Benefit of directional microphones for unilateral, bilateral and bimodal cochlear implant users

References

• Bentler, R.A. 2005. Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 16(7): 473–484. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16.7.7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blamey, P.J., Maat, B., Başkent, D., Mawman, D., Burke, E., Dillier, N., et al. 2015. A retrospective multicenter study comparing speech perception outcomes for bilateral implantation and bimodal rehabilitation. Ear and Hearing, 36(4): 408–416. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmeyer, A.M., Potts, L.G. 2011. Evaluation of different signal processing options in unilateral and bilateral cochlear freedom implant recipients using R-Space background noise. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 22(2): 65–80. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.2.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechner, A., Brendel, M., Saalfeld, H., Litvak, L., Frohne-Buechner, C., Lenarz, T. 2010. Results of a pilot study with a signal enhancement algorithm for HiRes120 cochlear implant users. Otology and Neurotology, 31(9): 1386–1390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechner, A., Dyballa, K.H., Hehrmann, P., Fredelake, S., Lenarz, T. 2014. Advanced beamformers for cochlear implant users: acute measurement of speech perception in challenging listening conditions. PLoS One, 9(4): e95542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R.M., Alexander, G.C. 1995. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear and Hearing, 16: 176–186. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199504000-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devocht, E.M., Janssen, A.M., Chalupper, J., Stokroos, R.J., George, E.L. 2016. Monaural beamforming in bimodal cochlear implant users: effect of (a)symmetric directivity and noise type. PLoS One, 11(8): e0160829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyballa, K.-H., Hehrmann, P., Hamacher, V., Nogueira, W., Lenarz, T., Büchner, A. 2015. Evaluation of a transient noise reduction algorithm in cochlear implant users. Audiology Research, 5(2): 116. doi: 10.4081/audiores.2015.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firszt, J.B., Holden, L.K., Skinner, M.W., Tobey, E.A., Peterson, A., Gaggl, W., et al. 2004. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear and Hearing, 25(4): 375–387.
   Google Scholar
• Geißler, G., Arweiler, I., Hehrmann, P., Lenarz, T., Hamacher, V., Büchner, A. 2015. Speech reception threshold benefits in cochlear implant users with an adaptive beamformer in real life situations. Cochlear Implants International, 16(2): 69–76. doi: 10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000088
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gifford, R.H., Revit, L.J. 2010. Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 21(7): 441–451. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.7.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R.H., Shallop, J.K., Peterson, A.M. 2008. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiology and Neurootology, 13(3): 193–205. doi: 10.1159/000113510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J.E., Zurek, P.M. 1992. Evaluation of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(3): 1662–1676. doi: 10.1121/1.402446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersbach, A.A., Arora, K., Mauger, S.J., Dawson, P.W. 2012. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 33(4): e13–e23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31824b9e21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, L.K., Brenner, C., Reeder, R.M., Firszt, J.B. 2013. Postlingual adult performance in noise with HiRes 120 and clearvoice low, medium and high. Cochlear Implants International, 14(5): 276–286. doi: 10.1179/1754762813Y.0000000034
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Honeder, C., Liepins, R., Arnoldner, C., Šinkovec, H., Kaider, A., Vyskocil, E., et al. 2018. Fixed and adaptive beamforming improves speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients equipped with the MED-EL SONNET audio processor. PLoS One, 13(1): e0190718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kates, J. M. 1993. Superdirective arrays for hearing aids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(4): 1930–1933. doi: 10.1121/1.407515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkinakis, K., Azimi, B., Hu, Y., Friedland, D.R. 2012. Single and multiple microphone noise reduction strategies in cochlear implants. Trends in Amplification, 16(2): 102–116. doi: 10.1177/1084713812456906
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kompis, M., Dillier, N. 2001. Performance of an adaptive beamforming noise reduction scheme for hearing aid applications. II. Experimental verification of the predictions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(3): 1134–1143. doi: 10.1121/1.1338558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M.S., Crandell, C.C., Valente, M., Horn, J.E. 2004. Speech perception in noise: directional microphones versus frequency modulation (FM) systems. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 15(6): 426–439 doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15.6.4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCreery, R.W., Venediktov, R.A., Coleman, J.J., Leech, H.M. 2012. An evidence-based systematic review of directional microphones and digital noise reduction hearing aids in school-age children with hearing loss. American Journal of Audiology, 21(2): 295–312. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0014)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosnier, I., Mathias, N., Flament, J., Amar, D., Liagre-Callies, A., Borel, S., et al. 2017. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 274(9): 3335–3342. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4651-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek, A., Nabelek, I. 1994. Room acoustics and speech perception. In: Katz, J., (ed.) Handbook of clinical audiology, 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, p. 624–636.
   Google Scholar
• Nabelek, A., Pickett, J. 1974. Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17(4): 724–739. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1704.724
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts, T., Dhar, S. 1999. Comparison of performance across three directional hearing aids. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 10(4): 180–189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts, T., Henry, P. 2002. Evaluation of an adaptive, directional-microphone hearing aid. International Journal of Audiology, 41(2): 100–112. doi: 10.3109/14992020209090400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, G.H., Kates, J.M. 1997. Speech intelligibility enhancement using hearing-aid array processing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(3): 1827–1837. doi: 10.1121/1.420107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, E.C., Pogue, J., Milrany, T. 2012. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 23(7): 501–509. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.7.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smulders, Y.E., van Zon, A., Stegeman, I., Rinia, A.B., Van Zanten, G.A., Stokroos, R.J., et al. 2016. Comparison of bilateral and unilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, 142(3): 249–256. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3305
   Google Scholar
• Spahr, A., Dorman, M. 2004. Performance of subjects fit with the advanced bionics CII and nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices. Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, 130(5): 624–628. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.5.624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spriet, A., Van Deun, L., Eftaxiadis, K., Laneau, J., Moonen, M., van Dijk, B., et al. 2007. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system. Ear and Hearing, 28(1): 62–72. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000252470.54246.54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, M., Fabry, D.A., Potts, L.G. 1995. Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 6(6): 440–449.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Veugen, L.C., Chalupper, J., Snik, A.F., Opstal, A.J., Mens, L.H. 2015. Matching automatic gain control across devices in bimodal cochlear implant user. Ear and Hearing, 37(3): 260–270. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veugen, L.C., Chalupper, J., Snik, A.F., Opstal, A.J., Mens, L.H. 2016. Frequency-dependent loudness balancing in bimodal cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngology, 136(8): 775–781. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2016.1155233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., Brand, T., Kollmeier, B. 1999. Entwick-lung und evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache II: Optimierung des Oldenburger Satztests. Zeitschrift für Audiologie, 38: 44–56. doi: 10.3109/00206099909073001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weissgerber, T., Rader, T., Baumann, U. 2015. Impact of a moving noise masker on speech perception in cochlear implant users. PLoS One, 10(5): e0126133.
   Google Scholar