Stretched but not snapped: constitutional lessons from the 2010 coalition government in Britain

References

• Ashdown, P. (2000). Diaries; volume one 1988–1997. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Badgehot, W. (1867). The English Constitution and other political essays [see Smith, P. (Ed.). (2001). Badgehot: The English Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press].
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, N. (2007). The house of lords – Into the future? The Journal of Legislative Studies, 13(2), 197–209. doi: 10.1080/13572330701334254
   Google Scholar
• Bara, J. (2005). A question of trust: Implementing party manifestos. Parliamentary Affairs, 58(3), 585–599. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsi053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, S. (2005). Political strategy: Modern politics in contemporary Britain. Liverpool: Liverpool Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, S. (2013). The coalition and constitutional reform revisited. Amicus Curiae, 95, 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, S. (2014). Principles or practicalities? Salvaging house of lords reform. Renewal: A Journal of Social Democracy, 22(1/2), 118–128.
   Google Scholar
• Benn, T. (1989). Against the tide: Diaries 1973–76. London: Arrow.
   Google Scholar
• Bennister, M., & Heffernan, R. (2012). Cameron as prime minister: The intra-executive politics of Britain's coalition government. Parliamentary Affairs, 65(4), 778–801. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsr061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2008). The Westminster model, governance and judicial reform. Parliamentary Affairs, 61(4), 559–577. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsn025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdanor, V. (2011, April 14). The coalition and the constitution. Gresham College Lecture.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, N. (2013, October 7). Correspondence with Michael Moore MP. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-24426306
   Google Scholar
• Coalition Agreement on Stability and Reform. (2010). Coalition Agreement on stability and reform. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cowley, P., & Stuart, M. (2013, May 14). Parliament still remains on course to be the most rebellious since 1945. Political Insight.
   Google Scholar
• Crines, A. (2012). The conservatives in coalition: “How the Tories are opposing Miliband's labour party”. British Politics and Policy at LSE. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48835/1/blogs.lse.ac.uk-Conservatives_in_Coalition_How_Tories_are_opposing_Miliband%E2%80%99s_Labour_Party.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Curtice, J. (2010). So what went wrong with the electoral system? The 2010 election result and the debate about electoral reform. Parliamentary Affairs, 63(4), 623–638. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. (2005). None, one or several? Perspectives on the UK's constitution(s). The Cambridge Law Journal, 64(02), 329–351. doi: 10.1017/S0008197305006884
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, M. (2011). Devolution, delegation and the Westminster model: A comparative analysis of developments within the UK, 1998–2009. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 49(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1080/14662043.2011.541109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, M. (2000). The British presidency. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganesh, J. (2014, March 24). Cameron's coalition is a bazaar for big, radical ideas. Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, O. (2006). The office of Deputy Prime Minister. Standard note: SN/PC/04023, Parliament and Constitution Centre. London: House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Hayton, R. (2014). Conservative party statecraft and the politics of coalition. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(1), 6–24. doi: 10.1093/pa/gst019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazell, R. J. D., & Yong, B. (2012). The politics of coalition: How the conservative liberal democrat government works. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, R. (2005). Exploring (and explaining) the British Prime Minister. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(4), 605–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2005.00203.x
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, R. (2011). Labour's new labour legacy: Politics after Blair and Brown. Political Studies Review, 9(2), 163–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00230.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heppell, T. (2002). The ideological composition of the parliamentary conservative party 1992–97. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 4(2), 299–324. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.t01-1-00006
   Google Scholar
• Heppell, T. (2014). Ministerial selection and portfolio allocation in the Cameron government. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(1), 64–79. doi: 10.1093/pa/gst022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heppell, T., & Hill, M. (2012). Labour in opposition. In T. Heppell & D. Seawright (Eds.), Cameron and the conservatives: The transition to coalition government (pp. 209–223). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchens, P. (2010, May 13). Actually ‘con-dem’ is a better name for a government that is to the left of new labour. Daily Mail.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2010). The coalition: Our programme for government.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, R., & Maloney, J. (2011). Why has Britain fewer marginal seats than it used to? (No. 1105). Exeter University, Department of Economics. Retrieved from http://business-school.exeter.ac.uk/research/areas/topics/economics/outputs/publication/?id=696
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords Constitution Select Committee. (2013). Constitutional implications of coalition government: Call for evidence.
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords Library Note. (2011, November 1). Constitutional and parliamentary effect of coalition government, LLN 2011/002.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. W., & Blick, A. (2010). The PM and the centre of UK government from Tony Blair to David Cameron: How much will change in the transition from single-party to coalition government? British Politics and Policy at LSE.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, R. (2010). Short money, parliament and constitution centre. House of Commons Library.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy – Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: University of Yale Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, F. (2011). Constitutional stretching: Coalition governance and the Westminster model. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 49(4), 486–509. doi: 10.1080/14662043.2011.615169
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, D. (2010, June). The making of a cutters’ coalition’. Socialist Review. Retrieved from http://socialistreview.org.uk/issue/june-2010
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Code. (2010). Cabinet Office. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/61402/ministerial-code-may-2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2014, July 14). Reshuffle: Ministers facing the sack in mutiny against David Cameron. Evening Standard.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (1997). The case for first-past-the-post. Representation, 34(2), 84–88. doi: 10.1080/00344899708522993
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (2008). Making sense of opposition. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 14(1–2), 236–250. doi: 10.1080/13572330801921257
   Google Scholar
• Paun, A. (2011). After the age of majority? Multi-party governance and the Westminster model. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 49(4), 440–456. doi: 10.1080/14662043.2011.615167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, T., Bara, J., & Bartle, J. (2011). The UK coalition agreement of 2010: Who won? Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 21(2), 295–312. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2011.562610
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (2006). Executives in parliamentary government. In R. A. W. Rhodes, S. Binder, & B. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions (pp. 323–343). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A., & Bevir, M. (2006). Prime ministers, presidentialism and Westminster smokescreens. Political Studies, 54(4), 671–690. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00632.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (2010). A stronger second chamber? Assessing the impact of house of lords reform in 1999 and the lessons for bicameralism. Political Studies, 58(5), 866–885. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00810.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N., & Warren, M. E. (2008). The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 387–412. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham-Jones, M. (2013). Labour's austerity problem. Dissent, 60(4), 38–42. doi: 10.1353/dss.2013.0075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks-Heeg, S. (2010). Uninventing the ‘hung parliament’. British Politics and Policy at LSE.
   Google Scholar