Publication Cover
Cochlear Implants International
An Interdisciplinary Journal for Implantable Hearing Devices
Volume 19, 2018 - Issue 3
940
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original articles

Comparing eSRT and eCAP measurements in pediatric MED-EL cochlear implant users

, , , &

References

  • Allum, J.H.J., Greisiger, R., Probst, R. 2002. Relationship of intraoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds to maximum comfortable loudness levels of children with cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology, 41(2): 93–99. doi: 10.3109/14992020209090399
  • Alvarez, I., de la Torre, A., Sainz, M., Roldán, C., Schoesser, H., Spitzer, P. 2010. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor. Ear and Hearing, 31(1): 134–45. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181bdb88f
  • Battmer, R.D., Laszig, R., Lehnhardt, E. 1990. Electrically elicited stapedius reflex in cochlear implant patients. Ear and Hearing, 11(5): 370–74. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199010000-00008
  • Bergeron, F., Hotton, M. 2014. Comparison of eSRTs and comfort levels in users of digisonic SP cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants International, 16(2): 110–14. doi: 10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000092
  • Bresnihan, M., Norman, G., Scott, F., Viani, L. 2001. Measurement of comfort levels by means of electrical stapedial reflex in children. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, 127(8): 963–966. doi: 10.1001/archotol.127.8.963
  • Brickley, G., Boyd, P., Wyllie, F., O’Driscoll, M., Nopp, P. 2005. Investigations into electrically evoked stapedius reflex measures and subjective loudness percepts in the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant. Cochlear Implants International, 6(1): 31–42. doi: 10.1002/cii.18
  • Brill, S., Müller, J., Hagen, R., Möltner, A., Brockmeier, S.-J., Stark, T. et al. 2009. Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array. Biomedical Engineering Online, 8(1): 40. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-8-40
  • Brown, C.J. 2003. The electrically evoked whole nerve action potential. In: Cullington H.E., (ed.) Cochlea implants – objective measures. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd, p. 96–129.
  • Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., Etler, C.P., O’Brien, S., Oleson, J.J. 2010. Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 21(1): 5–15. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.1.2
  • Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., Gantz, B., 1990. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88(3): 1385–91. Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology. doi: 10.1121/1.399716
  • Cafarelli Dees, D., Dillier, N., Lai, W.K., von Wallenberg, E., van Dijk, B., Akdas, F. et al. 2005. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 10(2): 105–116. doi: 10.1159/000083366
  • Caner, G., Olgun, L., Gültekin, G., Balaban, M. 2007. Optimizing fitting in children using objective measures such as neural response imaging and electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold. Otology & Neurotology, 28(5): 637–640. doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e3180577919
  • Chiveralls, K., Fitzsimons, R. 1973. Stapedial reflex action in normal subjects. British Journal of Audiology, 7: 105–110. doi: 10.3109/03005367309082598
  • Christov, F., Munder, P., Berg, L., Bagus, H., Lang, S., Arweiler-Harbeck, D. 2016. ECAP analysis in cochlear implant patients as a function of patients’ age and electrode-design. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases, 133(Suppl 1): S1–S3. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2016.04.015
  • de Vos Johan, J., Biesheuvel, J.D., Briaire, J.J., Boot, P.S., van Gendt, M.J., Dekkers, O.M. 2017. Use of electrically evoked compound action potentials for cochlear implant fitting: a systematic review. Ear and Hearing. Epub ahead of print, doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000495.
  • Gattaz, G., Battmer, R.D., Lehnhardt, E., Gnadeberg, D. 1992. Beziehung zwischen dem elektrisch ausgelösten Stapediusreflex und der Unbehaglichkeitsschwelle bei Cochlear-Implant-Patienten. HNO, 40(11): 480–483.
  • Greisiger, R., Shallop, J.K., Hol, P.K., Elle, O.J., Jablonski, G.E. 2015. Cochlear implantees: analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups. Cochlear Implants International, 16(Suppl 4): 1–19. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2015.1110372
  • Hodges, A.V., Balkany, T., Ruth, R., Lambert, P., Dolanash, S., Schloffman, J. 1997. Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programming. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 117(3 Pt 1): 255–261. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70183-9
  • Hodges, A.V., Butts, S., Dolan-Ash, S., Balkany, T.J. 1999. Using electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds to fit the CLARION cochlear implant. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Supplement, 177: 64–68. doi: 10.1177/00034894991080S413
  • Hodges, A.V., Butts, S.L. King, J.E. 2003. Electrically evoked stapedial reflexes: utility in cochlear implant patients. In: Cullington H.E., (ed.) Cochlea implants – objective measures. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd, p. 241.
  • Hughes, M.L., Vander Werff, K.R., Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., Kelsay, D.M.R., Teagle, H.F.B. et al. 2001. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Ear & Hearing, 22(6): 471–486. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200112000-00004
  • Jerger, J., Jenkins, H., Fifer, R., Mecklenburg, D. 1986. Stapedius reflex to electrical stimulation in a patient with a cochlear implant. Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology, 95(2 Pt 1): 151–157. doi: 10.1177/000348948609500208
  • Jerger, J., Oliver, T.A., Chmiel, R.A., 1988. Prediction of dynamic range from stapedius reflex in cochlear implant patients. Ear and Hearing, 9(1): 4–8. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198802000-00010
  • Ji, F., Liu, K., Yang, S.-m. 2015. Clinical application of electrically evoked compound action potentials. Journal of Otology, 9(3): 117–121. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2014.11.002
  • Kim, J.-R., Abbas, P.J., Brown, C.J., Etler, C.P., O’Brien, S., Kim, L.-S. 2010. The relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential and speech perception: A study in cochlear implant users with short electrode array. Otology & Neurotology, 31(7): 1041–1048. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181ec1d92
  • Kosaner, J., Anderson, I., Turan, Z., Deibl, M. 2009. The Use of ESRT in fitting children with cochlear implants. The Journal of international Advanced Otology, 5(1): 62–71.
  • Lorens, A., Walkowiak, A., Piotrowska, A., Skarzynski, H., Anderson, I. 2004. ESRT and MCL correlations in experienced paediatric cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants International, 5(1): 28–37. doi: 10.1179/146701004807509143
  • Makhdoum, M.J., Snik, A.F., Stollman, M.H., de Grood, P.M., van den Broek, P. 1998. The influence of the concentration of volatile anesthetics on the stapedius reflex determined intraoperatively during cochlear implantation in children. The American Journal of Otology, 19(5): 598–603.
  • Miller, C.A., Abbas, P.J., Robinson, B.K., Rubinstein, J.T., Matsuoka, A.J. 1999. Electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hearing Research, 130: 197–218. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00012-X
  • Miller, C.A., Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., Chi, S.-L. 2008. The clinical application of potentials evoked from the peripheral auditory system. Hearing Research, 242(1–2): 184–197. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.04.005
  • Opie, J.M., Allum, J.H., Probst, R., 1997. Evaluation of electrically elicited stapedius reflex threshold measured through three different cochlear implant systems. The American Journal of Otology, 18(6 Suppl): S107–S108.
  • Ramekers, D., Versnel, H., Strahl, S.B., Smeets, E.M., Klis, S.F.L., Grolman, W. 2014. Auditory-nerve responses to varied inter-phase gap and phase duration of the electric pulse stimulus as predictors for neuronal degeneration. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 15(2): 187–202. doi: 10.1007/s10162-013-0440-x
  • Smoorenburg, G.F. 2006. Cochlear implant ear marks. Utrecht: University Medical Centre.
  • Spivak, L.G., Chute, P.M. 1994. The relationship between electrical acoustic reflex thresholds and behavioral comfort levels in children and adult cochlear implant patients. Ear and Hearing, 15(2): 184–192. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199404000-00008
  • Steel, M.M., Abbasalipour, P., Salloum, C.A.M., Hasek, D., Papsin, B.C., Gordon, K.A. 2014. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness. Ear and Hearing, 35(6): e291–e301. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000069
  • Stephan, K., Welzl-Müller, K. 1992. Stapedius reflex in patients with an inner ear prosthesis. The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 15(7): 436–439.
  • Stephan, K., Welzl-Müller, K. 1994. Effect of stimulus duration on stapedius reflex threshold in electrical stimulation via cochlear implant. Audiology, 33(3): 143–151. doi: 10.3109/00206099409071875
  • Stephan, K., Welzl-Müller, K. 2000. Post-operative stapedius reflex tests with simultaneous loudness scaling in patients supplied with cochlear implants. Audiology, 39(1): 13–18. doi: 10.3109/00206090009073049
  • Stephan, K., Welzl-Müller, K., Stiglbrunner, H. 1988. Stapedius reflex threshold in cochlear implant patients. Audiology, 27(4): 227–233. doi: 10.3109/00206098809081593
  • Vaerenberg, B., de Ceulaer, G., Zir, E., Harman, S. Jaspers, N., Tam, Y. et al. 2014. Cochlear implant programming: a global survey on the state of the art. The Scientific World Journal, 2014: 501738.
  • Vallés, H., Royo, J., Lázaro, A., Alfonso, J.I., Artal, R. 2009. Study of the relationship of stapedial reflex thresholds induced during cochlear implant surgery and the highest hearing comfort of paediatric patients. Acta Otorrinolaringologica Espanola, 60(2): 90–98. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6519(09)02003-2
  • Van den Abbeele, T., Noël-Petroff, N., Akin, I., Caner, G., Olgun, L., Guiraud, J. 2012. Multicentre investigation on electrically evoked compound action potential and stapedius reflex: how do these objective measures relate to implant programming parameters? Cochlear Implants International, 13(1): 26–34. doi: 10.1179/1754762810Y.0000000001
  • van den Borne, B., Snik, A.F., Mens, L.H., Broxx, J.P., van den Broek, P. 1996. Stapedius reflex measurements during surgery for cochlear implantation in children. The American Journal of Otology, 17(4): 554–558.
  • Van Dijk, B., Botros, A.M., Battmer, R.-D., Begall, K., Dillier, N., Hey, M. et al., 2007. Clinical results of AutoNRT(TM), a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 28: 558–570. Available from: http://www.ear-hearing.com/pt/re/earhearing/abstract.00003446-200708000-00011.htm. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc1d1
  • Walkowiak, A., Lorens, A., Kostek, B., Skarzynski, H., Polak, M. 2010. ESRT, ART, and MCL correlations in experienced paediatric cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants International, 11(Supp 1): 482–484. doi: 10.1179/146701010X12671177204741
  • Walkowiak, A., Lorens, A., Polak, M., Kostek, B., Skarzynski, H., Szkielkowska, A. et al. 2011. Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users. ORL; Journal for Oto-rhino-laryngology and Its Related Specialties, 73(4): 189–195. doi: 10.1159/000326892
  • Wolfe, J., Kasulis, H. 2008. Relationships among objective measures and speech perception in adult users of the HiResolution Bionic Ear. Cochlear Implants International, 9(2): 70–81. doi: 10.1179/cim.2008.9.2.70
  • Zehnder, A., Allum, J.H., Honegger, F., Probst, R. 1999. The usefulness of intraoperatively registered, electrically evoked stapedius reflex for the programming of cochlear implants in children. HNO, 47(11): 970–975. German. doi: 10.1007/s001060050477

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.