References
- Banks P, Elton V, Jones Y, Rice P, Derwent S, Odondi, L. 2010. The use of fixed appliances in the UK: a survey of specialist orthodontists. J Orthod. 37:43–55. doi: 10.1179/14653121042867
- Blau MA. 1973. Expanded use of auxiliary personnel in orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod. 64:137–146. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9416(73)90305-9
- The British Orthodontic Society. 2017. Guidelines on supervision of orthodontic therapists. London.
- The British Orthodontic Society and the Orthodontic National-Group 2012. Guidelines on supervision of qualified orthodontic therapists. London.
- The British Orthodontic Society Archive and Museum Committee. 2011. A history of the events which lead to the establishment orthodontic therapists in the UK. In: Bos, editor. London.
- Choi BC, Pak AW. 2005. A catalog of biases in questionnaires. Prev Chronic Dis. 2:A13.
- Coughlin SS. 1990. Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 43:87–91. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90060-3
- Dugdale CA, Ahmed F, Waring DT, Malik OH. 2017. Scope of practice and supervision of orthodontic therapists in the United Kingdom: Part 2: a national cross-sectional survey of orthodontists. J Orthod.
- Gardner AW, Jones JW. 2002. An audit of the current consent practices of consultant orthodontists in the UK. J Orthod. 29:330–334. doi: 10.1093/ortho/29.4.330
- General Dental Council. 2009. Scope of practice. London.
- Hobson RS, Clark JD. 1998. How UK orthodontists advise patients on oral hygiene. Br J Orthod. 25:64–66. doi: 10.1093/ortho/25.1.64
- Hodge T. 2010. Orthodontic therapists – a challenge for the 21st century. J Orthod. 37:297–301. doi: 10.1179/14653121043236
- Ide M, Scanlan PJ. 2003. The role of professionals complementary to dentistry in orthodontic practice as seen by United Kingdom orthodontists. Br Dent J. 194:677–681; Discussion 673. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4810282
- Kalange, JT. 2004. Indirect bonding: a comprehensive review of the advantages. World J Orthod. 5:301–307.
- Kincaid JP, FishburneJrRP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. 1975. Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. No. Rbr-8-75. Naval Technical Training Command Millington TN Research Branch.
- Lawshe CH. 1975. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychol. 28:563–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
- Moss JP. 1993. Orthodontics in Europe 1992. Eur J Orthod. 15:393–401. doi: 10.1093/ejo/15.5.393
- Nuffield Foundation 1980. Inquiry into dental education. London.
- Samuels RH, Willner F, Knox J, Jones ML. 1996. A national survey of orthodontic facebow injuries in the UK and Eire. Br J Orthod. 23:11–20. doi: 10.1179/bjo.23.1.11
- Shih TH, Fan XT. 2009. Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: a meta-analysis. Educ Res Rev. 4:26–40. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2008.01.003
- Shirck JM, Firestone AR, Beck FM, Vig KW, Huja SS. 2011. Temporary anchorage device utilization: comparison of usage in orthodontic programs and private practice. Orthodontics (Chic.). 12:222–231.
- Stephens CD, Cook J. 2002. Attitudes of UK consultants to teledentistry as a means of providing orthodontic advice to dental practitioners and their patients. J Orthod. 29:137–142. doi: 10.1093/ortho/29.2.137
- Wu BU, Banks PA, Conwell DL. 2009. Disparities in emergency department wait times for acute gastrointestinal illnesses: results From the national hospital ambulatory medical care survey, 1997–2006. Am J Gastroenterol. 104:1668–1673. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.189