References
- Agrawal, S. 2014. Technology for improving speech understanding in noise in cochlear implant recipients. 14th Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children. Paper presented at the 14th Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children, Nashville, TN.
- Balkany, T., Hodges, A., Menapace, C., Hazard, L., Driscoll, C., Gantz, B., et al. 2007. Nucleus freedom North American clinical trial. Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 136(5): 757–762. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.006. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17478211. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.006
- Bernstein, J.G., Goupell, M.J., Schuchman, G.I., Rivera, A.L., Brungart, D.S. 2016. Having two ears facilitates the perceptual separation of concurrent talkers for bilateral and single-sided deaf cochlear implantees. Ear and Hearing, 37(3): 289–302. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000284. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26886027. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000284
- Buechner, A., Dyballa, K.H., Hehrmann, P., Fredelake, S., Lenarz, T. 2014. Advanced beamformers for cochlear implant users: acute measurement of speech perception in challenging listening conditions. PloS One, 9(4): e95542. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095542. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24755864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095542
- Chung, K., Zeng, F.G., Acker, K.N. 2006. Effects of directional microphone and adaptive multichannel noise reduction algorithm on cochlear implant performance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(4): 2216–2227. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17069317. doi: 10.1121/1.2258500
- Compton-Conley, C.L., Neuman, A.C., Killion, M.C., Levitt, H. 2004. Performance of directional microphones for hearing aids: real-world versus simulation. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 15(6): 440–455. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15341225. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15.6.5
- Desjardins, J.L. 2016. The effects of hearing Aid directional microphone and noise reduction processing on listening effort in older adults with hearing loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 27(1): 29–41. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15030. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26809324. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15030
- Devocht, E.M., Janssen, A.M., Chalupper, J., Stokroos, R.J., George, E.L. 2017. The benefits of bimodal aiding on extended dimensions of speech perception: intelligibility, listening effort, and sound quality. Trends in Hearing, 21: 1–20. doi: 10.1177/2331216517727900
- Feuerstein, J.F. 1992. Monaural versus binaural hearing: ease of listening, word recognition, and attentional effort. Ear and Hearing, 13(2): 80–86. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1601196. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199204000-00003
- Fraser, S., Gagne, J.P., Alepins, M., Dubois, P. 2010. Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(1): 18–33. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0140). Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19635945. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0140)
- Friesen, L.M., Shannon, R.V., Wang, X. 2001. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(2): 1150–1163. doi: 10.1121/1.1381538
- Grieco-Calub, T.M., Ward, K.M., Brehm, L. 2017. Multitasking during degraded speech recognition in school-age children. Trends in Hearing, 21: 2331216516686786. doi:10.1177/2331216516686786. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28105890. doi: 10.1177/2331216516686786
- Hick, C.B., Tharpe, A.M. 2002. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(3): 573–584. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/046)
- Hicks, C.B., Tharpe, A.M., Ashmead, D.H. 2000. Behavioral auditory assessment of young infants: methodological limitations or natural lack of auditory responsiveness? American Journal of Audiology, 9(2): 124–130. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2000/015)
- Holden, L.K., Finley, C.C., Firszt, J.B., Holden, T.A., Brenner, C., Potts, L.G., et al. 2013a. Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. [Research support, N.I.H., extramural]. Ear and Hearing, 34(3): 342–360. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23348845. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7
- Holden, L.K., Finley, C.C., Firszt, J.B., Holden, T.A., Brenner, C., Potts, L.G., et al. 2013b. Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 34(3): 342–360. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23348845. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7
- Holube, I., Haeder, K., Imbery, C., Weber, R. 2016. Subjective listening effort and electrodermal activity in listening situations with reverberation and noise. Trends in Hearing, 20. doi:10.1177/2331216516667734. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27698257. doi: 10.1177/2331216516667734
- Hornsby, W.B. 2013. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands. Ear and Hearing, 34(5): 523–534. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828003d8. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23426091. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828003d8
- Hughes, K.C., Galvin, K.L. 2013. Measuring listening effort expended by adolescents and young adults with unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants or normal hearing. Cochlear Implants International, 14(3): 121–129. doi:10.1179/1754762812Y.0000000009. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23540588. doi: 10.1179/1754762812Y.0000000009
- Illg, A., Bojanowicz, M., Lesinski-Schiedat, A., Lenarz, T., Buchner, A. 2014. Evaluation of the bimodal benefit in a large cohort of cochlear implant subjects using a contralateral hearing aid. Otology & Neurotology, 35(9): e240–e244. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000529. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25058838. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000529
- Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Koelewijn, T., de Kluiver, H., Shinn-Cunningham, B.G., Zekveld, A.A., Kramer, S.E. 2015. The pupil response reveals increased listening effort when it is difficult to focus attention. Hearing Research, 323: 81–90. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.004. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25732724. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.004
- Larsby, B., Hallgren, M., Lyxell, B., Arlinger, S. 2005. Cognitive performance and perceived effort in speech processing tasks: effects of different noise backgrounds in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. International Journal of Audiology, 44(3): 131–143. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15916114. doi: 10.1080/14992020500057244
- Litovsky, R.Y., Goupell, M.J., Godar, S., Grieco-Calub, T., Jones, G.L., Garadat, S.N., et al. 2012. Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin’s binaural hearing and speech laboratory. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 23(6): 476–494. doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.6.9. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22668767.
- Litovsky, R.Y., Parkinson, A., Arcaroli, J., Peters, R., Lake, J., Johnstone, P., Yu, G. 2004. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. Archives of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 130(5): 648–655. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.5.648
- Lowery, K.J., Plyler, P.N. 2013. The effects of noise reduction technologies on the acceptance of background noise. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 24(8): 649–659. doi:10.3766/jaaa.24.8.2. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24131601. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.8.2
- McFadden, B., Pittman, A. 2008. Effect of minimal hearing loss on children’s ability to multitask in quiet and in noise. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39(3): 342–351. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2008/032). Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18596291. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2008/032)
- McGarrigle, R., Munro, K.J., Dawes, P., Stewart, A.J., Moore, D.R., Barry, J.G., Amitay, S. 2014. Listening effort and fatigue: what exactly are we measuring? A British society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘white paper’. International Journal of Audiology, 53(7): 433–440. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.890296
- Mok, M., Grayden, D., Dowell, R.C., Lawrence, D. 2006. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(2): 338–351. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/027). Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16671848. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/027)
- Morera, C., Cavalle, L., Manrique, M., Huarte, A., Angel, R., Osorio, A., et al. 2012. Contralateral hearing aid use in cochlear implanted patients: multicenter study of bimodal benefit. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 132(10): 1084–1094. doi:10.3109/00016489.2012.677546. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22667256. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2012.677546
- Nilsson, M., Soli, S.D., Sullivan, J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(2): 1085–1099. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8132902. doi: 10.1121/1.408469
- Pals, C., Sarampalis, A., van Rijn, H., Baskent, D. 2015. Validation of a simple response-time measure of listening effort. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(3): EL187–EL192. doi:10.1121/1.4929614. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26428811. doi: 10.1121/1.4929614
- Parkinson, A.J., Arcaroli, J., Staller, S.J., Arndt, P.L., Cosgriff, A., Ebinger, K. 2002. The nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant system: adult clinical trial results. Ear and Hearing, 23(1 Suppl): 41S–48S. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11883766. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200202001-00005
- Peterson, G.E., Lehiste, I. 1962. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 27: 62–70. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14485785. doi: 10.1044/jshd.2701.62
- Pichora-Fuller, M.K., Kramer, S.E., Eckert, M.A., Edwards, B., Hornsby, B.W., Humes, L.E., et al. 2016. Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: The framework for understanding effortful listening (FUEL). Ear and Hearing, 37(Suppl 1): 5S–27S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27355771. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312
- Picou, E.M., Gordon, J., Ricketts, T.A. 2016. The effects of noise and reverberation on listening effort in adults With normal hearing. Ear and Hearing, 37(1): 1–13. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000222. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26372266. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000222
- Picou, E.M., Moore, T.M., Ricketts, T.A. 2017. The effects of directional processing on objective and subjective listening effort. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(1): 199–211. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0416. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28114609. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0416
- Picou, E.M., Ricketts, T.A. 2014. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort. Ear and Hearing, 35(6): 611–622. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000055. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24992491. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000055
- Picou, E.M., Ricketts, T.A., Hornsby, B.W. 2013. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort. Ear and Hearing, 34(5): e52–e64. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827f0431. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23416751. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827f0431
- Plant, K., van Hoesel, R., McDermott, H., Dawson, P., Cowan, R. 2016. Influence of contralateral acoustic hearing on adult bimodal outcomes after cochlear implantation. International Journal of Audiology, 55(8): 472–482. doi:10.1080/14992027.2016.1178857. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27216386. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1178857
- Qin, M.K. Oxenham, A.J. 2003. Effects of simulated cochlear implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(1): 446–454. doi: 10.1121/1.1579009
- Rakerd, B., Seitz, P.F., Whearty, M. 1996. Assessing the cognitive demands of speech listening for people with hearing losses. Ear and Hearing, 17(2): 97–106. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8698163. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199604000-00002
- Rennies, J., Schepker, H., Holube, I., Kollmeier, B. 2014. Listening effort and speech intelligibility in listening situations affected by noise and reverberation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(5): 2642–2653. doi:10.1121/1.4897398. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25373965. doi: 10.1121/1.4897398
- Ricketts, T.A., Grantham, D.W., Ashmead, D.H., Haynes, D.S., Labadie, R.F. 2006. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources. Ear and Hearing, 27(6): 763–773. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000240814.27151.b9. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17086085. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000240814.27151.b9
- Ronnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A., Sorqvist, P., Danielsson, H., Lyxell, B., et al. 2013. The ease of language understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7: 31. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874273. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031
- Ronnberg, J., Rudner, M., Foo, C., Lunner, T. 2008. Cognition counts: a working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU). International Journal of Audiology, 47(Suppl 2): S99–S105. doi:10.1080/14992020802301167. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19012117. doi: 10.1080/14992020802301167
- Schafer, E.C., Amlani, A.M., Paiva, D., Nozari, L., Verret, S. 2011. A meta-analysis to compare speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation. International Journal of Audiology, 50(12): 871–880. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.622300. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22103439. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.622300
- Schepker, H., Haeder, K., Rennies, J., Holube, I. 2016. Perceived listening effort and speech intelligibility in reverberation and noise for hearing-impaired listeners. International Journal of Audiology, 55(12): 738–747. doi:10.1080/14992027.2016.1219774. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27627181. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1219774
- Seeman, S., Sims, R. 2015. Comparison of psychophysiological and dual-task measures of listening effort. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(6): 1781–1792. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0180. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26363285. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0180
- Sladen, D.P., Gifford, R.H., Haynes, D., Kelsall, D., Benson, A., Lewis, K., et al. 2017. Evaluation of a revised indication for determining adult cochlear implant candidacy. The Laryngoscope. doi:10.1002/lary.26513. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233910.
- Sladen, D.P., Zappler, A. 2015. Older and younger adult cochlear implant users: speech recognition in quiet and noise, quality of life, and music perception. American Journal of Audiology, 24(1): 31–39. doi:10.1044/2014_AJA-13-0066. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25239296. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJA-13-0066
- Smulders, Y.E., van Zon, A., Stegeman, I., Rinia, A.B., Van Zanten, G.A., Stokroos, R.J., et al. 2016. Comparison of bilateral and unilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngology -- Head & Neck Surgery, 142(3): 249–256. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3305. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26796630. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3305
- Stickney, G.S., Zeng, F.G. 2004. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(2): 1081–1091. doi: 10.1121/1.1772399
- Studebaker, G.A. 1985. A “rationalized” arcsine transform. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28(3): 455–462. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4046587. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2803.455
- Ward, K.M., Shen, J., Souza, P.E., Grieco-Calub, T.M. 2017. Age-related differences in listening effort during degraded speech recognition. Ear and Hearing, 38(1): 74–84. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000355. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556526. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000355
- Whelan, R. 2008. Effective analysis on reaction time data. The Psychological Record, 58: 475–482. doi: 10.1007/BF03395630
- Winn, M. 2016. Rapid release from listening effort resulting from semantic context, and effects of spectral degradation and cochlear implants. Trends in Hearing, 20. doi:10.1177/2331216516669723. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27698260. doi: 10.1177/2331216516669723
- Wolfe, J., Parkinson, A., Schafer, E.C., Gilden, J., Rehwinkel, K., Mansanares, J., et al. 2012. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study. Otology Neurotology, 33(4): 553–560. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825367a5. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22588233. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825367a5
- Wu, Y.H., Stangl, E., Zhang, X., Perkins, J., Eilers, E. 2016. Psychometric functions of dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort. Ear and Hearing, 37(6): 660–670. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000335. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27438866. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000335