The limits of prescription: courts and social policy in India and South Africa

References

• Albertyn, C. (2011). Gendered transformation in South African jurisprudence: Poor women and the constitutional court. Stellenbosch Law Review, 22(3), 591–613.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, G. (1999). Working a democratic constitution: A history of the Indian experience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (2008). Litigating for social justice in post apartheid South Africa: A focus on health and education. In V. Gauri & D. Brinks (Eds.), Courting social justice: Judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world (pp. 38–99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birchfield, L., & Corsi, J. (2010). Between starvation and globalization: Realizing the right to food in India. Michigan Journal of International Law, 31(4), 691–764.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, D. (2011). Policy making in India: A dynamic process of statecraft. Pacific Affairs, 84(1), 89–107. doi: 10.5509/201184189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deva, S. (2009). Public interest litigation in India: A critical review. Civil Justice Quarterly, 28, 19–40.
   Google Scholar
• Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2013). An uncertain glory: India and its contradictions. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Dugard, J. (2008). Courts and the poor in South Africa: A critique of systemic judicial failures to advance transformative justice. SA Journal of Human Rights, 24, 214–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epp, C. R. (1998). The rights revolution: Lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Even amid its wealth, India finds, half its small children are malnourished. (2007, February 10). The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, L. (2006). India’s new middle class: Democratic politics in an era of economic reform. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, F. R. (2005). India’s political economy: The gradual revolution (1947–2004). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, S. (2016). Enabling agency: The constitutional court and social policy. Transformation, 91, 19–39. doi: 10.1353/trn.2016.0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, S., & Mottiar, S. (2005). A rewarding engagement? The treatment action campaign and the politics of HIV/AIDS. Politics & Society, 33, 511–565. doi: 10.1177/0032329205280928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauri V. (2009). Public interest litigation in India: Overreaching or underachieving? ( Policy Research Working Paper 5109). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Gauri, V., & Brinks, D. (2008). Introduction: The elements of legalization and the triangular shape of social and economic rights. In V. Gauri & D. Brinks (Eds.), Courting social justice: Judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world (pp. 1–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonsalves, C. (2011). Kaliyug: The decline of human rights Law in the period of globalisation. New Delhi: Human Rights Law Network.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, S. (2011). Rights, activism and the poor in India: Supreme court and the ‘right to food case’. International conference ‘social protection for social justice’ , Institute of Development Studies, Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Hershkoff, H. (2010). A new policy landscape: Legalizing social and economic rights in the developing world. In V. Gauri, & D. Brinks (Eds.), Courting social justice: Judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world (pp. 303–352). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Investing in our children. (2006, December 30). The Hindu.
   Google Scholar
• Khosla, M. (2010). Making social rights conditional: Lessons from India. International Journal of Constitutional law, 8(4), 739–765. doi: 10.1093/icon/mor005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, J. K. (2003). Social policy advocacy and the role of the courts in India. American Asian Review, 21(91), 91–124.
   Google Scholar
• Legal Resources Centre. (2004). Grootboom precedent applied to Valhalla Park residents. Retrieved March 12, 2014, from http://www.lrc.org.za/other-news/443-grootboom-precedent-applied-to-valhalla-park-residents
   Google Scholar
• Leuchtenberg, W. E. (1963). Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the new deal, 1932–40. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Maiorano, D. (2015). Autumn of the Matriarch: Indira Gandhi’s final term in office. London: Hurst & Co./Oxford University Press/HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Manor, J. (2016). India’s states: The struggle to govern. Studies in Indian Politics, 4(1), 8–21. doi: 10.1177/2321023016634909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, P. B. (2005). The inner conflict of constitutionalism – judicial review and the basic structure. In Z. Hasan, E. Sridharan, & R. Sudarshan (Eds.), India’s living constitution – ideas, practices, controversies (pp. 179–206). London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, P. B. (2007). The rise of judicial sovereignty. Journal of Democracy, 18(2), 70–83. doi: 10.1353/jod.2007.0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopal, B. (2007). Pro-Human rights but anti-poor? A critical evaluation of the Indian supreme court from a social movement perspective. Human Rights Review, 8(3), 157–186. doi: 10.1007/s12142-007-0004-8
   Google Scholar
• Ray, B. (2011). Proceduralisation’s triumph and engagement’s promise in socio-economic rights litigation. SA Journal of Human Rights, 27, 107–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., Samanni, M., & Teorell, J. (2012). Explaining the welfare state: Power resources vs. the quality of government. European Political Science Review, 4(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1017/S1755773911000051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux, T. (2003). Legitimating transformation: Political resource allocation in the South African constitutional court’’. Democratization, 10(4), 92–111. doi: 10.1080/13510340312331294047
   Google Scholar
• Roux, T. (2009). Principle and pragmatism on the constitutional court of South Africa. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7(1), 106–138. doi: 10.1093/icon/mon029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, S. H., & Rudolph, L. I. (2001). Redoing the constitutional design: From an interventionist to a regulatory state. In Atul Kohli (Ed.), The success of India’s democracy (pp. 127–162). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruparelia, S. (2013a). A progressive juristocracy? The unexpected social activism of India’s supreme court (Kellogg Institute Working Paper 391). University of Notre Dame.
   Google Scholar
• Ruparelia, S. (2013b). India’s new rights agenda: Genesis, promises, risks. Pacific Affairs, 86(3), 569–590. doi: 10.5509/2013863569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathe, S. P. (2002). Judicial activism in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, S. (2009). Scaling justice: India’s supreme court, anti-terror laws, and social rights. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, S., & Mehta, P. B. (2008). Courts and socio-economic rights in India. In V. Gauri, & D. Brinks (Eds.), Courting social justice: Judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world (pp. 146–182). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solange, R. (2011). Transformative constitutionalism in a democratic developmental state. Stellenbosch Law Review, 22(3), 452–565.
   Google Scholar
• South African Civil Society Information Service. (2009, October 2). Violent attacks on social movement Abahlali base Mjondolo misrepresented. Retrieved March 12, 2014, from http://www.sacsis.org.za/site/article/174.19
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2000/2001). Social and economic rights? Lessons from South Africa. Forum Constitutionnel, 11(4), 123–132.
   Google Scholar
• Thom, A. (2013, December 11). Motsoaledi happy with HIV response. NSP Review. Retrieved March 13, 2014, from http://www.nspreview.org/2013/12/11/motsoaledi-happy-with-hiv-response/
   Google Scholar
• Tolsi N. (2012, March 9). Grootboom win a house of cards. Mail and Guardian. Retrieved March 12, 2014, from http://mg.co.za/article/2012-03-09-grootboom-win-a-house-of-cards
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. (2011). Litigating housing rights in Johannesburg’s inner city: 2004–2008. SA Journal of Human Rights, 27, 127–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar