Institutional dynamics and party think tank development: Britain and Germany compared

References

• Allern, E. H. (2010). Political parties and interest groups in Norway. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bale, T. (1996). Demos: Populism, eclecticism and equidistance in the post-modern world. Contemporary British History, 10(2), 22–34. doi: 10.1080/13619469608581384
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. (2006). The IPPR and demos: Think tanks of the new social democracy. The Political Quarterly, 77(2), 166–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2006.00759.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, M., & Katz, R. (2005). From catch-all politics to cartelisation: The political economy of the cartel party. West European Politics, 28(1), 33–60. doi: 10.1080/0140238042000297080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braml, J. (2004). Think tanks versus Denkfabriken: US and German policy research institutes’ coping with and influencing their environments. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• British Electoral Commission. (n.d). PDG summary allocations and claims totals. Retrieved from https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Charities Commission UK. (2008). Speaking out: Guidance on campaigning and political activities by charities (CC9). Government of the United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G., & Kelly, S. (2004). Echoes of Butler? The conservative research department and the making of conservative policy. The Political Quarterly, 75(4), 378–382.
   Google Scholar
• Cornford, J. (1990). Performing fleas: Reflections from a think tank. Policy Studies, 11(4), 22–30. doi: 10.1080/01442879008423579
   Google Scholar
• Day, A. (2000). Think tanks in Western Europe. In J. McGann & R. Weaver (Eds.), Think tanks and civil societies: Catalysts for ideas and action (pp. 108–138). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Denham, A., & Garnett, M. (2006). What works? British think tanks and the end of ideology. The Political Quarterly, 77(2), 156–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2006.00758.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detterbeck, K. (2008). Party cartel and cartel parties in Germany. German Politics, 17(1), 27–40. doi: 10.1080/09644000701855119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. (2009). Hayden Phillips and Jack Straw: The continuation of British exceptionalism in party finance? Parliamentary Affairs, 62(2), 298–317. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsn047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, J., & Webb, P. (2003). Political participation: The vocational motivations of labour party employees. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 5(2), 166–187. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00102
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, M. (2010). Democratic drift majoritarian modification and democratic anomie in the United Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaffney, J. (1991). The political think-tanks in the UK and the ministerial cabinets in France. West European Politics, 14(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/01402389108424829
   Google Scholar
• Garner, R., & Kelly, R. (1998). British political parties today. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, W. (1998). Think tanks in Germany. In D. Stone, A. Denham, & M. Garnett (Eds.), Think tanks across nations (pp. 82–106). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grundgesetz der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (GG). (1967). Act on political parties (political parties act) (Parteiengesetz – Part G). (Federal Ministry of the Interior, Trans.). Retrieved from https://www.bundestag.de/blob/189734/2f4532b00e4071444a62f360416cac77/politicalparties-data.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harris, M. (1996). The centre for policy studies: The paradoxes of power. Contemporary British History, 10(2), 51–64. doi: 10.1080/13619469608581386
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung. Bylaws of Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, updated November 2016. Retrieved from https://www.boell.de/en/2017/01/31/bylaws-heinrich-boell-stiftung
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung. Bylaws of Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, updated November 2016. Retrieved from https://www.boell.de/en/2017/01/31/bylaws-heinrich-boell-stiftung
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Public Affairs. Annual report, 2016. Retrieved from http://apps.charitycommission.gov.uk/Accounts/Ends65/0000800065_AC_20161231_E_C.pdf
   Google Scholar
• James, S. (1993). The idea brokers: The impact of think tanks on British government. Public Administration, 71(4), 491–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1993.tb00988.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, G., & Cairney, P. (2013). What is the dominant model of British policymaking? Comparing majoritarian and policy community ideas. British Politics, 8(3), 233–259. doi: 10.1057/bp.2013.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KAS. (2009). Mission: Democracy! Berlin: KAS. Retrieved from http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_13947-544-2-30.pdf?100223110855
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28. doi: 10.1177/1354068895001001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, R. (2016). Short Money (Briefing Paper, No. 01663). House of Commons Library.
   Google Scholar
• Kelstrup, J. (2016). The politics of think tanks in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Antinuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16(1), 57–85. doi: 10.1017/S000712340000380X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koβ, M. (2010). The politics of party funding: State funding to political parties and party competition in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langenbacher, E. (2015). The political and constitution order. In S. Colvin (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of German politics and culture (pp. 87–104). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Langguth, G. (2009, August 7). The scandal that helped Merkl become Chancellor. Spiegel Online. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/germany-s-schreiber-affair-the-scandal-that-helped-merkel-become-chancellor-a-640938.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGann, J. (2017). 2016 global go to think tank index report. TTCSP global go to think tank index reports (p. 12). Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/12
   Google Scholar
• Mendizabal, E. (2009). Introduction. In E. Mendizabal & K. Sample (Eds.), Thinking politics: Think tanks and political parties in Latin America (pp. 9–20). Peru: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA).
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, A. (2010). The German political foundations as actors in democracy assistance. Boca Raton, FL: Universal Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. (2006). Thinking in tanks: The changing ecology of political ideas. The Political Quarterly, 77(2), 147–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2006.00757.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassmacher, K.-H. (2009). The funding of party competition: Political finance in 25 democracies. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Pautz, H. (2008). Think-tanks in Germany: The Bertelsmann foundation's role in labour market reform. Zeitschrift Für Politikberatung (ZPB)/Policy Advice and Political Consulting, 1(3/4), 437–456.
   Google Scholar
• Pautz, H. (2010). Think tanks in the United Kingdom and Germany: Actors in the modernisation of social democracy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 12(2), 274–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pautz, H. (2013). The think tanks behind Cameronism. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 15(3), 362–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00518.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto-Duschinsky, M. (1991a). The party foundations and political finance in Germany. In F. L. Seidle (Ed.), Comparative issues in party and election finance: Volume 4 of the research studies (pp. 179–250). Oxford: Dundern Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto-Duschinsky, M. (1991b). German political foundations and their US counterparts. International Affairs, 67(1), 33–63. doi: 10.2307/2621218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poguntke, T. (1994). Parties in a legalistic culture. In R. Katz & P. Mair (Eds.), How parties organize: Party change and adaptation in party organisations in western Democracies (pp. 185–215). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Poguntke, T. (2002). Parties without firm social roots? Party organisational linkage. In K. R. Luther & F. Müller-Rommel (Eds.), Political parties in the new Europe: Political and analytical challenges (pp. 43–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pulzer, P. (2001). Votes and resources: Political finance in Germany. German Politics and Society, 19(1), 1–36. doi: 10.3167/104503001782173765
   Google Scholar
• Rosa Luxemburg Foundation. Annual report, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.rosalux.de/fileadmin/rls_uploads/pdfs/sonst_publikationen/Jahresbericht_2016_engl.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ruben, P. (1996). The institute for public policy research: Policy and politics. Contemporary British History, 10(2), 65–79. doi: 10.1080/13619469608581387
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., & Sciara, M. (2008). The policy impact of defeats in the House of Lords. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 10(4), 571–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856x.2008.00331.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, T. (2002). The German party system: Continuity and change. German Politics, 11(3), 99–130. doi: 10.1080/714001303
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. (1996). Parties and their members: Organizing for victory in Britain and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M. (2003). Political institutions in the federal republic of Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1999). Transnationalizing democracy promotion: The role of western political foundations and think-tanks. Democratization, 6(3), 146–170. doi: 10.1080/13510349908403625
   Google Scholar
• Sieberer, U. (2006). Agenda setting in the German bundestag: A weak government in a consensus democracy. German Politics, 15(1), 49–72. doi: 10.1080/09644000500534972
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2004). Introduction: Think tanks, policy advice and governance. In D. Stone & A. Denham (Eds.), Think tank traditions: Policy research and political ideas (pp. 1–18). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2007). Recycling bins, garbage cans or think tanks? Three myths regarding policy analysis institutes. Public Administration, 85(2), 259–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00649.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thunert, M. (2004). Think tanks in Germany. In D. Stone & A. Denham (Eds.), Think tank traditions: Policy research and political ideas (pp. 71–88). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thunert, M. (2006). The development and significance of think tanks in Germany. German Policy Studies, 3(2), 185–221.
   Google Scholar
• van Klingeren, M., Orozco, M., van Spanje, J., & de Vreese, C. (2015). Party financing and referendum campaigns in EU member states. Brussels: Committee on Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, R., & McGann, J. (2000). Think tanks and civil society in a time of change. In J. McGann & R. Weaver (Eds.), Think tanks and civil societies: Catalysts for ideas and action (pp. 1–36). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P. (1994). Party organizational change in Britain: The iron Law of centralization. In R. S. Katz & P. Mair (Eds.), How parties organize: Change and adaptation in party parties without firm social roots? (pp. 109–133). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weilemann, P. (2000). Experiences of a multi-dimension think tank: The Konrad Adenauer-Stitfung. In J. McGann & R. Weaver (Eds.), Think tanks and civil societies: Catalysts for ideas and action (pp. 169–186). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, P., Seyd, P., & Richardson, J. (1994). True blues: The politics of conservative party membership: The politics of conservative party membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilks-Heeg, S., & Crone, S. (2010). Funding political parties in Great Britain: A pathway to reform. UK Democratic Audit. Retrieved from: https://partyfundingreform.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/party_funding_web.pdf
   Google Scholar