References
- Dowell, R.C., Hollow, R., Winton, E. 2004. Outcomes for cochlear implant users with significant residual hearing: implications for selection criteria in children. Archives of Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, 130: 575–581. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.5.575
- Fielden, C.A., Hampton, R., Smith, S., Kitterick, P.T. 2016. Access to aidable residual hearing in adult candidates for cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants International Supplement on Candidacy, 17(S1): 70–73.
- Illg, A., Bojanowicz, M., Lesinski-Schiedat, A., Lenarz, T., Buchner, A. 2014. Evaluation of the bimodal benefit in a large cohort of cochlear implant subjects using a contralateral hearing aid. Otology and Neurotology, 35: 240–244. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000529
- Liang, K.-Y., Zeger, S. 1986. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73: 13–22. doi: 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisal Guidance 2009. Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness. NICE technology appraisal guidance [TAG166]. [accessed 29 January 2016]. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/ta166
- UKCISG 2004. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults III: prospective evaluation of an actuarial approach to defining a criterion. Ear and Hearing, 25: 361–374. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000134551.13162.88
- Zhang, T., Spahr, A.J., Dorman, M.F., Saoji, A. 2013. Relationship between auditory function of nonimplanted ears and bimodal benefit. Ear and Hearing, 34: 133–141. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826709af