“She’s the communication expert”: digital labor and the implications of datafied relational communication

References

• Adkins, Lisa. 2001. “Cultural Feminization: ‘Money, Sex and Power’ for Women.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 26 (3): 669–695. doi:10.1086/495625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, Mark. 2002. “The Work of Being Watched: Interactive Media and the Exploitation of Self-Disclosure.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 19 (2): 230–248. doi:10.1080/07393180216561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, Mark. 2011. “Surveillance and Alienation in the Online Economy.” Surveillance & Society; Kingston 8 (3): 278–287. doi:10.24908/ss.v8i3.4164.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, Mark. 2014. “The Big Data Divide.” International Journal of Communication 8: 17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcy, Jacquelyn. 2016. “Emotion Work: Considering Gender in Digital Labor.” Feminist Media Studies 16 (2): 365–368. doi:10.1080/14680777.2016.1138609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balbi, Gabriele. 2013. “‘I Will Answer You, My Friend, but I Am Afraid’: Telephones and the Fear of a New Medium in Nineteenth- and Early Twentieth-Century Italy.” In Routledge Research in Cultural and Media Studies 46, edited by Siân Nicholas and O’Malley Tom. Moral Panics, Social Fears, and the Media, Historical Perspectives, 60–75. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, Nancy K. 2015. “Connect with Your Audience! the Relational Labor of Connection.” The Communication Review 18 (1): 14–22. doi:10.1080/10714421.2015.996401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolin, Göran. 2010. “Symbolic Production And Value In Media Industries.” Journal of Cultural Economy 2 (3): 345–361. doi:10.1080/17530350903345579.
   Google Scholar
• Cirucci, Angela M. 2018. “A New Women’s Work: Digital Interactions, Gender, and Social Network Sites.” International Journal of Communication 12: 23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, Nick. 2009. “Communicative Entitlements and Democracy: The Future of the Digital Divide Debate.” Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548798.003.0016
   Google Scholar
• Coviello, Lorenzo, Adam D. Yunkyu Sohn, I. Kramer, Massimo Franceschetti Cameron Marlow, A.Christakis Nicholas, and James H. Fowler. 2014. “Detecting Emotional Contagion in Massive Social Networks.” PLoS ONE 9: 3. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain, Marion G., Winifred Poster, and Miriam A. Cherry, eds. 2016. Invisible Labor: Hidden Work in the Contemporary World.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, Kelsey. 2019. “‘But We Still Try’: Affective Labor in the Corporate Mommy Blog.” Feminist Media Studies 19 (1): 38–52. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1382548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Craig M, and Jim Thatcher. 2014. “What Does A Critical Data Studies Look Like, And Why Do We Care?” In Society+Space, 2014. May.
   Google Scholar
• Dijck, Jose van. 2014. “Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology”. Surveillance & Society 12 (2): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
   Google Scholar
• Dijck, Jose van. 2014. “Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology.” Surveillance & Society 12 (2): 197–208. doi:10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776.
   Google Scholar
• Dijk, Jan van. 2005. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. California: Thousand Oaks. doi:10.4135/9781452229812.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, Brooke Erin, and Urszula Pruchniewska. 2017. “Gender and Self-Enterprise in the Social Media Age: A Digital Double Bind.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (6): 843–859. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1291703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer-Witheford, Nick. 2015. Cyber-Proletariat: Global Labour in the Digital Vortex. Pluto Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt183p1zg
   Google Scholar
• Edna, Rogers, L., and Richard V. Farace. 1975. “Analysis of Relational Communication in Dyads: New Measurement Procedures.” Human Communication Research 1 (3): 222–239. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00270.x.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, Silvia. 2014. Caliban and the Witch. 2. revised edition ed. New York: Autonomedia.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, Leopoldina. 1981. The Arcane of Reproduction: Housework, Prostitution, Labor and Capital. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Autonomedia.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, Leopoldina. 2007. “Immaterial Labor and Its Machinization 19”.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, Leopoldina. 2011. “ICTs and Immaterial Labor from a Feminist Perspective.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 35 (4): 426–432. doi:10.1177/0196859911417713.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, Christian. 2014. “Theorising and Analysing Digital Labour: From Global Value Chains to Modes of Production.” The Political Economy of Communication 1 (2). http://www.polecom.org/index.php/polecom/article/view/19
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, Melissa. 2008. “The Normalisation of Flexible Female Labour in the Information Economy.” Feminist Media Studies 8 (3): 285–299. doi:10.1080/14680770802217311.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, Melissa. 2011. Work’s Intimacy. Oxford, UNITED KINGDOM: Polity Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kbdk/detail.action?docID=1180349
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, Melissa, and Rutvica Andrijasevic. 2019. “Virtually Absent: The Gendered Histories and Economies of Digital Labour”. Feminist Review 123 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141778919878929
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, Melissa, and Rutvica Andrijasevic. 2019. “Virtually Absent: The Gendered Histories and Economies of Digital Labour.” Feminist Review 123 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1177/0141778919878929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, Keith, Lee Rainee, Lu Weixu, and Kristen Purcell. 2015. “Psychological Stress and Social Media Use.” Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech (blog). 15 January 2015. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/01/15/psychological-stress-and-social-media-use-2/
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, Susan C. 1994. “Politeness in Computer Culture: Why Women Thank and Men Flame.” In.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, Susan C. 1999. “The Rhetorical Dynamics of Gender Harassment On-Line.” The Information Society 15 (3): 151–167. doi:10.1080/019722499128466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, Susan C. 2003. “Gender and Power in On-Line Communication.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, edited by Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 202–228. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing . doi:10.1002/9780470756942.ch9.
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, David. 2010. “User-Generated Content, Free Labour and the Cultural Industries.” Ephemera 10 (3): 267–284.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1979. “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology 85 (3): 551–575. doi:10.1086/227049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. 3rd ed. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, Arlie Russell, and Anne Machung. 2012. The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home. New York, N.Y: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Huws, Ursula. 2019. “The Hassle of Housework: Digitalisation and the Commodification of Domestic Labour.” Feminist Review 123 (1): 8–23. doi:10.1177/0141778919879725.
   Google Scholar
• Iliadis, Andrew, and Federica Russo. 2016. “Critical Data Studies: An Introduction”. Big Data & Society 3 (2): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716674238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. 1960. “Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics.” In Style in Language. edited by Thomas A. Sebeok. The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett, Kylie. 2014. “The Relevance of ‘Women’s Work’: Social Reproduction and Immaterial Labor in Digital Media.” Television & New Media 15 (1): 14–29. doi:10.1177/1527476413487607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrett, Kylie. 2015. “Feminism, Labour and Digital Media : The Digital Housewife”. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315720111
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett, Kylie. 2018. “Laundering Women’s History: A Feminist Critique of the Social Factory.” First Monday 23: 3. doi:10.5210/fm.v23i3.8280.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Klaus Bruhn, and Rasmus Helles. 2017. “Speaking into the System: Social Media and Many-to-One Communication.” European Journal of Communication 32 (1): 16–25. doi:10.1177/0267323116682805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joler, Vladan, and Andrej Petrovski. 2016. “Immaterial Labour and Data Harvesting.” SHARE LAB (blog). 21 August 2016. https://labs.rs/en/facebook-algorithmic-factory-immaterial-labour-and-data-harvesting/
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Elihu, and Paul Felix Lazarsfeld. 1966. Personal Influence. The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Keyton, Joann. 1999. “Relational Communication in Groups.” In The Handbook of Group Communication Theory and Research, 192–222.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Youna. 2016. “Mobile Phone for Empowerment? Global Nannies in Paris.” Media, Culture & Society 38 (4): 525–539. doi:10.1177/0163443715613638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, Rob, and Tracey Lauriault. 2014. “Towards Critical Data Studies: Charting and Unpacking Data Assemblages and Their Work” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2474112. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2474112
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, Adam D. I., Jamie E. Guillory, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2014. “Experimental Evidence of Massive-Scale Emotional Contagion through Social Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (24): 8788–8790. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320040111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, Signe Sophus, Jesper Pagh, and Fiona Huijie Zeng. 2019. “Tracing Communicative Patterns: A Comparative Ethnography across Platforms, Media and Contexts.” Nordicom Review 40 (s1): s1. doi:10.2478/nor-2019-0019.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarato, Maurizio. 1996. “Immaterial Labor.” In Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, edited by Paolo Virno and Michael Hardt, 142–157, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, Lori Kido. 2009. “The Radical Act of ‘Mommy Blogging’: Redefining Motherhood through the Blogosphere.” New Media & Society 11 (5): 729–747. doi:10.1177/1461444809105349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansell, Robin. 2002. “From Digital Divides to Digital Entitlements in Knowledge Societies.” Current Sociology 50 (3): 407–426. doi:10.1177/0011392102050003007.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, Robin. 2017. “Bits of Power: Struggling for Control of Information and Communication Networks.” The Political Economy of Communication 5 (1). http://www.polecom.org/index.php/polecom/article/view/75
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor, and Kenneth Cukier. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, Vicki. 2013. ““To Communicate Is Human; to Chat Is Female.” The Feminization of US Media Work.” The Routledge Companion to Media & Gender. December 13: 2013. doi:10.4324/9780203066911-11.
   Google Scholar
• Mejias, Ulises Ali. 2013. Off the Network: Disrupting the Digital World. U of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mihelj, Sabina, Adrian Leguina, and John Downey. 2019. “Culture Is Digital: Cultural Participation, Diversity and the Digital Divide.” New Media & Society 21 (7): 1465–1485. doi:10.1177/1461444818822816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette, Laurie, and Julie Wilson. 2011. “Women’s Work.” Cultural Studies 25 (4–5): 548–565. doi:10.1080/09502386.2011.600546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew, Research Center. 2005. “How Women and Men Use the Internet.” Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech (blog). 28 December 2005. https://www.pewinternet.org/2005/12/28/how-women-and-men-use-the-internet/
   Google Scholar
• Pew, Research Center. 2019. “Demographics of Social Media Users and Adoption in the United States.” Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech.(blog). https://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Picone, Ike, Jelena Kleut, Tereza Pavlíčková, Bojana Romic, Jannie Møller Hartley, and Ridder De Sander. 2019. “Small Acts of Engagement: Reconnecting Productive Audience Practices with Everyday Agency.” New Media & Society 21 (9): 2010–2028. doi:10.1177/1461444819837569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portwood-Stacer, Laura. 2013. “Media Refusal and Conspicuous Non-Consumption: The Performative and Political Dimensions of Facebook Abstention.” New Media & Society 15 (7): 1041–1057. doi:10.1177/1461444812465139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portwood-Stacer, Laura. 2014. “Care Work and the Stakes of Social Media Refusal | New Criticals.” March 2014. http://www.newcriticals.com/care-work-and-the-stakes-of-social-media-refusal
   Google Scholar
• Radway, Janice A. 1984. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill, US: University of North Carolina Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10355395
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez Jr, Jr, Artemio, and Shuangyue Zhang. 2007. “When Online Meets Offline: The Effect of Modality Switching on Relational Communication.” Communication Monographs 74 (3): 287–310. doi:10.1080/03637750701543493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smythe, Dallas. 1981. “On the Audience Commodity and Its Work.” In Dependency Road: Communications, Capitalism, Consciousness, and Canada, 22–51. Norwoord, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Terranova, Tiziana. 2000. “Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy.” Social Text 63 18 (2): 33–58. doi:10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33.
   Google Scholar
• Van. Cleaf, Kara. 2015. “Of Woman Born to Mommy Blogged: The Journey from the Personal as Political to the Personal as Commodity.” WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly 43 (3–4): 247–264. doi:10.1353/wsq.2015.0064.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, Joseph B., and Lisa C. Tidwell. 1995. “Nonverbal Cues in Computer‐mediated Communication, and the Effect of Chronemics on Relational Communication.” Journal of Organizational Computing 5 (4): 355–378. doi:10.1080/10919399509540258.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Julie A., and Emily Chivers Yochim. 2017. Mothering through Precarity: Women’s Work and Digital Media. Durham; London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar