References
- Boers, M., Kirwan, J.R., Wells, G., Beaton, D., Gossec, L., d'Agostino, M.A., et al. 2014. Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(7): 745–753. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.013
- Bruce, I.A., Cooper, H., Waltzman, S., Schramm, D., Graham, J. 2015. Maximising research value in the field of hearing implantation: a call for ‘big data’. Cochlear Implants International, 16(6): 301–302. doi: 10.1179/1467010015Z.000000000282
- Bruce, I.A., Markey, A., Henderson, L., Green, K.M.J. 2013. The need for specific outcome measures when evaluating cochlear implantation in hearing impaired children with cerebral palsy. Cochlear Implants International, 14(S3): S35–S37. doi: 10.1179/1467010013Z.000000000112
- Cullington, H.E., Aidi, T. 2017. Is the digit triplet test an effective and acceptable way to assess speech recognition in adults using cochlear implants in a home environment? Cochlear Implants International, 18(2): 97–105. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2016.1273435
- The CROWN Initiative. 2014. The core outcomes in women's health (CROWN) initiative. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 180: A1–A2. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.06.013
- Vila, P.M., Hullar, T.E., Buchman, C.A., Lieu, J.E. 2016. Analysis of outcome domains in adult cochlear implantation: a systematic review. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 155(2): 238–245. doi: 10.1177/0194599816641382