Publication Cover
Cochlear Implants International
An Interdisciplinary Journal for Implantable Hearing Devices
Volume 20, 2019 - Issue 3
756
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original articles

Controlled comparative clinical trial of hearing benefit outcomes for users of the Cochlear™ Nucleus® 7 Sound Processor with mobile connectivity

, &

References

  • Chang, W.H., Tseng, H.C., Chao, T.K., Hsu, C.J., Liu, T.C. 2008. Measurement of hearing aid outcome in the elderly: comparison between young and old elderly. Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 138(6): 730–734. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.02.012
  • Cox, R.M., Gilmore, C., Alexander, G.C. 1991. Comparison of two questionnaires for patient-assessed hearing aid benefit. The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2: 134–145.
  • Dawes, P., Powell, S., Munro, K.J. 2011. The placebo effect and the influence of participant expectation on hearing aid trials. Ear and Hearing. 32(6): 767–774. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182251a0e
  • Dawson, P.W., Hersbach, A., Swanson, B. 2013. An adaptive Australian sentence test in noise (Austin). Ear and Hearing, 34(5): 592–600. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828576fb
  • De Ceulaer, G., Swinnen, F., Pascoal, D., Philips, B., Killian, M., James, C. et al. 2015. Conversion of adult Nucleus 5 cochlear implant users to the Nucleus 6 system. Cochlear Implants International, 16(4): 222–232. doi: 10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000097
  • Dillon, H., James, A., Ginis, J. 1997. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 8(1): 27–43.
  • Dorman, M.F., Gifford, R.H. 2010. Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition. International Journal of Audiology, 49(12): 912–919. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.509113
  • Dreschler, W.A., de Ronde-Brons, I. 2016. A profiling system for the assessment of individual needs for rehabilitation with hearing aids. Trends in Hearing, 20: 1–8. doi: 10.1177/2331216516673639
  • Hersbach, A.A., Arora, K., Mauger, S.J., Dawson, P.W. 2012. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 33(4): e13–e23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31824b9e21
  • Mauger, S., Warren, C., Knight, M., Goorevich, M., Nel, E. 2014. Clinical evaluation of the Nucleus® 6 cochlear implant system: performance improvements with Smart Sound iQ. International Journal of Audiology, 53(8): 564–576. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.895431
  • Mosnier, I., Marx, M., Venail, F., Loundon, N., Roux-Vaillard, S., Sterkers, O. 2014. Benefits from upgrade to the CP810 sound processor for Nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 271(1): 49–57. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2381-8
  • Norrix, L.W., Camarota, K., Harris, F.P., Dean, J. 2016. The effects of FM and hearing aid microphone settings, FM gain, and ambient noise levels on SNR at the tympanic membrane. The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 27(2): 117–125. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15012
  • Oberg, M., Bohn, T., Larsson, U., Hickson, L. 2014. A preliminary evaluation of the active communication education program in a sample of 87-year-old hearing impaired individuals. The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 25(2): 219–228. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.25.2.10
  • Peterson, G.E., Lehiste, I. 1962 Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 27: 62–70. doi: 10.1044/jshd.2701.62
  • Plasmans, A., Rushbrooke, E., Moran, M., Spence, C., Theuwis, L., Zarowski, A., et al. 2016. A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus® 6 system. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 83: 193–199. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.02.004
  • Revit, L.J., Killion, M.C., Conley, C.L. 2007. Developing and testing a laboratory sound system that yields accurate real-world results. The Hearing Review.
  • Sousa, A.F., Carvalho, A.C., Couto, M.I., Tsuji, R.K., Goffi-Gomez, M.V., Bento, R.F., et al. 2015. Telephone usage and cochlear implant: auditory training benefits International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 19(3): 269–272. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390301
  • Ullauri, A., Crofts, H., Wilson, K., Titley, S. 2007. Bimodal benefits of cochlear implant and hearing aid (on the non-implanted ear): a pilot study to develop a protocol and a test battery. Cochlear Implants International, 8(1): 29–37. doi: 10.1179/cim.2007.8.1.29
  • Wolfe, J., Neumann, S., Marsh, M., Schafer, E., Lianos, L., Gilden, J., et al. 2015. Benefits of adaptive signal processing in a commercially available cochlear implant sound processor. Otology and Neurotology, 36(7): 1181–1190. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000781
  • Wolfe, J., Morais, M., Schafer, E. 2016. Speech recognition of bimodal cochlear implant recipients using a wireless audio streaming accessory for the telephone. Otology and Neurotology. 37(2): e20–e25. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000903

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.