Expert opinion: Can different assessments be used to overcome current candidacy issues?

References

• Althalye, S., Mulla, I., Archbold, S. 2014. The experiences of adults assessed for cochlear implantation who did not proceed. Cochlear Implants International, 15(6): 301–311.
   Google Scholar
• Archbold, S., Lamb, B., O'Neill, C., Atkins, J. 2014. The real cost of hearing Loss: reducing its impact by increasing access to the latest hearing technologies. Ear Foundation. http://www.earfoundation.org.uk/files/download/869 accessed February 2016
   Google Scholar
• Arnoldner, C, Lin, VY. 2013. Expanded selection criteria in adult cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants International, 14(Suppl 4): S10–S13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aschendorff, A., Kromeier, J., Klenzer, T., Laszig, R. 2007. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 28: 75S–79S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318031542e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bess. 2000. The role of generic health-related quality of life measures in establishing audiological rehabilitation outcomes. Ear and Hearing, 21(4): 74S–79S.
   Google Scholar
• British Society for Audiology. 2011. Pure-tone air-conduction threshold audiometry with and without masking. Available from: http://www.thebsa.org.uk/resources/.
   Google Scholar
• Buhagiar, R., Lutman, M. 2011. Development of a quality-of-life measure for adult patients with sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants International, 12(Suppl. 2): S44–S46. doi: 10.1179/146701011X13074645127559
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlson, M.L., Sladen, D.P., Haynes, D.S., Driscoll, C.L., DeJong, M.D., Erickson, H.C. et al. 2015. Evidence for the expansion of paediatric cochlear implant candidacy. Otology & Neurotology, 36(1): 965–971. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chundu, S., Flynn, S.L. 2014. Audiogram and cochlear implant candidacy – UK perspective. Cochlear Implants International, 15(4): 241–244. doi: 10.1179/1754762813Y.0000000052
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doran, M., Jenkinson, L. 2016. Mono-syllabic word test as a pre-operative assessment criterion for cochlear implant candidature in adults with acquired hearing loss. Cochlear Implants International, 17(S1).
   Google Scholar
• Gaylor, J.M., Raman, G., Chung, M., Lee, J., Rao, M., Lau, et al. 2013. Cochlear implantation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, 139(3): 265–72. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.1744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R.H., Dorman, M.F., Shallop, J.K., Sydlowski, S.A. 2010. Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy. Ear and Hearing, 31(2): 186–194. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c6b831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haumann, S., Hohmann, V., Meis, M., Herzke, T., Lenarz, T., Büchner, A. 2012. Indication criteria for cochlear implants and hearing aids: impact of audiological and non-audiological findings. Audiology Research, 2: e12. doi: 10.4081/audiores.2012.e12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamb, B., Archbold, S. 2013. Adult Cochlear Implantation: Evidence and experience. The Case for a Review of Provision. Ear Foundation. http://www.earfoundation.org.uk/files/download/667 accessed February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, B., Archbold, S., O'Neill, C. 2015. Bending the spend: expanding technology to improve health, wellbeing and save public money. Ear Foundation. http://www.earfoundation.org.uk/files/download/1077 accessed February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Leal, C., Marriage, J., Vickers, D. 2016. Evaluating recommended audiometric changes to candidacy using the Speech Intelligibility Index. Cochlear Implants International, 17(S1).
   Google Scholar
• Loeffler, C., Aschendorff, A., Burger, T., Kroeger, S., Laszig, R., Arndt, S. 2010. Quality of life measurements after cochlear implantation. The Open Otorhinolaryngology Journal, 4: 47–54. doi: 10.2174/1874428101004010047
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, R.E., Vickers, D.A., Summerfield, A.Q. 2015. Bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children: criterion of candidacy derived from an observational study. Ear Hear, 36(1): 14–23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 2009. Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness. NICE technology appraisal guidance [TAG166]. [cited 2016 February 15] Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/ta166 accessed 08/02/2016. Reviewed in 2011 at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/TA166/documents/hearing-impairment-cochlear-implants-review-decision-june-2011.
   Google Scholar
• NHS England and Department of Health. Action Plan on Hearing Loss. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• NICE. (2013) Guide to the methods of technology appraisal, paragraph 5.3.10.
   Google Scholar
• Office of National Statistics. 2011. National Population Projections 2010-based Statistical Bulletin. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/npp/national-population-projections/2010-based-projections/stb-2010-based-npp-principal-and-key-variants.html.
   Google Scholar
• Payakachat, N., Ali, M.M., Tilford, J.M. 2015. Can the EQ-5D detect meaningful change? A systematic review. PharmacoEconomics, 33(11): 1137–1154. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0295-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine, C. 2013. Cochlear implants in the UK: Awareness and utilisation. Cochlear Implants International Supplement 1, vol. 14: S32–S37.
   Google Scholar
• Ramen, G., Lee, J., Chung, M., Galyor, J.M., Sen, S., Rao, M., et al. 2011. Effectiveness of cochlear implants in adults with senrorneural hearing loss. Technology Assessment Report for the Tufts Centre. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coverage/DeterminationProcess/Downloads/id80TA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sampaio, A.L., Araújo, F.S., Oliveira, C.A. 2011. New criteria of indication and selection of patients to cochlear implant. International Journal of Otolaryngology, 2011:13.
   Google Scholar
• Sampath Kumar, R., Mawman, D., Sankaran, D., Melling, C., O’Driscoll, M., Freeman, S.M., Lloyd, S.K.W. 2016. Cochlear implantation in early deafened, late implanted adults: Do they benefit? Cochlear Implants International, 17(S1): 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Turche, G., Bellelli, S., Palla, I. Berre, S. 2011. Systematic review of the scientific literature on the economic evaluation of cochlear implants in adult patients. ACTA Otorhinol Aryngologica Italica, 31: 319–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuur, C., Hellier, W., Teo, C. 2016. An evaluation of hearing preservation outcomes in routine cochlear implant care: Implications for candidacy. Cochlear Implants International, 17(S1).
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, D., De Raeve, L., Graham, J. 2016. International survey of cochlear implant candidacy. Cochlear Implants International, 17(S1).
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, F., Bradley, J. 2016. Outcomes in implanted teenagers who do not meet the adult candidacy criteria. Cochlear Implants International, 17(S1).
   Google Scholar