The dog that did not bark: the army and the emergency in India

References

• Agüero, F. (1995). Soldiers, civilians, and democracy: Post-Franco Spain in comparative perspective. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33(1), 1–4. Retrieved from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU33.html
   Google Scholar
• Austin, G. (2003). Working a democratic constitution: A history of the Indian experience. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyaya, J. (2003). The making of India’s foreign policy. New Delhi: Allied.
   Google Scholar
• Barany, Z. (2012). The soldier and the changing state: Building democratic Armies in Africa Asia, Europe and Americas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baruah, S. (2001). Generals as governors: The parallel political systems of northeast India. Himal South Asian. Retrieved from http://www.himalmag.com/june2001/essay.html
   Google Scholar
• Berg, S. (1988). Snowball sampling. In S. Kotz & N. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Statistical Sciences (pp. 528–532). New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Belkin, A., & Schofer, E. (2003). Toward a structural understanding of coup risk. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47, 594–620. doi: 10.1177/0022002703258197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruneau, T. C., & Scott D. Tollefson. (Eds.). (2006). Who guards the guardians and how: Democratic civil-military relations. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chibber, M. L. (1986). Military leadership to prevent military coups. New Delhi: Lancer.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. P. (1972). The Indian army: Its contribution to the development of a nation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. P. (1976). The military. In Henry Hart (Ed.), Indira Gandhi’s India: A political system appraised (pp. 207–240). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. P. (1988). The military and Indian democracy. In Atul Kohli (Ed.), India’s democracy: An analysis of changing state-society relations (pp. 99–143). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R., & Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desch, M. (1997). Civilian control of the military: The changing security environment. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dhar, P. N. (2000). Indira Gandhi, Indian democracy and the emergency. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elkin, J. F., & Andrew Ritezel, W. (1985). Military role expansion in India. Armed Forces and Society, 11(4), 489–504. doi: 10.1177/0095327X8501100402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finer, S. E. (1962). The man on horseback: The role of the military in politics. London: Pall Mall.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M. (1996). National interests in international society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitch, J. Samuel. (1988). The armed forces and democracy in Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, F. (2009). India’s political economy 1947–2004 (2nd ed.). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. K. (1969). Ambassador’s journal: A personal account of the kennedy years. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
   Google Scholar
• Ganguly, S. (1991). From aid to the civil to the defence of the nation: The army in contemporary India. Journal of Asian and African Affairs, 26, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Taylor, R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936–957. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. (1960). India: The most dangerous decades. Madras: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, V. (2010). Political mobilization and democracy in India: States of emergency. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil–military relations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janowitz, M. (1964). The professional soldier: A social and political portrait. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janowitz, M. (1977). Military institutions and coercion in the developing nations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kavic, L. (1967). India’s quest for security: Defence policies 1947–1965. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, A. (1990). Democracy and discontent: India’s growing crisis of governability. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, R. (1997). How democracies control the military. Journal of Democracy, 8(4), 140–153. doi: 10.1353/jod.1997.0060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu, A. (1998). Militarism in India: The army and civil society in consensus. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, J. (1978). The breakdown of democratic regimes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53, 69–105. doi: 10.2307/1951731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548. doi: 10.1023/A:1007113830879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749. doi: 10.2307/1961840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2011). The logic of appropriateness. In Michael Moran, Martin Rein, & Robert E. Goodin (Eds.), Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 478–497). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Misra, K. P. (1980). Paramilitary forces in India. Armed Forces & Society, 6(3), 371–388. doi: 10.1177/0095327X8000600302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naib, V. P. (1960). Higher defence organization. USII Journal, LXXXX, 317–320.
   Google Scholar
• Nordlinger, E. (1977). Soldiers in politics: Military coups and governments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenburg, P. (2010). India, Pakistan and Democracy: Solving the puzzle of divergent paths. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Palit, D. K. (1992). War in high Himalaya: The Indian army in crisis. London: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan, R. D. (1999). From debacle to revival: Y.B. Chavan as defence minister, 1962–1965. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and material well-being in the world, 1950–1990. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlivan, J. T. (1999). Coup-proofing: Its practice and consequences in the Middle East. International Security, 24(2), 131–165. doi: 10.1162/016228899560202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavan, S. (2009). Civil-military relations in India: The China crisis and after. Journal of Strategic Studies, 32(1), 149–175. doi: 10.1080/01402390802407616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, L., & Rudolph, S. H. (1964). Generals and politicians in India. Pacific Affairs, 37, 5–19. doi: 10.2307/2754526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, L., & Rudolph, S. H. (1987). In pursuit of Lakshmi: The political economy of the Indian state. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serra, N. (2010). The military transition: Democratic reform of the armed forces. (Peter Bush, Trans.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sethna, A. M. (1988 October–December). Politics and professionalism. United Services Institution (USII) Journal, CXVII, 425–428.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, V. N. (1994). Threats to national security due to internal problems, National Security Lectures. Delhi: United Services Institute of India.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, N. (2016). Seizing power: The strategic logic of military coups. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, S. K. (1965). Our military traditions. USII Journal, LXXXXV.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, S. K. (1970). Indian army since independence. USII Journal, C(421), 395–402.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, S. K. (1974). In aid of the civil power. USII Journal, CIV, 115–123.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, S. K. (1980). Higher defence organization in India. New Delhi: United Services Institution of India.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T., & Pierson, P. (2002). Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. In I. Katznelson & H. Milner (Eds.), Political science: State of the discipline (pp. 693–721). New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Stepan, A. (1971). The military in politics: Changing patterns in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stepan, A. (1973). New professionalism of internal warfare and military role expansion. In Alfred Stepan (Ed.), Authoritarian Brazil (pp. 47–68). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2003). Politics and the Russian army: Civil-military relations, 1689-2000. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369–404. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. (1986). Indian security policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, W. R. (1975). Regime vulnerability and the military coup. Comparative Politics, 7(4), 459–487. doi: 10.2307/421422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkateswaran, A. L. (1967). Indian defence organization. New Delhi: Ministry of Information and Broadcasting.
   Google Scholar
• Vildawsky, A. (2010). Craftways: On the organization of scholarly work (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, W. P. (2005). Dictionary of statistics and methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vohra, A. M. (1988, July–Sept). The military and political power. USII Journal, CXVI, 226–232.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, M. (1989). India in the mid-seventies: A political system in transition. In Ashutosh Varshney (Ed.), The Indian paradox: Essays in Indian politics (pp. 263–291). New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, C. (1976). Civilian control of the military: Theory and cases from developing countries. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, J. M. (1976). Review of reviews: Social origins of dictatorship and democracy. Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. History and Theory, 15(2), 146–175. doi: 10.2307/2504823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (2015). Army and nation: The military and Indian democracy since independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar