Ceiling effects for speech perception tests in pediatric cochlear implant users

References

• Andresen, N.S., Vohra, V., Galaiya, D.J., Carver, C.L., Marsiglia, D.D., Yeagle, J.D., et al. 2022. Are speech perception scores in cochlear implant recipients consistent across different tests? Otology & Neurotology, 43(7): e720. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archbold, S., Harris, M., O’Donoghue, G., Nikolopoulos, T., White, A., Richmond, H.L. 2008. Reading abilities after cochlear implantation: the effect of age at implantation on outcomes at 5 and 7 years after implantation. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 72(10): 1471–1478. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.06.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassari, C.M., Schmidt, C., Schubert, C.M., Srinivasan, P., Dodson, K.M., Sismanis, A. 2009. Receptive language outcomes in children after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 140(1): 114–119. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2008.09.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeson, T.R., Pisoni, D.B., Davis, R.A.O. 2003. A longitudinal study of audiovisual speech perception by children with hearing loss who have cochlear implants. The Volta Review, 103(4): 347–370.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blamey, P.J., Sarant, J.Z., Paatsch, L.E., Barry, J.G., Bow, C.P., Wales, R.J., et al. 2001. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(2): 264–285. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruijnzeel, H., Cattani, G., Stegeman, I., Topsakal, V., Grolman, W. 2017. Incorporating ceiling effects during analysis of speech perception data from a paediatric cochlear implant cohort. International Journal of Audiology, 56(8): 550–558. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1311029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chweya, C.M., May, M.M., DeJong, M.D., Baas, B.S., Lohse, C.M., Driscoll, C.L.W., et al. 2021. Language and audiological outcomes among infants implanted before 9 and 12 months of age versus older children: A continuum of benefit associated with cochlear implantation at successively younger ages. Otology & Neurotology, 42(5): 686693. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, C.M., Craig, H.K., Raudenbush, S.W., Heavner, K., Zwolan, T.A. 2006. The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: is there an added value for early implantation? Ear and Hearing, 27(6): 628–644. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000240640.59205.42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosetti, M.K., Waltzman, S.B. 2011. Cochlear implants: current status and future potential. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 8(3): 389–401. doi:10.1586/erd.11.12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, R.S., DelDot, J., Barker, E.J., Sarant, J.Z., Pegg, P., Dettman, S., et al. 1997. Speech perception results for children with implants with different levels of preoperative residual hearing. The American Journal of Otology, 18(6 Suppl): S125–S126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davidson, L.S., Gers, A.E., Blamey, P.J., Tobey, E.A., Brenner, C.A. 2011. Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear & Hearing, 32(1 Suppl): 19S–26S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ffdb8b.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davidson, L.S., Gers, A.E., Uchanski, R.M., Firszt, J.B. 2019. Effects of early acoustic hearing on speech perception and language for pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(9): 3620–3637. doi:10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-18-0255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettman, S.J., Dowell, R.C., Choo, D., Arnott, W., Abrahams, Y., Davis, A., et al. 2016. Long-term communication outcomes for children receiving cochlear implants younger than 12 months. Otology & Neurotology, 37(2): e82–e95. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, C.M., de Jong, K., Pisoni, D.B. 2012. Phonological awareness, reading skills, and vocabulary knowledge in children who use cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(2): 205–226. doi:10.1093/deafed/enr043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell, R.C., Dettman, S.J., Blamey, P.J., Barker, E.J., Clark, G.M. 2002. Speech perception in children using cochlear implants: prediction of long-term outcomes. Cochlear Implants International, 3(1): 1–18. doi:10.1179/cim.2002.3.1.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn, C.C., Walker, E.A., Oleson, J., Kenworthy, M., Van Voorst, T., Tomblin, J.B., et al. 2014. Longitudinal speech perception and language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users: the effect of age at implantation. Ear & Hearing, 35(2): 148–160. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182a4a8f0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easwar, V., Sanfilippo, J., Papsin, B., Gordon, K. 2018. Impact of consistency in daily device use on speech perception abilities in children with cochlear implants: datalogging evidence. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 29(09): 835–846. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi-Madiseh, A., Eikelboom, R.H., Jayakody, D.M.P., Atlas, M.D. 2016. Speech perception scores in cochlear implant recipients: an analysis of ceiling effects in the CUNY sentence test (Quiet) in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. Cochlear Implants International, 17(2): 75–80. doi:10.1080/14670100.2015.1114220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards, J., Beckman, M.E., Munson, B. 2004. The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children’s production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(2): 421–436. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/034).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, L.S., Johnson, K.C., Martinez, A.S., Cokely, C.G., Tobey, E.A., Quittner, A.L., et al. 2006. Speech recognition at 1-year follow-up in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study: methods and preliminary findings. Audiology and Neurotology, 11(4): 259–268. doi:10.1159/000093302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erber, N.P. 1982. Screening auditory abilities. In: Erber N.E., (ed.) Auditory training. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf, p. 47–71.
   Google Scholar
• Gifford, R.H., Noble, J.H., Camarata, S.M., Sunderhaus, L.W., Dwyer, R.T., Dawant, B.M., et al. 2018. The relationship between spectral modulation detection and speech recognition: adult versus pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Trends in Hearing, 22: 233121651877117. doi:10.1177/2331216518771176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R.H., Shallop, J.K., Peterson, A.M. 2008. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiology and Neurotology, 13(3): 193–205. doi:10.1159/000113510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R.V., Gordon, K.A., Mount, R.J. 2005. Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation. Developmental Psychobiology, 46(3): 252–261. doi:10.1002/dev.20052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskins, H.L. 1949. A phonetically balanced test of speech discrimination for children [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Helms, J., Weichbold, V., Baumann, U., von Specht, H., Schön, F., Müller, J., et al. 2004. Analysis of ceiling effects occurring with speech recognition tests in adult cochlear-implanted patients. ORL, 66(3): 130–135. doi:10.1159/000079332.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., Goswami, U. 2010. Phonological awareness, vocabulary, and reading in deaf children with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(2): 237–261. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0139).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, K.I., Pisoni, D.B., Osberger, M.J. 1995. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 16(5): 470–481. doi:10.1097/00003446-199510000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, K.I., Ying, E., Miyamoto, R.T., O’Neill, T., Lento, C.L., Fears, B. 2002. Effects of age at implantation in young children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 111(5_suppl): 69–73. doi:10.1177/00034894021110S515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K.E., Walker, E.A., Kirby, B., McCreery, R.W. 2017. Vocabulary facilitates speech perception in children with hearing aids. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(8): 2281–2296. doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-16-0086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocdor, P., Iseli, C.E., Teagle, H.F., Woodard, J., Park, L., Zdanski, C.J., et al. 2016. The effect of interdevice interval on speech perception performance among bilateral, pediatric cochlear implant recipients. The Laryngoscope, 126(10): 2389–2394. doi:10.1002/lary.26012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamping, W., Goehring, T., Marozeau, J., Carlyon, R.P. 2020. The effect of a coding strategy that removes temporally masked pulses on speech perception by cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, 391: 107969. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2020.107969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenarz, M., Sönmez, H., Joseph, G., Büchner, A., Lenarz, T. 2012. Long-term performance of cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 147(1): 112–118. doi:10.1177/0194599812438041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky, R.Y. 2005. Speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in young children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(5): 3091–3099. doi:10.1121/1.1873913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, R.W., Walker, E.A., Spratford, M., Oleson, J., Bentler, R., Holte, L., et al. 2015. Speech recognition and parent ratings from auditory development questionnaires in children who are hard of hearing. Ear & Hearing, 36(1): 60S–75S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minimum Speech Test Battery (MSTB) User Manual. 2011. http://www.auditorypotential.com/MSTBfiles/MSTBManual2011-06-20%20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moog, J.S., Gers, A.E. 1999. Speech and language acquisition in young children after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 32(6): 1127–1141. doi:10.1016/S0030-6665(05)70199-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, B., Kurtz, B.A., Windsor, J. 2005. The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(5): 1033–1047. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/072).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na, E., Toupin-April, K., Olds, J., Whittingham, J., Fitzpatrick, E.M. 2022. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of children with cochlear implants who had preoperative residual hearing. International Journal of Audiology, 61(2): 108–118. doi:10.1080/14992027.2021.1893841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Soli, S., Gelnett, D. 1996. Development of the sharing in noise test for children (HINT-C). Los Angeles, CA: House Ear Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Soli, S.D., Sullivan, J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(2): 1085–1099. doi:10.1121/1.408469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberger, M.J., Miyamoto, R.T., Zimmerman-Phillips, S., Kemink, J.L., Stroer, B.S., Firszt, J.S., et al. 1991. Independent evaluation of the speech perception abilities of children with the nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. Ear and Hearing, 12(4): 66S. doi:10.1097/00003446-199108001-00009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberger, M.J., Zimmerman-Phillips, S., Koch, D.B. 2002. Cochlear implant candidacy and performance trends in children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 111(5_suppl): 62–65. doi:10.1177/00034894021110S513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paatsch, L.E., Blamey, P.J., Sarant, J.Z., Martin, L.F.A., Bow, C.P. 2004. Separating contributions of hearing, lexical knowledge, and speech production to speech-perception scores in children with hearing impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(4): 738–750. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/056).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B.R., Litovsky, R., Parkinson, A., Lake, J. 2007. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Otology & Neurotology, 28(5): 649–657. doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000281807.89938.60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, G.E., Lehiste, I. 1962. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 27(1): 62–70. doi:10.1044/jshd.2701.62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robbins, A.M., Renshaw, J.J., Osberger, M.J. 1995. Common phrases test. Indianapolis: Indiana University School of Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Rom, D.M. 1990. A sequentially rejective test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni inequality. Biometrika, 77(3): 663–665. doi:10.1093/biomet/77.3.663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarant, J. 2012. Cochlear implants in children: a review. In: S. Naz, (ed.) Hearing loss. London: InTech, p. 331–382.
   Google Scholar
• Sarant, J.Z., Blamey, P.J., Dowell, R.C., Clark, G.M., Gibson, W.P. 2001. Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 22(1): 18–28. doi:10.1097/00003446-200102000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, E.C. 2010. Speech perception in noise measures for children: A critical review and case studies. Journal of Educational Audiology, 16: 415.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffield, S.W., Haynes, D.S., Wanna, G.B., Labadie, R.F., Gifford, R.H. 2020. Availability of binaural cues for pediatric bilateral cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 26(03): 289298. doi:10.3766/jaaa.26.3.8
   Google Scholar
• Spahr, A.J., Dorman, M.F., Litvak, L.M., Cook, S.J., Loiselle, L.M., DeJong, M.D., et al. 2014. Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists. Ear & Hearing, 35(4): 418422. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spahr, A.J., Dorman, M.F., Litvak, L.M., Van Wie, S., Gifford, R.H., Loizou, P.C., et al. 2012. Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear & Hearing, 33(1): 112–117. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822c2549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teagle, H.F.B., Park, L.R., Brown, K.D., Zdanski, C., Pillsbury, H.C. 2019. Pediatric cochlear implantation: a quarter century in review. Cochlear Implants International, 20(6): 288–298. doi:10.1080/14670100.2019.1655868.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thornton, A.R., Raffin, M.J. 1978. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21(3): 507–518. doi:10.1044/jshr.2103.507.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uhler, K., Warner-Czyz, A., Gifford, R., PMSTB Working Group. 2017. Pediatric minimum speech test battery. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 28(3): 232–247. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uziel, A.S., Sillon, M., Vieu, A., Artieres, F., Piron, J.-P., Daures, J.-P., et al. 2007. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Otology & Neurotology, 28(5): 615–628. doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000281802.59444.02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltzman, S.B. 2006. Cochlear implants: current status. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 3(5): 647–655. doi:10.1586/17434440.3.5.647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wauters, L.N., Van Bon, W.H., Tellings, A.E. 2006. Reading comprehension of Dutch deaf children. Reading and Writing, 19(1): 49–76. doi:10.1007/s11145-004-5894-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J., Neumann, S., Marsh, M., Schafer, E., Lianos, L., Gilden, J., et al. 2015. Benefits of adaptive signal processing in a commercially available cochlear implant sound processor. Otology & Neurotology, 36(7): 1181–1190. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitler, D.M., Kessler, M.A., Terushkin, V., Roland, J.T.J., Svirsky, M.A., Lalwani, A.K., et al. 2008. Speech perception benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children and adults. Otology & Neurotology, 29(3): 314–325. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181662cb5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwolan, T.A., Ashbaugh, C.M., Alarfaj, A., Kileny, P.R., Arts, H.A., El-Kashlan, H.K., et al. 2004. Pediatric cochlear implant patient performance as a function of age at implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 25(2): 112–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar