Turkey’s struggle with the PKK and civilian control over the Turkish Armed Forces

References

• Acar, Feride, 2002. ‘Turgut Özal: Pious Agent of Liberal Transformation’. In Political Leaders and Democracy in Turkey, eds. Metin Heper and Sabri Sayarı. Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, 163–180.
   Google Scholar
• Aknur, Müge, 2005. ‘Civil-Military Relations in Turkey: Analysis of Civilian Leaders’. PhD diss., McGill University.
   Google Scholar
• Aras, Bülent and Gökhan Bacık, 2000. ‘The Rise of Nationalist Action Party and Turkish Politics’. Nationalism & Ethnic Politics 6(4), 48–64.
   Google Scholar
• Arıkan, Harun, 2002. ‘A Lost Opportunity? A Critique of the EU’s Human Rights Policy Towards Turkey’. Mediterranean Politics 7(1), 19–50.
   Google Scholar
• Avant, Deborah D., 1994. Political Institutions and Military Change: Lessons from Peripheral Wars. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Aydın, Senem and Ali Çarkoğlu, 2005. ‘EU Conditionality and Democratic Rule of Law in Turkey’. CDDRL Publications. Available at: iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/21244/EU_Conditionality,_Rule_of_Law_in_Turkey.pdf [Accessed 4 January 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Aydınlı, Ersel, 2002. ‘Between Security and Liberalization: Decoding Turkey’s Struggle with the PKK’. Security Dialogue 33(2), 209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, Willard F. and C. Neale Ronning, 1966. Internal Security and Military Power: Counterinsurgency and Civic Action in Latin America. Ohio State Press, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Barkey, Henri J. and Graham E. Fuller, 1998. Turkey’s Kurdish Question. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Beichelt, Timm, 2012. ‘The Research Field of Democracy Promotion’. Living Reviews in Democracy 3, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bila, Fikret, 2007. Komutanlar Cephesi [The Commanders’ Front]. Detay Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Bila, Fikret, 2007. Ankara’da Irak Savaşları [The Iraq Wars in Ankara]. Güncel Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Birand, Mehmet Ali, 1992. APO ve PKK [APO and the PKK]. 8th edn. Milliyet Yayınları, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Birand, Mehmet Ali and Soner Yalçın, 2001. The Özal: Bir Davanın Öyküsü [The Özal: The Story of a Cause]. 9th edn. Doğan Kitapçılık, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Bruneau, Thomas C. and Scott D. Tollefson (eds.), 2006. Who Guards the Guardians and How: Democratic Civil-Military Relations. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Burk, James, 2002. ‘Theories of Democratic Civil-Military Relations’. Armed Forces & Society 29(1), 7–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cizre, Ümit, 2000. ‘Politics and Military in Turkey into the 21st Century’. European University Institute Working Papers, RSC no. 2000/24, Florence.
   Google Scholar
• Cizre, Ümit, 2002. ‘Tansu Çiller: Lusting for Power and Undermining Democracy’. In Political Leaders and Democracy in Turkey, eds. Metin Heper and Sabri Sayarı. Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Cizre, Ümit, 2003. ‘Demythologizing the National Security Concept: The Case of Turkey’. The Middle East Journal 57(2), 213–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cizre, Ümit and Menderes Çınar, 2003. ‘Turkey 2002: Kemalism, Islamism, and Politics in the Light of the February 28 Process’. The South Atlantic Quarterly 102(2), 309–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottey, Andrew, Timothy Edmunds and Anthony Forster, 2002. ‘The Second Generation Problematic’. Armed Forces & Society 29(1), 31–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croissant, Aurel, David Kuehn, Paul Chambers and Siegfried O. Wolf, 2010. ‘Beyond the Fallacy of Coup-ism: Conceptualizing Civilian Control of the Military in Emerging Democracies’. Democratization 17(5), 950–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, Ali, 2003. ‘Who Wants Full Membership? Characteristics of Turkish Public Support for EU Membership’. Turkish Studies 4(1), 171–194.
   Google Scholar
• Dağı, İhsan D., 1996. ‘Transition in Turkey, 1980–83: The Impact of European Diplomacy’. Middle Eastern Studies 32(2), 124–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dağı, İhsan D., 2001. ‘Human Rights, Democratization and the European Community in Turkish Politics: The Özal Years, 1983–87’. Middle Eastern Studies 37(1), 17–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desch, Michael C., 1999. Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing Security Environment. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Feaver, Peter D., 1999. ‘Civil-Military Relations’. Annual Review of Political Science 2, 211–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch, J. Samuel, 1998. The Armed Forces and Democracy in Latin America. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Gökmen, Yavuz, 1999. Sarışın Güzel Kadın [Beautiful Blonde Woman]. Doğan Kitapçılık, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Grabbe, Heather, 2003. ‘Europeanization Goes East: Power and Uncertainty in the EU Accession Process’. In The Politics of Europeanization, eds. Kevin Featherstone and Claudio M. Radaelli. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 303–330.
   Google Scholar
• Güzel, Hasan Celal, 2007. Kuzey Irak: Kürtçülük ve Ayrılıkçı Terör. [Northern Iraq: Kurdism and Separatist Terror] Timaş Yayınları, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, Michael M., 1991. ‘Turkey and the Kurds: New Developments in 1991’. Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies 15(2), 32–45.
   Google Scholar
• Heper, Metin and Aylin Güney, 2000. ‘The Military and the Consolidation of Democracy: The Recent Turkish Experience’. Armed Forces & Society 26(4), 635–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, Wendy, 1997. Eroding Military Influence in Brazil: Politicians against Soldiers. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel P., 1962. ‘Patterns of Violence in World Politics’. In Changing Patterns of Military Politics, ed. Samuel Huntington. The Free Press of Glencoe, New, York, 17–50.
   Google Scholar
• İmset, İsmet, 1993. PKK: Ayrılıkçı Şiddetin 20 Yılı (1973–1992) [PKK: 20 Years of Separatist Violence (1973–1992)]. Turkish Daily News Yayınları, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, Wade, 2006. ‘Inspiration, Coalition, and Substitution: External Influences on Postcommunist Transformations’. World Politics 58(4), 623–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Gareth, 2001. Context and Circumstance: The Turkish Military and Politics. Adelphi Paper, no. 337. International Institute for Strategic Studies, London.
   Google Scholar
• Karaosmanoğlu, Ali L., 1994. ‘The Limits of International Influence for Democratization’. In Politics in the Third Turkish Republic, eds. Metin Heper and Ahmet Evin. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 117–133.
   Google Scholar
• Karaosmanoğlu, Ali L., 2011. ‘Transformation of Turkey’s Civil-Military Relations Culture and International Environment’. Turkish Studies 12(2), 253–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kınıklıoğlu, Suat, 2002. ‘The Democratic Left Party: Kapıkulu Politics Par Excellence’. Turkish Studies 3(1), 4–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kışlalı, Mehmet Ali, 1996. Güneydoğu: Düşük Yoğunluklu Çatışma [The Southeast: Low Intensity Conflict]. Ümit Yayıncılık, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Koonings, Kees and Dirk Kruijit (eds.), 2002. Political Armies: The Military and Nation Building in the Age of Democracy. Zed Books, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Kubicek, Paul J., 2003. ‘International Norms, the European Union and Democratization: Tentative Theory and Evidence’. In The European Union and Democratization, ed. Paul J. Kubicek. Routledge, London, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehn, David and Philip Lorenz, 2011. ‘Explaining Civil-Military Relations in New Democracies: Structure, Agency and Theory Development’. Asian Journal of Political Science 19(3), 231–249.
   Google Scholar
• Loveman, Brian, 1999. For la Patria: Politics and the Armed Forces in Latin America. Scholarly Resources, Wilmington, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Loveman, Brian, and Thomas M. Davies Jr (eds.), 1997. The Politics of Antipolitics: The Military in Latin America. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, Scott and Matthew Soberg Shugart (eds.), 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Makovsky, Alan, 1999. ‘An Analysis of the 1999 Elections’. Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Research Guide: Turkey’s Election and New Government. Available at: http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/special/99elections.html#TURKEY%E2%80%99S [Accessed 5 February 2009].
