. doi:10.1080/14791420.2019.1572905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National archives and records administration. College Park, Maryland: Government of the United States.
   Google Scholar
• Natividad, L., and G. Kirk. 2010. Fortress Guam: Resistance to US military mega-buildup. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 9 (19):3356.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, R. 2019. Theft is property! Dispossession and critical theory. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nishiyama, H. 2022. Base built in the middle of ‘rice fields’: A politics of ignorance in Okinawa. Geopolitics 27 (20):546–65. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1801646.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, J. 2010. Rethinking territory. Antipode 42 (5):1090–118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00795.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, K., P. Steinberg, and E. Stratford eds. 2020. Territory beyond terra. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Sacquety, T. J. 2011. Same organization, four different names: U.S. Army civil affairs in Korea 1950–1953. Veritas 7 (2): 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. 2014. Foreign military presence and the changing practice of sovereignty: A pragmatist explanation of norm change. The American Political Science Review 108 (4):817–29. doi:10.1017/S0003055414000434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, F. 2019. Reclaiming territory: The spatial contours of empire in US history. In Spatial Formats Under the Global Condition, ed. M. Middell and S. Marung. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. 107-148.
   Google Scholar
• Sidaway, J. 2003. Sovereign excesses? Portraying postcolonial sovereigntyscapes. Political Geography 22 (2):157–78. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00082-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, B. 2012. The United States and the curious history of self-determination. Diplomatic History 36 (4):675–94. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7709.2012.01049.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, J. 2007. Sŏul toshigyehoek iyagi [Speaking of Seoul planning]. Seoul: Hanul.
   Google Scholar
• Stoler, A. L. 2006. Degrees of imperial sovereignty. Public Culture 18 (1):125–46. doi:10.1215/08992363-18-1-125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Army. 1989. “Armed forces oral histories: Korean War studies and after-action reports.” Bethesda: University Publications of America.
   Google Scholar
• Vine, D. 2015. Base nation: How U.S. military bases abroad harm America and the World. New York: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• War Department. 1944. Basic field manual: Rules of land warfare (FM 27-10). Washington, DC: United States Government.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmore, E. 1976. History of the United States army engineer district far east, 1957–1975. Seoul: US Army Far East District.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson Center digital archive. Washington, DC: The Wilson Center. https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org
   Google Scholar
• Witt, J. F. 2008. Form and substance in the law of counterinsurgency damages. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 41:1455–82.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, A. 2011. Activists, alliances, and anti-US protests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, A., and S. Pettyjohn. 2020. Bases of empire? The logic of overseas U.S. military base expansion, 1870–2016. Comparative Strategy 41 (1):18–35.
   Google Scholar