544
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Negotiating hegemonies in language policy: ideological synergies in media recontextualizations of audit culture

ORCID Icon
Pages 1-20 | Received 06 Jul 2021, Accepted 12 Nov 2021, Published online: 16 Dec 2021

References

  • Abdul Rahim, H., & Jalalian Daghigh, A. (2020). Locally developed versus global textbooks: An evaluation of cultural content in textbooks used in English language teaching in Malaysia. Asian Englishes, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2019.1669301
  • Albury, N. J. (in press). Language policy, ideological clarification and theory of mind. Language Policy.
  • Anderson, B. (1998). The spectre of comparisons: Nationalism, Southeast Asia and the world. Verso.
  • Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. In M. Featherstone (Ed.), Global culture: Nationalism, globalization and modernity (pp. 295–310). Sage.
  • Baker, W., & Jarunthawatchai, K. (2017). English language policy in Thailand. European Journal of Language Policy, 9(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2017.3
  • Barakos, E., & Unger, J. W. (Eds.). (2016). Discursive approaches to language policy. Palgrave.
  • Baroutsis, A., & Lingard, B. (2017). Counting and comparing school performance: An analysis of media coverage of PISA in Australia, 2000–2014. Journal of Education Policy, 32(4), 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1252856
  • Blommaert, J. (2007). Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2007.001
  • Canagarajah, S. (2018). The unit and focus of analysis in lingua franca English interactions: In search of a method. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(7), 805–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1474850
  • Clark, R., & Gieve, S. N. (2006). On the discursive construction of ‘the Chinese learner’. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310608668754
  • De Costa, P., Park, J., & Wee, L. (2016). Language learning as linguistic entrepreneurship: Implications for language education. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(5–6), 695–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0302-5
  • De Costa, P. I., Park, J., & Wee, L. (2019). Linguistic entrepreneurship as affective regime: Organizations, audit culture, and second/foreign language education policy. Language Policy, 18(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-018-9492-4
  • Draper, J. (2012). Reconsidering compulsory English in developing countries in Asia: English in a community of Northeast Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 777–811. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.50
  • Education First. (2018). EF English Proficiency Index. Available at https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi/downloads/ (Accessed 18 November 2021).
  • El Bouhali, C. (2015). The OECD neoliberal governance: Policies of international testing and their impact on global education systems. In A. A. Abdi, L. Shultz, & T. Pillay (Eds.), Decolonizing global citizenship education (pp. 119–129). Brill Sense.
  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Intertextuality in critical discourse analysis. Linguistics and Education, 4(3–4), 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(92)90004-G
  • Ferrara, F. (2015). The political development of modern Thailand. Cambridge University Press.
  • Flores, N. (2013). The unexamined relationship between neoliberalism and plurilingualism: A cautionary tale. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 500–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.114
  • Franz, J., & Teo, A. (2018). A2 is normal’ – Thai secondary school English teachers’ encounters with the CEFR. RELC Journal, 49(3), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217738816
  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of antonio gramsci. Lawrence & Wishart.
  • Harrison, R. V., & Jackson, P. A. (Eds.). (2010). The ambiguous allure of the west: Traces of the colonial in Thailand. Hong Kong University Press.
  • Heller, M. (2003). Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00238.x
  • Heller, M. (2010). The commodification of language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951
  • Hewison, K. (2005). Neoliberalism and domestic capital: The political outcomes of the economic crisis in Thailand. Journal of Development Studies, 41(2), 310–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022038042000309269
  • Hill, R. C., & Fujita, K. (2012). Detroit of the East: A multiscalar case study of regional development policy in Thailand. In B. G. Park, R. C. Hill, & A. Saito (Eds.), Locating neoliberalism in East Asia: Neoliberalizing spaces in developmental states (pp. 257–293). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hornberger, N. H. (2005). Opening and filling up implementational and ideological spaces in heritage language education. The Modern Language Journal, 89(4), 605–609.
  • Hornberger, N. H. (2020). Reflect, revisit, reimagine: Ethnography of language policy and planning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719052000001X
  • Hult, F. (2010). Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space and time. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 202, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2010.011
  • Johnson, D. C. (2009). Ethnography of language policy. Language Policy, 8(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-009-9136-9
  • Johnson, D. C. (2013). Positioning the language policy arbiter: Governmentality and footing in the school district of Philadelphia. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 116–136). Routledge.
  • Kamens, D. H. (2013). Globalization and the emergence of an audit culture: PISA and the search for ‘best practices’ and magic bullets. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 117–140). Symposium Books.
  • Kasetsiri, C. (2003). Thailand-Cambodia: A love-hate relationship. Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia, 3, 1–8.
  • Kimber, M., & Ehrich, L. C. (2015). Are Australia’s universities in deficit? A tale of generic managers, audit culture and casualisation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2014.991535
  • Koller, V., & Davidson, P. (2008). Social exclusion as conceptual and grammatical metaphor: A cross-genre study of British policy-making. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088963
  • Krzyżanowski, M. (2016). Recontextualization of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies. Discourse & Society, 27(3), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901
  • Levinson, B. A., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808320676
  • Machin, D. (2013). What is multimodal critical discourse studies? Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.813770
  • Maybin, J. (2017). Textual trajectories: Theoretical roots and institutional consequences. Text & Talk, 37(4), 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2017-0011
  • McCargo, D., & Pathmanand, U. (2005). The Thaksinization of Thailand. Nias Press.
  • Ministry of Education. (2008). Basic education core curriculum.
  • Ministry of Education. (2015). Handbook for reforming learning and teaching English according to CEFR: Primary schools.
  • Nardi, E. (2008). Cultural biases: A non-Anglophone perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(3), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940802417467
  • Ng, C. J. W. (2018). Skilling the nation, empowering the citizen: Neoliberal instantiations in Singapore’s lifelong learning policy. Journal of Language and Politics, 17(1), 118–140. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16012.ng
  • Nipakornkitti, N., & Adunyarittigun, D. (2018). An investigation of content validity in O-NET (English subject) for the upper secondary level (Matthayom 6). Journal of Liberal Arts, 18(1), 56–75.
  • North, B. (2014). The CEFR in practice. Cambridge University Press.
  • Ockey, J. (2004). State, bureaucracy and polity in modern Thai politics. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 34(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330480000021
  • Office of the Education Council. (2017). National Education Plan 2017-2036.
  • Park, J. S. (2009). The local construction of a global language: Ideologies of English in South Korea. Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Piller, I., & Cho, J. (2013). Neoliberalism as language policy. Language in Society, 42(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404512000887
  • Premsrirat, S. (2011). Redefining “Thainess”: Embracing diversity, preserving unity. The Journal of the Royal Institute of Thailand, 3, 54–75.
  • Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2015). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (pp. 23–61). SAGE.
  • Rutkowski, D. J. (2007). Converging us softly: How intergovernmental organizations promote neoliberal educational policy. Critical Studies in Education, 48(2), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480701494259
  • Savski, K. (2016). Analysing voice in language policy: Plurality and conflict in Slovene government documents. Language Policy, 15(4), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-015-9388-5
  • Savski, K. (2017). Language policy at times of instability and struggle: The impact of fluctuating will and competing agendas on a Slovene language strategy. Current Issues in Language Planning, 18(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2016.1265280
  • Savski, K. (2018). The roles of field and capital in negotiating language policy in the Slovene parliament. Journal of Language and Politics, 17(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17013.sav
  • Savski, K. (2019). Putting the plurilingual/pluricultural back into CEFR: Reflecting on policy reform in Thailand and Malaysia. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(2), 644–652. http://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.2.13.644
  • Savski, K. (2020). Local problems and a global solution: Examining the recontextualization of CEFR in Thai and Malaysian language policies. Language Policy, 19(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-019-09539-8
  • Savski, K. (2021). Dialogicality and racialized discourse in TESOL recruitment. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 795–816. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3013
  • Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2000). Coercive accountability: The rise of audit culture in higher education. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy (pp. 57–89). Routledge.
  • Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Governing by numbers: Audit culture, rankings and the new world order. Social Anthropology, 23(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12098
  • Smalley, W. (1994). Linguistic diversity and national unity: Language ecology in Thailand. University of Chicago Press.
  • Spooner, M. (2020). Technologies of governance in context: Four global windows into neoliberalism and audit culture in higher education. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(7), 743–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419878750
  • Strathern, M. (Ed.). (2003). Audit cultures. Routledge.
  • Sukamolson, S. (1998). English language education policy in Thailand. Asian Englishes, 1(1), 68–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.1998.10800995
  • Takayama, K. (2008). The politics of international league tables: PISA in Japan’s achievement crisis debate. Comparative Education, 44(4), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060802481413
  • Takayama, K. (2010). Politics of externalization in reflexive times: Reinventing Japanese education reform discourses through “Finnish PISA success”. Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1086/644838
  • Takayama, K. (2018). How to mess with PISA: Learning from Japanese kokugo curriculum experts. Curriculum Inquiry, 48(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2018.1435975
  • Vezovnik, A. (2011). Diskurz. Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede.
  • von Eye, A., & Wiedermann, W. (Eds.). (2016). Statistics and causality: Methods for applied empirical research. Wiley.
  • Waldow, F., Takayama, K., & Sung, Y. K. (2014). Rethinking the pattern of external policy referencing: Media discourses over the ‘Asian tigers’’ PISA success in Australia, Germany and South Korea. Comparative Education, 50(3), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013.860704
  • Widiawati, D., & Savski, K. (in press). English-medium instruction in a minority language area: Any space for learners’ L1? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1817044
  • Winichakul, T. (1996). Siam mapped: A history of the geo-body of a nation. University of Hawai’i Press.
  • Wodak, R. (2011). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Palgrave.
  • Wodak, R., Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K. (2009). The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh University Press.
  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2015). Critical discourse studies: history, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 1–22). London: SAGE.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.