Anomalous authoritarianism: what, which, why?

References

• Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 155–194. doi: 10.1023/A:1024471506938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J., Limongi, F., & Przeworski, A. (1996). Classifying political regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID), 31(2), 3–36. doi: 10.1007/BF02719326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anckar, C. (2008). Size, Islandness, and democracy: A global comparison. International Political Science Review, 29(4), 433–459. doi: 10.1177/0192512108095722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. (1999). Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), 158–183. doi: 10.1086/250107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellin, E. (2004). The robustness of authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics, 36(2), 139–157. doi: 10.2307/4150140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benchemsi, A. (2012). Morocco: Outfoxing the opposition. Journal of Democracy, 23(1), 57–69. doi: 10.1353/jod.2012.0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendourou, O. (1996). Power and opposition in Morocco. Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 108–122. doi: 10.1353/jod.1996.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, M., Reenock, C., & Nordstrom, T. (2004). The legacy of western overseas colonialism on democratic survival. International Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 225–250. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00298.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, C. (2011). Democracy, development, and the international system. International Political Science Review, 105(4), 809–828. doi: 10.1017/S0003055411000402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, C., & Stokes, S. (2003). Endogenous democratization. World Politics, 55(4), 517–549. doi: 10.1353/wp.2003.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. (1983). World system position, dependency, and democracy: The cross-national evidence. American Sociological Review, 48(4), 468–479. doi: 10.2307/2117715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinks, D., & Coppedge, M. (2006). Diffusion is no illusion neighbor emulation in the third wave of democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 39(4), 463–489. doi: 10.1177/0010414005276666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlee, J. (2009). Portents of pluralism: How hybrid regimes affect democratic transitions. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 515–532. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler, M. (2015). Continuity through co-optation: Rural politics and regime resilience in Morocco and Mauritania. Mediterranean Politics, 20(3), 364–385. doi: 10.1080/13629395.2015.1071453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnell, P. (2011). Promoting democracy abroad: Policy and performance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. (1999). Aiding democracy abroad: The learning curve. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143(1–2), 67–101. doi: 10.1007/s11127-009-9491-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clague, C., Gleason, S., & Knack, S. (2001). Determinants of lasting democracy in poor countries: Culture, development, and institutions. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 573(1), 16–41. doi: 10.1177/0002716201573001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D., & J. Mahoney. (1996). Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics, 49(01), 56–91. doi: 10.1353/wp.1996.0023
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debly, T. (2014). Culture and resistance in Swaziland. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 32(3), 284–301. doi: 10.1080/02589001.2014.956496
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (1992). Economic development and democracy reconsidered. In Reexamining democracy: Essays in honor of Seymour Martin Lipset (pp. 93–139). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2008). The spirit of democracy: The struggle to build free societies throughout the world: New York, NY: Holt Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Doorenspleet, R. (2000). Reassessing the three waves of democratization. World Politics, 52(3), 384–406. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100016580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doorenspleet, R. (2005). Democratic transitions: Exploring the structural sources of the fourth wave. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Doorenspleet, R. (2012). Deviant democracies. In J. Haynes (Eds.), Routledge handbook of democratization, (pp. 190–206). London and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, Z., & Simmons, B. (2005). On waves, clusters, and diffusion: A conceptual framework. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 33–51. doi: 10.1177/0002716204272516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, M. S. (2002). Islam and authoritarianism. World Politics, 55(1), 4–37. doi: 10.1353/wp.2003.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2011). The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the French revolution. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J., & Przeworski, A. (2007). Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats. Comparative Political Studies, 40(11), 1279–1301. doi: 10.1177/0010414007305817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. (1990). How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics. Political Analysis, 2(1), 131–150. doi: 10.1093/pan/2.1.131
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 115–144. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, K. F. (2007). Why dominant parties lose: Mexico’s democratization in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund. (2007). Guide on resource revenue transparency. Washington, DC: IMF Multimedia Services Division.
   Google Scholar
• Karl, T. L. (1997). The paradox of plenty: Oil booms and petro-states. Vol. 26. Berkeley, CF: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koter, D. (2013). King makers: Local leaders and ethnic politics in Africa. World Politics, 65(2), 187–232. doi: 10.1017/S004388711300004X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M. (1988). Of rule and revenue. 1. paperback print., [nachdr.]. California series on social choice and political economy 13. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold War. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B. (1993). Islam and liberal democracy. ATLANTIC-BOSTON, 271, 89–89.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, E. S. (2005). Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 435–452. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. The American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. doi: 10.2307/1951731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMillan, H. (1985). Swaziland: Decolonisation and the triumph of ‘tradition’. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 23(4), 643–666. doi: 10.1017/S0022278X00055014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maghraoui, A. (2001). Monarchy and political reform in Morocco. Journal of Democracy, 12(1), 73–86. doi: 10.1353/jod.2001.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, M. (1986). The sources of social power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Migdal, J. (1988). Strong societies and weak states: State-society relations and state capabilities in the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1861/1993). Considerations on Representative Government, 188–428.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, E. N. (1985). Dependent economic development, aid dependence on the United States, and democratic breakdown in the third world. International Studies Quarterly, 29(4), 445–469. doi: 10.2307/2600381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C., Weingast, B., & Wallis, J. J. (2009). Violence and social orders a conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1997). Modernization: Theories and facts. World Politics, 49(2), 155–183. doi: 10.1353/wp.1997.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M. (2001). Does oil hinder democracy? World Politics, 53(03), 325–361. doi: 10.1353/wp.2001.0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M. (2008). Oil and democracy revisited. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Rustow, D. A. (1970). Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model. Comparative Politics, 2(3), 337–363. doi: 10.2307/421307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1974). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Unwin University Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shepsle, K. A. (1989). Studying institutions some lessons from the rational choice approach. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1(2), 131–147. doi: 10.1177/0951692889001002002
   Google Scholar
• Sihlongonyane, M. F. (2003). The invisible hand of the royal family in the political dynamics of Swaziland. African and Asian Studies (Leiden), 2(2), 155–187. doi: 10.1163/156920903322149419
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions. A comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D. (2003). Iron cage in an iron fist: Authoritarian institutions and the personalization of power in Malaysia. Comparative Politics, 36(1), 81–101. doi: 10.2307/4150161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepan, A., Linz, J. J., & Minoves, J. F. (2014). Democratic parliamentary monarchies. Journal of Democracy, 25(2), 35–51. doi: 10.1353/jod.2014.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepan, A., & Skach, C. (1993). Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus presidentialism. World Politics, 46(01), 1–22. doi: 10.2307/2950664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svolik, M. W. (2012). The politics of authoritarian rule. Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teorell, J. (2010). Determinants of democratization: Explaining regime change in the world, 1972–2006. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 369–404. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolstrup, J. (2014). Russia vs. the EU: The competition for influence in post-soviet states. Boulder, CO: First Forum Press, a division of Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• USAID, Human Rights Report. (2014). 2013 Human Rights Report: Swaziland. Report. Department Of State. The Office of Website Management, Bureau of Public Affairs. Swaziland.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderhill, R. (2013). Promoting authoritarianism abroad. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, D. (2012). Patrimonialism (neo) and the kingdom of Swaziland: Employing a case study to rescale a concept. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 50(3), 344–366. doi: 10.1080/14662043.2012.692926
   Google Scholar
• Yom, S. L., & Gause, F. G. III. (2012). Resilient royals: How Arab monarchies hang on. Journal of Democracy, 23(4), 74–88. doi: 10.1353/jod.2012.0062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar