Torque resistance of different stainless steel wires commonly used for fixed retainers in orthodontics

References

• Arnold SN, Pandis N, Patcas R. Factors influencing fixed retention practices in German-speaking Switzerland: a survey. J Orofac Orthop 2014; 75: 446–458. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0239-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantleon HP, Droschl H. Front torque using a partial arch technic. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1988; 49: 203–212. doi: 10.1007/BF02163378
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Booth FA, Edelman JM, Proffit WR. Twenty-year follow-up of patients with permanently bonded mandibular canine-to-canine retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstone CJ. The mechanics of the segmented arch techniques. Angle Orthod 1966; 36: 99–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl EH, Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod 1991; 25: 619–630.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalstra M, Eriksen H, Bergamini C, Melsen B. Actual versus theoretical torsional play in conventional and self-ligating bracket systems. J Orthod 2015; 42: 103–113. doi: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich P, Patcas R, Pandis N, Eliades T. Long-term follow-up of maxillary fixed retention: survival rate and periodontal health. Eur J Orthod 2015; 37: 37–42. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldner JC, Sarkar NK, Sheridan JJ, Lancaster DM. In vitro torque-deformation characteristics of orthodontic polycarbonate brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994; 106: 265–272. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70046-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzer W, Bourauel C, Gmyrek H. Torque capacity of metal and polycarbonate brackets with and without a metal slot. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26: 435–441. doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.4.435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliadi A, Kloukos D, Gkantidis N, Katsaros C, Pandis N. Failure of fixed orthodontic retainers: a systematic review. J Dent 2015; 43: 876–896. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapila S, Sachdeva R. Mechanical properties and clinical applications of orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 100–109. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90251-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsaros C, Livas C, Renkema AM. Unexpected complications of bonded mandibular lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 838–841. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai CS, Grossen JM, Renkema AM, Bronkhorst E, Fudalej PS, Katsaros C. Orthodontic retention procedures in Switzerland. Swiss Dent J 2014; 124: 655–661.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Partowi S, Keilig L, Reimann S, Jager A, Bourauel C. Experimental analysis of torque characteristics of orthodontic wires. J Orofac Orthop 2010; 71: 362–372. doi: 10.1007/s00056-010-1028-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazera P, Fudalej P, Katsaros C. Severe complication of a bonded mandibular lingual retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142: 406–409. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.01.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizarro K, Jones ML. Crown inclination relapse with multiflex retainers. J Clin Orthod 1992; 26: 780–782.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. St. Louis: Mosby; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Reitan K. Some factors determining the evaluation of forces in orthodontics. Am J Orthodont 1957; 43: 32–45. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(57)90114-8
   Google Scholar
• Reitan K. Effects of force magnitude and direction of tooth movement on different alveolar bone types*. Angle Orthodont 1964; 34: 244–255.
   Google Scholar
• Reitan K. Principles of retention and avoidance of posttreatment relapse. Am J Orthodont 1969; 55: 776–790. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(69)90050-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renkema AM, Al-Assad S, Bronkhorst E, Weindel S, Katsaros C, Lisson JA. Effectiveness of lingual retainers bonded to the canines in preventing mandibular incisor relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 179e1–179e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renkema AM, Renkema A, Bronkhorst E, Katsaros C. Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 614–621. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakima MT, Dalstra M, Melsen B. How does temperature influence the properties of rectangular nickel-titanium wires? Eur J Orthod 2006; 28: 282–291. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider E, Ruf S. Upper bonded retainers. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 1050–1056. doi: 10.2319/022211-132.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarze J, Bourauel C, Drescher D. The mobility of the anterior teeth after the direct bonding of lingual retainers. A comparison of in-vitro and in-vivo measurements. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1995; 56: 25–33. doi: 10.1007/BF02265836
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shah AA, Sandler PJ, Murray AM. How to … place a lower bonded retainer. J Orthod 2005; 32: 206–210. doi: 10.1179/146531205225021114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Eliades T, Makou M, Katsaros C, Bourauel C. In-vitro assessment of the forces generated by lingual fixed retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 44–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sifakakis I, Eliades T, Bourauel C. Residual stress analysis of fixed retainer wires after in vitro loading: can mastication-induced stresses produce an unfavorable effect? Biomed Tech (Berl) 2015; 60: 617–622. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2015-0013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stormann I, Ehmer U. A prospective randomized study of different retainer types. J Orofac Orthop 2002; 63: 42–50. doi: 10.1007/s00056-002-0040-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zachrisson BU. The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth. Swed Dent J Suppl 1982; 15: 247–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar