Parliamentary supremacy versus judicial review: Is a compromise possible?Footnote*

The research for this article was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, The Shastri Indo‐Canadian Institute, and the South Asia: Ontario Consortium. Earlier drafts were presented as papers to seminars at Duke University Law School Library and Osgoode Hall Law School, York University in 1987.

Notes

• Tocqueville , Alexis De . 1835–40 . Democracy in America ,
   Google Scholar
• Diggins , John P. 1984 . The Lost Soul of American politics 246 New York
   Google Scholar
• Stannard , Harold . 1949 . The Two Constitutions: A Comparative Study of British and American Constitutional Systems New York
   Google Scholar
• Verney , Douglas V. 1976 . British Government and Politics , 3rd edition New York Chapter 2
   Google Scholar
• Verney , Douglas V. 1986 . Three Civilizations, Two Cultures, One State: Canada's Political Traditions Durham, NC Chapter 1, ‘American in Civilization, Canadian in Culture’
   Google Scholar
• Dawson , R. MacGregor . 1970 . The Government of Canada , 5th edition Edited by: Ward , Norman . 43 Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Verney . Three Civilizations , 146 – 7 .
   Google Scholar
• Wheare , K. C. 1953 . Federal Government , 3rd edition 28 London
   Google Scholar
• Strayer , Barry . 1968 . Judicial Review of Legislation in Canada 25 Toronto
   Google Scholar
• January‐February 1982 . The Globe and Mail January‐February , Toronto
   Google Scholar
• McRoberts , Kenneth and Posgate , Dale . 1980 . Quebec: Social Change and Political Crisis , revised edition Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Russell , Peter H. 1982 . Leading Constitutional Decisions , second edition 3 Ottawa
   Google Scholar
• 15 April 1987 . The Globe and Mail 15 April , Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , Nevil . 1977 . In Search of the Constitution 125 198 London
   Google Scholar
• Fox , Paul , ed. 1982 . “ ‘Although monarchical persuasion may be waning, republicanism does not seem to be waxing.’ ” . In Politics Canada , fifth edition 426 Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Howard , Ross . 1987 . The Globe and Mail , 23 May
   Google Scholar
• Hogg , Peter W. 1985 . Constitutional Law of Canada , 2nd edn 657 Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Hogg , Peter W. 1986 . “ ‘Judicial Review on Federal Grounds: Canada compared to the United States’ ” . In The Supreme Court of Canada: Proceedings of the October 1985 Conference Edited by: Beaudoin , Gerald A. Cowansville, Quebec
   Google Scholar
• 1987 . Allen Singer Ltd. v. A.G. of Quebec , 17–18 November
   Google Scholar
• Slattery , Brian . 1987 . ‘A Theory of the Charter’ . Osgoode Hall Law Journal , 25 ( 4 ) : 704
   Google Scholar
• 1986 . The Ontario Film and Video Appreciation Society v. Regina , 15–19 September
   Google Scholar
• Armour , Leslie and Trott , Elizabeth . 1981 . “ ‘There is, in short, a kind of philosophical federalism at work’ ” . In The Faces of Reason: An Essay in Philosophy and Culture in English Canada, 1850–1950 4 Waterloo, Ont.
   Google Scholar
• Presthus , Robert . 1973 . Elite Accommodation in Canadian Politics Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Siwach , J. R. 1985 . Dynamics of Indian Government and Politics , New Delhi : Sterling . Chapter 7
   Google Scholar
• 1984 . Canadian News Facts , : 3055
   Google Scholar
• 1988 . The Globe and Mail , 27 February
   Google Scholar
• 1985 . Re B. C. Motor Vehicle Act , 2 : 486 S.C.R.
   Google Scholar
• 1986 . ‘Charter ruling worries legal experts’ . The Globe and Mail , 24 February : A14 Al and
   Google Scholar
• Finlay , J. Richard . 1987 . ‘Cast off the cloak of secrecy: judges should be picked in public’ . The Globe and Mail , 22 October : A7
   Google Scholar
• 1987 . Toronto Star , 27 May : 1
   Google Scholar
• Murphy , Walter F. 1986 . ‘Who Shall Interpret the Constitution?’ . The Review of Politics , 48 ( 3 ) : 417
   Google Scholar
• The research for this article was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, The Shastri Indo‐Canadian Institute, and the South Asia: Ontario Consortium. Earlier drafts were presented as papers to seminars at Duke University Law School Library and Osgoode Hall Law School, York University in 1987.
   Google Scholar