258
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Scientific Section

Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information

&
Pages 186-192 | Received 18 Dec 2015, Accepted 14 May 2016, Published online: 02 Aug 2016

References

  • Aldairy T, Laverick S, Mcintyre G. Orthognathic surgery: is patient information on the Internet valid? Eur J Orthod 2012; 34: 466–469. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr046
  • Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE, Dumitru RC, Pudule I, Santana S, et al. European citizens’ use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health [online] 2007; 7: 53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-53
  • Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S. Internet-derived information on cleft lip and palate for families with affected children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2009; 46: 75–80. doi: 10.1597/07-206.1
  • Cedro M, Moles DR, Hodges S. Adult orthodontics in the absence of orthognathic treatment: a hospital perspective. J Orthod 2012; 39: 292–302. doi: 10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000050
  • Cedro MK, Moles DR, Hodges SJ. Adult orthodontics – who's doing what? J Orthod 2010; 37: 107–117. doi: 10.1179/14653121042966
  • Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53: 105–111. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.2.105
  • Delli K, Livas C, Spijkervet F, Vissink A. Internet information on xerostomia: what should patients expect? Oral Dis 2015; 21: 83–89. doi: 10.1111/odi.12213
  • Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 1948; 32: 221–233. doi: 10.1037/h0057532
  • Fox S. 2005. Health information online [Online]. Available: http://www.pewinternet.org [accessed November 2015].
  • http://www.gdc-uk.org/Search/Pages/Results.Aspx?K=Orthodontic%20curriculum. [accessed April 2016].
  • http://www.healthonnet.org. [accessed January 2015].
  • http://www.internetlivestats.com/Internet-Users. [accessed April 2015].
  • http://www.minervation.com/Lida-Tool. [accessed March 2015].
  • http://www.Mlanet.org/Sites/Default/Files/Resources/Pdf/Low_Hlth_Literacy.Pdf. [accessed June 2015].
  • Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Vogels DS, Vogels PB. 2014 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, Part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod 2014; 48: 607–630.
  • Kummervold PE, Chronaki CE, Lausen B, Prokosch H-U, Rasmussen J, Santana S, et al. eHealth trends in Europe 2005–2007: a population-based survey. J Med Internet Res [online] 2008; 10: e42. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1023
  • Langille M, Veldhuyzen VZS, Shanavaz S-A, Massoud E. Systematic evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea websites on the internet. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 41: 265–272.
  • Leira-Feijoo Y, Ledesma-Ludi Y, Seoane-Romero JM, Blanco-Carrion J, Seoane J, Varela-Centelles P. Available web-based dental implants information for patients. How good is it? Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 1276–1280. doi: 10.1111/clr.12451
  • Lew KK. Attitudes and perceptions of adults towards orthodontic treatment in an Asian community. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 31–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1993.tb00715.x
  • Livas C, Delli K, Ren Y. Quality evaluation of the available Internet information regarding pain during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2012; 83: 500–506. doi: 10.2319/052512-435.1
  • Manogue M, Mcloughlin J, Christersson C, Delap E, Lindh C, Schoonheim-Klein M, et al. Curriculum structure, content, learning and assessment in European undergraduate dental education–update 2010. Eur J Dent Educ 2011; 15: 133–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00699.x
  • Ni Riordain R, Mccreary C. Head and neck cancer information on the internet: type, accuracy and content. Oral Oncol 2009; 45: 675–677. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.10.006
  • Ni Riordain RN, Hodgson T. Content and quality of website information on the treatment of oral ulcers. Br Dent J [online] 2014; 217: e15. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.886
  • Parekh J, Gill D. The quality of orthodontic practice websites. Br Dent J [online] 2014; 216: e21. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.403
  • Patel A, Cobourne MT. The design and content of orthodontic practise websites in the UK is suboptimal and does not correlate with search ranking. Eur J Orthod 2015; 37: 447–452. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju078
  • Patel U, Cobourne MT. Orthodontic extractions and the Internet: quality of online information available to the public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: e103–e109. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.07.019
  • Pithon MM, Santos ESD. Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: a careful review. Dental Press J Orthod 2014; 19: 86–92. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.086-092.oar
  • Podichetty VK, Booher J, Whitfield M, Biscup R. Assessment of internet use and effects among healthcare professionals: a cross sectional survey. Postgrad Med J 2006; 82: 274–279. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.040675
  • Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the InternetCaveant lector et viewor—let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 1997; 277: 1244–1245. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039
  • Stinson JN, Tucker L, Huber A, Harris H, Lin C, Cohen L, et al. Surfing for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: perspectives on quality and content of information on the Internet. J Rheumatol 2009; 36: 1755–1762. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.081010
  • Usher W. Developing policies for e-health: use of online health information by Australian health professionals and their patients. The HIM Journal 2011; 40: 15–22.
  • Verhoef WA, Livas C, Delli K, Ren Y. Assessing the standards of online oral hygiene instructions for patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. J Am Dent Assoc 2015; 146: 310–317. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.01.004
  • Wangberg SC, Andreassen HK, Prokosch H-U, Santana SMV, Sørensen T, Chronaki CE. Relations between Internet use, socio-economic status (SES), social support and subjective health. Health Promot Int 2008; 23: 70–77. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam039
  • Winker MA, Flanagin A, Chi-Lum B, White J, Andrews K, Kennett RL, et al. Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. American Medical Association. JAMA 2000; 283: 1600–1606. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.12.1600

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.