Causal modeling of substance use and mental health among male military veterans

References

• Awang, Z. (2012). Structural equation modeling using amos graphic. UiTM Press
   Google Scholar
• Bray, R., Fairbank, J., & Marsden, M. (1999). Stress and substance use among military men and women. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 25(2), 239–256. doi:10.1081/ADA-100101858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. J., & Nobel, O. B.-Y. (2009). Occupational stressors in military service: A review and framework. Military Psychology, 21(Suppl. 2), S47–S67. doi:10.1080/08995600903249149
   Google Scholar
• Cancio, R. (2017). Structural pathways between race/ethnicity, substance use, military service, and male-perpetrated intimate partner violence in pre-9/11 military families. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 0886260517723142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cancio, R. (2018). Pain and masculinity: A cohort comparison between Mexican American Vietnam and post–9/11 combat veterans. Men and Masculinities. doi:10.1177/1097184X18761779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancio, R., & Altal, D. (2019). Comparing post-Gulf War and post-9/11 era of service among veterans: Intimate partner violence and substance use by race and ethnicity. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 1–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forza, C., & Filippini, R. (1998). TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: A causal model. International Journal of Production Economics, 55(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gewirtz, A. H., Polusny, M. A., DeGarmo, D. S., Khaylis, A., & Erbes, C. R. (2010). Posttraumatic stress symptoms among national guard soldiers deployed to Iraq: Associations with parenting behaviors and couple adjustment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 599–610. doi:10.1037/a0020571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenspoon, P. J., & Saklofske, D. H. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of the multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(5), 965–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J., Anderson. R. E., (2010). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. M., Halpern, C. T., Whitsel, E., Hussey, J., Tabor, J., Entzel, P., & Udry., J. R. (2009). The national longitudinal study of adolescent to adult health: Research design.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.). (1999). Statistical strategies for small sample research. Sage
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). Statistical power and tests of mediation. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, S. R. (1998). The stability of post hoc model modifications in confirmatory factor analysis models. The Journal of Experimental Education, 66(4), 361–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). London, England: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W, & Hau, K. T. (1999). Confirmatory factor analysis: Strategies for small sample sizes. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, 1, 251–284.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. D., Panuzio, J., & Taft, C. (2005). Intimate partner violence among military veterans and active-duty servicemen. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 862–876. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(4), 599–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2011). The military-civilian gap: War and sacrifice in the post-9/11 era. Washington, DC: Pew Social and Demographic Trends.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. P., Roberts, P. A., Jones, N., & Bisson, J. I. (2015). Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 38, 25–38. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seal, K. H., Metzler, T. J., Gima, K. S., Bertenthal, D., Maquen, S., & Marmar, C. R. (2009). Trends and risk factors for mental health diagnoses among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans using department of veterans affairs health care,2002–2008. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 1651–1658. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.150284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Principal components and factor analysis. Using Multivariate Statistics, 4, 582–633.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, C. T., Stafford, J., Watkins, L. E., & Street, A. E. (2011). Posttraumatic stress disorder and intimate relationship programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 22–33. doi:10.1037/a0022196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanielian, T., & Jaycox, L. H. (2008). Invisible wounds of war: Psychological and cognitive injuries. Their consequences, and services to assist recovery, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, J. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 35–50. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Defense. (2015). Demographics profile of the military community. Arlington, VA: ThePentagon.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: an evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar