Putting on a Show? The Sovereignty of De Facto States Between Performativity, Performance and Virtuality

References

• Agnew, J. 1994. The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy 1 (1):53–80. doi:10.1080/09692299408434268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. 2005. Sovereignty regimes: Territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (2):437–61. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00468.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. 2017. Globalization and sovereignty: Beyond the territorial trap. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J., and M. Kuus. 2008. Theorizing the state geographically: Sovereignty, subjectivity, territoriality. In The sage handbook of political geography. ed. K. Cox, 95–106. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781848607880.n6.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. 2011. Power and performance. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Ali Saji, A. 2004. The memory of another past: Bergson, Deleuze and a new theory of time. Continental Philosophy Review 37 (2):203–39. doi:10.1007/s11007-005-5560-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anghie, A. 2005. Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anghie, A. 2012. Western discourses of sovereignty. In Sovereignty: Frontiers of possibility, ed. J. Evans, 19–36. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press. doi:10.21313/hawaii/9780824835637.003.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Bartelson, J. 1995. A genealogy of sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartelson, J. 2014. Sovereignty as symbolic form. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315774909.
   Google Scholar
• Bellwood, P. 1991. The Austronesian dispersal and the origin of languages. Scientific American 265 (1):88–93. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0791-88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, E., and J. Ker-Lindsay, eds. 2020. The politics of international interaction with de facto states: Conceptualising engagement without recognition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, E., and S. Pegg. 2018. Scrutinizing a policy of ‘engagement without recognition: US requests for diplomatic actions with de facto states. Foreign Policy Analysis 14 (3):388–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergson, H. 2007/1941. The creative mind: An introduction to metaphysics. M. Andison, trans. Mineola: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Biersteker, T. & Weber, C., eds. (1996). State sovereignty as social construct, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511598685.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, M. 2008. Becoming Somaliland. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brannen, K. 2015. “From Kirkuk to K Street”. Foreign Policy, August 13. https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/08/13/from-kirkuk-to-k-street/
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B., Schindler, S., and Wille, T. 2019. Rethinking agency in international relations: Performativity, performances and actor-networks. Journal of International Relations and Development. 22(4):787–807. doi:10.1057/s41268-018-0147-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broers, L. 2013. Recognizing politics in unrecognized states: 20 years of enquiry into the de facto states of the South Caucasus. Caucasus Survey 1 (1):59–74. doi:10.1080/23761199.2013.11417283.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, R. 2021a. Sovereignty in drag: On fakes, foreclosure and unbecoming states. Cultural Anthropology 36 (1):52–83. doi:10.14506/ca36.1.03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, R. 2021b. The everyday lives of sovereignty: Political imagination beyond the state, ed. Reeves, M. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. doi:10.7591/cornell/9781501755736.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, R., and M. Hatay. 2020. Sovereignty suspended: Building the so-called state. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. doi:10.9783/9780812297133.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1988. Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal 40 (4):519–31. doi:10.2307/3207893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2007. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. 4th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2014. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203760079.
   Google Scholar
• Byman, D., and C. King. 2012. The mystery of phantom states. The Washington Quarterly 35 (3):43–57. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2012.703580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. 1998. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caspersen, N., G. Stansfield, eds. (2011) Unrecognised states in the international system, London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203834510.
   Google Scholar
• Caspersen, N. 2012. Unrecognised states. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Černy, H. 2018. Iraqi Kurdistan, the PKK and international relations: Theory and ethnic conflict. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315560212.
   Google Scholar
• Černy, H. 2023. How the Iraqi Kurdistan independence debate came to die: Western IR scholars as co-protagonists of the nationalist conflicts they set out to describe. In Variations on sovereignty: Political contestations and transformations from around the world, ed. H. Černy and J. Grzybowski, 108–30. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003287506-8
   Google Scholar
• Černy, H., and J. Grzybowski, eds., 2023. Variations on sovereignty: Contestations and transformations from around the world. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003287506
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, C.-L. March 22, 2023. “Navigating the Pacific: Taiwan’s diplomatic policy in Oceania”. Global Taiwan Institute. Report https://globaltaiwan.org/2023/03/navigating-the-pacific-taiwans-diplomatic-policy-in-oceania/.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, F. 2018. The One-China policy: State, sovereignty, and Taiwan’s international legal status. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102314-3.00002-1.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, C.-C. 2018. Contending notions of the cross-strait status quo in Taiwan and across the strait. China Review 18 (3):121–48.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. 2020. Cross-strait relations since 2016: The end of the illusion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. 2003. Gilles Deleuze. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coppieters, B. 2019. Engagement without recognition. In Routledge handbook of state recognition, ed. G. Visoka, Doyle, J., Newman, E. 241–55. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781351131759-19.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, H. 2023. “Anger in Taiwan, boasting in China in wake of Honduras switch”. The Guardian, 27 March. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/27/anger-in-taiwan-boasting-in-china-in-wake-of-honduras-switch
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1991/1966. Bergsonism. H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, trans., New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 2004/1980. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. B. Massumi, trans. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 2014/1969. Difference and repetition. trans. ed. P. Patton London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1996. What is philosophy?. eds., H. Tomlinson & G. Burchill, trans. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeLisle, J. 2018. United States–Taiwan relations: Tsai’s presidency and Washington’s policy. China Review 18 (3):13–60.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 2002. Negotiations: Interventions and interviews, 1971-2001. E. Rottenberg, trans. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, I. 2022. The performative state: Public scrutiny and environmental governance in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doty, R. L. 2003. Anti-immigrantism in Western democracies: Statecraft, desire, and the politics of exclusion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Drath, V. 2004. The Cyprus referendum: An island divided by mutual mistrust. American Foreign Policy Interests 26 (4):341–51. doi:10.1080/10803920490502755.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. 2010. There is no such thing as the state: Discourse, effect and performativity. Forum for Development Studies 37 (1):79–92. doi:10.1080/08039410903558285.
   Google Scholar
• Entessar, N. 2010. Kurdish politics in the Middle East. 2 nd ed. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, C., Lindemann, T., Sending, and O.J. 2018. Frustrated sovereigns: The agency that makes the world go around. Review of International Studies. 44 (5):787–804. doi:10.1017/S0260210518000402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Canclini, N. 1995. Hybrid cultures: Strategies for entering and leaving modernity. C. Chiappari & S. Lopez, trans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geldenhuys, D. 2009. Contested states in world politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9780230234185.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, S. 2015. China and Taiwan. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gregson, N., and G. Rose. 2000. Taking Butler elsewhere: Performativities, spatialities and subjectivities. Environment and Planning, Society and Space 18 (4):433–52. doi:10.1068/d232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzybowski, J. 2019. The paradox of state identification: De facto states, recognition, and the (re-)production of the international. International Theory 11 (3):241–63. doi:10.1017/S1752971919000113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsley, F. 1986. Sovereignty. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. 2012. The Eurocentric conception of world politics: Western international theory, 1760-2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, C. 2001. Manly states: Masculinities, international relations, and gender politics. New York: Columbia University Press. doi:10.7312/hoop12074.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, K.-B. 2016. Taiwan’s foreign policy and international space. In Routledge handbook of contemporary Taiwan, ed. G. Schubert, 465–81. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group (ICG). 2015. “Arming Iraq’s Kurds: Fighting IS, inviting conflict”. Report No. 158, May 12.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, A. 2013. The improvised state: Sovereignty, performance and agency in Dayton Bosnia. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118278789.
   Google Scholar
• Kalmo, H., and Q. Skinner, eds., 2011. Sovereignty in fragments: The past, present and future of a contested concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511675928
   Google Scholar
• Keating, J. 2018. Invisible countries: Journeys to the edge of nationhood. New Haven: Yale University Press. doi:10.12987/9780300235050.
   Google Scholar
• Ker-Lindsay, J. 2012. The Foreign policy of counter-secession: Preventing the recognition of contested states. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199698394.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Ker-Lindsay, J. 2015. Engagement without recognition: The limits of diplomatic interaction with contested states. International Affairs 91 (2):267–85. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klich, S. 2022. De facto state identity and international legitimation. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003178521.
   Google Scholar
• Kraidy, M. 2005. Hybridity or the cultural logic of globalization. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. doi:10.26530/OAPEN_626979.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kyris, G. 2018. Sovereignty and engagement without recognition: Explaining the failure of conflict resolution in Cyprus. Ethnopolitics 17 (4):426–42. doi:10.1080/17449057.2018.1495364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-Y. 2016. Taiwan-US security relations. In Routledge handbook of contemporary Taiwan, ed. G. Schubert, 482–98. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315769523-32
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. 2007. Judith Butler: From norms to politics. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. 2016. Performativity and performance. In The oxford handbook of feminist theory, ed. L. Disch and M. Hawkesworth. 572–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.013.30
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, J. 2008. The man who made Vermeers. Unvarnishing the legend of master Forger Han van Meegeren. San Diego: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Loxley, J. 2006. Performativity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malešević, S. 2006. Identity as ideology: Understanding ethnicity and nationalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9780230625648.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, M. 2023. The making and remaking of state sovereignty in IR theory: From fantasy to nightmare. In Variations on sovereignty: Contestations and transformations from around the world, ed. H. Černy and J. Grzybowski. 23–45. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003287506-3
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, F. 2010. The fallacy and the promise of the territorial trap: Sovereign articulations of geopolitical anomalies. Geopolitics 15 (4):762–68. doi:10.1080/14650041003717533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, F. 2016. Rehearsing the state: The political practices of the Tibetan government in exile. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118661192.
   Google Scholar
• McDowall, D. 2021. A modern history of the Kurds. 4th ed. London: I.B. Tauris. doi:10.5040/9780755600762.
   Google Scholar
• Natali, D. 2010. The Kurdish quasi-state: Development and dependency in Post-Gulf War Iraq. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Navaro-Yashin, Y. 2012. The make-believe space: Affective geography in a postwar polity. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, E., and G. Visoka. 2018. The foreign policy of state recognition: Kosovo’s diplomatic strategy to join international society. Foreign Policy Analysis 14 (3):367–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, B. 2009. How to get out of Iraq with integrity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Loughlin, J., Kolosov, V., Toal, G. 2014. Inside the Post-Soviet de facto states: A comparison of attitudes in Abkhazia, Nagorny Karabakh, South Ossetia, and Transnistria. Eurasian Geography and Economics. 55(5):423–56. doi:10.1080/15387216.2015.1012644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osiander, A. 2001. Sovereignty, international relations, and the Westphalian myth. International Organization 55 (2):251–87. doi:10.1162/00208180151140577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pegg, S. 1998. International society and the de facto state. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Pegg, S. 2019. Somaliland. In Routledge handbook of state recognition, ed. G. Visoka, Doyle, J., Newman, E. 417–29. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351131759-32
   Google Scholar
• Pegg, S., and E. Berg. 2016. Lost and found: The WikiLeaks of de facto state – great power relations. International Studies Perspectives 17 (3):267–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, V. S., and V. S. Peterson. 1992. Gendered states: Feminist (re)visions of international relations theory. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. doi:10.1515/9781685859305.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. 2017. The Kurdish spring: A new map of the Middle East. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prunier, G. 2021. The country that does not exist: A history of Somaliland. Cambridge: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, P. 2019. Sovereignty, the hyperreal, and “taking back control”. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 6 (6):1999–2015. doi:10.1080/24694452.2019.1587283.
   Google Scholar
• Ringmar, E. 2016. How the world makes its subjects: An embodied critique of constructivist IR theory. Journal of International Relations and Development 16 (1):101–25. doi:10.1057/jird.2015.33.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. (2011). Governance without a state: Policies and politics in areas of limited statehood, ed. Risse, T. New York: Columbia University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560530.013.0049.
   Google Scholar
• Romano, D. 2006. The Kurdish nationalist movement: Opportunity, mobilization and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, D. 2003. Taiwan: A political history. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russel, P. 2021. Sovereignty: The biography of a claim. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, D. 2012. Laughing at Leviathan: Sovereignty and audience in West Papua. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 2006. Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck, T. 2020. The race to zero? China’s poaching of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies. Orbis 64 (2):334–52. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2020.02.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shields, R. 2003. The virtual. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, D. 2004. The land that never was: Sir Gregor McGregor and the most audacious fraud in history. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 2012. Essays on Deleuze. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teschke, B. 2003. The myth of 1648: Class, geopolitics, and the making of modern international relations. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, Y.-C.2021‘It’s not marriage!’. In Taiwan during the first administration of Tsai Ing-Wen: Navigating in stormy waters, ed. Schubert, G. & Lee, C-Y. 234–53. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003206323-11
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. 1987. The anthropology of performance. New York: PAJ Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Voller, Y. 2014. The Kurdish liberation movement in Iraq: From insurgency to statehood. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International relations as political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511559150.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A. H.-E., Y.-Y. Yeh, C. K. S. Wu, and F.-Y. Chen. 2021. The non-consensus 1992 consensus. Asian Politics & Policy 13 (2):212–27. doi:10.1111/aspp.12576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, C. 1995. Simulating sovereignty: Intervention, the state and symbolic exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511559167.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. 1998. Performative states. Millennium 27 (1):77–95. doi:10.1177/03058298980270011101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, C. 2017. International relations theory: A critical introduction. 4th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, B., and R. Shields. 2011. The virtual north: On the boundaries of sovereignty. Ethnic and Racial Studies 34 (1):103–20. doi:10.1080/01419870.2010.490592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, C. 1996. Goffman in feminist perspective. Sociological Perspectives 39 (3):353–69. doi:10.2307/1389251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2011. Gilles Deleuze’s philosophy of time: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. doi:10.1515/9780748645428.
   Google Scholar
• Zarakol, A. 2018. A non-Eurocentric approach to sovereignty. International Studies Review 20 (3):506–09.
   Google Scholar
• Zarakol, A. 2022. Before the West: The rise and fall of Eastern world orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108975377.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., and B. Freeman. 2021. The Taiwan Lobby. Center for International Policy, Foreign Influence Transparency Initiative Report. April.
   Google Scholar