Electric compound action potentials (ECAPs) and impedances in an open and closed operative site during cochlear implantation

References

• Anne, S., Juarez, J.M., Shaffer, A., Eleff, D., Kitsko, D., Sydlowski, S. et al. 2017 Aug. Utility of intraoperative and postoperative radiographs in pediatric cochlear implant surgery. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 99:44–48. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arweiler-Harbeck, D., Mönninghoff, C., Greve, J., Hoffmann, T., Göricke, S., Arnolds, J. et al. 2012 Dec 4. Imaging of electrode position after cochlear implantation with flat panel CT. ISRN Otolaryngology, 728205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bas, E., Bohorquez, J., Goncalves, S., Perez, E., Dinh, C. T., Garnham, C. et al. 2016 Jul. Van De Water TR. Electrode array-eluted dexamethasone protects against electrode insertion trauma induced hearing and hair cell losses, damage to neural elements, increases in impedance and fibrosis: A dose response study. Hearing Research, 337: 12–24. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., Etlert, C.P., O’Brient, S., Oleson, J.J. 2010. Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 21(1):5–15. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.1.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby, P.A., Plant, K.L., Whitford, L.A. 2002 Sep. Electrode impedance in adults and children using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Cochlear Implants International, 3(2):87–103. doi:10.1179/cim.2002.3.2.87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, J.K., Chuang, A.Y., Sprinzl, G.M., Tung, T.H., Li, L.P. 2013 Aug 26. Impedance and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) drop within 24 hours after cochlear implantation. PLoS One, 8(8):e71929. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071929. eCollection 2013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christov, F., Munder, P., Berg, L., Arnolds, J., Bagus, H., Lang, S. et al. 2016a. A twelve months follow-up: influence of origin and duration of hearing-loss on tNRTs after cochlear implantation. otolaryngology, 6:4 doi: 10.4172/2161-119X.1000258
   Google Scholar
• Christov, F., Munder, P., Berg, L., Bagus, H., Lang, S., Arweiler-Harbeck, D. 2016b Jun. ECAP analysis in cochlear implant patients as a function of patient’s age and electrode-design. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases, 133(Suppl. 1):S1–3. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cosetti, M.K., Troob, S.H., Latzman, J.M., Shapiro, W.H., Roland, J.T. Jr, Waltzman, S.B. 2012 Feb. An evidence-based algorithm for intraoperative monitoring during cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 33(2):169–76. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182423175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• bility in isolated frog nerves. Journal of Neural Engineering, 10(3):036024. doi:10.1088/1741-2560/10/3/036024. Epub 2013 May 16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goehring, J.L., Hughes, M.L., Baudhuin, J.L., Lusk, R.P. 2013 Feb. How well do cochlear implant intraoperative impedance measures predict postoperative electrode function? Otology & Neurotology, 34(2):239–44. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827c9d71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, P., Jiang, Y., Gao, X., Huang, S., Yuan, Y., Wang, G. et al. 2016 Jul. Effects of cochlear implant surgical technique on post-operative electrode impedance. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 136(7):677–81. doi:10.3109/00016489.2016.1143967. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.Q., Tykocinski, M., Stathopoulos, D., Cowan, R. 2007 Sep. Effects of steroids and lubricants on electrical impedance and tissue response following cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants International, 8(3):123–47. doi: 10.1179/cim.2007.8.3.123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes, M.L., Vander Werff, K.R., Brown, C.J. et al. 2001. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 22(6):471–86. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200112000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüttenbrink, K.B., Zahnert, T., Jolly, C., Hofmann, G. 2002. Movements of cochlear implant electrodes inside the cochlea during insertion: an X-ray microscopy study. Otology &Neurotology, 23:187–91. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200203000-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khater, A.M., Moustafa, M.F., Said, A., Fahmy, H.S. 2015 Sep. An evidence-based guide for intraoperative cochlear implant backup use. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 79(9):1500–4. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.06.037. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lathuillière, M., Merklen, F., Piron, J.P., Sicard, M., Villemus, F., Menjot de Champfleur, N. et al. 2017 Jan. Cone-beam computed tomography in children with cochlear implants: the effect of electrode array position on ECAP. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 92:27–31. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.10.033. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Zhu, L., Sheng, S., Sun, L., Zhou, H., Tang, H. et al. 2013 Jun. Post stimulus effects of high frequency biphasic electrical current on a fibre’s conducti
   Google Scholar
• Marsella, P., Scorpecci, A., Pacifico, C., Resca, A., Vallarino, M.V., Ingrosso, A. et al. 2014 Feb. Safety and functional results of early cochlear implant switch-on in children. Otology & Neurotology, 35(2):277–82. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, D.R., Bikson, M., Jefferys, J. G. 2005 Feb 15. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 141(2):171–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittmann, P., Todt, I., Ernst, A., Rademacher, G., Mutze, S., Göricke, S. et al. 2016 Dec. Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 273(12):4251–56. Epub 2016 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4175-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittmann, P., Todt, I., Ernst, A., Rademacher, G., Mutze, S., Göricke, S. et al. 2017 Jan. Radiological and NRT-ratio-based estimation of slim straight cochlear implant electrode positions: a multicenter study. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 126(1):73–78. Epub 2016 Oct 25. doi: 10.1177/0003489416675355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molisz, A., Zarowski, A., Vermeiren, A., Theunen, T., De Coninck, L., Siebert J. et al. 2015. Postimplantation changes of electrophysiological parameters in patients with cochlear implants. Audiology and Neurotology, 20:222–28. doi: 10.1159/000377615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbold, C., Mergen, S., Richardson, R., Seligman, P., Millard, R., Cowan, R. et al. 2014 Jul. Impedance changes in chronically implanted and stimulated cochlear implant electrodes. Cochlear Implants International, 15(4):191–9. doi:10.1179/1754762813Y.0000000050. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramos Miguel, A., Ramos Macías, A., Viera Artiles, J., Perez Zaballos, M.T. 2015 Dec. The effect of reference electrode position in cochlear implants. The Journal of International Advanced Otology, 11(3):222–8. doi:10.5152/iao.2015.1746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teal, P.D., Ni, G. 2016 Oct. Finite element modelling of cochlear electrical coupling. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(4): 2769. doi: 10.1121/1.4964897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todt, I., Basta, D., Seidl, R., Ernst, A. 2008. Electrophysiological effects of electrode pull-back in cochlear implant surgery. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 128(12):1314–21. doi:10.1080/00016480801935533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesarg, T., Arndt, S., Aschendorff, A., Laszig, R., Beck, R., Jung, L. et al. 2017 Apr. Intra- und postoperative elektrophysiologische Diagnostik [Intra- and postoperative electrophysiological diagnostics]. HNO, 65(4):308–20. doi:10.1007/s00106-016-0195-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesarg, T., Arndt, S., Aschendorff, A., Laszig, R., Zirn, S. 2014 Oct. Intraoperative audiologisch-technische Diagnostik bei der Cochleaimplantatversorgung [Intraoperative audiological-technical diagnostics during cochlear implant surgery]. HNO, 62(10):725–34. doi:10.1007/s00106-014-2936-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilk, M., Hessler, R., Mugridge, K., Jolly, C., Fehr, M., Lenarz, T. et al. 2016. Impedance changes and fibrous tissue growth after cochlear implantation are correlated and can be reduced using a dexamethasone eluting electrode. PLoS One, 11(2):e0147552. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Tang, J., Cao, K., Zhu, X., Wang, Y., Pan, T. 2001 Oct. The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi, 36(5): 352–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zadrozniak, M., Szymański, M., Siwiec, H., Broda, T. 2011 May-Jun. Impedance changes in cochlear implant users. [Article in Polish]. Polish Journal of Otolaryngology, 65(3):214–7. doi:10.1016/S0030-6657(11)70678-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhu, X., Cao, K., Pan, T., Yang, H., Wang, Y. Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2002 Jan;16(1):5–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar