Effect of adaptive beamforming and noise reduction algorithms on speech intelligibility and noise tolerance in bimodal cochlear implant users

References

• Advanced Bionics. 2012. ClearVoice: Technical Facts. [cited 2020 Jan 20]. Available from: https://cochlearimplanthelp.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/ab_clearvoice_data_etc.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, J., König, G. 2014. Improvement in speech intelligibility and subjective benefit with binaural beamformer technology. Hearing Review, 21(11): 40–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, R., Wu, Y.H., Kettel, J., Hurtig, R. 2008. Digital noise reduction: outcomes from laboratory and field studies. International Journal of Audiology, 47(8): 447–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräcker, T., Hellmiss, S., Batsoulis, C., Petzold, T., Gabel, L., Möltner, A., et al. 2019a. Introducing real-life listening features into the clinical test environment: Part II: measuring the hearing performance and evaluating the listening effort of individuals with a hearing implant. Cochlear Implants International, 20(4): 165–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bräcker, T., Opie, J., Nopp, P., Anderson, I. 2019b. Introducing real-life listening features into the clinical test environment: Part I: measuring the hearing performance and evaluating the listening effort of individuals with normal hearing. Cochlear Implants International, 20(3): 138–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Büchner, A., Schwebs, M., Lenarz, T. 2020. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users – microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments. Cochlear Implants International, 21(1): 1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buechner, A., Brendel, M., Saalfeld, H., Litvak, L., Frohne-Buechner, C., Lenarz, T. 2010. Results of a pilot study with a signal enhancement algorithm for HiRes 120 cochlear implant users. Otology & Neurotology, 31(9): 1386–1390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechner, A., Dyballa, K.H., Hehrmann, P., Fredelake, S., Lenarz, T, Wanunu M. 2014. Advanced beamformers for cochlear implant users: acute measurement of speech perception in challenging listening conditions. PLoS One, 9(4): e95542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devocht, E.M.J., Janssen, A.M.L., Chalupper, J., Stokroos, R.J., George, E.L.J. 2017. The benefits of bimodal aiding on extended dimensions of speech perception: intelligibility, listening effort, and sound quality. Trends in Hearing, 21: 233121651772790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devocht, E.M.J., Janssen, A.M.L., Chalupper, J., Stokroos, R.J., George, E.L., Larson, C.R. 2016. Monaural beamforming in bimodal cochlear implant users: effect of (a)symmetric directivity and noise type. PLoS One, 11(8): e0160829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, H. 2012. Hearing aids. 2nd ed. Sydney: Boomerang Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, J.G., Goedegebure, A. 2015. Application of noise reduction algorithm ClearVoice in cochlear implant processing: effects on noise tolerance and speech intelligibility in noise in relation to spectral resolution. Ear and Hearing, 36(3): 357–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, J.G., Goedegebure, A. 2018. Optimising the effect of noise reduction algorithm ClearVoice in cochlear implant users by increasing the maximum comfort levels. International Journal of Audiology, 57(3): 230–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, J.G., Vroegop, J.L., Goedegebure, A. 2018. Effects of a transient noise reduction algorithm on speech intelligibility in noise, noise tolerance and perceived annoyance in cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology, 57(5): 360–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elko, G., Pong, A. 1995. Simple adaptive first order differential microphone. In: Proceedings of IEEE workshop on applications of signal processing to audio and acoustics. New Paltz, NY, p. 169–172.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, A., Anton, K., Brendel, M., Battmer, R.D. 2019. Benefit of directional microphones for unilateral, bilateral and bimodal cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants International, 20(3): 147–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., Buchner, A. 2007. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2): 175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geißler, G., Arweiler, I., Hehrmann, P., Lenarz, T., Hamacher, V., Büchner, A. 2015. Speech reception threshold benefits in cochlear implant users with an adaptive beamformer in real life situations. Cochlear Implants International, 16(2): 69–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hambrick, L. 2017, January 31. Introduction to AB's Latest Innovation: the Naída Bimodal Hearing Solution. AudiologyOnline, Article 19063. Available from: https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/introduction-to-ab-s-latest-19063.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, L.K., Brenner, C., Reeder, R.M., Firszt, J.B. 2013. Postlingual adult performance in noise with HiRes 120 and ClearVoice low, medium, and high. Cochlear Implants International, 14(5): 276–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppe, U., Hocke, T., Digeser, F. 2018. Bimodal benefit for cochlear implant listeners with different grades of hearing loss in the opposite ear. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 138(8): 713–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek, A.K., Tampas, J.W., Burchfield, S.B. 2004. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(5): 1001–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phonak. 2005. Real Ear Sound: A simulation of the pinna effects optimizes sound localization also with open fittings. Phonak Field study news. [cited 2020 Jan 20]. Available from: https://www.phonakpro.com/content/dam/phonakpro/gc_hq/fr/resources/evidence/field_studies/FSN_2005_Real%20Ear%20Sound%20-%20A%20simulation%20of%20the%20pinna%20effect%20optimizes%20sound%20localization%20also%20with%20open%20fittings_GB.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sivonen, V., Willberg, T., Aarnisalo, A.A., Dietz, A. 2020. The efficacy of microphone directionality in improving speech recognition in noise for three commercial cochlear-implant systems. Cochlear Implants International, 21(3): 153–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagener, K., Brand, T., Kollmeier, B. 1999b. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache Teil III: Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and evaluation of a German sentence test Part III: evaluation of the Oldenburg sentence test]. Zeitschrift für Audiologie – Audiological Acoustics, 38(3): 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., Kühnel, V., Kollmeier, B. 1999a. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache I: Design des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and evaluation of a German sentence test I: design of the Oldenburger sentence test]. Zeitschrift für Audiologie – Audiological Acoustics, 38(1): 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, L.L.N., Chen, Y., Wang, Q., Kuehnel, V. 2018. Efficacy of a hearing aid noise reduction function. Trends in Hearing, 22: 2331216518782839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar