An evaluation of reclaimed asphalt shingles in hot mix asphalt by varying sources and quantity of reclaimed asphalt shingles

REFERENCES

• Daniel, J. S. & Mogawer, W. S. (2010). Determining the effective PG grade of binder in RAP mixtures (Final research report to the New England transportation consortium).
   Google Scholar
• Eddhahak-Ouni, A., Dony, A., Colin, J., Mendez, S., Navaro, J., Drouadaine, I., & Bruneau, D. (2012). 1. Experimental investigation of the homogeneity of the blended binder of a high rate recycled asphalt. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13(3), 566–575. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2012.700269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foxlow, J. J., Daniel, J. S., & Swamy, A. K. (2010). RAP or RAS? The difference in performance of HMA containing reclaimed asphalt pavement and reclaimed asphalt shingles. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 80: 347–373.
   Google Scholar
• Hajj, E., Sebaaly, P., & Shrestha, R. (2009). Laboratory evaluation of mixes containing recycled asphalt pavement (RAP). Road Materials and Pavement Design, 10(3), 495–517. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2009.9690211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. R., Guddati, M. N., Underwood, B. S., Yun, T. Y., Subramanian, V., Savadatti, S., & Thirunavukkarasu, S. (2008). Development of a multiaxial VEPCD-FEP++ (Final report FHWA-HRT-08-073). Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Mangiafico, S., Di Benedetto, H., Sauzéat, C., Olard, F., Pouget, S., & Planque, L. (2013). Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement content on complex modulus of asphalt binder blends and corresponding mixes: experimental results and modelling. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 14(Suppl. 1), 132–148. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2013.774751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, R., & Anderson. R. M. (2001a). Recommended use of reclaimed asphalt pavement in the superpave mix design method: technician's manual (NCHRP Report 452). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board - National Research Council, National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, R., & Anderson, R. M. (2001b). Recommended use of reclaimed asphalt pavement in the superpave mix design method: guidelines (NCHRP Research Results Digest, Number 253).
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, R. S., Soleymani, H., Anderson, R.M., Turner, P., & Peterson, R. (2000). Recommended use of reclaimed asphalt pavement in the superpave mix design method (Contractor's final report, NCHRP Web Document 30, Project D9-12).
   Google Scholar
• Mogawer, W., Bennert, T., Daniel, J. S., Bonaquist, R., Austerman, A., & Booshehrian, A. (2012), Performance characteristics of plant produced high RAP mixtures. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13(Suppl. 1), 183–208. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2012.657070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHDOT Construction Manual: Division 400 – Pavements. (April 2009). New Hampshire Department of Transportation. Retrieved from http://www.nh.gov/dot/org/projectdevelopment/construction/documents/toc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Soleymani, H., Anderson, M., McDaniel, R., & Abdelrahman, M. (2000). Investigation of the black rock issue for recycled asphalt mixtures. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 69, 366–390.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, J., Mahoney, J., & Dippold, C. (2001). Determination of the PG binder grade to use in a RAP mix (Final report JHR 00-278, Project 99-1). Connecticut Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Stroup-Gardiner, M., & Wagner, C. (1999). Use of reclaimed asphalt pavement in superpave hot-mix asphalt applications. Transportation Research Record, 1681, 1–9. doi: 10.3141/1681-01
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, B. S., & Kim, Y. R. (2009). Analytical techniques for determining the endurance limit of hot mix asphalt concrete. 2nd International Conference on Perpetual Pavements, Columbus, Ohio. September 30 – October 1, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, B. S., Kim, Y. R., & Guddati, M. N. (2010). Improved calculation method of damage parameter in viscoelastic continuum damage model. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 11(6), 459–476. doi: 10.1080/10298430903398088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar