Partisan-motivated prorogation and the Westminster model: a comparative perspective

References

• An Act to Amend the Canada Elections Act. (2007). Statutes of Canada (2007, c.10). Retrieved from http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/annualstatutes/2007_10/
   Google Scholar
• An Act to amend the Election Act, the Election Finances Act and the Legislative Assembly Act, to repeal the Representation Act, 1996 and to enact the Representation Act. (2005). Statutes of Ontario (2005, c.35). Retrieved from http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/source/statutes/english/2005/elaws_src_s05035_e.htm
   Google Scholar
• Aucoin, P., Jarvis, M. D., & Turnbull, L. (2011). Democratizing the constitution: Reforming responsible government. Toronto: Emond Montgomery Publications.
   Google Scholar
• British North America Act. (1867). 30 & 31 Vic. (1867, c.3). Retrieved from http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. (2009, December 18). ‘The buck stopped nowhere': Inside foreign affairs, no one was in charge to act on Colvin's warnings. Globe and Mail, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Canada. Parliament. House of Commons. (2009a). Special committee on the Canadian mission in Afghanistan. Retrieved from http://www.parl.gc.ca/CommitteeBusiness/CommitteeHome.aspx?Cmte=AFGH&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=40&Ses=2
   Google Scholar
• Canada. Parliament. House of Commons. (2009b). Journals, 40th parliament, 2nd session. Retrieved from http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/House/402/Journals/128/Journal128.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Press. (2012, October 24). Ontario's prorogation due to ‘spurious, phoney contempt motion,’ McGuinty Says. National Post. Retrieved from http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/10/24/ontarios-prorogation-due-to-spurious-phoney-contempt-motion-mcguinty-says/
   Google Scholar
• Chase, S. (2009, November 25). Whistleblower's warnings reached Minister's office. Globe and Mail, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, S., & Ibbitson, J. (2009, December 11). MPs join forces to order release of afghan records. Globe and Mail, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Constitution Act (Canada), 1982. (1982). Retrieved from http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/Const_index.html
   Google Scholar
• Delacourt, S. (2008, January 17). Tory government takes aim at bureaucracy. Toronto Star. Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com/news/2008/01/17/tory_government_takes_aim_at_bureaucracy.html
   Google Scholar
• Desserud, D. A. (2009). The governor general, the prime minister and the request to prorogue. Canadian Political Science Review, 3(3), 40–54.
   Google Scholar
• Don't shut Queen's Park. (2012, October 17). Toronto Star, p. A18.
   Google Scholar
• Dornan, C. (2009). Introduction: The outcome in retrospect. In C. Dornan & J. H. Pammett (Eds.), The Canadian federal election of 2008 (pp. 7–15). Toronto: Dundurn Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dufour, P., Jenson, J., & Saint-Martin, D. (2011). Governing without a majority: What consequences in Westminster systems? Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 49(4), 435–439. doi: 10.1080/14662043.2011.615166
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, T. (2011). The emerging Conservative coalition. Policy Options, 32(6), 104–108.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, G. (2009, December 15). Tories ponder closing down parliament, Goodale says. Globe and Mail, p. A7.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, G., Clark, C., & Laghi, B. (2006, January 18). Harper: Don't fear a majority. Globe and Mail, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• The Globe's view: Democracy diminished, accountability avoided. (2009, December 31). Globe and Mail, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Heard, A. (2009). The governor general's decision to prorogue parliament: Parliamentary democracy defended or endangered? Points of view: Discussion paper No. 7. Retrieved from http://www.law.ualberta.ca/centres/ccs/publications/pointsofview.php?id=33
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, B. (2010). British and Canadian experience with the royal prerogative. Canadian Parliamentary Review, 33(2), 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, B. (2012). The Westminster approach to prorogation, dissolution and fixed date elections. Canadian Parliamentary Review, 35(2), 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, P. (2010). Prorogation and the power of the governor general. National Journal of Constitutional Law, 27(1), 193–203.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, G. W. (2012a). Prorogation as partisan political tool: The New South Wales experience. Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law, 6(1), 161–194.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, G. W. (2012b, September 28–30). Prorogation as partisan political tool: The Western Australia experience. Paper presented at the Atlantic Provinces Political Science Association annual conference, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, G. W. (2013). Prorogation and partisanship in Tasmania and South Australia. Parliaments, Estates and Representation, 33(2), 140–155. doi: 10.1080/02606755.2013.845348
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, K. (2012a, October 6). Government, public-sector workers on collision course. Globe and Mail, p. A10.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, K. (2012b, October 13). Liberals accused of ‘cover up’ after document dump. Globe and Mail, p. A15.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, K. (2013, August 7). Document release put McGuinty's prorogation talk into ‘high gear’, Committee told. Globe and Mail, p. A6.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, A. (2008). Parliamentary opposition in Westminster democracies: Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 14(1–2), 20–45. doi: 10.1080/13572330801920887
   Google Scholar
• Koch, K. (2012). Legislative reports: Ontario. Canadian Parliamentary Review, 35(4), 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Koring, P. (2009, December 1). Heavy blackouts hamper detainee probe. Globe and Mail, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. (2010). Harperland: The politics of control. Toronto: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• McWhinney, E. (2009). The constitutional and political aspects of the office of the governor general. Canadian Parliamentary Review, 32(2), 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• McWhinney, E. (2010). The role of the governor general: Some lessons from Australia and the Commonwealth. Canadian Parliamentary Review, 33(4), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B. W. (2009). Proroguing parliament: A matter of convention. Public Law Review, 20, 100–107.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeau, C. (2011). Rogue in power: Why Stephen Harper is remaking Canada by Stealth. Toronto: James Lorimer.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario. Legislative Assembly of Ontario. (2012). Official report of debates (Hansard), first session, fortieth parliament. Retrieved from http://www.ontla.on.ca/house-proceedings/transcripts/files_pdf/02-OCT-2012_L087.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paun, A. (2011). After the age of majority? Multi-party governance and the Westminster model. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 49(4), 440–456. doi: 10.1080/14662043.2011.615167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prorogation an abuse of power. (2012, October 18). Globe and Mail, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Re: Resolution to amend the Constitution. (1981). SCR(1) 753.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W., Wanna, J., & Weller, P. (2009). Comparing Westminster. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, P. H., & Sossin, L. (Eds.). (2009). Parliamentary democracy in crisis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, B. (2002). Bicameralism and democracy: The transformation of Australian state upper houses. Australian Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 267–281. doi: 10.1080/10361140220148142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strangio, P. (2004). Labor and reform of the Victorian legislative council, 1950–2003. Labour History, 86, 33–52. doi: 10.2307/27515966
   Google Scholar
• Totaro, P. (1994, December 8). ‘Carnival is over': Fahey defies extension motion. Sydney Morning Herald, p. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Turn the tables on prorogation. (2010, January 5). Toronto Star, p. A14.
   Google Scholar
• Valpy, M. (2009). The ‘crisis’: A narrative. In P. H. Russell & L. Sossin (Eds.), Parliamentary democracy in crisis (pp. 3–18). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar