5,629
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Federalism, multi-level elections and social policy in Brazil and India

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Almeida, M. (2013, November 25). O Nosso Dilemma: O Brasil Deu Certo?. Blog Do Mansueto Almeida. Retrieved from https://mansueto.wordpress.com/2013/11/25/o-nosso-dilema/
  • Alston, L. J., Melo, M. A., Mueller, B., & Pereira, C. (2016). Brazil in transition: Beliefs, leadership, and institutional change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Ames, B. (2001). The deadlock of democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Ames, B., Machada, F., Rennó, L., Samuels, D., Smith, A. E., & Zucco, C. (2013). The Brazilian electoral panel studies (BEPS): Brazilian public opinion in the 2010 presidential elections. Technical Note IDB-TN-508. Inter-American Development Bank.
  • Banting, K. (2005). Canada: Nation-building in a federal welfare state. In H. Obinger, S. Leibfried, & F. G. Castles (Eds.), Federalism and the welfare state: New world and European experiences (pp. 89–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Banting, K., & Kymlicka, W. (2006). Multiculturalism and the welfare state: Recognition and redistribution in contemporary democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bonoli, G., & Champion, C. (2015). Federalism and welfare to work in Switzerland: The development of active social policies in a fragmented welfare state. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 45(1), 77–98. doi: 10.1093/publius/pju025
  • Borges, A., & Lloyd, R. (2016). Presidential coattails and electoral coordination in multilevel elections: Comparative lessons from Brazil. Electoral Studies, 43(September), 104–114. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.05.009
  • Brancati, D. (2008). The origins and strengths of regional parties. British Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 135–159. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000070
  • Burke, V. (1985). Guns or butter? War and the making of the welfare state. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Campello, T., & Neri, M. C. (2013). Programa Bolsa Família: Uma Década de Inclusão E Cidadania. Brasília: IPEA.
  • Campello, T., & Neri, M. C. (2014). Programa Bolsa Família: Uma Década de Inclusão E Cidadania: Sumário Executivo. Brasília: IPEA.
  • Caramani, D. (2004). The Nationalisation of politics: The formation of national electorates and party systems in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Castañeda-Angarita, N. (2013). Party system nationalization, presidential coalitions, and government spending. Electoral Studies, Special Symposium: The new research agenda on electoral integrity, 32(4), 783–794. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.03.005
  • Champion, C., & Bonoli, G. (2011). Institutional fragmentation and coordination initiatives in Western European Welfare States. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(4), 323–334. doi: 10.1177/0958928711412220
  • Chhibber, P. (2009). Are national elections any more than aggregations of state-level verdicts? Economic and Political Weekly XLIV(39). Retrieved from http://www.epw.in/national-election-study-2009/are-national-elections-any-more-aggregations-state-level-verdicts.html
  • Chhibber, P., & Kollman, K. (2004). The formation of national party systems: Federalism and party competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Chhibber, P., & Murali, G. (2006). Duvergerian dynamics in the Indian states federalism and the number of parties in the state assembly elections. Party Politics, 12(1), 5–34. doi: 10.1177/1354068806059243
  • Chhibber, P., Shastri, S., & Sisson, R. (2004). Federal arrangements and the provision of public goods in India. Asian Survey, 44(3), 339–352. doi: 10.1525/as.2004.44.3.339
  • Chopra, D. (2015). Political commitment in India’s social policy implementation: Shaping the performance of MGNREGA. Effective States and Inclusive Development (Working Paper No. 50). Retrieved from http://www.effective-states.org/wp-content/uploads/working_papers/final-pdfs/esid_wp_50_chopra.pdf
  • Cutler, F. (2004). Government responsibility and electoral accountability in federations. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 34(2), 19–38. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a005028
  • Deshpande, R., Kailash, K. K., & Tillin, L. (2017). States as laboratories: The politics of social welfare policies in India. India Review, 16(1), 85–105. doi: 10.1080/14736489.2017.1279928
  • Dickovick, J. T. (2006). Municipalization as central government strategy: Central-regional–local politics in Peru, Brazil, and South Africa. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 37(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1093/publius/pjl012
  • Diwakar, R. (2010). Party aggregation in India: A state level analysis. Party Politics, 16(4), 477–496. doi: 10.1177/1354068809343108
  • Drèze, J., & Khera, R. (2014, March 24). Water for the Leeward India. Outlook. Retrieved from http://www.outlookindia.com/article/water-for-the-leeward-india/289801
  • Drèze, J., & Khera, R. (2015). Understanding leakages in the public distribution system. Economic & Political Weekly, L (7), pp. 39–42.
  • Epstein, Daniel. 2012. Brazil. In Programmatic parties (pp. 47–60). Stockholm: International IDEA. Retrieved from http://www.idea.int/development/upload/brazil-2.pdf
  • Fenwick, T. B. (2016). Avoiding governors: Federalism, democracy, and poverty alleviation in Brazil and Argentina. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Freitas, D. (2016, July 14). Bolsa Família Mais Que Dobra Em Goiás. O Popular. Retrieved from www.opopular.com.b
  • Fucs, J. (2016, September 11). Hora de Mudar. Hora de Mudar. Retrieved from www.estadao.com.br
  • Gerring, J., Thacker, S. C., & Moreno, C. (2005). Centripetal democratic governance: A theory and global inquiry. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 567–581. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051889
  • Government of India. (2015). Report of the fourteenth finance commission. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
  • Greer, S., Elliott, H., & Oliver, R. (2015). Differences that matter: Overcoming methodological nationalism in comparative social policy research. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 17(4), 408–429. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2015.1060713
  • Harriss, J. (2013). Audacious reforms? India’s new rights agenda: An introduction. Pacific Affairs, 86(3), 561–568. doi: 10.5509/2013863561
  • Hicken, A., Kollman, K., & Simmons, J. W. (n.d.). Party system nationalization and the provision of public health services. Retrieved from http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/cpworkshop/papers/Hicken.pdf
  • Hicken, A., & Stoll, H. (2011). Presidents and parties: How presidential elections shape coordination in legislative elections. Comparative Political Studies, 44(7), 854–883. doi: 10.1177/0010414011401231
  • Huber, E., Ragin, C., & Stephens, J. D. (1993). Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional structure, and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 711–749. doi: 10.1086/230321
  • Jenkins, R. (1999). Democratic politics and economic reform in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Joshi, V. (2016). India’s long road: The search for prosperity. Haryana: Penguin Books.
  • Joshua, A., & Sriram, J. (2015, February 27). Your law was not flawless, Modi tells Congress. The Hindu. Retrieved from http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/mnrega-monument-to-failure-of-congress-govts-modi/article6941521.ece
  • Jurado, I. (2014). Party system nationalisation and social spending. European Journal of Political Research, 53(2), 288–307. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12035
  • Kapur, D., & Nangia, P. (2015). Social protection in India: A welfare state sans public goods? India Review, 14(1), 73–90. doi: 10.1080/14736489.2015.1001275
  • Levine, R. M. (1998). Father of the poor? Vargas and his Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lieberman, E. (2003). Race and regionalism in the politics of taxation in Brazil and South Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives. New York: The Free Press.
  • Maiorano, D. (2014). The politics of the Mahatma Gandhi national rural employment guarantee act in Andhra Pradesh. World Development, 58(June), 95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.006
  • Manor, J. (2012). Did the central government’s poverty initiatives help to re-elect it? In Lawrence Sáez & Gurharpal Singh (Eds.), New dimensions of politics in India: The united progressive alliance in power (pp. 13–25). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Mathew, S., & Moore, M. (2011, May). State Incapacity by Design: Understanding the Bihar Story. IDS (Working Paper No. 366): pp. 1–33.
  • Melo, M. (2008). Unexpected successes, unanticipated failures: Social policy from Cardoso to Lula. In Peter Kingstone & Timothy J. Power (Eds.), Democratic Brazil revisited (pp. 161–184). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Melo, M., & Pereira, C. (2013). Making Brazil work: Checking the president in a multiparty system. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Niedzwiecki, S. (2016). Social policies, attribution of responsibility, and political alignments: a subnational analysis of Argentina and Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 49(4), 457–498. doi: 10.1177/0010414015612392
  • Obinger, H., Leibfried, S., & Castles, F. G. (Eds.). (2005). Federalism and the welfare state: New world and European experiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Palshikar, S. (2013). Regional and caste parties. In Atul Kohli & Prerna Singh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Indian politics (pp. 91–104). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Pierson, P. (1995). Fragmented welfare states: Federal institutions and the development of social policy. Governance, 8(4), 449–478. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.1995.tb00223.x
  • Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179. doi: 10.1353/wp.1996.0004
  • Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order national elections – A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x
  • Rodden, J. (2003). Reviving leviathan: Fiscal federalism and the growth of government. International Organization, 57, 695–729. doi: 10.1017/S0020818303574021
  • Rodden, J., & Wibbels, E. (2011). Dual accountability and The Nationalization of party competition: Evidence from four federations. Party Politics, 17(5), 629–653. doi: 10.1177/1354068810376182
  • Roy, I. (2015). Class Politics and Social Protection: The Implementation of India’s MGNREGA. Effective States and Inclusive Development (Working Paper No. 46).
  • Ruparelia, S. (2013). India’s new rights agenda: Genesis, promises, risks. Pacific Affairs, 86(3), 569–590. doi: 10.5509/2013863569
  • Sátyro, N. (2017, 3 February). Dismantling social protection in Brazil: The impact of Temer's Government. Presentation at the workshop on “Brazilian Democracy from Dilma to Temer”, Brazilian studies programme, St. Antony's College, University of Oxford, Oxford.
  • Schakel, A. H. (2013). Congruence between regional and national elections. Comparative Political Studies, 46(5), 631–662. doi: 10.1177/0010414011424112
  • Schneider, A. (2015, July). Political economy of citizenship regimes: Tax in India and Brazil. UNRISD (Working Paper No. 11).
  • Singh, P. (2016). How solidarity works for welfare: Subnationalism and social development in India. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sridharan, E. (2002). The fragmentation of the Indian party system 1952-99: seven competing explanations. In Zoya Hasan (ed.) Parties and party politics in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Stepan, A. (1999). Federalism and democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model. Journal of Democracy, 10(4), 19–34. doi: 10.1353/jod.1999.0072
  • Straiotto, S. (2016, September 15). Reiniciado O Programa Renda Cidadã. Diário de Goiás. Retrieved from diariodegoias.com.br
  • Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424. doi: 10.1086/257839
  • Tillin, L., Deshpande, R., & Kailash, K. K. (Eds.). (2015). Politics of welfare: Comparisons across Indian states. New Delhi: OUP.
  • Tillin, L. (2015). Regional resilience and national party system change: India’s 2014 general elections in context. Contemporary South Asia, 23(2), 181–197. doi: 10.1080/09584935.2015.1021299
  • Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Weyland, K. (1996). Democracy without equity: Failures of reform in Brazil. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Yadav, Y., & Palshikar, S. (2009, February). Principal state-level contests and derivative national choices: Electoral trends in 2004-09’. Economic and Political Weekly, pp. 55–62.
  • Zepeda, E., McDonald, S., Panda, M., & Kumar, G. (2013). Employing India: Guaranteeing jobs for the rural poor. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.