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W. and Georg Vanberg, 2014. ‘Parties and Policymaking in Multiparty Governments: The Legislative Median, Ministerial Autonomy, and the Coalition Compromise’. American Journal of Political Science 58(4), 979–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müftüler-Baç, Meltem, 2000. ‘The Impact of the European Union on Turkish Politics’. East European Quarterly 14(2), 159–179.
   Google Scholar
• Nunn, Frederick M., 1992. The Time of the Generals: Latin American Professional Militarism in World Perspective. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, Guillermo A., 1979. Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism. Studies in South American Politics, no. 9. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, Ergun, 2000. Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Özcan, Gencer, 2010. ‘The Changing Role of Turkey’s Military in Foreign Policy Making’. UNISCI Discussion Papers, no. 23. Research Unit on International Security and Cooperation (UNISCI), Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Özdağ, Ümit and Ersel Aydınlı, 2003. ‘Winning a Low Intensity Conflict: Drawing Lessons from the Turkish Case’. In Democracies and Small Wars, ed. Efraim Inbar. Frank Cass, Portland, OR, 99–118.
   Google Scholar
• Pilster, Ulrich and Tobias Böhmelt, 2012. ‘Do Democracies Engage Less in Coup-Proofing? On the Relationship between Regime Type and Civil-Military Relations’. Foreign Policy Analysis 8(4), 355–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pion-Berlin, David, 1992. ‘Military Autonomy and Emerging Democracies in South America’. Comparative Politics 25(1), 83–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pion-Berlin, David, 2001. ‘Introduction’. In Civil-Military Relations in Latin America: New Analytical Perspectives, ed. David Pion-Berlin. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Pion-Berlin, David, 2011. ‘The Study of Civil-Military Relations in New Democracies’. Asian Journal of Political Science 19(3), 222–230.
   Google Scholar
• Pion-Berlin, David and Craig Arceneaux, 2000. ‘Decision-Makers or Decision-Takers? Military Missions and Civilian Control in Democratic South America’. Armed Forces & Society 26(3), 413–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pion-Berlin, David and Harold Trinkunas, 2005. ‘Democratisation, Social Crisis, and the Impact of Military Domestic Roles in Latin America’. Journal of Political and Military Sociology 33(1), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rouquié, Alain, 1987. The Military and the State in Latin America. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Satana, Nil S., 2008. ‘Transformation of the Turkish Military and the Path to Democracy’. Armed Forces & Society 34(3), 357–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz W., 1988. ‘The Joint Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration’. Public Administration 66(3), 239–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank and Ulrich Sedelmeier (eds.), 2005. The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, Ulrich, 2011. ‘Europanisation in New Member and Candidate States’. Living Reviews in European Governance 6(1), 1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Staniland, Paul, 2008. ‘Explaining Civil-Military Relations in Complex Political Environments: India and Pakistan in Comparative Perspective’. Security Studies 17(2), 322–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepan, Alfred, 1976. ‘The New Professionalism of Internal Warfare and Military Role Expansion’. In Armies and Politics in Latin America, ed. Abraham F. Lowenthal. Holmes and Meier Publishers, New York, 244–260.
   Google Scholar
• Stepan, Alfred, 1988. Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Tocci, Nathalie, 2005. ‘Europeanisation in Turkey: Trigger or Anchor for Reform?’. South European Society & Politics 10(1), 73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Trinkunas, Harold A., 2005. Crafting Civilian Control of the Military in Venezuela: A Comparative Perspective. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, George, 1995. ‘Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism, and Multipartysm’. British Journal of Political Science 25(3), 289–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uğur, Mehmet, 2003. ‘Testing Times in EU-Turkey Relations: The Road to Copenhagen and Beyond’. Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans 5(2), 165–183.
   Google Scholar
• Uzgel, İlhan, 2003. ‘Between Praetorianism and Democracy: The Role of the Military in Turkish Foreign Policy’. Turkish Yearbook of International Relations 34, 177–212.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, Gregory, 2003. ‘Fighting the Enemy Within: Terrorism, the School of the Americas, and the Military in Latin America’. Human Rights Review 5(1), 12–27.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, Claude E. and Arthur K. Smith, 1974. Military Role and Rule: Perspectives on Civil-Military Relations. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, MA.
   Google Scholar