New directions for pharmacotherapy in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome

References

• Niemeijer MN, van den Berg ME, Leening MJ, et al. Declining incidence of sudden cardiac death from 1990-2010 in a general middle-aged and elderly population: the Rotterdam Study. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(1):123–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierlotka M, Zdrojewski T, Wojtyniak B, et al. Incidence, treatment, in-hospital mortality and one-year outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in Poland in 2009-2012-nationwide AMI-PL database. Kardiol Pol. 2015;73(3):142–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk E, Nakano M, Bentzon JF, et al. Update on acute coronary syndromes: the pathologists’ view. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(10):719–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(3):267–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(20):2569–2619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(20):2001–2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1045–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt DL, Stone GW, Mahaffey KW, et al. Effect of platelet inhibition with cangrelor during PCI on ischemic events. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(14):1303–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalescot G, Bolognese L, Dudek D, et al. Pretreatment with prasugrel in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(11):999–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalescot G, van ‘t Hof AW, Lapostolle F, et al. Prehospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(11):1016–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M, et al. Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2109–2122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Abt M, et al. Effects of dalcetrapib in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(22):2089–2099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls SJ, Ruotolo G, Brewer HB, et al. Cholesterol efflux capacity and pre-beta-1 HDL concentrations are increased in dyslipidemic patients treated with evacetrapib. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(20):2201–2210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue ML, Glaser R, Cavender MA, et al. Effect of losmapimod on cardiovascular outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(15):1591–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoff AM, Mehran R, Povsic TJ, et al. Effect of the REG1 anticoagulation system versus bivalirudin on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (REGULATE-PCI): a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10016):349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove EL, Würtz M, Thomas MR, et al. Antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16(14):2133–2147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe MT, Armstrong PW, Fox KA, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(14):1297–1309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarese EP, Buffon A, Kozinski M, et al. A critical overview on ticagrelor in acute coronary syndromes. QJM. 2013;106(2):105–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamski P, Koziński M, Ostrowska M, et al. Overview of pleiotropic effects of platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Thromb Haemost. 2014;112(2):224–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiviott SD, Trenk D, Frelinger AL, et al. Prasugrel compared with high loading- and maintenance-dose clopidogrel in patients with planned percutaneous coronary intervention: the prasugrel in comparison to clopidogrel for inhibition of platelet activation and aggregation-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 44 trial. Circulation. 2007;116(25):2923–2932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey RF, Husted S, Harrington RA, et al. Inhibition of platelet aggregation by AZD6140, a reversible oral P2Y12 receptor antagonist, compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(19):1852–1856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koziński M, Obońska K, Stankowska K, et al. Prasugrel overcomes high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in the acute phase of acute coronary syndrome and maintains its antiplatelet potency at 30-day follow-up. Cardiol J. 2014;21(5):547–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubica J, Adamski P, Ostrowska M, et al. Morphine delays and attenuates ticagrelor exposure and action in patients with myocardial infarction: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled IMPRESSION trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(3):245–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parodi G, Valenti R, Bellandi B, et al. Comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor loading doses in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: RAPID (rapid activity of platelet inhibitor drugs) primary PCI study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(15):1601–1606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubica A, Kasprzak M, Siller-Matula J, et al. Time-related changes in determinants of antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in patients after myocardial infarction. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;742:47–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combescure C, Fontana P, Mallouk N, et al. Clinical implications of clopidogrel non-response in cardiovascular patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(5):923–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofi F, Marcucci R, Gori AM, et al. Clopidogrel nonresponsiveness and risk of cardiovascular morbidity. An updated meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost. 2010;103(4):841–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brar SS, ten Berg J, Marcucci R, et al. Impact of platelet reactivity on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. A collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(19):1945–1954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter MP, Koziński M, Kubica J, et al. Personalized antiplatelet therapy with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors: benefits and pitfalls. Postep Kardiol Inter. 2015;11(4):259–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibbing D, Kastrati A, Berger PB. Pre-treatment with P2Y12 inhibitors in ACS patients: who, when, why, and which agent? Eur Heart J. 2016;37(16):1284–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widimsky P, Motovská Z, Simek S, et al. Clopidogrel pre-treatment in stable angina: for all patients >6 h before elective coronary angiography or only for angiographically selected patients a few minutes before PCI? A randomized multicentre trial PRAGUE-8. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(12):1495–1503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Sciascio G, Patti G, Pasceri V, et al. Effectiveness of in-laboratory high-dose clopidogrel loading versus routine pre-load in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the ARMYDA-5 PRELOAD (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(7):550–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalescot G, Collet JP, Ecollan P, et al. Effect of prasugrel pre-treatment strategy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for NSTEMI: the ACCOAST-PCI study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(24):2563–2571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudek D, Dziewierz A, Widimsky P, et al. Impact of prasugrel pretreatment and timing of coronary artery bypass grafting on clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: from the a comparison of prasugrel at PCI or time of diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (ACCOAST) study. Am Heart J. 2015;170(5):1025–32.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalescot G, van ‘t Hof AW, Bolognese L, et al. Effect of pre-hospital ticagrelor during the first 24 h after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the ATLANTIC-H(24) analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(7):646–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127(4):e362–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(24):e139–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexopoulos D, Barampoutis N, Gkizas V, et al. Crushed versus integral tablets of ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a randomized pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55(3):359–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parodi G, Xanthopoulou I, Bellandi B, et al. Ticagrelor crushed tablets administration in STEMI patients: the MOJITO study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(5):511–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollini F, Franchi F, Hu J, et al. Crushed prasugrel tablets in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the CRUSH study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(17):1994–2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz-Schüpke S, Byrne RA, ten Berg JM, et al. ISAR-SAFE: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6 vs. 12 months of clopidogrel therapy after drug-eluting stenting. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(20):1252–1263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauri L, Kereiakes DJ, Yeh RW, et al. Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(23):2155–2166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kereiakes DJ, Yeh RW, Massaro JM, et al. Antiplatelet therapy duration following bare metal or drug-eluting coronary stents: the dual antiplatelet therapy randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(11):1113–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauri L, Elmariah S, Yeh RW, et al. Causes of late mortality with dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stents. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(4):378–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Cohen M, et al. Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(19):1791–1800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Storey RF, et al. Ticagrelor for prevention of ischemic events after myocardial infarction in patients with peripheral artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(23):2719–2728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Steg PG, et al. Ischaemic risk and efficacy of ticagrelor in relation to time from P2Y12 inhibitor withdrawal in patients with prior myocardial infarction: insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(14):1133–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarese EP, Andreotti F, Schulze V, et al. Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2015;350:h1618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udell JA, Bonaca MP, Collet JP, et al. Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in the subgroup of patients with previous myocardial infarction: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(4):390–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(10):1082–1115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kereiakes DJ, Yeh RW, Massaro JM, et al. DAPT score utility for risk prediction in patients with or without previous myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(21):2492–2502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh RW, Secemsky EA, Kereiakes DJ, et al. Development and validation of a prediction rule for benefit and harm of dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2016;315(16):1735–1749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubica J, Kozinski M, Navarese EP, et al. Cangrelor: an emerging therapeutic option for patients with coronary artery disease. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30(5):813–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreiro JL, Ueno M, Angiolillo DJ. Cangrelor: a review on its mechanism of action and clinical development. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2009;7(10):1195–1201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrington RA, Stone GW, McNulty S, et al. Platelet inhibition with cangrelor in patients undergoing PCI. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(24):2318–2329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt DL, Lincoff AM, Gibson CM, et al. Intravenous platelet blockade with cangrelor during PCI. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(24):2330–2341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White HD, Chew DP, Dauerman HL, et al. Reduced immediate ischemic events with cangrelor in PCI: a pooled analysis of the CHAMPION trials using the universal definition of myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2012;163(2):182–90.e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Hamm CW, et al. Effect of cangrelor on periprocedural outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions: a pooled analysis of patient-level data. Lancet. 2013;382(9909):1981–1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor G, Osinski D, Thevenin A, et al. Is platelet transfusion efficient to restore platelet reactivity in patients who are responders to aspirin and/or clopidogrel before emergency surgery? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(5):1367–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godier A, Taylor G, Gaussem P. Inefficacy of platelet transfusion to reverse ticagrelor. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(2):196–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalén M, Ivert T, Lindvall G,et al. Ticagrelor-associated bleeding in a patient undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27(5):e55–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zafar MU, Santos-Gallego C, Vorchheimer DA, et al. Platelet function normalization after a prasugrel loading-dose: time-dependent effect of platelet supplementation. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(1):100–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan A, Newton P, Pehrsson S, et al. Structural and functional characterization of a specific antidote for ticagrelor. Blood. 2015;125(22):3484–3490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(1):9–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, et al. 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the sixth joint task force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts): developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(29):2315–2381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators, Mihaylova B, Emberson J, et al. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2012;380(9841):581–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Atorvastatin for acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2001;286(5):533–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(15):1495–1504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karalis DG, Victor B, Ahedor L, et al. Use of lipid-lowering medications and the likelihood of achieving optimal LDL-cholesterol goals in coronary artery disease patients. Cholesterol. 2012;2012:861924.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, et al. Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(25):2387–2397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gryn SE, Hegele RA. Ezetimibe plus simvastatin for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16(8):1255–1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarese EP, Kołodziejczak M, Dimitroulis D, et al. From proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 to its inhibition: state-of-the-art and clinical implications. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2016;2(1):44–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarese EP, Kolodziejczak M, Schulze V, et al. Effects of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibodies in adults with hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(1):40–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kereiakes DJ, Robinson JG, Cannon CP, et al. Efficacy and safety of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab among high cardiovascular risk patients on maximally tolerated statin therapy: the ODYSSEY COMBO I study. Am Heart J. 2015;169(6):906–915.e13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon CP, Cariou B, Blom D, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in high cardiovascular risk patients with inadequately controlled hypercholesterolaemia on maximally tolerated doses of statins: the ODYSSEY COMBO II randomized controlled trial. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(19):1186–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastelein JJ, Ginsberg HN, Langslet G, et al. ODYSSEY FH I and FH II: 78 week results with alirocumab treatment in 735 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(43):2996–3003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(16):1489–1499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth EM, Taskinen MR, Ginsberg HN, et al. Monotherapy with the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab versus ezetimibe in patients with hypercholesterolemia: results of a 24 week, double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial. Int J Cardiol. 2014;176(1):55–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnier M, Jones P, Severance R, et al. Efficacy and safety of adding alirocumab to rosuvastatin versus adding ezetimibe or doubling the rosuvastatin dose in high cardiovascular-risk patients: the ODYSSEY OPTIONS II randomized trial. Atherosclerosis. 2016;244:138–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bays H, Gaudet D, Weiss R, et al. Alirocumab as add-on to atorvastatin versus other lipid treatment strategies: ODYSSEY OPTIONS I randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(8):3140–3148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raal FJ, Stein EA, Dufour R, et al. PCSK9 inhibition with evolocumab (AMG 145) in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (RUTHERFORD-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9965):331–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson JG, Nedergaard BS, Rogers WJ, et al. Effect of evolocumab or ezetimibe added to moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy on LDL-C lowering in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the LAPLACE-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311(18):1870–1882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarese EP, Kolodziejczak M, Kereiakes DJ, et al. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies for acute coronary syndrome: a narrative review. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(9):600–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almontashiri NA, Vilmundarson RO, Ghasemzadeh N, et al. Plasma PCSK9 levels are elevated with acute myocardial infarction in two independent retrospective angiographic studies. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunven C, Paehler T, Poitiers F. A randomized study of the relative pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of alirocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, after single subcutaneous administration at three different injection sites in healthy subjects. Cardiovasc Ther. 2014;32(6):297–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parodi G, Bellandi B, Valenti R, et al. Comparison of double (360 mg) ticagrelor loading dose with standard (60 mg) prasugrel loading dose in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: the Rapid Activity of Platelet Inhibitor Drugs (RAPID) primary PCI 2 study. Am Heart J. 2014;167(6):909–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubica J, Adamski P, Ostrowska M, et al. Influence of morphine on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction (IMPRESSION): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meine TJ, Roe MT, Chen AY, et al. Association of intravenous morphine use and outcomes in acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE quality improvement initiative. Am Heart J. 2005;149(6):1043–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puymirat E, Lamhaut L, Bonnet N, et al. Correlates of pre-hospital morphine use in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients and its association with in-hospital outcomes and long-term mortality: the FAST-MI (French registry of acute ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction) programme. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(13):1063–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iakobishvili Z, Porter A, Battler A, et al. Effect of narcotic treatment on outcomes of acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105(7):912–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubica J, Kubica A, Jilma B, et al. Impact of morphine on antiplatelet effects of oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Int J Cardiol. 2016;215:201–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy CP, Mullins KV, Sidhu SS, et al. The on- and off-target effects of morphine in acute coronary syndrome: a narrative review. Am Heart J. 2016;176:114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siller-Matula JM, Specht S, Kubica J, et al. Abciximab as a bridging strategy to overcome morphine-prasugrel interaction in STEMI patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 [Cited 2016 Jul 1]. DOI:10.1111/bcp.13053
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abraham NS, Hlatky MA, Antman EM, et al. ACCF/ACG/AHA 2010 expert consensus document on the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and thienopyridines: a focused update of the ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 expert consensus document on reducing the gastrointestinal risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID use. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(24):2051–2066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chintala M, Shimizu K, Ogawa M, et al. Basic and translational research on proteinase-activated receptors: antagonism of the proteinase-activated receptor 1 for thrombin, a novel approach to antiplatelet therapy for atherothrombotic disease. J Pharmacol Sci. 2008;108(4):433–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricoci P, Huang Z, Held C, et al. Thrombin-receptor antagonist vorapaxar in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(1):20–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow DA, Braunwald E, Bonaca MP, et al. Vorapaxar in the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(15):1404–1413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Bartolo B, Takata K, Duong M, et al. CETP inhibition in CVD prevention: an actual appraisal. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016;18(5):43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho LS, Virginio VW, Panzoldo NB, et al. Elevated CETP activity during acute phase of myocardial infarction is independently associated with endothelial dysfunction and adverse clinical outcome. Atherosclerosis. 2014;237(2):777–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brousseau ME, Schaefer EJ, Wolfe ML, et al. Effects of an inhibitor of cholesteryl ester transfer protein on HDL cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(15):1505–1515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon CP, Shah S, Dansky HM, et al. Safety of anacetrapib in patients with or at high risk for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(25):2406–2415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotto AM Jr, Cannon CP, Li XS, et al. Evaluation of lipids, drug concentration, and safety parameters following cessation of treatment with the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor anacetrapib in patients with or at high risk for coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113(1):76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovingh GK, Kastelein JJ, van Deventer SJ, et al. Cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibition by TA-8995 in patients with mild dyslipidaemia (TULIP): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9992):452–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krintus M, Kozinski M, Kubica J, et al. Critical appraisal of inflammatory markers in cardiovascular risk stratification. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2014;51(5):263–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krintus M, Kozinski M, Stefanska A, et al. Value of C-reactive protein as a risk factor for acute coronary syndrome: a comparison with apolipoprotein concentrations and lipid profile. Mediators Inflamm. 2012;2012:419804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muslin AJ. MAPK signalling in cardiovascular health and disease: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Clin Sci (Lond). 2008;115(7):203–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisk M, Gajendragadkar PR, Mäki-Petäjä KM, et al. Therapeutic potential of p38 MAP kinase inhibition in the management of cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2014;14(3):155–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newby LK, Marber MS, Melloni C, et al. Losmapimod, a novel p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor, in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9949):1187–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue ML, Glaser R, Aylward PE, et al. Rationale and design of the LosmApimod To Inhibit p38 MAP kinase as a TherapeUtic target and moDify outcomes after an acute coronary syndromE trial. Am Heart J. 2015;169(5):622–630.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyke CK, Steinhubl SR, Kleiman NS, et al. First-in-human experience of an antidote-controlled anticoagulant using RNA aptamer technology: a phase 1a pharmacodynamic evaluation of a drug-antidote pair for the controlled regulation of factor IXa activity. Circulation. 2006;114(23):2490–2497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povsic TJ, Wargin WA, Alexander JH, et al. Pegnivacogin results in near complete FIX inhibition in acute coronary syndrome patients: RADAR pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic substudy. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(19):2412–2419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povsic TJ, Vavalle JP, Alexander JH, et al. Use of the REG1 anticoagulation system in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the phase II RADAR-PCI study. EuroIntervention. 2014;10(4):431–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovlatova NL, Jakubowski JA, Sugidachi A, et al. The reversible P2Y antagonist cangrelor influences the ability of the active metabolites of clopidogrel and prasugrel to produce irreversible inhibition of platelet function. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6(7):1153–1159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider DJ, Agarwal Z, Seecheran N, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects during the transition between cangrelor and ticagrelor. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(4):435–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitt AK, Drexel H, Feely J, et al. Persistent lipid abnormalities in statin-treated patients and predictors of LDL-cholesterol goal achievement in clinical practice in Europe and Canada. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(2):221–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar