Caloric function as a predictor of cochlear implant performance

References

• Cohen, N.L., Hoffman, R.A. 1991. Complications of cochlear implant surgery in adults and children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 100(9): 708–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubo, T., Yamamoto, K.I., Iwaki, T., Doi, K., Tamura, M. 2001. Different forms of dizziness occurring after cochlear implant. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 258(1): 9–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fina, M., Skinner, M., Goebel, J., Piccirillo, J.F., Neely, J.G. Vestibular dysfunction after cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology, 2003; 24(2): 234–242.
   Google Scholar
• Ribári O, Küstel M, Szirmai Á, Répássy G. Cochlear implantation influences contralateral hearing and vestibular responsiveness. Acta Oto-laryngologica. 1999;119(2):225–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien, H.C., Linthicum, F.H. 2002. Histopathologic changes in the vestibule after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 127(4): 260–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handzel, O., Burgess, B.J., Nadol, J.B. 2006. Histopathology of the peripheral vestibular system after cochlear implantation in the human. Otology & Neurotology, 27(1): 57–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banakis Hartl, R.M., Greene, N.T., Jenkins, H.A., Cass, S.P., Tollin, D.J. 2018. Lateral semi-circular canal pressures during cochlear implant electrode insertion: A possible mechanism for postoperative vestibular loss. Otology & Neurotology, 39(6): 755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang, H., Haversat, H., Michaelides, E. 2015. Impairment of caloric function after cochlear implantation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58: 1387–1395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsiari, E., Balatsouras, D.G., Sengas, J., Riga, M., Korres, G.S., et al. 2013. Influence of cochlear implantation on the vestibular function. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 270(2): 489–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melvin, T.-A.N., della Santina, C.C., Carey, J.P., Migliaccio, A.A. 2008. The effects of cochlear implantation on vestibular function. Otology & Neurotology, 30: 87–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, I., da Silva, S.D., Segal, B., Zeitouni, A. 2017. Effect of cochlear implant surgery on vestibular function: Meta-analysis study. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 46(1): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Stultiens, J.J.A., Kieft, H.W., Mylanus, E.A.M., Pennings, R.J.E., Terwoert, L., et al. Impact of cochlear implantation on the function of the three semicircular canals. International Journal of Audiology. 2020:59(11): 843–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchman, C.A., Joy, J., Hodges, A., Telischi, F.F., Balkany, T.J 2004. Vestibular effects of cochlear implantation. The Laryngoscope, 114(S103): 1–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, P.F. 2017. The vestibular system and cognition. Current Opinion in Neurology, 30(1): 84–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolter, E., Gordon, A., Papsin, C., Cushing, S.L. 2015. Vestibular and balance impairment contributes to cochlear implant failure in children. Otology & Neurotology, 36: 1029–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillman, T., Carhart, R. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55. Tech Rep SAM-TR. 1966:1-12.
   Google Scholar
• Spahr, A., Dorman, M., Litvak, L., Van Wie, S., Gifford, R.H., Loizou, P.C., et al. 2012. Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear and Hearing, 33: 112–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soli, S., Wong, L. 2008. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the hearing in Noise test. International Journal of Audiology, 47(6): 356–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brant, J.A., Eliades, S.J., Kaufman, H., Chen, J., Ruckenstein, M.J. 2018. AzBio speech understanding performance in quiet and noise in high performing cochlear implant users. Otology and Neurotology, 39(5): 571–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer, J.B., Chari, D., Machmer, E., Lipson, S., Rouse, L., Lalwank, A.K. 2015. Utility of electronystagmography in the prediction of post-operative outcome following cochlear implantation. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 129(3): 238–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore, J.A., Vasil, K.J., He, S., Moberly, A.C. 2020. Explaining speech recognition and quality of life outcomes in adult cochlear implant users: complementary contributions of demographic, sensory, and cognitive factors. Otology & Neurotology, 41(7): e795–e803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, C.J., Karoui, C., Laborde, M.L., Lepage, B., Molinier, C.É., Tartayre, M., et al. 2019. Early sentence recognition in adult cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 40(4): 905–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamey, P., Artieres, F., Başkent, D., Bergeron, F., Beynon, A., Burke, E., et al. 2012. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiology and Neurotology, 18(1): 36–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipo R, Patrizi M, La Gamma R, D'Elia C, La Rosa G, Barbara M. 2006. Vestibular impairment and cochlear implantation. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 126(12): 1266–1274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walia, A., Shew, M.A., Kallogjeri, D., Wick, C.C., Durakovic, M., Lefler, S.M., et al. 2022. Electrocochleography and cognition are important predictors of speech perception outcomes in noise for cochlear implant recipients. Scientific Reports, 12(1): 3083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, D.F. 1999. Test-retest reliability of open-loop bithermal caloric irrig …  : Otology & Neurotology. Otology & Neurotology, 20(2): 220–222.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J., Wright, G., Mcilmoyl, L., Canter, R.J., Barber, H.O. The reproducibility of caloric tests of vestibular function in young and old subjects. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 1998;106(3-4):264–268.
   Google Scholar