Methodological quality and outcome of systematic reviews reporting on orthopaedic treatment for class III malocclusion: Overview of systematic reviews

References

• Blackman NJ, Koval JJ. Interval estimation for Cohen's kappa as a measure of agreement. Stat Med 2000; 19: 723–741. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000315)19:5<723::AID-SIM379>3.0.CO;2-A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzoudi MI, Ioannidou-Marathiotou I, Papadopoulos MA. Clinical effectiveness of chin cup treatment for the management of Class III malocclusion in pre-pubertal patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod 2014; 15: 720. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0062-9
   Google Scholar
• Cordasco G, Matarese G, Rustico L, Fastuca S, Caprioglio A, Lindauer SJ, et al. Efficacy of orthopedic treatment with protraction facemask on skeletal Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res 2014; 17: 133–143. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaire J, Verdon P, Lumineau JP, Cherga-Negrea A, Talmant J, Boisson M. Some results of extra-oral tractions with front-chin rest in the orthodontic treatment of class 3 maxillomandibular malformations and of bony sequelae of cleft lip and palate. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 1972; 73: 633–642.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feng X, Li J, Li Y, Zhao Z, Zhao S, Wang J. Effectiveness of TAD-anchored maxillary protraction in late mixed dentition. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 1107–1114. doi: 10.2319/111411-705.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire AdB, Nascimento LEAGd, Lira AdLSd. Effects induced after the use of maxillary protraction appliances: a literature review. Dental Press J Orthodontics 2012; 17: 122–128. doi: 10.1590/S2176-94512012000400023
   Google Scholar
• Fudalej P, Dragan M, Wedrychowska-Szulc B. Prediction of the outcome of orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusions—a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 190–197. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghassemi M, Jamilian A, Becker JR, Modabber A, Fritz U, Ghassemi A. Soft-tissue changes associated with different surgical procedures for treating class III patients. J Orofac Orthop 2014; 75: 299–307. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0224-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S, (editors.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
   Google Scholar
• Jäger A, Braumann B, Kim C, Wahner S. Skeletal and dental effects of maxillary protraction in patients with angle class III malocclusion. A meta-analysis. J Orofac Orthop 2001; 62: 275–284. doi: 10.1007/PL00001935
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanas RJ, Carapezza L, Kanas SJ. Treatment classification of Class III malocclusion. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008; 33: 175–186. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.33.2.431877341u182416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Viana MA, Graber TM, Omerza FF, BeGole EA. The effectiveness of protraction face mask therapy: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 115: 675–685. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70294-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kung J, Chiappelli F, Cajulis OO, Avezova R, Kossan G, Chew L, et al. From systematic reviews to clinical recommendations for evidence-based health care: validation of revised assessment of multiple systematic reviews (R-AMSTAR) for grading of clinical relevance. Open Dent J 2010; 4: 84–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• List T, Axelsson S. Management of TMD: evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 430–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02089.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu ZP, Li CJ, Hu HK, Chen JW, Li F, Zou SJ. Efficacy of short-term chincup therapy for mandibular growth retardation in Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 162–168. doi: 10.2319/050510-244.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major MP, Wong JK, Saltaji H, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Skeletal anchored maxillary protraction for midface deficiency in children and early adolescents with Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J World Feder Orthodont 2012; 1: e47–e54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2012.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Maspero C, Galbiati G, Perillo L, Favero L, Giannini L. Orthopaedic treatment efficiency in skeletal Class III malocclusions in young patients: RME-face mask versus TSME. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2012; 13: 225–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minami-Sugaya H, Lentini-Oliveira DA, Carvalho FR, Machado MA, Marzola C, Saconato H, et al. Treatments for adults with prominent lower front teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 5: CD006963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010; 8: 336–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Fernandez M, Iglesias-Linares A, Yanez-Vico RM, Mendoza-Mendoza A, Solano-Reina E. Bone- and dentoalveolar-anchored dentofacial orthopedics for Class III malocclusion: new approaches, similar objectives?: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 540–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmann AJ, Kasenda B, Briel M. Meta-analyses: what they can and cannot do. Swiss Med Wkly 2012; 142: w13518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou SN, Xavier GM, Cobourne MT. Basic study design influences the results of orthodontic clinical investigations. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68: 1512–1522. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovich I, Windsor B, Jordan V, Showell M, Shea B, Farquhar CM. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of two different approaches. PLoS One 2012; 7: e50403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogante M, Kairy D, Giacomozzi C, Grigioni M. A quality assessment of systematic reviews on telerehabilitation: what does the evidence tell us? Ann Ist Super Sanita 2015; 51: 11–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007; 7: 10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1013–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Showkatbakhsh R, Jamilian A. A novel approach in treatment of maxillary deficiency by reverse chin cup. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 2010; 21: 27–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sinclair PM. Orthodontic considerations in adult surgical orthodontic cases. Dent Clin North Am 1988; 32: 509–528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solano-Mendoza B, Iglesias-Linares A, Yanez-Vico RM, Mendoza-Mendoza A, Alió-Sanz JJ, Solano-Reina E. Maxillary protraction at early ages. The revolution of new bone anchorage appliances. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012; 37: 219–229. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.37.2.q0k770403v443053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toffol LD, Pavoni C, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cozza P. Orthopedic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 561–573. doi: 10.2319/030207-108.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turley PK. Managing the developing Class III malocclusion with palatal expansion and facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122: 349–352. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.127295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkinson S, Harrison JE, Furness S, Worthington HV. Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 9: CD003451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Li C, Bai D, Su N, Chen T, Xu Y, et al. Treatment effectiveness of Fränkel function regulator on the Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 146: 143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.04.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yepes E, Quintero P, Rueda ZV, Pedroza A. Optimal force for maxillary protraction facemask therapy in the early treatment of class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod 2014; 36: 586–594. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar