Governance Challenges of South Asia’s Energy Megaprojects

References

• Ahmed, M., and S. Suphachalasai. 2014. Assessing the costs of climate change and adaptation in South Asia. Manila: Asian Development Bank).
   Google Scholar
• Alley, K., R. Hile, and M. Chandana. 2014. Visualizing hydropower across the Himalayas: Mapping in a time of regulatory decline. Himalaya 34 (2):52–66.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. 2017. Nigeria: A criminal enterprise? Shell’s involvement in human rights violations in Nigeria in the 1990s. London: United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. S., A. Goldthau, and N. Sitter, ed. 2017. Energy Union : Europe’s new liberal mercantilism?. 2 ed. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Andreas, G., and B. K. Sovacool. 2016. Energy technology, politics, and interpretative frames: Shale gas fracking in Eastern Europe. Global Environmental Politics 16 (4):50–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansar A, Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A and Lunn D. (2014). Should we build more large dams? The actual costs of hydropower megaproject development. Energy Policy, 69 43–56. 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, V., and S. Moisio. 2020. Towards a constructive critical geopolitics – Inspirations from the Frankfurt School of critical theory. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 38 (2):251–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baev, P. K., and I. Øverland. 2010. The South Stream versus Nabucco pipeline race: Geopolitical and economic (ir)rationales and political stakes in mega-projects. International Affairs 86 (5):1075–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, O., and C. McDowell. 2012. Displaced: The human cost of development and resettlement. 1st edn ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Billon, L., Philippe, and E. Savage. 2016. Binding pipelines? Oil, armed conflicts, and economic rationales for peace in the two Sudans. African Geographical Review 35 (2):134–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bogrand, A., B. Caroline, D. Mbenna, Joy, A. A. Claire, A. Bashir, T. Scott, Sellwood, and A, Scott. 2020. Empty Promises Down the Line? A Human Rights Impact Assessment of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline. Nairobi: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Borzel, T. A., and T. Risse. 2016. The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism, Handbook of comparative regionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• BP, 2022 Statistical Review of World Energy (London: BP)
   Google Scholar
• BRF (2021) High-Quality Belt and Road Cooperation: Partnership on Connectivity Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. A., S. Zhou, and M. Ahmadi. 2018. Smart grid governance: An international review of evolving policy issues and innovations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment 7 (5):1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. 2021. Renewable energy (in)justice in Latin America. London: United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Callegari, C., A. Szklo, and R. Schaeffer. 2018. Cost overruns and delays in energy megaprojects: How big is big enough?’. Energy Policy 114:211–20. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chacko, P. 2018. The right turn in India: Authoritarianism, populism and neoliberalisation. Journal of Contemporary Asia 48 (4):541–65. doi:10.1080/00472336.2018.1446546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherp, A., J. Jewell, V. Vinichenko, N. Bauer, and E. De Cian. 2016. Global energy security under different climate policies, GDP growth rates and fossil resource availabilities. Climatic Change 136 (1):83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherp, A., J. Jewell, and A. Goldthau. 2011. Governing global energy: Systems, transitions, complexity. Global Policy 2 (1):75–88. doi:10.1111/j.1758-5899.2010.00059.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, John, W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• CooperationReport on the Findings and Recommendations from the Meetings of the Advisory Council of the Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation in 2019 and 2020
   Google Scholar
• Dadwal, S. R. 2011. Can the South Asian gas pipeline dilemma be resolved through a legal regime?’. Strategic Analysis 35 (5):757–69.
   Google Scholar
• Dalby, S. 1991. Critical geopolitics: Discourse, difference, and dissent. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space 9 (3):261–83. doi:10.1068/d090261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhakal, S., P. Karki, and S. Shrestha. 2019a. Cross-border electricity trade for Nepal: A SWOT-AHP analysis of barriers and opportunities based on stakeholders’ perception. International Journal of Water Resources Development 37 (3): 559–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie, C. 2022. Steering global energy governance: Who governs and what do they do? Regulation & Governance 16 (2):487–99. doi:10.1111/rego.12352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubash, N. K., and A. Florini. 2011a. Mapping global energy governance. Global Policy 2 (s1):6–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ebinger, C. K. 2011. Energy and security in South Asia: Cooperation or conflict?. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press).
   Google Scholar
• El Mekaoui, A., R. Tariq, O. B. Ramírez, and P. Méndez-Monroy. (2020). Sustainability, Sociocultural Challenges, and New Power of Capitalism for Renewable Energy Megaprojects in an Indigenous Mayan Community of Mexico. Sustainability 12(18): 7432. doi:10.3390/su12187432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escribano, G., and J. Valdés. 2017. Oil prices: Governance failures and geopolitical consequences. Geopolitics 22 (3):693–718. doi:10.1080/14650045.2016.1254621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faruque, M. O. 2018. The politics of extractive industry corporate practices: An anatomy of a company-community conflict in Bangladesh. The Extractive Industries and Society 5 (1):177–89. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2017.11.009.
   Google Scholar
• Fatima, Q., and S. Zafar. 2014. New great game: Players, interests, strategies and Central Asia. South Asian Studies 29 (2):627–55.
   Google Scholar
• Fischhendler, I., G. Cohen-Blankshtain, Y. Shuali, and M. Boykoff. 2015. Communicating mega-projects in the face of uncertainties: Israeli mass media treatment of the Dead Sea Water Canal. Public Understanding of Science 24 (7):794–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhendler, I. 2018. The use of intangible benefits for promoting contested policies: The case of geopolitical benefits and the Israeli gas policy. Geopolitics 23 (4):929–53. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1350842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florini, A., and N. K. Dubash. 2011. Introduction to the special issue: Governing energy in a fragmented world. Oxford, UK: Global Policy; pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Florini, A., and B. K. Sovacool. 2011. Bridging the gaps in global energy governance. Global Governance 17 (1):57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B (2014). What you Should Know about Megaprojects and Why: An Overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2): 6–19. doi:10.1002/pmj.21409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B. (2016). The Fallacy of Beneficial Ignorance: A Test of Hirschman’s Hiding Hand. World Development, 84 176–189. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foxall, A. 2019. From Evropa to Gayropa: A critical geopolitics of the European Union as seen from Russia. Geopolitics 24 (1):174–93. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1417848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzsche, K., D. Zejli, and D. Tänzler. 2011. The relevance of global energy governance for Arab countries: The case of Morocco. Energy Policy 39 (8):4497–506. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futak-Campbell, B. 2021. Globalizing regionalism and international relations. 1st ed. edn ed. Bristol: Bristol University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, A. 2003. Developing compliance and resistance: The state, transnational social movements and tribal peoples contesting India’s Narmada project. Global Networks 3 (4):481–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S. 2017. China and global energy governance: Integration or confrontation?’. Global Governance 23 (2):307–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, R., and A. Zerda. 2016. Hydropower megaprojects in Colombia and the influence of local communities: A view from prospect theory to decision making process based on expert judgment used in large organizations. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 6(3): 408–420.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, P. S. 2013. An enigma that is South Asia: India versus the region. Asia-Pacific Review 20 (1):100–20.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A. 2014. Rethinking the governance of energy infrastructure: Scale, decentralization and polycentrism. Energy Research & Social Science 1 (Supplement C):134–40. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.009.
   Google Scholar
• Graaf, T. V. D. 2013. The politics and institutions of global energy governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Graaf, T. V. D. 2016. The Palgrave handbook of the international political economy of energy/Thijs Van de Graaf [and four others], editors. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, J. 2018. China resumes sharing Brahmaputra water flow data with India. New Delhi: The Third Pole).
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, G. M., S. Kelly, J. J. Cousins, and C. Sneddon. What Makes a Megaproject? Environment and Society, 10(1): 101–121. doi:10.3167/ares.2019.100107.
   Google Scholar
• Haastrup, T., and Y. Eun. 2014. Regionalizing global crises the financial crisis and new frontiers in regional governance. 2 ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, K. J., and V. Vivoda. 2014. International political economy: A field born of the OPEC crisis returns to its energy roots. Energy Research & Social Science 1:206–16.
   Google Scholar
• Haque, H. M. E., S. Dhakal, and S. M. G. Mostafa. 2020. An assessment of opportunities and challenges for cross-border electricity trade for Bangladesh using SWOT-AHP approach. Energy Policy 137:111118. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, W., and L. Holstenkamp. 2018. Global governance and the interplay of coordination and contestation: The Case of Renewable Energies in the South. Global Governance 24 (3): 431–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heubaum, H., and F. Biermann. 2015. Integrating global energy and climate governance: The changing role of the International Energy Agency. Energy Policy 87:229–39. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HRW.2020. New York: Human Rights Watch.
   Google Scholar
• Huda, M. S. 2017. Envisioning the future of cooperation on common rivers in South Asia: A cooperative security approach by Bangladesh and India to the Tipaimukh Dam. Water International 42 (1):54–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huda, M. S. 2019. Addressing challenges to regional energy cooperation in South Asia. In Sustainable Energy Transition in South Asia, ed. S. Narayan, C. Len, and K. Roshni, pp. 25–43. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Huda, M. S. 2020. Energy cooperation in South Asia: Utilizing natural resources for peace and sustainable development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huda, M. S. 2021. An ecological response to ethno-nationalistic populism: Grassroots environmental peacebuilding in South Asia. International Affairs 97 (1):119–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huda, M. S. 2022. Autocratic power? Energy megaprojects in the age of democratic backsliding. Energy Research & Social Science 90:102605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huda M Sadaqat and Ali S H. (2017). Energy diplomacy in South Asia: Beyond the security paradigm in accessing the TAPI pipeline project. Energy Research & Social Science, 34 202–213. 10.1016/j.erss.2017.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huda, M. S., and S. Ali. 2018. Environmental peacebuilding in South Asia: Establishing consensus on hydroelectric projects in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna (GBM) Basin. Geoforum 96:160–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huda, M. S., and S. Ali. 2019. The energy politics of the Asia-Pacific region. In The Oxford Handbook of Energy Politics, ed. K. J. Hancock and J. Allison, pp. 590–615. New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Huda, M. S., and M. McDonald. 2016. Regional cooperation on energy in South Asia: Unraveling the political challenges in implementing transnational pipelines and electricity grids. Energy Policy 98:73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDSA, and . , and . , and . 2010. Water security for India: The external dynamics. IDSA Task Force Report. New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses).
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, C., T. I. Gunton, and J. Hoffele. (2020). Assessing the public interest in environmental assessment: Lessons from cost-benefit analysis of an energy megaproject. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 38(5): 397–411. doi:10.1080/14615517.2020.1780371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karunakar, P. 2012. Building of large dams and the rights of tribes in India. Fourth World Journal 11 (1):27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A., R. Hile, and C. Mitra. 2014. Visualizing hydropower across the Himalayas: Mapping in a time of regulatory decline. Himalayan and Central Asian Studies 34 (2):52–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney-Lazar M and Ishikawa N. Mega-Plantations in Southeast Asia. Environment and Society 10(1): 63–82. doi:10.3167/ares.2019.100105.
   Google Scholar
• Kian, M. R. E., M. Sun, and F. Bosché. 2016. A consistency-checking consensus-building method to assess complexity of energy megaprojects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 226:43–50. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.160.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, N., and V.-P. Tynkkynen. 2021. The geopolitics of renewables in Kazakhstan and Russia. Geopolitics 26 (2):521–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotikalapudi, C. K. 2016. Corruption, crony capitalism and conflict: Rethinking the political economy of coal in Bangladesh and beyond. Energy Research & Social Science 17:160–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, S. S., and H. S. K. Nathan. 2016. The elephant and the tiger: Energy security, geopolitics, and national strategy in China and India’s cross border gas pipelines. Energy Research & Social Science 11:183–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. 2017. Critical geopolitics. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. 30. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lederer, M. 2022. The promise of Prometheus and the opening up of pandora’s box: Anthropological geopolitics of renewable energy. Geopolitics, 27(2): 655–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen M. (2019). Ecological Economics and Opening up of Megaproject Appraisal: Lessons From Megaproject Scholarship and Topics for a Research Programme. Ecological Economics, 159 148–156. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, A. R., and C. B. Thompson. 2016. Infrastructure, governance and global energy futures: Regulating the oil sands pipelines. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice 28 (3):355.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, H., M. Tanveer, and M. Furqan. 2021. Rule of law, corruption control, governance, and economic growth in managing renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption in South Asia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (20):10637. doi:10.3390/ijerph182010637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazaheri, N. 2016. Oil Booms and Business Busts: Why Resource Wealth Hurts Entrepreneurs in the Developing World. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDuie-Ra, D., and D. Kikon. 2016. Tribal communities and coal in Northeast India: The politics of imposing and resisting mining bans. Energy Policy 99:261. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, K. 2014. The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation: Problems and prospects. Progress in Development Studies 14 (4):373–81. doi:10.1177/1464993414521524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nag, T. 2021. Barriers to cross-border energy cooperation and implications on energy security: An Indian perspective with reference to energy trade in South Asia. Global Business Review 22 (6):1530–52. doi:10.1177/0972150919826380.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, H. S. K., S. S. Kulkarni, and D. R. Ahuja. 2013. Pipeline politics-A study of India’s proposed cross border gas projects. Energy Policy 62:145–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öge, K. 2021. Understanding pipeline politics in Eurasia: Turkey’s transit security in natural gas. Geopolitics 26(5): 1510–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogwang T and Vanclay F. (2021). Cut-off and forgotten?: Livelihood disruption, social impacts and food insecurity arising from the East African Crude Oil Pipeline. Energy Research & Social Science, 74 :101970. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. 2016. Protecting electricity networks from natural hazards. Vienna: Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Overland, I. 2016. Energy: The missing link in globalization. Energy Research & Social Science 14:122–30. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overland, I., and G. Reischl. 2018. A place in the Sun? IRENA’s position in the global energy governance landscape. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 18 (3):335–50. doi:10.1007/s10784-018-9388-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parveen, S., and I. M. Faisal. 2002. People versus power: The geopolitics of Kaptai Dam in Bangladesh. International Journal of Water Resources Development 18 (1):197–208. doi:10.1080/07900620220121756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittock, J., D. Dumaresq, and S. Orr. 2017. The Mekong River: Trading off hydropower, fish, and food. Regional Environmental Change 17 (8):2443–53. doi:10.1007/s10113-017-1175-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ptak, T., and D. Hommel. 2016. The trans-political nature of Southwest China’s Energy Conduit, Yunnan Province. Geopolitics 21 (3):556–78. doi:10.1080/14650045.2015.1114471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz, A. (2016), ‘The age of intolerance in South Asia’, South Asia Conference of the Pacific Northwest (University of Oregon, Portland).
   Google Scholar
• Riaz, Ali (2019) Voting in a Hybrid Regime: Explaining the 2018 Bangladeshi Election. Singapore: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Saklani, U., P. P. Shrestha, A. Mukherji, and C. A. Scott. 2020. Hydro-energy cooperation in South Asia: Prospects for transboundary energy and water security. Environmental Science & Policy 114:22–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SARI/EI (2018), ‘South Asia regional initiative for energy integration: March 2019 brochure’, (New Delhi, India)
   Google Scholar
• Schindler S, Fadaee S and Brockington D. Contemporary Megaprojects. Environment and Society, 10(1), 1–8. 10.3167/ares.2019.100101
   Google Scholar
• Siddiky, C. I. A. 2021. The geopolitics of energy in South Asia: Energy security of Bangladesh. Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqi, T. 2013. Pakistan, India, China, and the United States: Energy, climate change, and national security. Orbis 57 (4):615–26. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2013.08.008.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, B. K. 2013. South Asia energy security: Challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy 63 (Journal Article):458. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.128.
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., and C. J. Cooper. 2013. The governance of energy megaprojects politics, hubris and energy security. Northampton, Mass: Edward Elgar Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Stein S and Kalina M. Becoming an Agricultural Growth Corridor. Environment and Society, 10(1), 83–100. doi: 10.3167/ares.2019.100106
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, H., H. David, and K. A. Young. 2013. Gridlock why global cooperation is failing when we need it most. In Corporation Ebooks. Cambridge, UKMalden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• TI. 2019. Corruption Perceptions Index 2019. Berlin: Transparency International).
   Google Scholar
• Timilsina, Govinda 2018 (Washington: World Bank).
   Google Scholar
• Tortajada, C., and U. Saklani. 2018. Hydropower-based collaboration in South Asia: The case of India and Bhutan. Energy Policy 117:316–25. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidya, R. A., et al. 2019. Electricity trade and cooperation in the BBIN region: Lessons from global experience. International Journal of Water Resources Development :1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakulchuk, R., and I. Overland. 2019. China’s Belt and Road Initiative through the Lens of Central Asia. In Regional Connection Under the Belt and Road Initiative. 1st edpp. 115–33. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vakulchuk, R., I. Overland, and D. Scholten. 2020. Renewable energy and geopolitics: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 122:109547. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Graaf T and Colgan J. (2016). Global energy governance: a review and research agenda. Palgrave Commun, 2(1). doi:10.1057/palcomms.2015.47
   Google Scholar
• Vande Graaf,Thijs, and B. K. Sovacool. 2014. Thinking big: Politics, progress, and security in the management of Asian and European energy megaprojects. Energy Policy 74:16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wijk, Josef, and I. Fischhendler. 2016. The construction of urgency discourse around mega-projects: The Israeli case. Policy Sciences 50 (3):469–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Wildlife Fund. 2021. Hydropower in Europe: Transformation – not development. Brussels: Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, F. 2018. In the dark: How much do power sector distortions cost South Asia?’. Washington: The World Bank).
   Google Scholar