Publication Cover
Cochlear Implants International
An Interdisciplinary Journal for Implantable Hearing Devices
Volume 17, 2016 - Issue sup1: Issues in Cochlear Implant Candidacy
827
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Access to aidable residual hearing in adult candidates for cochlear implantation in the UK

, , &

References

  • Cullen, R. D., Higgins, C., Buss, E., Clark, M., Pillsbury, H. C., IIIrd, Buchman, C. A. 2004. Cochlear implantation in patients with substantial residual hearing. Laryngoscope, 114: 2218–2223. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000149462.88327.7f
  • Dowell, R.C., Hollow, R., Winton, E. 2004. Outcomes for cochlear implant users with significant residual hearing: implications for selection criteria in children. Archives of Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, 130: 575–581. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.5.575
  • Fielden, C.A., Mehta, R.L., Kitterick, P.T. 2016. Choosing which ear to implant in adult candidates with functional residual hearing. Cochlear Implants International Supplement on Candidacy, 17(S1): 47–50.
  • Green, T., Faulkner, A., Rosen, S. 2014. Overlapping frequency coverage and simulated spatial cue effects on bimodal (electrical and acoustical) sentence recognition in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135: 851. doi: 10.1121/1.4861843
  • Lenarz, T., Stover, T., Buechner, A., Paasche, G., Briggs, R., Risi, F. et al. 2006. Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode. Audiology and Neurotology, 11(Suppl. 1): 34–41.
  • Newcombe, R.G. 1998. Two-Sided Confidence Intervals for the Single Proportion: Comparison of Seven Methods. Statistics in Medicine, 17: 857–872. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::AID-SIM777>3.0.CO;2-E
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisal Guidance. 2009. Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness. NICE technology appraisal guidance [TAG166]. [accessed 29 January 2016]. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/ta166.
  • UKCISG. 2004. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults I: theory and measures of effectiveness. Ear and Hearing, 25: 310–335. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000134549.48718.53
  • van Buuren, S., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. 2011. Mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3): 1–67.
  • Visram, A. S., Azadpour, M., Kluk, K., McKay, C. M. 2012. Beneficial acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131: 4042–4050. doi: 10.1121/1.3699191
  • Zhang, T., Dorman, M. F., Spahr, A. J. 2010. Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation. Ear and Hearing, 31: 63–69. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b7190c

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.