Advanced search
Publication Cover
Road Materials and Pavement Design Volume 15, 2014 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
529
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original scientific papers

Influence of aggregate packing structure on California bearing ratio values of unbound granular materials

Tatek F. YidetiDivision of Highway and Railway Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology KTH, Stockholm, SwedenCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Bjorn BirgissonDivision of Highway and Railway Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology KTH, Stockholm, Sweden
&
Denis JelaginDivision of Highway and Railway Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology KTH, Stockholm, Sweden
Pages 102-113 | Received 14 Nov 2012, Accepted 01 Nov 2013, Published online: 28 Nov 2013

References

  • AASHTO. (2003) AASHTO pavement design guidelines for 1993. Virginia: Department of Transportation Materials Division.
  • ASTM D1883. (2007). Standard test method for CBR (California bearing ratio) of laboratory-compacted soils. Book of Standard Volume: 04.08.
  • ASTM D4429-09a. (2009). Standard test method for CBR (California bearing ratio) of soils in place. Book of Standard Volume: 04.08.
  • British Road Note 29. (1977). A guide for structural design of pavements for new roads. London: HMSO.
  • Erlingsson, S. (2007). On forecasting the resilient modulus from the CBR value of granular bases. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 8(4): 783–797.
  • Erlingsson, S., & Magnusdottir, B. (2004). Comparison between stiffness values from RLTT and CBR-values for unbound granular materials. Proceedings of the Nordic Geotechnical Conference – NGM, Swedish Geotechnical Society, May 18–21, Ystad, Sweden, B39–B47.
  • Heukelom, W., & Foster, C. R. (1960). Dynamic testing of pavements. Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, SMI, 86: 1–29.
  • Hoff, I. (1999). Material properties of unbound aggregates for pavement structures (PhD thesis). Institutt for veg- og jernbanebygging, NTNU, Trondheim.
  • Joseph, D., & Vipulanandan, C. (2011). Characterization of field compacted soil (un-soaked) using the California bearing ratio (CBR) test. Geo-Frontiers. ASCE, 2719–2728. doi:10.1061/41165(397)278.
  • Lambe, T. W., & Whitman, R. V. (1979). Soil mechanics SI version (pp. 29–31). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Liddle, W. J., Jones, G. M., Hurley, W. D., Petersen, D. E., & Sorbe, V. K. K. (1967). The repeatability of test results using various California bearing ratio procedures and the resistance R-value (Research Report 500-908). Utah State Department of Highways, Materials and Tests Division Utah.
  • National Cooperative Highway Research Program. (2001). Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Appendix CC-1: Correlation of CBR values with soil index properties. Champaign, IL: Author.
  • Packard, R. G. (1984). Thickness design of concrete highway and street pavement. Ottawa: Portland Cement Association.
  • Rollings, M. P., & Rollings, R. S. (1996). Geotechnical materials in construction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Sweere, G. T. H. (1990). Unbound granular bases for roads (pp. 4–16, 20). Delft: Delft University of Technology.
  • Van Til, C. J., McCullough, B. F., Vallerga, B. A., & Hicks, R. G. (1972). Evaluation of AASHTO interim guide for design of pavement structures (NCHRP 128). Highway Research Board.
  • Witczak, M. W., Qi, X., & Mirza, M. W. (1995). Use of nonlinear subgrade modulus in AASHTO design procedure. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 121, 273–282.
  • Yideti, T. F., Birgisson, B., Jelagin, D., & Guarin, A. (2013a). Packing theory-based framework to evaluate permanent deformation of unbound granular materials. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14(3), 309–320.
  • Yideti, T. F., Birgisson, B., Jelagin, D., & Guarin, A. (2013b). Packing theory-based framework for evaluating resilient modulus of unbound granular materials. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. doi:10.1080/10298436.2013.857772.
  • Yoder, E. J., & Witczak, M. W. (1975). Principles of pavement engineering (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.