Gender and development in post-conflict Swat, Pakistan: a critical analysis of NGO approaches used in development projects

References

• Agarwal, Bina, 1994. ‘A Field of One’s Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia’. South Asian Studies 58. Cambridge. doi:10.1017/S0041977X00032122.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, S.S., 2000. Gender and Human Rights in Islam and International Law: Equal Before Allah, Unequal Before Men? Kluwer Law International, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2000. ‘Asian Development Outlook 2000: The Social Challenge in Asia’. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/11540/279 [Accessed 23 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Buvinic, M., 1983. ‘Women’s Issues in Third World Poverty: A Policy Analysis’. In Women and Poverty in the Third World, eds. M. Buvinic, M. Lycette and W. P. McGreevy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 14–33.
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, M., 1998. ‘Aid Policy and Post-Modern Conflict: A Critical Review’. Occasional Paper 19, School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Elahi, N., I. Nyborg and N. Bahadar, 2015. ‘Participatory Approaches and Practices: A Critical Assessment of Their Impacts on Gender Relations, Empowerment and Development in Pre- and Post-Crisis Swat, Pakistan’. Forum of Development Studies 42(2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn-Dunlop, P., 1994. ‘Tourism: A Gender Analysis’. In Gender Culture and Tourism Development in Western Samoa, eds. V. Kinnaird and D. Hall. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, 121–141.
   Google Scholar
• Geiser, U., 2012. ‘Reading Political Contestation in Pakistan’s Swat Valley – from Deliberation to “The Political” and Beyond’. Geoforum 43(4), 707–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, A.M., 1992. ‘Gender and Administration’. Bulletin 23(4), 6–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, Y., 2009. ‘A War on Pakistan’s School Girls’. Available at: www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/opinions/articles/2009/01/26/20090126WPhassan0126.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N., 1994. Reversed Realities. Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought. Verso Publishers, London.
   Google Scholar
• Khalid, A., I. Nyborg and B.N. Khattak, 2015. ‘Whose Property Whose Authority? Gendering the Legal and Customary Practices in Ownership and Access to Land: A Case of Swat, Pakistan’. Journal of Rural Studies 41, 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid, A., I. Nyborg and B.N. Khattak, inpress. Disinherited and Marginalised Owners: Exploring Gendered Perceptions of Women’s Land Rights in Swat. Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm, C., 1979. ‘Contemporary Politics in a Tribal Society: Swat District, NWFP, Pakistan’. Asian Survey 19(5), 485–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoor, R., 2008. ‘Pakistani Women, Religious Extremism and Traditions’. 27 October 398. Available at: http://socialistpakistan.org/?.
   Google Scholar
• Masood, A., 2009. ‘How Green Was My Valley in’. Foreign Policy Journal, 25 May. Available at: www.eariana.com/ariena/eariana.nsf/articles/
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C.T., 1984. ‘Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses’. Boundary 13(1), 333–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molyneux, M., 1985. ‘Mobilization Without Emancipation? Women’s Interests, State and Revolution in Nicaragua’. Feminist Studies 11(2), 227–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momsen, Janet, 2019. Gender and Development. Routledge Perspectives on Development. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, E.P., 1993. ‘Gender, Power and Legal Pluralism: Rajasthan, India’. American Ethnologist 20(3), 522–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, N. C., 1989. ‘Gender Planning in the Third World: Meeting Practical and Strategic Gender Needs’. World Development 17(11), 1799–1825. Great Britain.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musharraf, P., 2004. ‘A Plea for Enlightened Moderation: Muslims Must Raise Themselves Up Through Individual Achievement and Socio-Economic Emancipation’. Washington Post, 01 June.
   Google Scholar
• Nawab, B. and I. Nyborg, 2017. ‘Climate Change and Disasters: Institutional Complexities and Actors’ Priorities for Mitigation, Adaptation and Response’. ID Bulletin 48(4), 47–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naz, Arab, Ibrahim and W. Ahmad, 2012. ‘Socio-Cultural Impediments to Women Political Empowerment in Pakhtun Society’. Academic Research International 3(1), 163–173.
   Google Scholar
• Nyborg, I., 2002. ‘Yours today, mine tomorrow? Study of women and men’s negotiations over resources in Baltistan, Pakistan’. PhD diss., Noragric, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU).
   Google Scholar
• Nyborg, I. and B. Nawab, 2021. ‘Civil Security in the Wake of Crisis—renegotiating Police-Community Relations in Post-Crisis Development in Swat, Pakistan’. Journal of Human Security 16(2), 134–148.
   Google Scholar
• Nyborg, I., B. Nawab, K. Khan and J. Ali, 2012. ‘Rural Development in Swat, Pakistan: Understanding Food and Livelihood Securing in Post Conflict Contexts’. Noragric Report, No 62.
   Google Scholar
• Orakzai, B.S., 2012. ‘Conflict in the Swat Valley of Pakistan: Pakhtun Culture and Peace-Building Theory Practice Application’. Journal of Peacebuilding and Development 6(1), 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Paydar, N., 2012. ‘Linking Land Rights to Livelihoods: Towards Upholding Women’s Property and Inheritance Rights in the Developing World’. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Mini-Conference Paper, Spring, Indiana University, Bloomington.
   Google Scholar
• PDMA, 2012. ‘Provincial Disaster Management Authority (PDMA), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa’. Government of Pakistan, official website. Available at: http://www.pdma.gov.pk [Accessed 18 March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, S. and C. Miller, 1995. ‘From WID to GAD: Conceptual Shifts in the Women and Development Discourse’. Occasional Paper No. 1 for Beijing, UNRISD, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J. and N. Peluso, 2003. ‘A Theory of Access’. Rural Sociology 68(2), 153–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, J., 2002. ‘Supporting Livelihoods in Situations of Chronic Conflict and Political Instability: Overview of Conceptual Issues’. Working Paper 183. ISBN: 0 85003 621 6.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. and L. Tilly, 1982. ‘Women’s Work and the Family in 19th Century Europe’. In The Changing Experience of Women, ed. E. Whitelegg. Martin Robertson/Open University, Oxford, 36–64.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, Q.A., B. Nawab and T. Mehmood, 2020b. ‘The Role of Stakeholders in Post Conflict Peacebuilding in Swat, Pakistan’. Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government 18(1), 211–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, Q.A., B. Nawab, I. Nyborg and N. Elahi, 2020a. ‘The Narrative of Militancy in Swat, Pakistan’. Journal of Human Security 16(2), 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Shakirullah, B. Nawab, I. Nyborg and N. Elahi, 2020. ‘The Underlying Causes of Violent Conflict in the North Waziristan Tribal Areas of Pakistan’. Civil Wars 22(1), 114–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakirullah, Nawab, B. and N. Elahi, 2019. ‘Violent Conflict in North Waziristan, Pakistan: The Distortion and Re-Emergence of Social Structure’. FWU Journal of Social Sciences 13(3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Staudt, K., 1985. Agricultural Policy Implication: A Case from Western Kenya. Kumarian Press, West Hartford.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan-e-Rome, 2008. ‘Women’s Right to Land Ownership in Swat State Area: The Swat State Area and Post-State Scenario’. Pakistan Vision 8(2), 116–141.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan-e-Rome, 2010. ‘Crisis and Reconciliation in Swat’. Pakistaniaat: A Journal of Pakistan Studies 3(1), 53–79.
   Google Scholar