Territory, Terrain, and Human Rights: Jurisdiction and Border Control Under the European Convention on Human Rights

References

• Agamben, G. 1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. 1994. The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy 1 (1):53–80. doi:10.1080/09692299408434268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altiparmak, K. 2004. Banković: An obstacle to the application of the European Convention on Human Rights in Iraq? Journal of Conflict & Security Law 9 (2):213–51. doi:10.1093/jcsl/9.2.213.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. 2006. Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography 25 (3):336–51. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonsich, M. 2009. On territory, the nation-state and the crisis of the hyphen. Progress in Human Geography 33 (6):789–806. doi:10.1177/0309132508104996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1973. The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Aust, A. 2010. Handbook of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, M. 2014. Rules of engagement: The spatiality of judicial review. In The expanding spaces of law: A timely legal geography, ed. I. Braverman, N. Blomley, D. Delaney, and A. S. Kedar, 215–38. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Besson, S. 2012. The extraterritoriality of the European Convention on Human Rights: Why Human Rights depend on jurisdiction and what jurisdiction amounts to. Leiden Journal of International Law 25 (4):857–84. doi:10.1017/S0922156512000489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. 2016. The territory of property. Progress in Human Geography 40 (5):593–609. doi:10.1177/0309132515596380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braverman, I., N. Blomley, D. Delaney, and A. Kedar, ed. 2014. Introduction. In The expanding spaces of law: A timely legal geography, 1–29, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brighenti, A. M. 2006. On territory as relationship and law as territory. Canadian Journal of Law & Society 21 (2):65–86. doi:10.1017/S0829320100008954.
   Google Scholar
• Brighenti, A. M. 2010. On territorology: Towards a general science of territory. Theory, Culture & Society 27 (1):52–72. doi:10.1177/0263276409350357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciliberto, G. 2021. A brand-new exclusionary clause to the prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens: The applicant’s own conduct in N.D. and N.T. v Spain. Human Rights Law Review 21 (1):203–20. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngaa041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. 2012. Immigrant IL-Legality: Geopolitical and legal borders in the US, 1882-present. Geopolitics 17 (2):402–22. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.563155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlon, D., N. Hiemstra, and A. Mountz. 2017. Spatial control: Geographical approaches to the study of immigration detention. Global Detention Project. Working Paper 24
   Google Scholar
• Costa, K. 2012. The extraterritorial application of selected human rights treaties. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. 2012. Brownlie’s principles of public international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De León, J. 2015. The land of open graves: Living and dying on the migrant trail. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dell’Agnese, E. 2013. The political challenge of relational territory. In Spatial politics: Essays for Doreen Massey, ed. D. Featherstone and J. Painter, 115–32. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Den Heijer, M. 2013. Reflections on refoulement and collective expulsion in the Hirsi case. International Journal of Refugee Law 25 (2):265–90. doi:10.1093/ijrl/eet020.
   Google Scholar
• Duttwiler, M. 2012. Authority, control and jurisdiction in the extraterritorial application of the European Convention on Human Rights. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 30 (2):137–62. doi:10.1177/016934411203000202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elden, S. 2009. Terror and territory: The spatial extent of sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. 2010. Land, terrain, territory. Progress in Human Geography 34 (6):799–817. doi:10.1177/0309132510362603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elden, S. 2013. The birth of territory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. 2017. Legal terrain-the political materiality of territory. London Review of International Law 5 (3):199–224. doi:10.1093/lril/lrx008.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, R. 2012. Third person: Politics of life and philosophy of the impersonal. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, D. 2012. Humanitarian reason: A moral history of the present times. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• FitzGerald, D. S. 2020. Remote control of migration: Theorising territoriality, shared coercion, and deterrence. Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies 46 (1):4–22. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1680115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammeltoft-Hansen, T., and J. C. Hathaway. 2015. Non-refoulement in a world of cooperative deterrence. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 53 (2):235–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuffré, M. 2021. A functional-impact model of jurisdiction: Extraterritoriality before the European Court of Human Rights. Questions of International Law, Zoom-In 82:53–80.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, C. S. 2017. Redefining refugees: Interpretive control and the bordering work of legal categorization in U.S. asylum law. Political Geography 58:36–45. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottmann, J. 1973. The significance of territory. Charlottesville: The University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., and R. Jones. 2018. The biopolitics and geopolitics of border enforcement in Melilla. Territory, Politics, Governance 6 (1):61–80. doi:10.1080/21622671.2016.1236746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. 2001. Out of the “moribund backwater”: Territory and territoriality in political geography. Political Geography 20 (16):677–93. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00032-4.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, J. S. 2017. Geographies of discretion and the jurisdictional imagination. Political & Legal Anthropology Review 40 (1):5–27. doi:10.1111/plar.12205.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, S. 2017. Cartographies of the present: ‘Contingent sovereignty’ and territorial integrity. In Netherlands yearbook of international law 2016. The changing nature of territoriality in international law, ed. M. Kuijer and W. Werner, 83–105. The Hague: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. 2017. Non-refoulement and extraterritorial jurisdiction: State sovereignty and migration controls at sea in the European context. Leiden Journal of International Law 30 (1):49–70. doi:10.1017/S0922156516000625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijer, M., and W. Werner. 2017. The paradoxical place of territory in international law. In Netherlands yearbook of international law 2016. The changing nature of territoriality in international law, ed. M. Kuijer and W. Werner, 3–17. The Hague: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maillet, P., A. Mountz, and K. Williams. 2018. Exclusion through Imperio: Entanglements of law and geography in the waiting zone, excised territory and search and rescue region. Social & Legal Studies 27 (2):142–63. doi:10.1177/0964663917746487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallory, C. 2020. Human Rights imperialists: The extraterritorial application of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Mallory, C. 2021. A second coming of extraterritorial jurisdiction at the European Court of Human Rights? Questions of International Law, Zoom-In 82:31–51.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, L. 2014. Protecting the EU’s borders from … fundamental rights? Squaring the circle between Frontex’s border surveillance and Human Rights. In Freedom, security and justice in the European Union: Internal and external dimensions of increased cooperation after the Lisbon treaty, ed. R. Holzhacker and P. Luif, 75–99. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Milanovic, M. 2008. From compromise to principle: Clarifying the concept of state jurisdiction in Human Rights treaties. Human Rights Law Review 8 (3):411–48. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngn021.
   Google Scholar
• Milanovic, M. 2011. Extraterritorial application of human rights treaties: Law, principles, and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. 2009. Revisiting extraterritorial jurisdiction: A territorial justification for extraterritorial jurisdiction under the European Convention. The European Journal of International Law 20 (4):1223–46. doi:10.1093/ejil/chp078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. 2015. A political theory of territory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mountz, A. 2020. The death of asylum: Hidden geographies of the enforcement archipelago. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. B. 2013. Territory’s continuing allure. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (5):1212–26. doi:10.1080/00045608.2012.696232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, M. 2022. Legal geography: Comparative law and the production of space. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ochoa Espejo, P. 2020. On borders: Territories, legitimacies, and the rights of place. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A., M. A. Ferdoush, R. Jones, A. B. Murphy, J. Agnew, P. Ochoa Espejo, J. J. Fall, and G. Peterle. 2022. Locating the territoriality of territory in border studies. Political Geography 95:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, J. 2010. Rethinking territory. Antipode 42 (5):1090–118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00795.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, N., and N. Vaughan-Williams. 2009. Lines in the sand? Towards an agenda for critical border studies. Geopolitics 14 (3):582–87. doi:10.1080/14650040903081297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffestine, C. 1980. Pour une Géographie du Pouvoir [For a geography of power]. Paris: Litec.
   Google Scholar
• Raible, L. 2016. The extraterritoriality of the ECHR: Why Jaloud and Pisari should be read as game changers. European Human Rights Law Review 2:161–68.
   Google Scholar
• Rigo, E. 2008. Europa di Confine: Trasformazioni della Cittadinanza nell’Unione Allargata [Border Europe: the transformations of citizenship in the enlarged Union]. Roma: Meltemi.
   Google Scholar
• Ryngaert, C. 2015. Jurisdiction in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sack, R. 1986. Human territoriality: Its theory and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shany, Y. 2013. Taking universality seriously: A functional approach to extraterritoriality in International Human Rights Law. Law and Ethics of Human Rights 7 (1):47–71. doi:10.1515/lehr-2013-0004.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. 2003. International law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slack, J. Y., D. E. Martínez, A. E. Lee, and S. Whiteford. 2016. The geography of border militarization: Violence, death, and health in Mexico and the United States. Journal of Latin American Geography 15 (1):7–32. doi:10.1353/lag.2016.0009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg Diez, O. 2020. What you don’t hear about Spain’s migration policy. Last modified February 13. Accessed on October 7. https://euobserver.com/opinion/147429
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. 1994. The state as container: Territoriality in the modern world-system. Progress in Human Geography 18 (2):151–62. doi:10.1177/030913259401800202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M. 2020. The making of migration: The biopolitics of mobility at Europe’s borders. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M., and G. Garelli. 2020. Containment beyond detention: The hotspot system and disrupted migration movements across Europe. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38 (6):1009–27. doi:10.1177/0263775818759335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevisanut, S. 2014. The principle of non-refoulement and the de-territorialization of border control at sea. Leiden Journal of International Law 27 (3):661–75. doi:10.1017/S0922156514000259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzevelekos, V., and A. Berkes. 2021. Turning water into wine: The concealed metamorphosis of the effective control extraterritoriality criterion in Carter v. Russia. Last modified November 20. Accessed 11 August 2022. https://www.echrblog.com/2021/11/guest-post-turning-water-into-wine.html
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. 2009. Jurisdiction and scale: Legal “technicalities” as resources for theory. Social & Legal Studies 18 (2):139–57. doi:10.1177/0964663909103622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. 2015. Chronotopes of Law: Jurisdiction, scale and governance. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, W. 2010. Foucault and frontiers: Notes on the birth of the humanitarian border. In Governmentality: Current Issues and future challenges, ed. U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann, and T. Lemke, 138–64. New York, N.Y: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M. 2015. From humanitarian exceptionalism to contingent care: Care and enforcement at the humanitarian border. Political Geography 47:11–20. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Skeini and Others v. The United Kingdom, 7 July 2011, Application no. 55721/07.
   Google Scholar
• Carter v. Russia, 21 September 2021, Application no. 20914/07.
   Google Scholar
• Georgia v. Russia II, 21 January 2021, Application no. 38263/08.
   Google Scholar
• Hanan v. Germany, 16 February 2019, Application no. 4871/16.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsi Jammah and Others v. Italy, 23 February 2012, Application no. 27765/09.
   Google Scholar
• Jaloud v. The Netherlands, 20 November 2014, Application no. 47708/08.
   Google Scholar
• Khlaifia and Others v. Italy, 15 December 2016, Application no. 16483/12.
   Google Scholar
• N.D. and N.T. v. Spain, 13 February 2020, Applications nos. 8675/15 and 8697/15.
   Google Scholar
• N.D. and N.T. v. Spain, 3 October 2017, Applications nos. 8675/15 and 8697/15.
   Google Scholar
• M.A. and Others v. Lithuania, 11 December 2018, Application no. 59793/17.
   Google Scholar