The Geopolitics of Return Migration in the International System

References

• Abdelaaty, L. 2021. Discrimination and delegation: Explaining state responses to refugees. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Achtnich, M. 2021. Waiting to move on: Migration, borderwork and mobility economies in Libya. Geopolitics 27 (5):1376–89. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1919626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Sharmani , M. 2007. Transnational somali families in Cairo. Refuge 24 (1):88–98. doi:10.25071/1920-7336.21370.
   Google Scholar
• Andrijasevic, R. 2010. DEPORTED: The right to Asylum at EU’s external border of Italy and Libya. International Migration 48 (1):148–74. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2009.00554.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashutosh, I., and A. Mountz. 2012. The geopolitics of migrant mobility: Tracing state relations through refugee claims, boats, and discourses. Geopolitics 17 (2):335–54. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.567315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, R., and S. Gent. 2006. Sustainable return in post-conflict contexts. International Migration 44 (3):15–38. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2006.00370.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blitz, B. K., R. Sales, and L. Marzano. 2005. Non-voluntary return? The politics of return to Afghanistan. Political Studies 53 (1):182–200. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00523.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. 2013. Refugee repatriation: Justice, responsibility and redress. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. 2021. Realising the right of return: Refugees’ roles in localising norms and socialising UNHCR. Geopolitics 1–28. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1994399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, K., and R. L. Gruby. 2019. Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal 47 (4):927–52. doi:10.1111/psj.12212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassarino, J. -P. 2007. Informalising readmission agreements in the EU neighbourhood. The International Spectator 42 (2):179–96. doi:10.1080/03932720701406365.
   Google Scholar
• Chimni. B.S. 1998. The Geopolitics of Refugee Studies: A View from the South, Journal of Refugee Studies 11, 350–374, https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/11.4.350-a
   Google Scholar
• Cleton, L., and R. Schweitzer. 2021. ‘Our aim is to assist migrants in making a well-informed decision’: how return counsellors in Austria and the Netherlands manage the aspirations of unwanted non-citizens. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47 (17):3846–63. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2021.1935813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collyer, M. 2012. Deportation and the micropolitics of exclusion: The rise of removals from the UK to Sri Lanka. Geopolitics 17 (2):276–92. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.562940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, J., and K. Long. 2016. Safe and voluntary refugee repatriation: From principle to practice. Journal on Migration and Human Security 4 (3):141–47. doi:10.1177/233150241600400305.
   Google Scholar
• Cuttitta, P. 2020. Non-governmental/civil society organisations and the European Union-externalisation of migration management in Tunisia and Egypt. Population, Space and Place 26 (7):e2329. doi:10.1002/psp.2329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlman, C., and G. Ó. Tuathail. 2005. Broken Bosnia: The localised geopolitics of displacement and return in two Bosnian places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (3):644–62. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00479.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Genova, N. 2002. Migrant “Illegality” and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology. 31(1):419–47. Retrieved from. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Genova, N. (2019). Detention, deportation, and waiting: Toward a theory of migrant detainability. Gender A Výzkum, 20(1), 92-104: Global Detention.https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Detention%2C+deportation%2C+and+waiting%3A+Toward+a+theory+of+migrant+detainability&btnG=
   Google Scholar
• Del Sarto, R. 2021. Borderlands: Europe and the mediterranean middle east. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, A. 2015. Distancing Asylum seekers from the state: Australia’s evolving political geography of immigration and border control. The Australian Geographer 46 (4):437–54. doi:10.1080/00049182.2015.1066240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (2020). Communication from the Commission on a New Pact on Migration and Asylum. Brussels, Brussels, 23.9. 2020 COM(2020) Brussels, Brussels, 23.9. 2020 https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0609&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• Elie, J. 2014. Histories of refugee and forced migration studies. In The oxford handbook of refugee and forced migration studies, Eds, E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, G. Loescher, K. Long, and N. Sigona (pp. 23-36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Essuman-Johnson, A. 2011. When refugees don’t go home: The situation of Liberian refugees in Ghana. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 9 (2):105–26. doi:10.1080/15562948.2011.567139.
   Google Scholar
• Fakhoury, T. 2021. Refugee return and fragmented governance in the host state: Displaced Syrians in the face of Lebanon’s divided politics. Third World Quarterly 42 (1):1–19. doi:10.1080/01436597.2020.1762485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakhoury, T. 2022. The external dimension of EU migration policy as region-building? Refugee cooperation as contentious politics. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (12):2908–26. doi:10.1080/1369183x.2021.1972568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakhoury, T., and R. Icaza. 2023. Undoing coloniality: Polycentric governing and refugee spaces. In forthcoming Polycentrism: How Governing Works Today, eds. J. A. Scholte and F. Gadinger (pp. 47-70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fakhoury, T., and N. Stel. 2022. EU engagement with contested refugee returns in Lebanon: The aftermath of resilience. Geopolitics 1–26. doi:10.1080/14650045.2022.2025779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, F. (2021). A coffin for malthusianism: Josué de Castro’s subaltern geopolitics. Geopolitics 26 (2):589-614. doi:10.1080/14650045.2019.1583213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freier, L. F., N. R. Micinski, and G. Tsourapas. 2021. Refugee commodification: The diffusion of refugee rent-seeking in the Global South. Third World Quarterly 42 (11):2747–66. doi:10.1080/01436597.2021.1956891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geha, C., and J. Talhouk. 2019. From recipients of aid to shapers of policies: Conceptualizing government–United nations relations during the Syrian refugee crisis in Lebanon. Journal of Refugee Studies 32 (4):645–63. doi:10.1093/jrs/fey052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerver, M. 2018. The ethics and practice of refugee repatriation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosn, F., T. S. Chu, M. Simon, A. Braithwaite, M. Frith and J. Jandali. 2021. The journey home: Violence, anchoring, and refugee decisions to return. The American Political Science Review 115 (3):982–98. doi:10.1017/S0003055421000344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, T., S. Lee, and N. Wazefadost. 2022. Not just a seat at the table: Refugee participation and the importance of listening. Forced Migration Review 70: https://www.fmreview.org/issue70/harley-lee-wazefadost.
   Google Scholar
• Hiemstra, N. 2012. Geopolitical reverberations of US migrant detention and deportation: The view from Ecuador. Geopolitics 17 (2):293–311. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.562942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J. 2012. The geopolitics of migration and mobility. Geopolitics 17 (2):243–55. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.569321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J. 2013. Feminist geopolitics meets refugee studies. In Refugees in international relations, Eds. A. Betts and G. Loescher (pp. 169-183). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• IOM 2019. ‘Key Migration Terms: Return’. International Organization of Migration, https://www.iom.int/key-migration-terms. Accessed on 11th March 2023.
   Google Scholar
• IOM (2022). Irregular Migration, . https://www.migrationdataportal.org/themes/irregular-migration#definition
   Google Scholar
• IOM. n.d. IOM’s policy on the full spectrum of return, readmission and reintegration, https://www.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl486/files/documents/ioms-policy-full-spectrum-of-return-readmission-and-reintegration.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kalicki, K. 2021. Toward liberal immigration control: The case of Japan. Asian Survey 61 (5):854–82. doi:10.1525/as.2021.1421466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalir, B. W., and L. Wissink. 2016. The deportation continuum: Convergences between state agents and NGO workers in the Dutch deportation field. Citizenship Studies 20 (1):34–49. doi:10.1080/13621025.2015.1107025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayaoglu, A., Z. Şahin-Mencütek, and M. M. Erdoğan. 2021. Return aspirations of Syrian refugees in Turkey. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 20 (4):1–23. doi:10.1080/15562948.2021.1955172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, P. 2019. Rescuing classical geopolitics: Separating geopolitics from realism. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 11 (1):41–58. doi:10.22381/GHIR11120192.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, A. 2014. The politics and discourse of migrant return: The role of UNHCR and IOM in the governance of return. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (6):905–23. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2013.855073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koser, K., and K. Kuschminder. 2015. Comparative research on the assisted voluntary return and reintegration of migrants. Switzerland: IOM and Maastricht Graduate School of Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Kuschminder, K., and T. Dubow. 2022. Moral exclusion, dehumanisation, and continued resistance to return: Experiences of refused Afghan Asylum seekers in the Netherlands. Geopolitics 1–22. doi:10.1080/14650045.2022.2055462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutz, W., and S. Wolff. 2022. Urban geopolitics and the decentring of migration diplomacy in EU-Moroccan affairs. Geopolitics 27 (3):703–28. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1843438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leerkes, A., R. van Os, and E. Boersema. 2017. What drives ‘soft deportation’? Understanding the rise in assisted voluntary return among rejected asylum seekers in the Netherlands. Population, Space and Place 23 (8):e2059. doi:10.1002/psp.2059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino, R., J. Schapendonk, and I. Lietaert. 2022. Translating EUrope’s return migration regime to the Gambia: The incorporation of local CSOs. Geopolitics 1–24. doi:10.1080/14650045.2022.2050700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mencütek, Z. Ş. 2021. Governing practices and strategic narratives for Syrian refugee returns. Journal of Refugee Studies 34 (3):2804–26. doi:10.1093/jrs/feaa121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mencütek, Z. S. 2022. The Geopolitics of Returns: Geopolitical Reasoning and Space-Making in Turkey’s Repatriation Regime. Geopolitics, 1-27. doi:10.1080/14650045.2022.2081550.
   Google Scholar
• Mhaissen, R., and E. Hodges. Unpacking return: Syrian refugees’ conditions and concerns. Sawa for Development and Aid. 6 February 2019. https://reliefweb.int/report/lebanon/unpacking-return-syrian-refugees-conditions-and-concerns-enar.
   Google Scholar
• Mielke, K. 2022. Calculated informality in governing (Non)return: An evolutionary governance perspective. Geopolitics 1–24. doi:10.1080/14650045.2022.2052854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myadar, O., and K. E. Dempsey. 2022. Making and unmaking refugees: Geopolitics of social ordering and struggle within the global refugee regime. Geopolitics 27 (2):367–74. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1924552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordling, V., and M. Persdotter. 2021. Bordering through destitution: The case of social assistance to irregularised migrants in Malmö, Sweden. Nordic Social Work Research 11 (2):155–68. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2021.1940246.
   Google Scholar
• Pallister-Wilkins, P. 2018. Médecins Avec Frontières and the making of a humanitarian borderscape. Environment and Planning D, Society & Space 36 (1):114–38. doi:10.1177/0263775817740588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallister-Wilkins, P. 2021. Alter-geographies of everyday externalisation: Shattering EUropean attempts at policing mobility? Geopolitics 27 (5):1–5. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.2008735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panizzon, M. 2012. Readmission agreements of EU member states: A case for EU subsidiarity or Dualism? Refugee Survey Quarterly 31 (4):101–33. doi:10.1093/rsq/hds014.
   Google Scholar
• Qadim, N. E. (2014). Postcolonial challenges to migration control: French–Moroccan cooperation practices on forced returns. Security Dialogue, 45(3), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614533139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Refugee Protection Watch (2021). “RPW study: “I have not known the taste of safety for ten years.”” https://refugeeprotectionwatch.org/rpw-study-i-have-not-known-the-taste-of-safety-for-ten-years/
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, S., V. Stern, and N. Merhaut. 2018. Protest movements in asylum and deportation. Cham: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Serra-Mingot, E., and M. Rudolf. 2022. On the same wavelength? Differing geopolitical positionalities and voluntary return and reintegration in Ghana. Journal of International Migration and Integration 1–18. doi:10.1007/s12134-022-00958-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, A. 2020. Caught in between: Syrians seeking to return from Lebanon stuck in buffer zone. Al Arabiya. https://english.alarabiya.net/features/2020/05/29/Caught-in-between-Syrians-seeking-to-return-from-Lebanon-stuck-in-buffer-zone.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. 2011. Subaltern Geopolitics: An introduction. Geoforum 42 (3):271–73. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigona, N. 2014. The politics of refugee voices: Representations, narratives and memories. In The oxford handbook of refugee and forced migration studies, Eds. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh E., Loescher, G., Long, K., Sigona, N. (pp. 369-382). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sigona, N., J. Kato, and I. Kuznetsova. 2021. Migration infrastructures and the production of migrants’ irregularity in Japan and the United Kingdom. Comparative Migration Studies 9 (1):1–19. doi:10.1186/s40878-021-00242-4.
   Google Scholar
• Silvey, R. 2007. Unequal borders: Indonesian transnational migrants at immigration control. Geopolitics 12 (2):265–79. doi:10.1080/14650040601168917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slominski, P., and F. Trauner. 2018. How do member states return unwanted migrants? The strategic (non-)use of ‘Europe’ during the migration crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (1):101–18. doi:10.1111/jcms.12621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sökefeld, M. 2019. Nations rebound: German politics of deporting Afghans. International Quarterly for Asian Studies 50 (1–2):91–118.
   Google Scholar
• Spathopoulou, A., A. Carastathis, and M. Tsilimpounidi. 2020. ‘Vulnerable refugees’ and ‘voluntary deportations’: Performing the hotspot, embodying its violence. Geopolitics 27 (4):1–27. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1772237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stel, N. 2021. Uncertainty, exhaustion, and abandonment beyond South/North divides: Governing forced migration through strategic ambiguity. Political Geography 88 (23):102391. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102391.
   Google Scholar
• Stutz, P., & Trauner, F. 2022. The EU's ‘return rate’with third countries: Why EU readmission agreements do not make much difference. International Migration, 60(3), 154-172. doi:10.1111/imig.12901.
   Google Scholar
• Sylla, A., and S.M. Cold-Rvnkilde. 2021. En Route to Europe? The anti-politics of deportation from North Africa to Mali. Geopolitics 27 (5):1390–409. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1995358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandafyllidou, A. 2022. Decentering the study of migration governance: A radical view. Geopolitics 27 (3):811–25. doi:10.1080/14650045.2020.1839052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Um, K. 2023. Refugee Return, Reintegration, and Sustainable Futurity: Politics, Pitfalls and Possibilities of Repatriation in Post/Conflict Situations. Geopolitics, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2018. Global compact for safe, orderly and regular migration. New York: UN. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N18/451/99/PDF/N1845199.pdf?OpenElement.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. (2003). Framework for Durable Solutions. Retrieved from Geneva: https://www.unhcr.org/partners/partners/3f1408764/framework-durable-solutions-refugees-persons-concern.html?query=Framework%20for%20Durable%20Solution.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. (2022). UNHCR - High commissioner’s opening statement to the 73rd session of the UNHCR executive committee, https://www.unhcr.org/admin/hcspeeches/6343e6e44/high-commissioners-opening-statement-73rd-session-unhcr-executive-committee.html
   Google Scholar
• Savio Vammen, I. M., S.M. Cold-Ravnkilde., & H. Lucht. 2022. Borderwork in the expanded EU-African Borderlands. Geopolitics 27(5), 1317-1330 doi:10.1080/14650045.2022.2008734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vathi, Z., R. King, and B. Kalir. 2022. Editorial Introduction: The shifting geopolitics of return migration and reintegration. Int Migration & Integration. doi:10.1007/s12134-022-00974-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrăbiescu, I. 2022. Deportation, smart borders and mobile citizens: Using digital methods and traditional police activities to deport EU citizens. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (8):1891–908. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1796267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, W. 2018. Aviation as deportation infrastructure: Airports, planes, and expulsion. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (16):2796–817. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1401517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, J. 2017. Bordering borderscapes: Australia’s use of humanitarian aid and border security support to immobilise asylum seekers. Geopolitics 22 (4):958–83. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1312350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. 2014. The politics of negotiating eu readmission agreements: Insights from Morocco and Turkey. European Journal of Migration and Law 16 (1):69–95. doi:10.1163/15718166-00002049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zardo, F., and S. Wolff. 2022. Decentering the study of migration governance in the Mediterranean. Geopolitics 27 (3):687–702. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1978944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeager, L. A. 2002. Negotiations for refugee repatriation or local settlement: A game-theoretic analysis. International Studies Quarterly 42 (2):367–84. doi:10.1111/1468-2478.00086.
   Google Scholar
• Zieck, M. 2004. Voluntary repatriation: Paradigm, pitfalls, progress. Refugee Survey Quarterly 23 (3):33–54. doi:10.1093/rsq/23.3.33.
   Google Scholar