References
- Action on Hearing Loss. 2015. Check your hearing. Available from: http://www.actiononhearingloss.org.uk/your-hearing/look-after-your-hearing/check-your-hearing/take-the-check.aspx
- Bench, J., Kowal, A., Bamford, J. 1979. The BKB (Bamford–Kowal–Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. British Journal of Audiology, 13(3): 108–112. doi: 10.3109/03005367909078884
- Boothroyd, A. 1968. Developments in speech audiometry. Sound, 2: 3–10.
- Boothroyd, A., Hanin, L., Hnath, T. 1985. A sentence test of speech perception: Reliability, set equivalence, and short-term learning. Internal report RCI10. New York: City University of New York.
- Craddock, L., Cooper, H., Riley, A., Wright, T. 2016. Cochlear implants for pre-lingually profoundly deaf adults. Cochlear Implants International, 17(Suppl 1): 26–30. doi:10.1080/14670100.2016.1161122. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2016.1161122
- Cullington, H.E. 2013. What do our service users really want? [poster]. British Cochlear Implant Group Annual Conference, Ayrshire.
- Cullington, H.E. 2016. Cochlear implant remote care service user feedback on home hearing test [10:13]. Available from: http://bit.do/remote_hearing_test.
- Cullington, H., Kitterick, P., DeBold, L., Weal, M., Clarke, N., Newberry, E. et al. 2016. Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 6(5): e011342. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011342. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011342
- Firszt, J.B., Holden, L.K., Skinner, M.W., Tobey, E.A., Peterson, A., Gaggl, W. et al. 2004. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear Hear, 25(4): 375–387. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000134552.22205.EE
- Gifford, R.H., Shallop, J.K., Peterson, A.M. 2008. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiology and Neurootology, 13(3): 193–205. doi:10.1159/000113510. doi: 10.1159/000113510
- Kaandorp, M.W., Smits, C., Merkus, P., Goverts, S.T., Festen, J.M. 2015. Assessing speech recognition abilities with digits in noise in cochlear implant and hearing aid users. International Journal of Audiology, 54(1): 48–57. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.945623. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.945623
- Leensen, M.C., de Laat, J.A., Dreschler, W.A. 2011. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification. International Journal of Audiology, 50(11): 823–834. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.595016. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.595016
- Levitt, H. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(2): 467–477. doi: 10.1121/1.1912375
- Litovsky, R.Y., Parkinson, A., Arcaroli, J., Sammeth, C. 2006. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear, 27(6): 714–731. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000246816.50820.42
- Mackersie, C.L. 2002. Tests of speech perception abilities. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 10(5): 392–397. doi: 10.1097/00020840-200210000-00012
- MED-EL. 2015. Online hearing test http://www.medel.com/hearing-test/. Available from: http://www.medel.com/hearing-test/.
- Mishra, S.K., Boddupally, S.P., Rayapati, D. 2015. Auditory learning in children with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 58(3): 1052–1060. doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-h-14-0340. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0340
- Naskov, N.D. 2016. Evaluating Cochlear implant's microphone acoustic performance in an uncontrolled environment. (BSc Computer Science BSc), University of Southampton, University of Southampton.
- NICE. 2009. NICE technology appraisal guidance 166. Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness: National Health Service National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta166.
- Nilsson, M., Soli, S.D., Sullivan, J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(2): 1085–1099. doi: 10.1121/1.408469
- Ofcom. 2015. The UK is now a smartphone society http://media.ofcom.org.uk/news/2015/cmr-uk-2015/. Available from: http://media.ofcom.org.uk/news/2015/cmr-uk-2015/.
- Office for National Statistics. 2015. Statistical bulletin: Internet users : 2015.
- Smits, C., Houtgast, T. 2005. Results from the Dutch speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Ear Hear, 26(1): 89–95. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200502000-00008
- Smits, C., Kapteyn, T.S., Houtgast, T. 2004. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. International Journal of Audiology, 43: 15–28. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050004
- Smits, C., Merkus, P., Houtgast, T. 2006. How we do it: The Dutch functional hearing-screening tests by telephone and internet. Clinical Otolaryngology, 31(5): 436–440. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01195.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01195.x
- Smits, C., Theo Goverts, S., Festen, J.M. 2013. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 133(3): 1693–1706. doi:10.1121/1.4789933. doi: 10.1121/1.4789933
- Stam, M., Smits, C., Twisk, J.W., Lemke, U., Festen, J.M., Kramer, S.E. 2015. Deterioration of speech recognition ability over a period of 5 years in adults ages 18 to 70 years: results of the dutch online speech-in-noise test. Ear Hear, 36(3): e129–137. doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000134. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000134
- Tsay, I.A. 2013. Using a patient-driven software tool for programming multiple cochlear implant patients simultaneously in a telemedicine setting. Thesis (PhD). (PhD), University of Colorado at Denver, US.
- Vickers, D.A., Riley, A., Ricaud, R., Verschuur, C., Cooper, S., Nunn, T. et al. 2016. Preliminary assessment of the feasibility of using AB words to assess candidacy in adults. Cochlear Implants International, 17(Suppl 1): 17–21. doi:10.1080/14670100.2016.1161143. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2016.1161143
- Vlaming, M.S., MacKinnon, R.C., Jansen, M., Moore, D.R. 2014. Automated screening for high-frequency hearing loss. Ear Hear, 35(6): 667–679. doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000073. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000073
- Watson, C.S., Kidd, G.R., Miller, J.D., Smits, C., Humes, L.E. 2012. Telephone screening tests for functionally impaired hearing: current use in seven countries and development of a US version. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 23(10): 757–767. doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.10.2. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.10.2
- Williams-Sanchez, V., McArdle, R.A., Wilson, R.H., Kidd, G.R., Watson, C.S., Bourne, A.L. (2014). Validation of a screening test of auditory function using the telephone. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 25(10): 937–951. doi:10.3766/jaaa.25.10.3. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.25.10.3