The politics of social policy: welfare expansion in Brazil, China, India and South Africa in comparative perspective

References

• Adésínà, J. O. (2009). Social policy in Sub-Saharan Africa: A glance in the rear-view mirror. International Journal of Social Welfare, 18(s1), S37–S51.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwala, R. (2013). Informal labor, formal politics, and dignified discontent in India. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, B. (1987). Political survival: Politicians and public policy in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, G., & Alexander, P. (2016). The community work programme: Potentials and problems. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 91(1), 157–177.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, G., Brown, D. S., & Hunter, W. (2005). The effects of capital mobility, trade openness, and democracy on social spending in Latin America, 1980–1999. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 625–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrientos, A. (2009). Labour markets and the (hyphenated) welfare regime in Latin America. Economy and Society, 38(1), 87–108.
   Google Scholar
• Barrientos, A. (2013). Social assistance in developing countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrientos, A., & Hulme, D. (2009). Social protection for the poor and poorest in developing countries: Reflections on a quiet revolution. Oxford Development Studies, 37(4), 439–456.
   Google Scholar
• Barrientos, A., Niño-Zarazúa, M., & Maitrot, M. (2010). Social assistance in developing countries database version 5.0. Brooks World Poverty Institute, University of Manchester. Retrieved from https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/32800149/FULL_TEXT.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Bohn, S. R. (2011). Social policy and vote in Brazil: Bolsa Familia and the shifts in Lula’s electoral base. Latin American Research Review, 46(1), 54–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. (2001). Political institutions, veto points, and the process of welfare state adaptation. In P. Pierson (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state (pp. 238–264). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Candland, C. (2007). Labor, democratization and development in India and Pakistan. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, R. D. (2007). The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3), 341–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, R. B., & Collier, D. (2002). Shaping the political Arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America (1st ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corrêa, D. S. (2015). Conditional cash transfer programs, the economy, and presidential elections in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 50(2), 63–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrêa, D. S., & Cheibub, J. A. (2016). The anti-incumbent effects of conditional cash transfer programs. Latin American Politics and Society, 58(1), 49–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeming, C., & Smyth, P. (2015). Social investment after neoliberalism: Policy paradigms and political platforms. Journal of Social Policy, 44(2), 297–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2013). An uncertain glory: India and its contradictions. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Duckett, J. (2011). The Chinese state’s retreat from health: Policy and the politics of retrenchment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duckett, J., & Wang, G. (2015). Poverty and inequality. In J. deLisle & A. Goldstein (Eds.), China’s challenges (pp. 25–41). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duckett, J., & Wang, G. (2017). Why do authoritarian regimes provide public goods? Policy communities, external shocks and ideas in China’s rural social policy making. Europe-Asia Studies, 69(1), 92–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1989). The three worlds of welfare capitalism (1st ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. B. (2016). Avoiding governors: Federalism, democracy, and poverty alleviation in Brazil and Argentina. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, S., & Groenmeyer, S. (2016). A nightmare on the brain of the living? The endurance and limits of the collective bargaining regime. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 91(1), 63–83.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, S., & Niekerk, R. (2016). Introduction: Social policy post 1994 in South Africa. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 91(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• George, A. L. (1969). The ‘operational code’: A neglected approach to the study of political leaders and decision-making. International Studies Quarterly, 13(2), 190–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, I., & Wood, G. (2004). Insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America: Social policy in development contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grindle, M. S. (2004). Despite the odds: The contentious politics of education reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. S. (2004). Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 243–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (2008). Development, democracy, and welfare states: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harriss, J. (2013). Audacious reforms? India’s New rights agenda: An introduction. Pacific Affairs, 86(3), 561–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann, M. G. (1980). Explaining foreign policy behavior using the personal characteristics of political leaders. International Studies Quarterly, 24(1), 7–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, A., & Zorn, C. (2005). Economic globalization, the macro economy, and reversals of welfare: Expansion in affluent democracies, 1978–94. International Organization, 59(3), 631–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, I. (2000). Productivist welfare capitalism: Social policy in East Asia. Political Studies, 48(4), 706–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. (2014). Addressing inequality: Migrants in the city. Unpublished paper for this project.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, E., Mustillo, T., & Stephens, J. D. (2008). Politics and social spending in Latin America. The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 420–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2012). Democracy and the left: Social policy and inequality in Latin America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, W., & Power, T. J. (2007). Rewarding Lula: Executive power, social policy, and the Brazilian elections of 2006. Latin American Politics and Society, 49(1), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, T., & Cusack, T. R. (2000). The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization? World Politics, 52(3), 313–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, T., & Stephens, J. D. (2008). Partisan politics, the welfare state, and three worlds of human capital formation. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5), 600–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayal, N. G. (2013). Citizenship and its discontents: An Indian history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (1999). Democratic politics and economic reform in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, R. R., & Segura-Ubiergo, A. (2001). Globalization, domestic politics, and social spending in Latin America: A time-series cross-section analysis, 1973–97. World Politics, 53(4), 553–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefer, P., & Vlaicu, R. (2008). Democracy, credibility, and clientelism. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 24(2), 371–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, G., & Chopra, D. (2014). Development and welfare policy in south Asia. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Korpi, W. (1983). The democratic class struggle. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (2003). New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95. American Political Science Review, 97(3), 425–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, D. A., & Baum, M. A. (2001). The invisible hand of democracy: Political control and the provision of public services. Comparative Political Studies, 34(6), 587–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid, R. (2003). Retiring the state: The politics of pension privatization in Latin America and beyond (1st ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manor, J. (2011). Did the central government’s poverty initiatives help to re-elect it? In L. Sáez & G. Singh (Eds.), New dimensions of politics in India: The united progressive alliance in power (pp. 13–25). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mares, I., & Carnes, M. E. (2009). Social policy in developing countries. Annual Review of Political Science, 12(1), 93–113.
   Google Scholar
• Melo, M. A., Ng’ethe, N., & Manor, J. (2012). Against the odds: Politicians, institutions and the struggle against poverty. London: C Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Mesquita, B. B. D., Morrow, J. D., Siverson, R. M., & Smith, A. (2002). Political institutions, policy choice and the survival of leaders. British Journal of Political Science, 32(4), 559–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, J. (1999). Growth, redistribution, and welfare: Toward social investment. Social Service Review, 73(1), 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, J. (2004). Social development and social welfare: Implications for social policy. In P. Kennett (Ed.), Social development and social welfare: Implications for social policy: A handbook of comparative social policy (pp. 217–238). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, J., & Piachaud, D. (2013). Social protection, economic growth and social change: Goals, issues and trajectories in China, India, Brazil and South Africa. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mkandawire, T. (2004). Social policy in a development context: Introduction. In T. Mkandawire (Ed.), Social policy in a development context (pp. 1–36). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mok, K. H., & Lau, M. K. (Eds.). (2014). Managing social change and social policy in greater China: Welfare regimes in transition. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Niedzwiecki, S. (2015). Social policies, attribution of responsibility, and political alignments: A subnational analysis of Argentina and Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 49(4), 457–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obinger, H., Leibfried, S., & Castles, F. G. (2005). Federalism and the welfare state: New world and European experiences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Odilla, F. (2016, February 21). Número de eleitores anti-PT cresce no país, aponta estudo - 21/02/2016 – Poder – Folha de S. Paulo. Folha de S. Paulo. Retrieved from http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/2016/02/1741508-numero-de-eleitores-anti-pt-cresce-no-pais-aponta-estudo.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Patel, L. (2013). Social protection in South Africa: History, goals and strategies. In J. Midgley & D. Piachaud (Eds.), Social protection, economic growth and social change: Goals, issues and trajectories in China, India, Brazil and South Africa (pp. 201–216). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, A. W. (2015). Bolsa Família and democracy in Brazil. Third World Quarterly, 36(9), 1682–1699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1995). Fragmented states: Federal institutes and the development of social policy. Governance: An Independent Journal of Policy and Administration, 8(4), 449–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1996). The New politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2001a). Introduction. In P. Pierson (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (Ed.). (2001b). The New politics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2001c). Post-industrial pressures on the mature welfare states. In P. Pierson (Ed.), The New politics of the welfare state (pp. 80–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis (1st ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pribble, J. (2010). Worlds apart: Social policy regimes in Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development, 46(2), 191–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pribble, J. (2013). Welfare and party politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pribble, J., Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2009). Politics, policies, and poverty in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 41(4), 387–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2008). Has globalization gone Too Far? Washington, DC: Peterson Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (1998). Just institutions matter: The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., Samanni, M., & Teorell, J. (2012). Explaining the welfare state: Power resources vs. the Quality of Government. European Political Science Review, 4(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudra, N. (2007). Welfare states in developing countries: Unique or universal? Journal of Politics, 69(2), 378–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruparelia, S. (2013). India’s new rights agenda: Genesis, promises, risks. Pacific Affairs, 86(3), 569–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segura-Ubiergo, A. (2007). The political economy of the welfare state in Latin America: Globalization, democracy, and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharkh, M. A., & Gough, I. (2010). Global welfare regimes: A cluster analysis. Global Social Policy, 10(1), 27–58.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P. (2016). How solidarity works for welfare: Subnationalism and social development in India. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: Political origins of social policy in the United States (New Ed edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmo, S., & Thelen, K. (1992). Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, A. (2013, December 13). India’s troubling trilemma: The reason why macro-stability is so elusive for India. Retrieved 1 March 2016, from http://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/arvind-subramanian-india-s-troubling-trilemma-113121300990_1.html
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, A. (2016). Global poverty: Deprivation, distribution, and development since the cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swank, D. (2001). Political institutions and welfare state restructuring. In P. Pierson (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state (pp. 197–237). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swank, D. (2002). Global capital, political institutions, and policy change in developed welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swank, D. (2005). Globalisation, domestic politics, and welfare state retrenchment in capitalist democracies. Social Policy and Society, 4(2), 183–195.
   Google Scholar
• Tillin, L. (unpublished manuscript). The ‘Right to Food’ and the National Food Security Act (NFSA).
   Google Scholar
• Tillin, L., Deshpande, R., & Kailash, K. K. (Eds.). (2015). Politics of welfare: Comparisons across Indian states. New Delhi: OUP India.
   Google Scholar
• Wibbels, E., & Ahlquist, J. S. (2011). Development, trade, and social insurance. International Studies Quarterly, 55(1), 125–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, L. (Ed.). (2013). China’s social development and policy: Into the next stage? Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zucco, C. (2013). When payouts Pay Off: Conditional cash transfers and voting behavior in Brazil 2002–10. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 810–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar