The management of brownfields in Ontario: A comprehensive review of remediation and reuse characteristics, trends, and outcomes, 2004–2015

References

• Alberini, A. 2007. Determinants and effects on property values of participation in voluntary cleanup programs: The case of Colorado. Contemporary Economic Policy 25(3): 415–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberini, A., and K. Segerson. 2002. Assessing Voluntary Programs to Improve Environmental Quality. Environmental and Resource Economics 22(1–2): 157–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman, A., S. Darley, T.P. Lyon, and K. Wernstedt. 2010. What Drives Participation in State Voluntary Cleanup Programs? Evidence from Oregon. Land Economics 86(4):785–799.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 1991. Interim Canadian Environmental Quality Criteria for Contaminated Sites. CCME, Winnipeg, MA, 20pp.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 1993. Contaminated Site Liability Report: Recommended Principles for a Consistent Approach Across Canada. CCME, Winnipeg, MA, p. 24.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 1996. Guidance Manual for Developing Site-specific Soil Quality Remediation Objectives for Contaminated Sites in Canada. CCME, Winnipeg, MA, p. 60.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 1997. Recommended Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines. CCME, Winnipeg, MA, p. 197.
   Google Scholar
• De Sousa, C. 2001. Contaminated Sites Management: The Canadian Situation in International Context. Journal of Environmental Management 62(2):131–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sousa, C. 2015. Overcoming Barriers and Facilitating Brownfields Redevelopment in the GTHA: A Review of Results from Interviews with Private Sector Stakeholders. Center for Urban Research and Land Development, Toronto, ON, p. 30. Available at http://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/cur/pdfs/WorkingPapers/CUR%20Working%20Paper_Brownfields_Redevelopment_November%2023%2C%202015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dylewski, F.R. 2001. Ohio’s Brownfield Problem and Possible Solutions: What is Required for a Successful Brownfield Initiative? Akron Law Review 35:81.
   Google Scholar
• ECO Canada. 2007. Who will do the Cleanup? Canadian Labour Requirements for Remediation and Reclamation of Contaminated Sites 2006–2009. Environmental Labour Market (ELM) Research, Environmental Careers Organization Canada, Calgary, AB, p. 57.
   Google Scholar
• Fishlock, R. 2010. Brownfields Reform in Ontario. Web version reprinted from Key Developments in Environmental Law. 2010. Canada Law Book, Aurora, ON, p. 18. Available at http://www.blakesfiles.com/Reports/2011_Blakes_Brownfields_Reform_in_Ontario_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ford, G., D. Macdonald and M. Winfield. 1994. Who Pays for Past Sins? Policy Issues Surrounding Contaminated Site Remediation in Canada. Alternatives 20:28–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guignet, D., and A. Alberini. 2010. Voluntary Cleanup Programs and Redevelopment Potential: Lessons from Baltimore, Maryland. Cityscape, 7–36.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, M., G. Arku and J. Gilliland. 2010. Assessing London, Ontario’s Brownfield Redevelopment Effort to Promote Urban Intensification. Local Environment 15(4):389–402.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.J., and P. Miller. 2015. Periodic Characteristics and Implications of Programs and Policies for Brownfield Management in the USA. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 43(1):96–107.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, P.B., and H.W. Van Landingham. 2000. Reclamation and Economic Regeneration of Brownfields. Reviews of Economic Development Literature and Practice 1:1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, P.B., and T. Lyons. 2000. Lessons from Private Sector Brownfield Redevelopers: Planning Public Support for Urban Regeneration. APA Journal 66(1):46–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Infrastructure, Ontario Growth Secretariat. 2013. Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2006, Office Consolidation, June 2013. Queen’s Printer for Ontario Toronto, ON, p. 82. Available at https://www.placestogrow.ca/content/ggh/2013-06-10-Growth-Plan-for-the-GGH-EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. 2005. Places to Grow Act (c-13). Available at https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/05p13
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. 2006. Bill 51, Planning and Conservation Land Statute Law Amendment Act. Queen’s Printer for Ontario Toronto, ON. Available at the Legislative Assembly of Ontario: http://www.ontla.on.ca/lao/en/bills/
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. 2007. A Practical Guide to Brownfield Redevelopment in Ontario. Queen’s Printer for Ontario, Toronto, ON, p. 23.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. 1989. Guidelines for the Decommissioning and Cleanup of Sites in Ontario. Waste Management Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto, ON, p. 44.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. 1993. Interim Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Petroleum Contaminated Sites in Ontario. Hazardous Contaminants Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto, ON, p. 24.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. 2001. Brownfields Statute Law Amendment Act, Government of Ontario (c-17, Bill 56), Toronto, ON. Available at the Government of Ontario website: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/S01017
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. 2015. Brownfields Redevelopment. Available at http://www.ontario.ca/page/brownfields-redevelopment.
   Google Scholar
• National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy. 1996a. Contaminated Sites Issues in Canada. NRTEE, Financial Services Task Force. Report prepared by Slmcleod consulting, Ottawa, ON, p. 79.
   Google Scholar
• National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy. 1996b. The Financial Services Sector and Brownfield Redevelopment. NRTEE, Financial Services Task Force. Report prepared by MM Dillon Limited, Global Risk Management Corporation, and Tecsult, Ottawa, ON, p. 85.
   Google Scholar
• National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy. 1997. Removing Barriers: Redeveloping Contaminated Lands for Housing. NRTEE, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. Report prepared by Delcan Corporation, Golder Associates Ltd. and McCarthy-Tetrault, Ottawa, ON, p. 156.
   Google Scholar
• National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy. 1998. State of the Debate: Greening Canada’s Brownfield Sites. NRTEE, Ottawa, ON, p. 72.
   Google Scholar
• National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy. 2003. Cleaning up the Past, Building the Future: A National Brownfield Redevelopment Strategy for Canada. NRTEE, Ottawa, ON, p. 93.
   Google Scholar
• Noonan, F., and C.A. Vidich, 1992. Decision Analysis for Utilizing Hazardous Waste Site Assessments in Real Estate Acquisition. Risk Analysis 12(2):245–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ontario Regulation 153/04 Records of Site Condition – Part XV.1 of the Act. 2004). Available at https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/040153/v1
   Google Scholar
• Page, G.W., and R.S. Berger. 2006. Characteristics and Land Use of Contaminated Brownfield Properties in Voluntary Cleanup Agreement Programs. Land Use Policy 23(4):551–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, H.G. 2001. Legislative Innovation in State Brownfields Redevelopment Programs. Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation 16:1–80.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S., C. Gaudet, M. Sheppard, and M. Wong. 1992. The Development of Assessment and Remediation Guidelines for Contaminated Soils, a Review of the Science. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 72(4):359–394.
   Google Scholar
• Therrien, R., and G. Hill. 1995. Canadian Contaminated Land Policy. Chemistry and Industry 13:515–517.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2014. State Brownfields and Voluntary Response Programs 2014. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, EPA-42-F-14-215, Washington D.C., p. 135. Available at https://www.epa.gov/brownfields/2014-state-brownfields-and-voluntary-response-programs.
   Google Scholar
• United States General Accounting Office. 1997. State Voluntary Programs Provide Incentives to Encourage Cleanups. GAO/RCED-97-66, Washington, D.C., p. 60. Available at www.gao.gov/archive/1997/rc97066.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wernstedt, K., A. Blackman, T.P. Lyon, and K. Novak. 2013. Revitalizing Underperforming and Contaminated Land through Voluntary Action: Perspectives from US Voluntary Cleanup Programs. Land Use Policy 31:545–556.
   Google Scholar
• Winson‐Geideman, K., R.A. Simons, and J. Pendergrass. 2004. Tracking Remediation and Redevelopment Trends of Brownfield Clean‐up Programmes: The Cook County Experience. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47(3):393–405.
   Google Scholar